Miami Heat vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats
The miami heat vs phoenix suns match player stats provide a detailed look at how Miami defeated Phoenix 111-102 on January 25, 2026, at the Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix, Arizona. The Heat used efficient shooting, strong interior scoring, balanced contributions from their rotation, and a productive fourth quarter to secure the road victory. Bam Adebayo led Miami with 22 points, while Jaime Jaquez Jr. contributed 20 points and six assists. For Phoenix, Dillon Brooks delivered the strongest individual scoring performance with 26 points, but his effort was not enough to overcome Miami’s more effective team offense.
This breakdown examines the complete game result, individual player performances, shooting percentages, rebounds, assists, defensive contributions, quarter-by-quarter scoring, and the tactical differences that influenced the final outcome. It also explains which performances mattered most and what the numbers reveal beyond the final score.
Match covered: January 25, 2026. This is the latest completed meeting identified in the available matchup records as of November 2, 2026.
Miami Heat vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The January 25 meeting featured two teams with different offensive approaches. Miami relied on its ability to create opportunities near the basket, move the ball, and convert important possessions. Phoenix depended heavily on individual scoring, particularly from Dillon Brooks and Grayson Allen.
Miami entered the fourth quarter with a five-point advantage and eventually extended its lead to 18 points. Phoenix attempted to respond, but the Heat maintained enough offensive control to finish the game with a nine-point victory.
Final Score and Match Information
| Game Detail | Result |
| Matchup | Miami Heat vs Phoenix Suns |
| Sport | NBA Basketball |
| Date | January 25, 2026 |
| Venue | Mortgage Matchup Center |
| Location | Phoenix, Arizona |
| Miami Heat Score | 111 |
| Phoenix Suns Score | 102 |
| Final Result | Miami Heat Won |
| Winning Margin | 9 Points |
| Game Status | Final |
| Attendance | 17,071 |
The result was important because Miami secured a road victory despite playing on consecutive nights. The Heat had defeated Utah 147-116 the previous evening, making their ability to maintain offensive production particularly noteworthy.
Phoenix, meanwhile, entered the contest without Devin Booker and Jalen Green. Both players were unavailable after injuries suffered during the team’s previous game against Atlanta. Their absence affected Phoenix’s offensive options and increased the responsibility placed on the remaining rotation.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score
| Quarter | Miami Heat | Phoenix Suns |
| First Quarter | 32 | 21 |
| Second Quarter | 26 | 27 |
| Third Quarter | 24 | 29 |
| Fourth Quarter | 29 | 25 |
| Final Score | 111 | 102 |
Miami established an early advantage by scoring 32 points in the opening quarter. Phoenix responded in the second and third periods, reducing the difference through improved offensive execution.
However, Miami’s fourth-quarter performance prevented a complete comeback.
The nine-point final margin does not fully explain how the game developed. Miami controlled much of the contest and built an 18-point lead during the fourth quarter. Phoenix’s late scoring helped reduce the difference, but the Heat had already established sufficient separation.
Complete Miami Heat Player Statistics
Miami’s offensive production was distributed across several players. Bam Adebayo led the team in scoring, while Jaime Jaquez Jr. provided outstanding efficiency from the field.
Norman Powell and Andrew Wiggins contributed on the glass, giving Miami additional possessions and helping the team maintain its advantage.
Miami Heat Player Stats Table
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG |
| Bam Adebayo | 32:24 | 22 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6/16 |
| Jaime Jaquez Jr. | 35:59 | 20 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 8/11 |
| Norman Powell | 31:20 | 16 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5/21 |
| Nikola Jović | 17:35 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4/10 |
| Dru Smith | 22:33 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5/8 |
| Pelle Larsson | 35:09 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4/9 |
| Andrew Wiggins | 23:30 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5/12 |
| Kasparas Jakučionis | 22:47 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2/5 |
| Simone Fontecchio | 15:15 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0/1 |
| Myron Gardner | 3:28 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0/0 |
MIN = minutes played, PTS = points, REB = rebounds, AST = assists, STL = steals, BLK = blocks, FG = field goals made and attempted.
Bam Adebayo’s 22-Point Performance
Bam Adebayo was Miami’s leading scorer with 22 points in 32 minutes and 24 seconds.
