Cleveland cavaliers vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats
The cleveland cavaliers vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats reveal an exciting NBA contest in which the Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the Cleveland Cavaliers 124-116. Played at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City, the game featured outstanding individual performances, an impressive fourth-quarter comeback attempt, and a dominant scoring display from Shai Gilgeous-Alexander.
Gilgeous-Alexander led all players with 42 points and eight assists, giving Oklahoma City the offensive leadership it needed to secure another victory over Cleveland. Ajay Mitchell contributed 23 points, while rookie Bennett Stirtz provided an important 16-point performance. For Cleveland, Donovan Mitchell finished with 27 points, and James Harden added 19 points, nine rebounds, and six assists.
Although Cleveland scored 42 points in the fourth quarter, its slow opening period created a significant challenge. Oklahoma City established an early advantage and maintained enough control to withstand the Cavaliers’ late offensive pressure.
This matchup was also important because it marked the second consecutive victory for Oklahoma City over Cleveland. The Thunder had previously defeated the Cavaliers 117-112 in their November 3 meeting, giving them a 2-0 advantage in the season series.
This detailed breakdown examines the final score, individual player performances, shooting percentages, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter scoring, and the important moments that shaped the result.
Game Overview: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Cleveland Cavaliers
The November 4 game in Oklahoma City, listed as November 5 in the Pakistan time zone, brought together two competitive NBA teams with different offensive approaches.
The Thunder entered the contest looking to maintain their strong home performance. Cleveland wanted to respond after losing the first meeting between the teams. However, Oklahoma City’s early scoring advantage proved difficult to overcome.
Final Match Information
| Match Detail | Information |
| Matchup | Cleveland Cavaliers vs Oklahoma City Thunder |
| Date in Oklahoma City | November 4, 2026 |
| Date in Pakistan | November 5, 2026 |
| League | NBA |
| Game Status | Final |
| Final Score | OKC 124, CLE 116 |
| Winning Team | Oklahoma City Thunder |
| Losing Team | Cleveland Cavaliers |
| Venue | Paycom Center |
| Location | Oklahoma City, Oklahoma |
| Attendance | 18,203 |
| Officials | John Goble, Jonathan Sterling, John Butler |
| Game ID | 401909929 |
Oklahoma City entered the game with a displayed record of 6-2, including a perfect 4-0 home record. Cleveland’s displayed record was 4-4, with a 1-3 record away from home.
The result strengthened Oklahoma City’s position in the early-season standings and extended its advantage in the head-to-head series.
Why This Game Was Important
Several factors made this matchup particularly interesting:
- Oklahoma City was attempting to continue its strong home form.
- Cleveland was looking to respond after losing the first meeting.
- Shai Gilgeous-Alexander was a major offensive threat for the Thunder.
- Donovan Mitchell remained Cleveland’s primary scoring option.
- The game offered another opportunity to evaluate the supporting players on both rosters.
The final result showed that individual scoring talent was important, but the supporting statistics also played a major role.
cleveland cavaliers vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats: Complete Box Score
The individual numbers provide a clearer understanding of how both teams performed.
Oklahoma City received excellent contributions from its leading players, while Cleveland relied heavily on Donovan Mitchell, James Harden, and Evan Mobley.
Cleveland Cavaliers Player Statistics
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | FT |
| Jarrett Allen | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Evan Mobley | 33 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 7-15 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
| James Harden | 35 | 19 | 9 | 6 | 5-16 | 3-8 | 6-6 |
| Donovan Mitchell | 33 | 27 | 3 | 6 | 10-17 | 5-10 | 2-2 |
| Tyrese Proctor | 22 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 1-1 |
| Mario Hezonja | 23 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 5-10 | 2-6 | 0-0 |
| Tristan Enaruna | 16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| Thomas Bryant | 13 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 5-6 |
| Sam Merrill | 27 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 2-2 |
| Craig Porter Jr. | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Meleek Thomas | 18 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3-9 | 3-7 | 0-0 |
Player minutes and shooting figures are rounded to match the supplied statistical summary.
Donovan Mitchell was Cleveland’s leading scorer with 27 points. Harden provided additional scoring and playmaking, while Mobley contributed a double-double with 16 points and 10 rebounds.
