Sacramento kings vs golden state warriors match player stats
The sacramento kings vs golden state warriors match player stats from October 11, 2026, provide an interesting look at an NBA preseason contest that featured impressive individual performances, strong offensive production, and a competitive battle between two Pacific Division teams. The Golden State Warriors secured a 111-106 victory over the Sacramento Kings at Chase Center in San Francisco, California. Although Sacramento finished with more steals and fewer turnovers, Golden State created important advantages through shooting efficiency, assists, defensive rebounding, and overall ball movement.
The contest offered several notable individual performances. Yaxel Lendeborg led Golden State with 23 points, 10 rebounds, and six assists, delivering an impressive all-around performance. Darius Acuff Jr. was Sacramento’s leading scorer with 25 points, while Jonathan Mogbo contributed 12 points and eight rebounds alongside five steals.
LJ Cryer added 19 points for Golden State, while Gui Santos contributed 15 points and six rebounds. Brandin Podziemski also made an important contribution with 14 points, seven rebounds, and four assists.
Despite Sacramento’s strong defensive activity, Golden State maintained a more efficient offensive approach and finished with a five-point victory. The result also highlighted how different statistical categories can influence a basketball game, even when both teams record the same number of made field goals.
This breakdown examines the final score, individual player performances, starting lineups, team statistics, shooting efficiency, and the most important statistical differences from the October 11 preseason matchup.
Game Overview: Kings vs Warriors
The Warriors hosted the Kings in an NBA preseason matchup at Chase Center. Golden State entered the game looking to improve its preseason record, while Sacramento aimed to secure its first victory in the displayed preseason results.
Golden State eventually won 111-106 after a competitive four-quarter performance.
Match Information
| Match Detail | Information |
| Competition | NBA Preseason |
| Date | October 11, 2026 |
| Game Time | 5:30 AM |
| Venue | Chase Center |
| Location | San Francisco, California |
| Home Team | Golden State Warriors |
| Away Team | Sacramento Kings |
| Final Score | Warriors 111, Kings 106 |
| Attendance | 18,064 |
| Winning Team | Golden State Warriors |
| Losing Team | Sacramento Kings |
| Kings Record | 0-3 |
| Warriors Record | 2-2 |
| Kings Away Record | 0-2 |
| Warriors Home Record | 2-0 |
| Where to Watch | Kings+ |
The attendance of 18,064 reflected the crowd present at Chase Center for the preseason meeting.
Although preseason results do not carry the same competitive weight as regular-season games, these contests provide opportunities to evaluate rotations, individual production, offensive execution, and defensive responsibilities.
For Sacramento, the game provided a useful statistical reference point for its younger contributors. Golden State, meanwhile, received strong scoring and playmaking contributions from several players.
Sacramento Kings vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats
The individual numbers reveal two different approaches to offensive production.
Sacramento relied heavily on Darius Acuff Jr., who finished as the game’s leading scorer with 25 points. Jonathan Mogbo provided additional production through scoring, rebounding, and defensive activity.
Golden State received contributions from several players. Lendeborg led the team in points, rebounds, and assists, while Cryer and Santos provided additional scoring support.
Sacramento Kings Player Statistics
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Steals |
| Darius Acuff Jr. | 25 | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Jonathan Mogbo | 12 | 8 | 1 | 5 |
| Zach LaVine | 11 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Precious Achiuwa | 8 | 8 | 1 | Not listed |
| Nique Clifford | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
Note: The supplied statistical extract does not provide every individual box-score category. Unavailable figures are therefore not estimated.
Darius Acuff Jr. Leads Sacramento
Darius Acuff Jr. delivered Sacramento’s strongest scoring performance, finishing with 25 points.
His scoring total represented almost one-quarter of the Kings’ final 106 points. That made his offensive contribution particularly important in a game decided by only five points.
A leading scorer’s impact cannot be measured through points alone. Shot selection, offensive efficiency, turnovers, and the ability to create opportunities for teammates also matter.