His shooting statistics included:
- 6 successful field goals from 16 attempts.
- 2 successful three-pointers from 6 attempts.
- 8 successful free throws from 8 attempts.
- 7 total rebounds.
- 1 assist.
- 2 steals.
- 1 blocked shot.
- 1 turnover.
Adebayo’s performance demonstrated why his offensive contribution is important to Miami’s system. He can score from different areas of the court while also creating opportunities through his physical presence around the basket.
His perfect free-throw shooting was particularly valuable. Although his overall field-goal percentage was 37.5%, he converted every attempt from the free-throw line.
That ability to generate points without depending entirely on perimeter shooting helped Miami maintain its offensive production.
Adebayo also contributed defensively with two steals and one block. These numbers show that his influence extended beyond scoring.
His seven rebounds helped Miami compete on the glass, although the team also received important rebounding contributions from its wings.
Jaime Jaquez Jr. Delivers an Efficient Scoring Performance
Jaime Jaquez Jr. produced one of the most impressive individual performances of the game.
He finished with:
- 20 points.
- 5 rebounds.
- 6 assists.
- 8-of-11 field-goal shooting.
- 1-of-3 three-point shooting.
- 3-of-4 free-throw shooting.
- 1 block.
- 35 minutes and 59 seconds played.
His 72.7% field-goal accuracy was particularly impressive.
Unlike a player who scores through a large number of difficult attempts, Jaquez converted most of his opportunities efficiently. He also contributed six assists, demonstrating his ability to create scoring opportunities for teammates.
His combination of scoring and playmaking made him one of Miami’s most influential players.
The plus/minus statistic provides another interesting detail. Jaquez finished at +19, the strongest figure among the listed Miami players. This means Miami outscored Phoenix by 19 points during his time on the court.
Plus/minus should not be treated as an individual measurement of defensive or offensive ability, but it does highlight how successful Miami’s lineups were while Jaquez was playing.
Norman Powell’s Double-Double
Norman Powell finished with 16 points and 10 rebounds, recording a double-double.
His statistical line included:
- 16 points.
- 10 rebounds.
- 1 assist.
- 1 steal.
- 5-of-21 field goals.
- 2-of-10 three-pointers.
- 4-of-4 free throws.
Powell’s shooting efficiency was not particularly strong. He converted just 23.8% of his field-goal attempts.
However, his rebounding contribution was significant.
Collecting 10 rebounds from the guard position provided Miami with additional defensive possessions and helped limit Phoenix’s opportunities to build momentum through second-chance scoring.
His perfect free-throw shooting also allowed him to contribute points despite struggling from the field.
Andrew Wiggins Adds Rebounding Strength
Andrew Wiggins recorded 10 points and 10 rebounds in 23 minutes and 30 seconds.
His shooting numbers were:
- 5-of-12 from the field.
- 0-of-4 from three-point range.
- 10 total rebounds.
- 3 assists.
Wiggins was another important contributor to Miami’s rebounding effort.
His 10 rebounds matched Powell’s total and gave the Heat two players with double-digit rebounds.
This was especially useful because Phoenix had several players capable of competing physically around the basket.
Wiggins also finished with a +10 plus/minus rating, indicating that Miami performed well during his minutes.
Nikola Jović and Dru Smith Provide Bench Production
Miami’s bench also played a meaningful role.
Nikola Jović scored 12 points, collected six rebounds, and converted four of his 10 field-goal attempts. He also made two three-pointers.
His +17 plus/minus was another indication of the positive impact Miami’s rotation players had during their minutes.
Dru Smith added 11 points while shooting 5-of-8 from the field. He made one three-pointer and recorded one steal.
These performances helped Miami avoid becoming overly dependent on Adebayo and Powell.
A strong bench contribution is especially important during games played on consecutive nights because it gives the coaching staff more ways to distribute minutes.
Complete Phoenix Suns Player Statistics
Phoenix received its best scoring performance from Dillon Brooks, who finished with 26 points.
Grayson Allen scored 18 points, while Mark Williams and Collin Gillespie each contributed 11.
The Suns had several productive individual performances, but their overall shooting efficiency was not enough to match Miami’s offensive output.