Oklahoma City Thunder Player Statistics
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | FT |
| Isaiah Hartenstein | 26 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| Aday Mara | 25 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| Kenrich Williams | 29 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 5-9 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Shai Gilgeous-Alexander | 35 | 42 | 4 | 8 | 11-26 | 5-11 | 15-19 |
| Ajay Mitchell | 32 | 23 | 7 | 4 | 9-17 | 1-3 | 4-6 |
| Alex Caruso | 20 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 4-4 |
| Micah Peavy | 26 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Jared McCain | 25 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3-11 | 1-6 | 2-2 |
| Josh Dix | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Bennett Stirtz | 22 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 6-9 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
Brooks Barnhizer and Dalen Terry did not play because of the coach’s decision.
The Thunder’s statistical distribution demonstrates how several players supported their leading scorer. Gilgeous-Alexander delivered the biggest individual performance, but Ajay Mitchell, Stirtz, and Williams also made meaningful contributions.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Leads Oklahoma City With 42 Points
The biggest individual story was the performance of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander.
The Oklahoma City guard finished with 42 points, eight assists, and four rebounds in approximately 35 minutes. His scoring output gave the Thunder an offensive advantage whenever Cleveland threatened to reduce the deficit.
His shooting numbers included:
- 42 total points
- 11 successful field goals on 26 attempts
- Five three-pointers on 11 attempts
- 15 successful free throws on 19 attempts
- Eight assists
- Four rebounds
His overall field-goal percentage was approximately 42.3%, while his three-point percentage was 45.5%.
These numbers show that his performance was not simply based on difficult perimeter shots. He also generated points from the free-throw line, where he converted 15 attempts.
How Gilgeous-Alexander Controlled the Offense
Gilgeous-Alexander’s influence extended beyond his scoring total.
His eight assists helped create opportunities for teammates, while his ability to attack defenders forced Cleveland to make difficult defensive decisions.
When defenders concentrated on stopping his drives, other Oklahoma City players had opportunities to find open positions. This helped the Thunder maintain offensive balance.
His free-throw production was especially important late in the game. According to the game recap, he made six free throws during the final 41 seconds, helping Oklahoma City protect its lead.
Why His 42 Points Mattered
A 42-point performance becomes especially valuable when the opposing team is attempting a comeback.
Cleveland scored 42 points in the final quarter, demonstrating that its offense had not given up. Gilgeous-Alexander’s ability to respond under pressure helped prevent that late scoring surge from changing the result.
His performance was therefore important in three areas:
- Early offensive leadership.
- Creating scoring opportunities for teammates.
- Converting important free throws during the closing minutes.
The combination of these contributions made him the standout performer of the contest.
Donovan Mitchell Leads Cleveland With 27 Points
Donovan Mitchell was Cleveland’s most productive scorer.
He recorded 27 points, six assists, and three rebounds while shooting 10-for-17 from the field.
His perimeter shooting was particularly effective. Mitchell connected on five of his ten three-point attempts, giving Cleveland an important source of outside scoring.
Donovan Mitchell’s Shooting Performance
| Statistic | Result |
| Minutes | 33 |
| Points | 27 |
| Rebounds | 3 |
| Assists | 6 |
| Field Goals | 10-17 |
| Three-Pointers | 5-10 |
| Free Throws | 2-2 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 58.8% |
| Three-Point Percentage | 50% |
Mitchell’s efficiency was one of Cleveland’s strongest offensive features.
He converted nearly 59% of his field-goal attempts, which was higher than the Cavaliers’ overall shooting percentage.
His ability to score from the perimeter also helped Cleveland increase its offensive production in the second half.
Fourth-Quarter Scoring Pressure
Mitchell became especially important during Cleveland’s late comeback attempt.
The Cavaliers reduced the deficit through a series of successful outside shots. Mitchell made three consecutive three-pointers during the closing period, helping Cleveland move closer to Oklahoma City.
However, the early deficit was too large to overcome.
His performance demonstrated that Cleveland had the individual scoring ability to challenge Oklahoma City. The bigger problem was maintaining that offensive effectiveness throughout the entire contest.
James Harden’s All-Around Contribution
James Harden provided another important performance for Cleveland.
He finished with 19 points, nine rebounds, and six assists in approximately 35 minutes.
Although his field-goal efficiency was lower than Mitchell’s, Harden contributed in several different areas.
Harden’s Complete Statistics
| Category | Performance |
| Points | 19 |
| Rebounds | 9 |
| Assists | 6 |
| Field Goals | 5-16 |
| Three-Pointers | 3-8 |
| Free Throws | 6-6 |
| Minutes | 35 |
Harden’s nine rebounds were particularly valuable for a player operating primarily as a perimeter creator.
His six assists also showed that he was involved in organizing Cleveland’s offensive possessions.
