Vanderbilt football vs alabama crimson tide football match player stats
The vanderbilt football vs alabama crimson tide football match player stats provide an interesting look at two SEC programs approaching their November 14 meeting from very different positions. Alabama enters the matchup ranked No. 7 nationally with a 7-2 overall record and a 5-2 conference record. Vanderbilt, meanwhile, arrives with a 4-5 overall record and a 1-5 SEC record, looking to use its home-field advantage at FirstBank Stadium in Nashville.
Although Alabama has the stronger overall record, individual player production makes this matchup more interesting than the standings alone suggest. Alabama quarterback Keelon Russell has recorded 2,263 passing yards and 18 touchdowns, while Vanderbilt’s leading receiver, Junior Sherrill, has accumulated 747 receiving yards. Those numbers highlight two different offensive strengths: Alabama’s quarterback production and Vanderbilt’s ability to generate receiving yards.
The matchup also features important defensive contributors. Alabama’s Caleb Woodson leads his team with 70 tackles, while Vanderbilt’s CJ Heard has recorded 63. On the pass-rushing side, Devan Thompkins has five sacks for Alabama, compared with four sacks from Vanderbilt’s Issa Ouattara.
This preview examines the available numbers in context, including quarterback efficiency, rushing production, receiving contributions, defensive performance, recent results, conference standings, and the factors that could influence the contest.
The central question is whether Vanderbilt can turn its home-field opportunity into a competitive game against an Alabama team with considerably stronger season-to-date results.
Game Information and Match Details
The game is listed as a Week 11 SEC contest. FirstBank Stadium will host the meeting in Nashville, Tennessee, giving Vanderbilt the advantage of playing in its home stadium.
| Match Detail | Information |
| Matchup | Alabama vs Vanderbilt |
| Date | November 14, 2026 |
| Competition | SEC |
| Week | Week 11 |
| Stadium | FirstBank Stadium |
| Location | Nashville, Tennessee |
| Alabama Ranking | No. 7 |
| Vanderbilt Ranking | Unranked |
| Alabama Record | 7-2 |
| Vanderbilt Record | 4-5 |
| Alabama SEC Record | 5-2 |
| Vanderbilt SEC Record | 1-5 |
| Broadcasting Network | SEC Network |
| Match Status | Scheduled |
| Listed Weather | 47°F |
Kickoff time clarification: The supplied ESPN information contains two different time listings: 10:45 PM in the main game information and 12:45 PM EST in the preview headline. These should not be treated as interchangeable. Readers should check the official game listing closer to kickoff for the confirmed start time and their local time zone.
The weather information lists a temperature of 47°F. Cooler conditions can affect player comfort, ball handling, and sideline preparation, although the actual conditions on game day may change.
2026 Season-to-Date Player Statistics Comparison
The most useful way to understand this matchup is to compare the leading contributors from both programs. The available figures show how each team has distributed its offensive production and which defenders have made the largest statistical contributions.
The following table presents the supplied season-to-date numbers.
| Statistical Category | Alabama | Vanderbilt |
| Leading Quarterback | Keelon Russell | Jared Curtis |
| Passing Yards | 2,263 | 1,657 |
| Completions | 165 | 145 |
| Passing Attempts | 245 | 224 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 18 | 8 |
| Interceptions | 5 | 8 |
| Leading Rusher | Traeshawn Brown | Sedrick Alexander |
| Rushing Yards | 359 | 333 |
| Rushing Attempts | 75 | 85 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 5 | 6 |
| Leading Receiver | Rico Scott | Junior Sherrill |
| Receiving Yards | 501 | 747 |
| Receptions | 31 | 56 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 3 | 4 |
| Sack Leader | Devan Thompkins | Issa Ouattara |
| Sacks | 5 | 4 |
| Tackles Leader | Caleb Woodson | CJ Heard |
| Total Tackles | 70 | 63 |
These statistics reveal several important differences.
- Alabama has a substantial advantage in passing yards and passing touchdowns.
- Vanderbilt’s leading receiver has produced more receiving yards and receptions than Alabama’s leading receiver.
- Sedrick Alexander has recorded more rushing attempts and rushing touchdowns than Traeshawn Brown.
- Alabama’s leading defender has recorded seven more tackles than Vanderbilt’s leader.
- Devan Thompkins has recorded one more sack than Issa Ouattara.
The numbers do not establish which team will win. They identify the individual matchups that deserve the most attention when evaluating the upcoming contest.
Alabama Crimson Tide Offensive Player Statistics
Alabama enters the November meeting with a productive offense that has shown the ability to generate points through the passing game and maintain pressure on opposing defenses.