Phoenix Suns Player Stats Table
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG |
| Dillon Brooks | 36:26 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 11/23 |
| Grayson Allen | 34:40 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4/18 |
| Mark Williams | 24:07 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4/6 |
| Collin Gillespie | 30:40 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4/12 |
| Royce O’Neale | 31:26 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2/10 |
| Isaiah Livers | 15:02 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4/4 |
| Jamaree Bouyea | 13:01 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2/6 |
| Oso Ighodaro | 16:44 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3/5 |
| Jordan Goodwin | 21:51 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1/7 |
| Ryan Dunn | 7:57 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2/6 |
| Khaman Maluach | 2:42 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0/0 |
| Nigel Hayes-Davis | 2:42 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0/2 |
| Rasheer Fleming | 2:42 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0/1 |
Dillon Brooks Leads Phoenix With 26 Points
Dillon Brooks delivered the highest individual scoring total of the game.
He finished with:
- 26 points.
- 5 rebounds.
- 2 assists.
- 1 steal.
- 2 blocks.
- 11-of-23 field goals.
- 2-of-5 three-pointers.
- 2-of-2 free throws.
- Zero turnovers.
Brooks shot 47.8% from the field, making him one of Phoenix’s most efficient high-volume scorers.
His performance was important because the Suns were missing two major offensive contributors.
Without Booker and Green, Phoenix needed other players to assume greater responsibility. Brooks responded by taking 23 field-goal attempts and converting 11.
His two blocks also showed that he contributed defensively.
However, basketball is a team sport, and one strong scoring performance cannot always overcome weaknesses across the entire rotation.
Phoenix struggled to generate efficient offense from several other important positions.
Grayson Allen Scores 18 Points
Grayson Allen finished with 18 points, six rebounds, and three assists.
His shooting line included:
- 4-of-18 field goals.
- 1-of-11 three-pointers.
- 9-of-10 free throws.
Allen’s free-throw accuracy was excellent, but his perimeter shooting was a major challenge.
He attempted 11 three-pointers and converted only one.
For a team attempting to overcome an early deficit, efficient outside shooting is particularly valuable because three-point baskets can reduce scoring gaps quickly.
Allen’s inability to consistently convert from the perimeter made that task more difficult.
His 18 points still represented an important contribution, but the shooting percentages reveal that he needed many attempts to reach that total.
Mark Williams Controls the Interior
Mark Williams recorded 11 points and eight rebounds.
His shooting performance was highly efficient:
- 4-of-6 field goals.
- 3-of-4 free throws.
- 8 rebounds.
- 1 assist.
- 1 block.
Williams converted 66.7% of his field-goal attempts.
His interior presence gave Phoenix a reliable option close to the basket.
He also finished with a +10 plus/minus rating, one of the stronger figures among the Suns players.
His performance demonstrates that Phoenix had productive individual contributions inside the paint, even though the team struggled with overall shooting.
Collin Gillespie Contributes From the Perimeter
Collin Gillespie scored 11 points in 30 minutes and 40 seconds.
His numbers included:
- 4-of-12 field goals.
- 3-of-6 three-pointers.
- 4 rebounds.
- 2 turnovers.
Gillespie’s three-point shooting was more efficient than the team’s overall perimeter performance.
He converted 50% of his attempts from beyond the arc.
However, his contribution did not fully compensate for the struggles of other Phoenix perimeter shooters.
The Suns needed more consistent production from multiple players to keep pace with Miami.
Royce O’Neale’s Playmaking Contribution
Royce O’Neale scored eight points while collecting five rebounds and five assists.
He also recorded two steals.
His five assists were the highest total among Phoenix players in the game.
Although his shooting performance was limited, his passing and defensive activity helped Phoenix remain competitive during parts of the contest.
O’Neale’s 2-of-10 field-goal shooting, including zero successful three-pointers from seven attempts, was a significant limitation.
Isaiah Livers Provides Efficient Bench Scoring
Isaiah Livers produced an interesting performance in limited playing time.
He scored nine points while making all four of his field-goal attempts.
His shooting included:
- 4-of-4 field goals.
- 1-of-1 three-pointers.
- 5 rebounds.
- 2 steals.
- 1 block.
Livers demonstrated that Phoenix had capable secondary scoring options.