However, shooting five of 16 from the field limited his overall scoring efficiency.
The difference between Harden’s performance and Mitchell’s shooting output is an important part of understanding Cleveland’s offensive challenge.
Mitchell converted 10 of 17 attempts, while Harden made five of 16. Cleveland needed more consistent efficiency from its other major offensive contributors.
Evan Mobley Provides Interior Production
Evan Mobley recorded 16 points, 10 rebounds, and three assists.
His double-double represented one of Cleveland’s most important individual contributions.
Mobley also provided defensive value through his size and ability to protect the paint. His two recorded blocks added another dimension to his performance.
Mobley’s Statistical Breakdown
- 16 points
- 10 rebounds
- Three assists
- Seven field goals made on 15 attempts
- One three-pointer made on five attempts
- Two blocks
Mobley’s ability to collect ten rebounds helped Cleveland remain competitive in the interior.
However, his outside shooting was less effective. He converted only one of five three-point attempts.
This matters because Cleveland needs Mobley to balance his interior contributions with efficient perimeter opportunities when the offense moves away from the basket.
His overall performance was productive, but Oklahoma City’s collective rebounding and offensive execution still provided the home team with an advantage.
Ajay Mitchell Delivers 23 Points for the Thunder
Ajay Mitchell was one of Oklahoma City’s most important supporting players.
He finished with 23 points, seven rebounds, and four assists.
His shooting performance was also efficient, as he made nine of 17 field-goal attempts.
Ajay Mitchell’s Contribution
| Statistic | Result |
| Points | 23 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Assists | 4 |
| Field Goals | 9-17 |
| Three-Pointers | 1-3 |
| Free Throws | 4-6 |
| Minutes | 32 |
His performance reduced the pressure on Gilgeous-Alexander to generate every important basket.
That balance was important because Cleveland could not focus exclusively on stopping one offensive player.
Ajay Mitchell also contributed on the boards, collecting seven rebounds. His combination of scoring, rebounding, and passing made him one of the most complete performers for Oklahoma City.
Bennett Stirtz Makes an Important Contribution
Rookie Bennett Stirtz delivered 16 points in approximately 22 minutes.
His performance stood out because of his shooting efficiency.
He converted six of nine field-goal attempts, including four of seven from three-point range.
His three-point percentage was approximately 57.1%.
Stirtz’s Game Statistics
- 16 points
- One rebound
- One assist
- Six field goals made
- Four successful three-pointers
- Seven three-point attempts
Stirtz provided Oklahoma City with valuable perimeter scoring.
His contribution also showed why bench production can make a difference in a close game. A player who can score efficiently in limited minutes gives the coaching staff another offensive option.
Rather than relying entirely on the primary stars, Oklahoma City received meaningful scoring from its supporting rotation.
Kenrich Williams and Isaiah Hartenstein Support the Thunder
Kenrich Williams and Isaiah Hartenstein contributed in different ways.
Williams recorded 13 points, four rebounds, and two assists. He made five of nine field-goal attempts and connected on three of five three-point shots.
Hartenstein produced three points, 12 rebounds, and four assists.
Their performances highlighted two important aspects of Oklahoma City’s game.
Williams provided perimeter scoring, while Hartenstein strengthened the team’s rebounding presence.
Hartenstein’s 12 rebounds were especially valuable because they helped Oklahoma City compete for possession opportunities.
His four assists also demonstrated that his contribution was not limited to collecting rebounds.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The scoring pattern explains why Oklahoma City won despite Cleveland’s stronger fourth-quarter performance.
| Quarter | Cleveland Cavaliers | Oklahoma City Thunder |
| First Quarter | 20 | 37 |
| Second Quarter | 24 | 23 |
| Third Quarter | 30 | 28 |
| Fourth Quarter | 42 | 36 |
| Final Score | 116 | 124 |
First Quarter: Oklahoma City Establishes Control
The first quarter was arguably the most important period of the entire game.
Oklahoma City scored 37 points, while Cleveland managed only 20.
The Thunder created a 17-point advantage through aggressive offense and effective shot creation.
A strong opening period can change the entire structure of an NBA game. The team that falls behind must often increase its offensive risk to recover.
That was exactly the challenge Cleveland faced.
The Thunder’s early scoring run gave them enough separation to manage the remaining periods with greater control.
Second Quarter: Cleveland Reduces the Difference
Cleveland improved during the second quarter.
The Cavaliers scored 24 points, compared with Oklahoma City’s 23.