However, the available data establishes Acuff as Sacramento’s primary scoring contributor in this matchup.
His 25-point performance was one of the biggest individual statistical highlights for the Kings.
Jonathan Mogbo Provides an All-Around Contribution
Jonathan Mogbo produced one of Sacramento’s most complete performances.
His statistical line included:
- 12 points
- 8 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 5 steals
The five steals were particularly noteworthy.
Steals represent opportunities to interrupt the opposing offense and potentially create transition scoring chances. Mogbo’s defensive activity helped Sacramento record 15 team steals, compared with Golden State’s 10.
His eight rebounds also provided additional support around the basket.
Mogbo’s performance demonstrates why individual defensive statistics deserve attention alongside scoring totals. A player can influence a contest without becoming the team’s leading scorer.
Zach LaVine Adds Scoring and Defensive Activity
Zach LaVine finished with 11 points, one rebound, two assists, and three steals.
His three steals contributed to Sacramento’s defensive production.
LaVine’s statistical contribution included both offensive and defensive activity, although the available numbers do not provide his individual shooting percentage or minutes played.
His presence in the starting lineup also gave Sacramento another experienced offensive option alongside Acuff Jr. and the other starters.
Precious Achiuwa Contributes Inside
Precious Achiuwa recorded eight points and eight rebounds, along with one assist.
His rebounding total matched Mogbo’s figure, giving Sacramento two players with eight rebounds in the supplied statistics.
Achiuwa’s contribution was important because rebounding helps teams maintain possession and limit second-chance opportunities.
Sacramento collected 13 offensive rebounds as a team, showing that the Kings were active on the offensive glass.
However, their total rebounding figure remained below Golden State’s.
Nique Clifford Adds a Supporting Contribution
Nique Clifford finished with seven points, three rebounds, and one steal.
Although his scoring total was lower than those of Sacramento’s leading performers, his contribution added depth to the team’s statistical production.
His one steal also contributed to the defensive numbers recorded by the Kings.
The available data does not include his complete shooting breakdown, so it would be inaccurate to draw conclusions about his shooting efficiency from the scoring total alone.
Golden State Warriors Player Statistics
Golden State’s offensive production was distributed across several contributors.
Yaxel Lendeborg led the Warriors with 23 points, but the supporting performances from LJ Cryer, Gui Santos, Brandin Podziemski, and Georges Niang helped the team reach 111 points.
Golden State Warriors Player Stats
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Yaxel Lendeborg | 23 | 10 | 6 |
| LJ Cryer | 19 | 0 | 1 |
| Gui Santos | 15 | 6 | 1 |
| Brandin Podziemski | 14 | 7 | 4 |
| Georges Niang | 13 | 1 | 0 |
| Al Horford | 4 | 5 | 3 |
Yaxel Lendeborg Leads Golden State
Yaxel Lendeborg produced the most complete statistical performance for Golden State.
His final numbers were:
- 23 points
- 10 rebounds
- 6 assists
The combination of scoring, rebounding, and playmaking made his performance particularly valuable.
His 10 rebounds completed a double-double, while his six assists demonstrated his contribution to the team’s offensive organization.
Lendeborg was not simply a scorer. He contributed across three major statistical categories.
His 23 points also placed him just two points behind Sacramento’s leading scorer, Acuff Jr.
This comparison is important because Golden State did not need one player to dominate the scoring column. Instead, several contributors helped maintain offensive production throughout the contest.
LJ Cryer Provides 19 Points
LJ Cryer finished with 19 points and one assist.
His scoring contribution was the second-highest among the listed Warriors players.
Cryer helped Golden State distribute its offensive production beyond Lendeborg.
In games where several players contribute meaningful scoring totals, opposing defenses face a more complicated challenge because they cannot focus exclusively on one offensive option.
His 19 points were particularly important in a game where Golden State finished with 111 total points.
Gui Santos Records 15 Points and Six Rebounds
Gui Santos added 15 points, six rebounds, and one assist.
His performance offered a combination of scoring and work on the glass.