However, his 15 minutes and two seconds of playing time limited the overall volume of his contribution.
His performance was one of the more efficient individual efforts on the Suns roster.
Miami Heat and Phoenix Suns Team Statistics Comparison
Individual player performances explain only part of the result. Team statistics reveal why Miami was able to secure the victory.
The Heat converted a greater percentage of their field-goal attempts and three-point attempts. They also generated more assists and collected more total rebounds.
Phoenix did have a small advantage in offensive rebounds and blocked shots, but those strengths were not enough to overcome its shooting problems.
Complete Team Comparison
| Statistical Category | Miami Heat | Phoenix Suns |
| Total Points | 111 | 102 |
| Field Goals Made | 39 | 37 |
| Field Goals Attempted | 93 | 100 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 41.9% | 37.0% |
| Three-Pointers Made | 9 | 7 |
| Three-Pointers Attempted | 35 | 35 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 25.7% | 20.0% |
| Free Throws Made | 24 | 21 |
| Free Throws Attempted | 29 | 26 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 82.8% | 80.8% |
| Total Rebounds | 59 | 56 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 18 | 21 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 41 | 35 |
| Assists | 21 | 14 |
| Steals | 6 | 6 |
| Blocks | 3 | 7 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 10 |
| Points in the Paint | 54 | 50 |
| Fast-Break Points | 18 | 12 |
| Biggest Lead | 18 | 2 |
The comparison highlights several important differences.
First, Miami made two more field goals despite attempting seven fewer shots.
Second, the Heat generated seven more assists, showing better overall passing production.
Third, Miami’s 59 rebounds helped it maintain possession and limit Phoenix’s opportunities.
Phoenix’s seven blocks were an advantage, but defensive statistics must be considered alongside the team’s ability to secure rebounds and prevent successful scoring attempts.
Why Miami’s Shooting Efficiency Mattered
Miami attempted 93 field goals and converted 39.
Phoenix attempted 100 and made 37.
This difference is significant because Phoenix needed seven additional attempts to make two fewer shots.
The Heat’s 41.9% shooting percentage was not exceptionally high, but it was still considerably better than Phoenix’s 37%.
Miami also made nine three-pointers compared with Phoenix’s seven.
Neither team was especially successful from long distance, but Miami maintained a small advantage in both total makes and accuracy.
Rebounding Gave Miami Additional Control
Miami collected 59 rebounds, while Phoenix finished with 56.
The difference was not enormous, but the distribution matters.
The Heat recorded 41 defensive rebounds compared with Phoenix’s 35.
Phoenix collected 21 offensive rebounds, three more than Miami.
That means the Suns were competitive when attacking the offensive glass, but Miami was more effective at finishing defensive possessions.
The Heat also received double-digit rebounding contributions from Norman Powell and Andrew Wiggins.
Their performances helped Miami maintain its overall advantage.
Passing and Ball Movement Favored Miami
Miami recorded 21 assists, compared with 14 for Phoenix.
That seven-assist difference provides an important indication of the teams’ offensive execution.
Jaquez led Miami with six assists, while Kasparas Jakučionis and Andrew Wiggins added three each.
Phoenix’s leading assist contributor was Royce O’Neale with five.
The Heat’s higher assist total suggests that more of their scoring opportunities came through successful passing sequences.
It also shows why Jaquez’s performance was so valuable. His contribution was not limited to scoring.
He helped create opportunities for teammates while remaining efficient as a scorer himself.
Quarter-by-Quarter Match Analysis
The scoring pattern explains how Miami established control, how Phoenix attempted to recover, and why the Heat ultimately protected their advantage.
First Quarter: Miami Takes Early Control
Miami 32-21 Phoenix
Miami opened the game with an aggressive offensive approach and scored 32 points in the first quarter.
Phoenix managed only 21 points, creating an 11-point difference after the opening period.
The Heat benefited from their ability to attack defensive weaknesses and create scoring opportunities close to the basket.
A 16-2 Miami run during the opening period was particularly important. It allowed the visitors to establish momentum before Phoenix could settle into its offensive rhythm.
The Suns struggled to find consistent shooting opportunities, while Miami made better use of its offensive possessions.