Although the improvement was modest, it prevented the deficit from becoming significantly larger.
The Thunder maintained their lead, but Cleveland showed better offensive organization.
The second period demonstrated that Cleveland could compete when its players found more efficient scoring opportunities.
Third Quarter: Cleveland Builds Momentum
The Cavaliers scored 30 points in the third quarter, compared with 28 for Oklahoma City.
This was another period in which Cleveland outscored the Thunder.
The difference became smaller, and the contest developed into a more competitive battle.
Mobley’s interior presence and Mitchell’s perimeter scoring helped Cleveland improve its offensive rhythm.
However, Oklahoma City continued to answer important scoring opportunities and protected its advantage.
Fourth Quarter: Cleveland Produces a Strong Finish
The fourth quarter was Cleveland’s best offensive period.
The Cavaliers scored 42 points, while Oklahoma City recorded 36.
Mitchell’s outside shooting played an important role in the comeback attempt.
Despite the improvement, Cleveland could not erase the first-quarter deficit.
Oklahoma City’s ability to make important shots and convert late free throws allowed the Thunder to finish with an eight-point victory.
The quarter-by-quarter numbers provide a clear lesson: Cleveland did not lose because it lacked fourth-quarter scoring. Its biggest problem was the opening period.
Team Statistical Comparison
The overall team statistics show how Oklahoma City gained its advantage.
| Team Statistic | Cleveland | Oklahoma City |
| Points | 116 | 124 |
| Field Goals | 40-93 | 41-89 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 43% | 46% |
| Three-Pointers | 19-49 | 15-36 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 39% | 42% |
| Free Throws | 17-19 | 27-35 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 89% | 77% |
| Total Rebounds | 45 | 47 |
| Assists | 19 | 25 |
| Turnovers | 12 | 9 |
| Steals | 5 | 7 |
| Blocks | 6 | 4 |
Field-Goal Efficiency
Oklahoma City made 41 of 89 field-goal attempts, while Cleveland converted 40 of 93.
The difference in overall shooting percentage favored the Thunder.
Oklahoma City’s 46% shooting rate was higher than Cleveland’s 43%.
Although the difference might appear small, it becomes important over an entire game.
The Thunder converted a larger proportion of their attempts while taking fewer shots.
Three-Point Shooting
Cleveland made more three-pointers in total.
The Cavaliers connected on 19 of 49 attempts, compared with Oklahoma City’s 15 of 36.
However, the Thunder had a better three-point percentage.
Oklahoma City converted approximately 42% of its attempts, while Cleveland finished around 39%.
This distinction is important because the number of successful shots does not tell the entire story.
A team can make more three-pointers simply because it attempts more of them. Efficiency provides a better understanding of shooting performance.
Free-Throw Production
Cleveland was more accurate from the free-throw line.
The Cavaliers converted 17 of 19 attempts, an impressive rate of approximately 89%.
Oklahoma City made 27 of 35 attempts, producing a percentage of approximately 77%.
However, the Thunder attempted 16 more free throws and made ten more.
That difference helped Oklahoma City create additional scoring opportunities.
Rebounding Comparison
Oklahoma City collected 47 rebounds, compared with Cleveland’s 45.
The two-point difference suggests that neither team completely dominated the glass.
Hartenstein’s 12 rebounds were an important individual contribution for Oklahoma City.
Mobley led Cleveland’s detailed player statistics with ten rebounds.
The relatively close team totals indicate that the result was influenced more by offensive efficiency, assists, and turnovers than by a major rebounding advantage.
Assists and Ball Movement
Oklahoma City recorded 25 assists, while Cleveland finished with 19.
This six-assist advantage suggests that the Thunder generated more scoring opportunities through teamwork.
Gilgeous-Alexander and Ajay Mitchell combined for 12 assists.
Harden and Donovan Mitchell also combined for 12 assists for Cleveland.
However, Oklahoma City received additional playmaking contributions from several other players.
This distribution helped the Thunder maintain their offensive rhythm.
Turnovers and Possession Management
The Thunder committed nine turnovers, compared with Cleveland’s 12.
This difference was important.
Every unnecessary turnover can end an offensive possession without producing a shot.
Oklahoma City’s ability to protect the ball helped preserve its scoring opportunities.
The Cavaliers also struggled to generate as many assists, which suggests that their offensive possessions were less consistently connected.
Why Oklahoma City Won the Game
The 124-116 result was not determined by one statistic alone.
Several factors combined to give Oklahoma City the advantage.
1. The Thunder’s Strong Opening Quarter
The 37-point first quarter created the foundation for the victory.