The six rebounds placed him among Golden State’s useful contributors in the rebounding department.
Santos also appeared in the starting lineup, according to the supplied game information.
His contribution helped establish a balanced offensive performance alongside Lendeborg and Cryer.
Brandin Podziemski Delivers a Balanced Performance
Brandin Podziemski recorded 14 points, seven rebounds, and four assists.
His statistical line showed activity in several areas.
Podziemski’s seven rebounds were the second-highest among the listed Golden State players, behind Lendeborg’s 10.
His four assists also provided an important playmaking contribution.
The combination of 14 points, seven rebounds, and four assists made him one of the team’s most balanced contributors.
Georges Niang Adds Another Scoring Option
Georges Niang finished with 13 points, one rebound, and no assists in the supplied statistics.
His 13 points gave Golden State another player in double figures.
The Warriors had five listed players score at least 13 points, demonstrating the distribution of their offensive production.
That scoring depth was one of the important features of the team’s performance.
Al Horford Contributes Beyond Scoring
Al Horford recorded four points, five rebounds, and three assists.
His scoring total was relatively modest compared with the other listed Warriors contributors.
However, his five rebounds and three assists added value in other areas.
A player’s overall contribution should not be judged exclusively by points. Rebounding, passing, defensive positioning, and possession management can all influence team performance.
Starting Lineups for Both Teams
The starting lineup information provides additional context for the matchup.
Sacramento Kings Starting Lineup
The Kings started the following players:
- Precious Achiuwa
- Keegan Murray
- Zach LaVine
- Ben Simmons
- Darius Acuff Jr.
This lineup combined scoring options, rebounding ability, and players who could contribute in different areas of the game.
LaVine and Acuff Jr. provided important offensive production in the available statistics.
Achiuwa also finished with eight points and eight rebounds.
Murray and Simmons were listed as starters, although their individual statistical figures were not included in the supplied extract.
It is important not to assume that an unavailable individual statistic represents zero production.
Golden State Warriors Starting Lineup
Golden State’s listed starters were:
- Draymond Green
- Gui Santos
- Yaxel Lendeborg
- Stephen Curry
- Brandin Podziemski
This starting group included several players who appeared in the available statistical summary.
Lendeborg recorded 23 points, 10 rebounds, and six assists. Santos contributed 15 points and six rebounds, while Podziemski added 14 points, seven rebounds, and four assists.
The supplied data does not provide individual statistics for Draymond Green or Stephen Curry.
Their inclusion in the starting lineup should therefore be distinguished from the individual performance figures available in this report.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown
The four-quarter scoring breakdown shows how the game developed.
| Quarter | Sacramento Kings | Golden State Warriors |
| First Quarter | 25 | 24 |
| Second Quarter | 31 | 37 |
| Third Quarter | 25 | 28 |
| Fourth Quarter | 25 | 22 |
| Final Score | 106 | 111 |
Golden State scored 111 points, while Sacramento finished with 106.
The most important scoring difference appeared in the second quarter.
First Quarter: Sacramento Takes a One-Point Lead
Sacramento scored 25 points in the opening quarter, while Golden State recorded 24.
The one-point difference gave the Kings a narrow advantage after the first period.
Both teams produced competitive offensive totals.
The opening-quarter numbers established a close contest rather than an early advantage for either side.
Second Quarter: Golden State Creates Separation
The second quarter was the highest-scoring period for both teams.
Golden State scored 37 points, compared with Sacramento’s 31.
This six-point advantage changed the overall scoring position.
The Warriors entered halftime with a five-point lead based on the supplied quarter totals.
This period was especially important because it represented Golden State’s largest quarter-level scoring advantage.
The difference between the teams’ offensive production in this period ultimately played a major role in the final result.
Third Quarter: Warriors Maintain Their Advantage
Golden State added another 28 points in the third quarter.
Sacramento scored 25.
The Warriors extended their advantage by three points during the period.
The quarter totals show that Golden State maintained a consistent offensive output after its strong second-quarter performance.