This early advantage influenced the remainder of the contest because Phoenix had to spend much of the game attempting to reduce the deficit.
Second Quarter: Phoenix Improves Its Offense
Miami 26-27 Phoenix
Phoenix responded in the second quarter by scoring 27 points.
Miami scored 26, meaning the Suns gained one point on the Heat during the period.
The improvement was encouraging for Phoenix because the team had struggled during the opening 12 minutes.
However, the Suns could not completely erase Miami’s early advantage.
At halftime, Miami maintained a 58-48 lead.
Both teams experienced difficulties from three-point range during the first half.
Miami made just three of its first 17 three-point attempts, while Phoenix converted two of 19.
This is an important detail because neither team was dominating through perimeter shooting.
Miami’s advantage came from its ability to generate other scoring opportunities and maintain a stronger overall offensive rhythm.
Third Quarter: Phoenix Attempts a Comeback
Miami 24-29 Phoenix
Phoenix continued its improvement in the third quarter.
The Suns scored 29 points, five more than Miami’s 24.
Their improved production reduced the gap to five points entering the final period.
The quarter was important because it demonstrated that Phoenix still had enough offensive ability to challenge Miami despite missing key players.
Isaiah Livers produced a notable moment by making a three-pointer from just inside the midcourt line at the buzzer.
That shot brought Phoenix within five points at 82-77.
However, Miami remained in front.
The Heat did not need to dominate every quarter. Their strong opening period had created a cushion that allowed them to withstand Phoenix’s improved performance.
Fourth Quarter: Miami Secures the Victory
Miami 29-25 Phoenix
The fourth quarter determined the final result.
Miami scored 29 points, while Phoenix managed 25.
The Heat gradually extended their advantage and built an 18-point lead midway through the period.
At that stage, Miami had created enough separation to make a Phoenix comeback difficult.
The Suns continued competing and reduced the deficit, but the Heat maintained their offensive advantage.
Miami’s ability to protect its lead was particularly important because the team was playing its second game in two nights.
Instead of allowing Phoenix to turn the final period into a close contest, Miami continued finding scoring opportunities and finished with a 111-102 victory.
The Biggest Factors Behind Miami’s Victory
Several statistical and tactical elements explain why Miami won this matchup.
1. Better Overall Field-Goal Accuracy
Miami shot 41.9% from the field, compared with Phoenix’s 37%.
The difference may appear relatively small, but it had a meaningful effect across 48 minutes.
Phoenix attempted 100 shots and made 37.
Miami attempted only 93 shots but converted 39.
The Heat therefore scored more field goals with fewer attempts.
This reflects the importance of shot quality.
Taking more shots does not automatically produce more points. Teams must create opportunities that their players can convert consistently.
2. More Productive Ball Movement
Miami recorded 21 assists, while Phoenix finished with 14.
The difference suggests that the Heat generated more successful scoring opportunities through passing.
Jaquez’s six assists were especially important.
His ability to contribute as both a scorer and facilitator helped Miami maintain offensive balance.
Phoenix received five assists from O’Neale, but the remaining players did not collectively match Miami’s playmaking production.
3. Stronger Contributions From Multiple Players
Miami had seven players score at least 10 points.
These players were:
- Bam Adebayo: 22 points.
- Jaime Jaquez Jr.: 20 points.
- Norman Powell: 16 points.
- Nikola Jović: 12 points.
- Dru Smith: 11 points.
- Pelle Larsson: 10 points.
- Andrew Wiggins: 10 points.
Phoenix had five players reach double figures.
Dillon Brooks led with 26, followed by Grayson Allen with 18, Mark Williams and Collin Gillespie with 11 each, and Isaiah Livers with nine.
Miami’s scoring balance reduced its dependence on any single player.
Even when Powell struggled with his field-goal attempts, Adebayo and Jaquez provided enough production to keep the offense moving.
4. Better Defensive Rebounding
Miami collected 41 defensive rebounds compared with Phoenix’s 35.
This helped the Heat end more Phoenix possessions without allowing additional offensive opportunities.
Phoenix did win the offensive-rebounding comparison, 21-18, but Miami’s defensive rebounding advantage helped maintain its overall control.
5. Phoenix’s Perimeter Shooting Problems
The Suns made seven of 35 three-point attempts.