Cleveland spent the rest of the game trying to recover from the early deficit.
Even when the Cavaliers improved their offense, Oklahoma City had enough points in reserve to protect its advantage.
2. Gilgeous-Alexander’s Scoring Leadership
His 42 points gave Oklahoma City a dependable offensive option.
He also contributed eight assists, meaning his influence extended beyond individual scoring.
His late free throws were particularly important.
3. Better Overall Shooting Efficiency
Oklahoma City finished with a 46% field-goal percentage.
Cleveland recorded 43%.
The Thunder also had a higher three-point percentage, even though Cleveland made more three-pointers.
These efficiency differences helped Oklahoma City maintain its advantage.
4. More Effective Ball Movement
The Thunder recorded six more assists.
This indicated that they were able to involve more players in their offensive possessions.
Ajay Mitchell, Williams, and Stirtz all provided scoring support.
5. Better Turnover Management
Oklahoma City committed three fewer turnovers.
That helped the Thunder avoid giving Cleveland additional opportunities to build momentum.
6. Strong Late-Game Execution
Cleveland’s fourth-quarter scoring surge created pressure.
However, Oklahoma City responded with important baskets and free throws.
The Thunder’s ability to remain composed during the final minutes helped secure the result.
Why Cleveland Cavaliers Lost Despite Scoring 42 in the Fourth Quarter
Cleveland’s final-quarter performance deserves attention because it demonstrated the team’s ability to create offensive momentum.
The Cavaliers scored 42 points in the period, their highest-scoring quarter of the game.
Nevertheless, a strong finish was not enough to overcome the opening deficit.
The First-Quarter Deficit Was Too Large
Cleveland was outscored by 17 points in the opening period.
That meant the Cavaliers had to play catch-up for most of the contest.
Even when they won the second, third, and fourth quarters, they could not recover the entire difference.
Inconsistent Shooting From the Field
Cleveland’s overall field-goal percentage was 43%.
Mitchell was highly efficient, but Harden struggled to convert his attempts.
A team needs contributions from several players to maintain consistent scoring against a strong opponent.
Too Many Turnovers
The Cavaliers committed 12 turnovers.
Oklahoma City had only nine.
That difference may seem modest, but it contributed to the Thunder’s ability to maintain control.
Limited Offensive Distribution
Cleveland recorded 19 assists.
The Thunder recorded 25.
The Cavaliers had several individual scoring performances, but Oklahoma City’s more balanced passing numbers reflected stronger overall distribution.
Jarrett Allen’s Early Exit
Allen played only seven minutes and finished with zero points and one rebound.
The Associated Press reported that he left the game in the first quarter with a right knee injury and did not return.
His absence reduced Cleveland’s available interior rotation and was an important development in the matchup.
Head-to-Head Series: Thunder Lead 2-0
The November 5 Pakistan-time result was the second victory for Oklahoma City over Cleveland in their early-season series.
The first meeting took place on November 3, 2026, when the Thunder won 117-112.
The second meeting ended 124-116 in Oklahoma City’s favor.
| Meeting | Result | Winner |
| First Meeting | Thunder 117, Cavaliers 112 | Oklahoma City |
| Second Meeting | Thunder 124, Cavaliers 116 | Oklahoma City |
The two results show that Oklahoma City had established a clear early-season advantage in this matchup.
Both games were competitive, but the Thunder found ways to produce enough offense to finish ahead.
For Cleveland, the next meeting would provide an opportunity to adjust its defensive approach and improve its early-game execution.
Statistical Lessons From the Matchup
The game offers several useful lessons for anyone analyzing NBA box scores.
Points Alone Do Not Explain the Result
Donovan Mitchell scored 27 points, while Gilgeous-Alexander finished with 42.
However, comparing only the leading scorers would leave out important details.
Oklahoma City’s advantages in assists, turnovers, and shooting efficiency helped determine the outcome.
Shooting Percentage Matters More Than Raw Shot Totals
Cleveland made more three-pointers.
Yet Oklahoma City had a better percentage from beyond the arc.
This demonstrates why analysts should consider both attempts and conversions when evaluating shooting performances.
Quarter-by-Quarter Analysis Reveals Momentum
The final score showed an eight-point difference.
The quarter breakdown revealed something more important: Oklahoma City’s 17-point opening advantage.
Without this information, it would be difficult to understand why Cleveland’s 42-point fourth quarter was insufficient.
Supporting Players Can Change Games
Ajay Mitchell scored 23 points, while Bennett Stirtz added 16.