Sacramento remained within reach, but the scoring difference continued to favor the home team.
Fourth Quarter: Kings Finish Stronger
Sacramento scored 25 points in the final quarter, while Golden State recorded 22.
The Kings therefore outscored the Warriors by three points in the fourth.
However, the earlier scoring differences were enough for Golden State to preserve its five-point advantage.
This illustrates an important feature of the matchup: winning the final quarter does not necessarily mean winning the game.
The cumulative score across all four periods determines the result.
Complete Team Statistics Comparison
Team statistics provide a broader understanding of why Golden State won despite Sacramento recording more steals and fewer turnovers.
| Statistical Category | Sacramento Kings | Golden State Warriors |
| Points | 106 | 111 |
| Field Goals | 38-91 | 38-79 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 42% | 48% |
| Three-Pointers | 10-30 | 12-35 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 33% | 34% |
| Free Throws | 20-25 | 23-29 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 80% | 79% |
| Total Rebounds | 41 | 49 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 13 | 10 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 28 | 39 |
| Assists | 20 | 26 |
| Turnovers | 17 | 21 |
| Steals | 15 | 10 |
| Blocks | 1 | 5 |
| Personal Fouls | 26 | 21 |
Several categories explain the difference between the teams.
Field Goal Efficiency Favored Golden State
Both teams made 38 field goals.
However, Golden State attempted 79 shots, while Sacramento attempted 91.
That difference produced a significant gap in shooting percentage.
- Sacramento: 38 of 91, or 42%.
- Golden State: 38 of 79, or 48%.
The Warriors converted a larger percentage of their field-goal attempts.
This was one of the clearest statistical advantages in the matchup.
Making the same number of shots does not mean two teams have performed equally efficiently.
Golden State needed fewer attempts to reach the same number of made field goals.
That efficiency helped the Warriors produce a higher final score.
Three-Point Shooting
Three-point shooting was relatively close.
Sacramento made 10 of 30 attempts, recording a 33% success rate.
Golden State converted 12 of 35 attempts, finishing at 34%.
The Warriors made two more three-pointers.
Although the percentage difference was small, the additional successful shots contributed to Golden State’s scoring advantage.
Three-point shooting can significantly influence the result of a close basketball game because each successful attempt produces three points.
However, the available figures do not establish which individual players made those shots.
Free Throw Production
Sacramento converted 20 of 25 free throws, while Golden State made 23 of 29.
The Kings recorded a slightly higher percentage.
| Team | Made | Attempted | Percentage |
| Kings | 20 | 25 | 80% |
| Warriors | 23 | 29 | 79% |
Sacramento’s 80% conversion rate was marginally better than Golden State’s 79%.
Nevertheless, the Warriors attempted and converted three additional free throws.
The total points from free throws were 20 for Sacramento and 23 for Golden State.
This gave the Warriors another three-point advantage in the scoring breakdown.
Rebounding Advantage
Rebounding was another major difference.
Golden State collected 49 total rebounds, compared with Sacramento’s 41.
That created an eight-rebound advantage for the Warriors.
The defensive rebounding difference was particularly significant.
- Sacramento defensive rebounds: 28.
- Golden State defensive rebounds: 39.
Golden State collected 11 more defensive rebounds.
Sacramento, however, recorded more offensive rebounds.
The Kings collected 13 offensive rebounds, while the Warriors recorded 10.
This distinction shows that the teams found different types of rebounding opportunities.
Sacramento was more active on the offensive glass, while Golden State collected substantially more defensive rebounds.
The overall advantage still belonged to Golden State.
Assists and Offensive Ball Movement
Golden State recorded 26 assists, while Sacramento finished with 20.
The six-assist difference indicates that the Warriors recorded more assisted scoring plays.
Assists are useful when evaluating how effectively a team creates scoring opportunities through passing.
A higher assist total does not automatically mean every possession was more efficient, but it provides useful evidence about offensive distribution.
Golden State’s combination of 48% field-goal shooting and 26 assists suggests a more productive offensive performance in the supplied team statistics.