Their 20% accuracy was a major limitation.
Miami also struggled from long distance, making only nine of 35 attempts.
However, the Heat still converted at a higher rate.
The difference was especially noticeable in Grayson Allen’s performance. His one successful three-pointer from 11 attempts limited Phoenix’s ability to produce quick scoring runs.
Individual Matchups That Shaped the Game
Looking beyond the final score helps explain how individual players influenced the result.
Bam Adebayo vs Mark Williams
Bam Adebayo
22
Points
7 rebounds
1 assist
Mark Williams
11
Points
8 rebounds
1 assist
Adebayo had the stronger scoring performance, finishing with twice as many points as Williams.
Williams was more efficient from the field, making four of six attempts.
Adebayo, however, created more scoring volume and added two three-pointers and eight free throws made.
Both players contributed defensively, with Adebayo recording two steals and one block and Williams adding one block.
The comparison shows two different offensive roles.
Adebayo provided Miami with a more versatile scoring option, while Williams concentrated much of his production around the basket.
Jaime Jaquez Jr. vs Royce O’Neale
Jaquez and O’Neale had different responsibilities in their respective offenses.
Jaquez scored 20 points and recorded six assists, making him one of Miami’s most productive offensive players.
O’Neale finished with eight points and five assists.
Although O’Neale contributed more defensive activity through two steals, Jaquez had a considerably greater scoring impact.
Jaquez’s 8-of-11 shooting also demonstrated superior efficiency.
This matchup illustrates how Miami benefited from a player who could combine scoring with playmaking.
Norman Powell vs Grayson Allen
Powell and Allen both scored in double figures, but neither had a particularly efficient shooting night.
Powell scored 16 points on 5-of-21 shooting.
Allen scored 18 points on 4-of-18 shooting.
Both players struggled from beyond the arc.
Powell made two of 10 three-point attempts, while Allen converted only one of 11.
Powell’s 10 rebounds gave him an additional contribution that was not reflected in his shooting percentage.
Allen also collected six rebounds and three assists.
The comparison demonstrates that scoring totals alone cannot fully explain a player’s performance. Shooting efficiency, rebounding, assists, and defensive contributions must also be considered.
Offensive and Defensive Performance Breakdown
Miami’s Offensive Approach
Miami’s offense produced 111 points through a combination of interior scoring, free throws, and contributions from several rotation players.
The Heat recorded 54 points in the paint.
That figure was four points higher than Phoenix’s 50.
Miami also scored 18 fast-break points compared with Phoenix’s 12.
These numbers suggest that the Heat were effective at converting defensive stops and transition opportunities into offense.
Their 21 assists further demonstrate the value of ball movement.
Instead of relying entirely on isolation scoring, Miami found different ways to create opportunities.
Phoenix’s Offensive Approach
Phoenix scored 102 points but needed 100 field-goal attempts to reach that total.
The Suns’ 37% field-goal percentage was a major weakness.
Their three-point shooting was even less effective.
The team made just seven of 35 attempts from beyond the arc.
However, Phoenix did show strength in certain areas.
The Suns recorded 21 offensive rebounds and seven blocks.
These figures demonstrate that the team remained competitive physically and had players capable of creating defensive disruptions.
The problem was converting those advantages into enough overall scoring.
Defensive Contributions From Both Teams
Miami recorded three blocks and six steals.
Phoenix recorded seven blocks and six steals.
Phoenix clearly had the advantage in blocked shots, but Miami’s defense was effective in other ways.
The Heat collected more defensive rebounds and limited Phoenix to 102 points.
Miami also forced the Suns to rely heavily on difficult perimeter attempts.
A defensive performance should not be evaluated through blocks alone. Rebounding, positioning, shot pressure, and the ability to end possessions are equally important.
Bench Production and Rotation Analysis
Bench contributions often determine close NBA games, particularly when teams are managing fatigue or missing important starters.
Miami received valuable production from its reserves.
Nikola Jović scored 12 points, Dru Smith added 11, and the remaining bench players helped maintain the team’s offensive structure.
Jović’s +17 plus/minus was particularly notable.
Dru Smith also provided efficient scoring by converting five of eight field-goal attempts.
Phoenix received nine points from Isaiah Livers and six from Oso Ighodaro.