Their contributions helped reduce the scoring burden on Gilgeous-Alexander.
Strong supporting performances are particularly important when a team faces an opponent with multiple scoring threats.
What the Result Means for Both Teams
Oklahoma City Thunder
The victory strengthened Oklahoma City’s early-season position.
The Thunder demonstrated that they could win through a combination of star scoring, supporting production, and effective possession management.
Their 2-0 series advantage also provided a positive result against an Eastern Conference opponent.
The main positive takeaway was the team’s ability to maintain an advantage even when Cleveland produced a strong second-half response.
Cleveland Cavaliers
Cleveland showed encouraging signs through its second-half scoring.
Mitchell’s 27 points and Mobley’s double-double provided offensive and interior production.
Harden’s passing and rebounding also gave the Cavaliers additional options.
However, the team needs to avoid slow starts and reduce unnecessary turnovers.
The early deficit made the final quarter much more difficult than it needed to be.
How to Read NBA Player Statistics Correctly
For readers who want to understand the numbers beyond the final score, several basic basketball statistics are especially useful.
Points (PTS)
Points measure the total number of points a player scores.
Three-pointers count for three points, regular field goals count for two, and successful free throws count for one.
Rebounds (REB)
Rebounds measure how many missed shots a player recovers.
They are generally divided into offensive and defensive rebounds.
A player who collects rebounds can help create additional possessions or prevent the opposition from getting another opportunity.
Assists (AST)
An assist is awarded when a player passes the ball to a teammate who scores directly from that pass.
Assists provide insight into ball movement and playmaking.
Field Goals (FG)
Field goals measure successful shots from the field.
A player’s field-goal percentage is calculated by dividing successful attempts by total attempts and multiplying by 100.
Three-Point Percentage (3P%)
This statistic measures how efficiently a player converts shots from beyond the three-point line.
Free-Throw Percentage (FT%)
Free-throw percentage measures the proportion of successful free throws.
Plus/Minus (+/-)
Plus/minus measures the team’s net scoring difference while a particular player is on the court.
For example, a player with a plus-five rating was on the court during a period when their team outscored its opponent by five points.
It should not be treated as a complete measure of individual performance because teammates, opponents, and lineup combinations also influence the result.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Cleveland Cavaliers vs Oklahoma City Thunder game on November 5, 2026?
The Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the Cleveland Cavaliers 124-116 at Paycom Center. The game was played on November 4 in Oklahoma City and early November 5 in Pakistan.
2. How many points did Shai Gilgeous-Alexander score against Cleveland?
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 42 points. He also recorded eight assists and four rebounds.
3. Who was Cleveland’s leading scorer?
Donovan Mitchell led Cleveland with 27 points. He also recorded six assists and made five three-pointers.
4. How many points did Ajay Mitchell score?
Ajay Mitchell scored 23 points for Oklahoma City. He also collected seven rebounds and recorded four assists.
5. What was the final score by quarter?
Cleveland scored 20, 24, 30, and 42 points across the four quarters. Oklahoma City scored 37, 23, 28, and 36 points, finishing with a 124-116 victory.
6. What was the Oklahoma City Thunder’s record in the season series?
Oklahoma City led the season series 2-0 after defeating Cleveland 117-112 in the first meeting and 124-116 in the second.
Conclusion
The Cleveland Cavaliers and Oklahoma City Thunder produced an entertaining contest that demonstrated the importance of scoring consistency, efficient shooting, and late-game execution.
Oklahoma City secured a 124-116 victory after building a substantial first-quarter advantage. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led the way with 42 points and eight assists, while Ajay Mitchell contributed 23 points and Bennett Stirtz added 16.
Cleveland received strong performances from Donovan Mitchell, who scored 27 points, James Harden, who recorded 19 points and nine rebounds, and Evan Mobley, who finished with 16 points and 10 rebounds.
The Cavaliers showed considerable offensive improvement in the second half, particularly in the fourth quarter when they scored 42 points. However, their early deficit, lower overall shooting percentage, and additional turnovers made a comeback difficult.
The team comparison also highlighted Oklahoma City’s advantages in field-goal efficiency, assists, rebounds, and ball security. Cleveland made more three-pointers and shot better from the free-throw line, but those strengths were not enough to overcome the Thunder’s overall performance.
Ultimately, the game reinforced an important basketball principle: winning is not only about producing a high-scoring finish. Teams must maintain consistency throughout all four quarters, protect possessions, and make effective decisions when the pressure increases.