Sacramento’s 20 assists were also a meaningful contribution, although the team finished with fewer total points.
Turnovers
Turnovers were one category where Sacramento held an advantage.
The Kings committed 17 turnovers.
Golden State committed 21.
That meant the Warriors recorded four more turnovers.
Turnovers can be costly because they end offensive possessions without guaranteeing a scoring attempt.
Sacramento’s lower turnover total was therefore a positive statistical feature.
However, it was not enough to overcome Golden State’s advantages in shooting efficiency, rebounding, assists, and blocks.
This is an important lesson when interpreting team statistics.
A team can win individual statistical categories without winning the game.
Steals and Defensive Pressure
Sacramento recorded 15 steals, while Golden State collected 10.
The five-steal difference gave the Kings a clear advantage in this category.
Mogbo contributed five steals individually, while LaVine recorded three.
Together, those two players accounted for eight of Sacramento’s 15 steals.
Steals can create transition opportunities and disrupt an opponent’s offensive rhythm.
However, a high steal total does not automatically translate into victory.
The Kings still allowed Golden State to finish with 111 points.
Blocks and Interior Defense
Golden State recorded five blocks, compared with Sacramento’s one.
The four-block difference favored the Warriors.
Blocks are important because they can prevent attempts from reaching the basket and influence how opposing players approach their shots.
The team statistics show that Golden State recorded more successful shot rejections.
However, the available information does not identify the individual players responsible for every block.
Personal Fouls
Sacramento committed 26 personal fouls.
Golden State recorded 21.
The Kings therefore committed five more fouls.
Fouls can affect defensive pressure, player availability, and free-throw opportunities.
In this matchup, Golden State attempted 29 free throws compared with Sacramento’s 25.
The free-throw figures provide a useful comparison, although the supplied information does not include a complete foul-by-player breakdown.
Why Did the Golden State Warriors Win?
Golden State’s 111-106 victory was not the result of dominating every statistical category.
Instead, the Warriors performed better in several important areas that collectively created the difference.
1. Better Overall Shooting Efficiency
The most obvious statistical advantage was field-goal percentage.
Golden State shot 48%, while Sacramento finished at 42%.
Both teams made 38 field goals, but Sacramento needed 12 additional attempts.
This difference highlights the importance of shot efficiency.
The number of successful shots is only one part of offensive evaluation. The number of attempts required to reach that total also matters.
2. More Effective Defensive Rebounding
Golden State’s 39 defensive rebounds compared with Sacramento’s 28 were a substantial difference.
Defensive rebounds help end an opponent’s possession and allow a team to transition into offense.
Although Sacramento recorded more offensive rebounds, Golden State’s overall rebounding advantage remained significant.
3. More Assists
The Warriors finished with 26 assists.
Sacramento recorded 20.
This six-assist difference provides another indication of Golden State’s offensive distribution.
The Warriors also had multiple players scoring in double figures in the supplied individual statistics.
4. Greater Shot-Blocking Production
Golden State recorded five blocks.
Sacramento managed one.
This category favored the Warriors and reflected a difference in recorded defensive shot rejections.
5. Balanced Individual Scoring
Lendeborg led the Warriors with 23 points.
However, Cryer added 19, Santos recorded 15, Podziemski scored 14, and Niang contributed 13.
That distribution gave Golden State several scoring options.
Sacramento had a strong 25-point performance from Acuff Jr., but the available player figures show a different distribution of scoring among the listed contributors.
What the Sacramento Kings Did Well
Despite the defeat, Sacramento recorded several positive statistical results.
A useful analysis should recognize these contributions rather than focusing exclusively on the final score.
Strong Defensive Activity
The Kings recorded 15 steals.
Mogbo’s five steals and LaVine’s three were particularly notable.
The team’s ability to generate defensive turnovers was one of its strongest statistical features.
Fewer Turnovers
Sacramento committed 17 turnovers compared with Golden State’s 21.
This gave the Kings a four-turnover advantage.