Livers was extremely efficient, converting all four of his field-goal attempts.
Ighodaro added seven rebounds and two blocks.
The Suns also received contributions from Jamaree Bouyea, Jordan Goodwin, and Ryan Dunn.
However, Miami’s bench production was more balanced.
The difference was not simply the number of points scored by reserves. It was the combination of scoring, rebounding, and playmaking that allowed Miami to maintain its advantage.
What the Match Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
The numbers from this game provide several useful observations for basketball fans analyzing the two franchises.
Miami Demonstrated Offensive Balance
The Heat did not rely on a single player to produce the entire offensive performance.
Adebayo and Jaquez led the scoring, but Powell, Jović, Smith, Larsson, and Wiggins all made meaningful contributions.
This balance made Miami more difficult to defend.
If one player experienced shooting difficulties, another could assume greater offensive responsibility.
Phoenix Needed More Consistent Perimeter Scoring
The Suns’ 20% three-point shooting percentage was one of the clearest weaknesses in the game.
Their seven successful three-pointers were insufficient to overcome Miami’s overall shooting advantage.
The absence of Booker and Green also reduced Phoenix’s available offensive options.
The remaining players had to take on additional responsibilities, and the shooting numbers show how difficult that challenge became.
Rebounding Was Competitive, but Defensive Boards Mattered
Phoenix actually won the offensive-rebounding battle.
However, Miami finished with three more total rebounds and six more defensive rebounds.
The difference highlights an important distinction.
Offensive rebounds create second-chance opportunities, but defensive rebounds help teams finish possessions.
Miami was more successful in the second area.
The First Quarter Created the Foundation for the Win
Miami’s 11-point opening-quarter advantage gave the team room to manage Phoenix’s comeback attempts.
The Suns won the second and third quarters, but the Heat remained ahead.
Miami then outscored Phoenix again in the fourth period.
This demonstrates how early scoring advantages can influence the tactical direction of an entire game.
How to Read NBA Match Player Statistics Correctly
For readers who follow basketball statistics, understanding individual categories makes game analysis more meaningful.
Here are some important terms used in the box score.
| Statistic | Meaning | Why It Matters |
| PTS | Points | Measures scoring production |
| REB | Rebounds | Shows control of missed shots |
| AST | Assists | Indicates successful passing that leads to baskets |
| STL | Steals | Measures possession-winning defensive actions |
| BLK | Blocks | Shows successful shot-blocking actions |
| FG% | Field-goal percentage | Measures overall shooting accuracy |
| 3P% | Three-point percentage | Measures perimeter shooting accuracy |
| FT% | Free-throw percentage | Measures accuracy from the free-throw line |
| TO | Turnovers | Shows lost possessions |
| +/− | Plus/minus | Measures the team’s scoring margin while a player is on court |
Why Points Are Not Enough
A player who scores 20 points is not automatically more effective than someone who scores 15.
Shooting efficiency, assists, rebounds, turnovers, and defensive contributions all influence a player’s overall impact.
For example, Jaquez scored 20 points on 8-of-11 shooting.
Powell scored 16 points but needed 21 field-goal attempts.
Their scoring totals were relatively close, but their shooting efficiency was very different.
Understanding Plus/Minus
Plus/minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a player is on the court.
Jaquez finished at +19, while several Phoenix players recorded negative figures.
This does not prove that one player individually caused the result.
Plus/minus is influenced by teammates, opponents, lineup combinations, and game situations.
It is most useful when considered alongside traditional statistics and game context.
Why Team Shooting Percentages Matter
Field-goal percentage provides a useful overview of offensive efficiency.
Miami shot 41.9%, while Phoenix shot 37%.
Three-point percentage offers another perspective.
Miami made 25.7% of its attempts from long distance, compared with Phoenix’s 20%.
These statistics explain why Miami scored more field goals despite taking fewer attempts.
Historical Context of the Heat vs Suns Rivalry
Miami and Phoenix represent two different basketball traditions.
The Heat have built a reputation around defensive discipline, physical basketball, player development, and strong coaching structures.
Phoenix has historically relied on offensive creativity, skilled perimeter players, and the ability to generate scoring through individual talent and team movement.