Protecting possession is an important part of offensive performance, especially against teams that can generate scoring opportunities through quick ball movement.
Offensive Rebounding
The Kings collected 13 offensive rebounds.
Golden State recorded 10.
The three-rebound advantage provided Sacramento with additional opportunities to recover missed shots.
Efficient Free Throw Shooting
Sacramento converted 80% of its free throws.
Golden State finished at 79%.
The difference was small, but Sacramento performed slightly better in conversion percentage.
Acuff Jr.’s Scoring Production
Darius Acuff Jr.’s 25 points were the highest individual scoring total in the supplied player statistics.
His performance was a major positive for Sacramento.
Mogbo’s all-around contribution also deserves attention because of his combination of points, rebounds, assists, and steals.
What the Warriors Can Take From This Performance
Golden State’s preseason victory highlighted several positive areas.
Offensive Efficiency
The Warriors made 38 field goals on 79 attempts.
Their 48% shooting percentage was higher than Sacramento’s 42%.
This provided an important statistical advantage.
Distributed Scoring
Five listed Warriors players scored at least 13 points.
This distribution reduced the team’s dependence on one individual scoring performance.
Lendeborg led the group, but Cryer, Santos, Podziemski, and Niang all provided meaningful production.
Rebounding Strength
Golden State’s 49 total rebounds demonstrated a clear advantage on the glass.
The 39 defensive rebounds were particularly important when comparing the teams.
Passing Production
The Warriors’ 26 assists were six more than Sacramento’s total.
That difference supported their overall offensive production.
These figures provide a useful snapshot of the team’s performance, although preseason statistics should not be treated as a complete prediction of regular-season success.
Understanding the Importance of Preseason Player Statistics
Preseason basketball statistics are useful, but they require a different interpretation from regular-season numbers.
The main purpose of preseason games is to prepare teams for the competitive schedule ahead.
Coaches use these contests to evaluate players, examine combinations, and assess different approaches to offense and defense.
Individual production can help identify areas of strength, but one performance should not be used as the sole measure of a player’s overall ability.
Scoring Does Not Tell the Entire Story
A player who scores 25 points may have a major offensive role.
However, the full evaluation also requires:
- Field-goal attempts and percentage.
- Three-point shooting.
- Free-throw production.
- Turnovers.
- Assists.
- Rebounding.
- Defensive contributions.
- Minutes played.
The supplied data confirms Acuff Jr.’s scoring total, but it does not provide his complete shooting breakdown or playing time.
That distinction matters when comparing individual efficiency.
Rebounding Provides Additional Context
Rebounds show how players contribute to possession control.
Offensive rebounds can create additional scoring opportunities, while defensive rebounds help finish opposing possessions.
Lendeborg’s 10 rebounds were a major part of his all-around statistical contribution.
Mogbo and Achiuwa also recorded eight rebounds each for Sacramento.
Assists Help Explain Offensive Organization
Assists provide insight into passing and scoring creation.
Lendeborg recorded six assists, while Podziemski added four.
Together, these figures demonstrate how the Warriors’ listed leading contributors participated in playmaking.
Defensive Numbers Need Context
Steals and blocks are important, but they do not capture every part of defense.
Defensive positioning, communication, contesting shots, and limiting effective scoring opportunities are also relevant.
Sacramento’s 15 steals did not guarantee a win, just as Golden State’s five blocks alone did not determine the result.
The full team comparison provides a more reliable picture.
Historical and Season Context
The October 11 meeting was part of the NBA preseason schedule.
The supplied record information showed Sacramento at 0-3 overall and 0-2 away, while Golden State stood at 2-2 overall and 2-0 at home.
These records provide context for the game but should not be confused with regular-season standings.
The matchup information also listed a next scheduled meeting for November 26, 2026, at Golden State.
That scheduled contest would provide another opportunity to compare the teams under a different stage of the season.
The preseason matchup record displayed in the supplied extract showed the Kings at 0-0 and the Warriors at 0-3. Because this figure appears alongside a separate season record, it should be understood as a distinct matchup-section statistic rather than treated as a replacement for the overall team records.
For accurate historical comparisons, it is important to distinguish preseason results, regular-season results, and head-to-head records.
How to Analyze a Basketball Box Score Correctly
A box score contains several categories, and understanding how they work together makes the numbers more useful.
Here is a practical approach to evaluating a game.
Step 1: Start With the Final Score
The final score establishes which team won and the size of the margin.
Golden State won this game by five points.
That narrow difference makes the underlying statistics especially useful.
Step 2: Compare Shooting Percentages
Field-goal percentage provides a basic measure of shooting efficiency.
The Warriors’ 48% figure compared with Sacramento’s 42% shows that Golden State converted its attempts at a higher rate.
Step 3: Review Rebounding
Total rebounds reveal which team collected more missed shots.
Golden State finished with eight additional rebounds.
Looking separately at offensive and defensive rebounds provides even more context.
Step 4: Examine Playmaking
Assists help explain how a team created its scoring opportunities.
Golden State’s six-assist advantage was another positive feature of its offensive performance.
Step 5: Check Possession Management
Turnovers and steals provide information about ball security and defensive pressure.
Sacramento committed fewer turnovers and recorded more steals.
These advantages are important even though the Kings lost.
Step 6: Evaluate Individual Contributions
Finally, examine the leading scorers, rebounders, and playmakers.
In this matchup:
- Acuff Jr. led Sacramento with 25 points.
- Lendeborg led Golden State with 23 points.
- Lendeborg also recorded 10 rebounds and six assists.
- Mogbo contributed five steals for Sacramento.
- Cryer scored 19 points for Golden State.
- Podziemski contributed 14 points and four assists.
This process creates a more complete understanding of the game than looking at the final score alone.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Sacramento Kings vs Golden State Warriors game on October 11, 2026?
The Golden State Warriors defeated the Sacramento Kings 111-106 in an NBA preseason game at Chase Center in San Francisco, California.
2. Who was the highest scorer in the Kings vs Warriors matchup?
Darius Acuff Jr. was the leading scorer with 25 points for Sacramento. Yaxel Lendeborg led Golden State with 23 points.
3. How many points, rebounds, and assists did Yaxel Lendeborg record?
Yaxel Lendeborg finished with 23 points, 10 rebounds, and six assists. His 10 rebounds also completed a double-double.
4. How many points did Jonathan Mogbo score against Golden State?
Jonathan Mogbo recorded 12 points, eight rebounds, one assist, and five steals for Sacramento.
5. Which team had more rebounds in the game?
Golden State collected 49 total rebounds, while Sacramento finished with 41. The Warriors therefore held an eight-rebound advantage.
6. Where was the Kings vs Warriors preseason game played?
The matchup took place at Chase Center in San Francisco, California. The listed attendance was 18,064.
Conclusion
The October 11, 2026, preseason matchup between Sacramento and Golden State ended with a 111-106 victory for the Warriors. The result reflected a competitive contest in which both teams produced several positive individual performances.
Darius Acuff Jr. led Sacramento with 25 points, while Jonathan Mogbo contributed 12 points, eight rebounds, and five steals. Zach LaVine also added 11 points and three steals.
For Golden State, Yaxel Lendeborg delivered the most complete individual performance with 23 points, 10 rebounds, and six assists. LJ Cryer scored 19 points, Gui Santos added 15, and Brandin Podziemski contributed 14 points, seven rebounds, and four assists.
The team comparison explains the final result. Golden State shot 48% from the field compared with Sacramento’s 42%, collected eight more rebounds, recorded six additional assists, and finished with four more blocks.
Sacramento performed better in steals, turnovers, offensive rebounds, and free-throw percentage. However, those advantages were not enough to overcome Golden State’s stronger overall shooting efficiency and rebounding production.
Ultimately, the game demonstrated why basketball analysis requires more than a final score. Individual performances, shooting efficiency, possession management, defensive activity, and team coordination all contribute to understanding how a matchup develops.