Their meetings often provide interesting comparisons because the teams can approach the game from different tactical perspectives.
The January 2026 matchup was particularly interesting because Miami completed a season sweep of Phoenix.
The Heat had also defeated the Suns 127-121 on January 13, 2026, in Miami.
That earlier game was more offense-oriented, with both teams surpassing 120 points.
The January 25 rematch produced a different result in terms of scoring volume.
Miami won 111-102, demonstrating its ability to secure another victory through a more controlled offensive performance.
The two results also show why individual game statistics should not automatically be treated as long-term performance indicators.
A player’s output can change considerably depending on availability, defensive matchups, minutes, and the role assigned by the coaching staff.
What Fans and Analysts Can Learn From This Matchup
The game provides several useful lessons for evaluating NBA performances.
First, efficient scoring can be more valuable than high shot volume. Phoenix attempted more field goals but made fewer baskets.
Second, balanced scoring makes an offense less predictable. Miami had several players capable of producing double-digit points.
Third, playmaking can reveal the quality of team offense. Miami’s seven-assist advantage reflected better overall passing production.
Fourth, defensive rebounding helps prevent opponents from extending possessions. Miami’s six-rebound advantage on the defensive glass was important.
Fifth, injuries and player availability can change an entire matchup. Phoenix played without Booker and Green, placing greater responsibility on its available players.
These lessons are useful when studying individual performances, comparing teams, or understanding why a game produced a particular result.
Official Match Statistics and Data Accuracy
For readers who want to verify individual numbers, the official NBA game record is the best starting point.
The official NBA box score contains the individual player statistics for both teams, including minutes, field goals, three-pointers, free throws, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, turnovers, personal fouls, points, and plus/minus.
The official game summary also provides the quarter-by-quarter score and additional team statistics.
One important distinction is that a box score describes what happened in one particular game. It should not be used as a substitute for season averages, career records, or future performance projections.
The statistics discussed in this article refer specifically to the January 25, 2026 contest.
This distinction is important for anyone researching historical games or comparing players across multiple seasons.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Miami Heat vs Phoenix Suns game on January 25, 2026?
The Miami Heat defeated the Phoenix Suns 111-102 on January 25, 2026, at the Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix. Miami secured a nine-point road victory.
2. Who was the leading scorer in the Heat vs Suns matchup?
Dillon Brooks was the game’s leading scorer with 26 points for Phoenix. Bam Adebayo led Miami with 22 points, while Jaime Jaquez Jr. added 20.
3. How many points did Bam Adebayo score against Phoenix?
Bam Adebayo scored 22 points, collected seven rebounds, recorded one assist, made two steals, and blocked one shot. He also converted all eight of his free-throw attempts.
4. How many rebounds did Norman Powell record?
Norman Powell collected 10 rebounds and scored 16 points. His double-double made him an important contributor to Miami’s victory.
5. Which Phoenix Suns player recorded the most points?
Dillon Brooks led Phoenix with 26 points. He made 11 of his 23 field-goal attempts, including two three-pointers, and also recorded five rebounds and two assists.
6. What was the biggest difference between the two teams?
Miami had better overall shooting efficiency and ball movement. The Heat shot 41.9% from the field and recorded 21 assists, while Phoenix shot 37% and finished with 14 assists.
Conclusion
The January 25, 2026 matchup between Miami and Phoenix demonstrated the importance of balanced scoring, efficient shooting, and consistent team execution.
Miami secured a 111-102 victory through contributions from several players. Bam Adebayo led the Heat with 22 points, while Jaime Jaquez Jr. delivered 20 points and six assists. Norman Powell and Andrew Wiggins both collected 10 rebounds, giving Miami additional strength on the glass.
Dillon Brooks was Phoenix’s leading scorer with 26 points. Grayson Allen added 18, while Mark Williams and Collin Gillespie contributed 11 points each.
The most important statistical differences were Miami’s better field-goal percentage, seven additional assists, and stronger defensive rebounding. Phoenix produced more blocks and offensive rebounds, but those advantages could not overcome its shooting difficulties.
Ultimately, this game demonstrated that individual scoring performances must be supported by efficient team offense and reliable defensive execution. The complete player statistics provide a clearer explanation of Miami’s victory than the final score alone.