Its 7-2 record reflects a stronger overall season than Vanderbilt’s, although the two losses show that Alabama has not been completely consistent.
Three offensive contributors deserve particular attention: quarterback Keelon Russell, running back Traeshawn Brown, and wide receiver Rico Scott.
Keelon Russell: Alabama’s Leading Quarterback
Keelon Russell is one of the most important players to monitor in this contest.
His supplied season statistics include:
| Passing Statistic | Total |
| Passing Yards | 2,263 |
| Completions | 165 |
| Attempts | 245 |
| Completion Percentage | 67.35% |
| Passing Touchdowns | 18 |
| Interceptions | 5 |
Russell’s completion percentage is approximately 67.3%, calculated by dividing 165 completions by 245 attempts.
This is an important figure because it provides additional context beyond total passing yards. A quarterback can accumulate significant yardage through a large number of attempts, but completion percentage offers a better indication of how consistently he completes passes.
Russell has completed more than two-thirds of his recorded attempts. His 18 touchdown passes also demonstrate his contribution to Alabama’s scoring production.
Another important statistic is his interception total.
Five interceptions across 245 attempts represent an interception rate of approximately 2.04% of his passes. This does not mean that every interception has the same impact, but it helps explain how often opposing defenses have managed to take possession away through the passing game.
Why Russell matters against Vanderbilt
Vanderbilt will need to manage several aspects of Russell’s game:
- Pressure him without regularly leaving receivers uncovered.
- Limit opportunities for Alabama to exploit open areas in the secondary.
- Prevent deep completions that quickly change field position.
- Force difficult third-down situations.
- Make Alabama sustain longer offensive drives.
If Russell receives sufficient protection, Alabama can use his passing production to control the tempo and create opportunities for its other offensive players.
For Vanderbilt, the challenge is not simply stopping the quarterback from throwing touchdowns. It is reducing his ability to complete passes consistently and preventing explosive plays.
Traeshawn Brown: Alabama’s Leading Rusher
Traeshawn Brown provides another important element of Alabama’s offensive production.
His supplied rushing numbers are:
| Rushing Statistic | Total |
| Rushing Attempts | 75 |
| Rushing Yards | 359 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 5 |
| Average Yards Per Carry | 4.79 |
Brown has averaged approximately 4.79 yards per rushing attempt.
This figure suggests that he has been productive enough to contribute meaningful yardage without requiring an unusually large number of carries.
His five rushing touchdowns are especially important. They show that his role has extended beyond moving the football between the 20-yard lines.
Running backs can become particularly valuable near the goal line, where defenses have fewer areas to protect and passing windows become smaller.
Brown’s potential contribution against Vanderbilt includes:
- Helping Alabama establish a balanced offense.
- Reducing pressure on Keelon Russell.
- Creating manageable third-down situations.
- Providing an option in short-yardage situations.
- Converting red-zone opportunities into touchdowns.
Vanderbilt’s defensive front must be prepared to stop Brown before he reaches the second level. If he consistently gains four or five yards, Alabama can remain unpredictable because the offense will not need to rely exclusively on passing plays.
Rico Scott: Alabama’s Leading Receiver
Rico Scott has been Alabama’s leading receiver according to the supplied statistics.
His season production is:
| Receiving Statistic | Total |
| Receptions | 31 |
| Receiving Yards | 501 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 3 |
| Average Yards Per Reception | 16.16 |
Scott’s average of approximately 16.16 yards per reception is a notable part of Alabama’s offensive profile.
It indicates that his receiving production has included meaningful yardage beyond short completions.
The distinction between reception volume and receiving efficiency is important.
A receiver with 56 catches may provide a quarterback with a dependable short-range option. A receiver with fewer catches but a higher average gain may be more effective at stretching the defense.
Scott’s numbers suggest that Alabama has received considerable yardage from his opportunities.
Against Vanderbilt, his ability to create separation could influence how the Commodores position their defensive backs.
If Vanderbilt commits additional defenders to covering Scott, other Alabama receivers may find more space. If the defense focuses on preventing short completions, Alabama could attempt to exploit deeper passing opportunities.
This makes Scott an important player in the overall offensive matchup.
Alabama’s Offensive Strengths
Looking at the three leading contributors together reveals a relatively balanced statistical profile.
- Russell provides the passing production.
- Brown offers a rushing option that can help control possession.
- Scott provides a productive receiving target with a strong average gain.
Alabama’s passing advantage is particularly clear.
Its leading quarterback has recorded 606 more passing yards than Vanderbilt’s leading quarterback. He has also produced 10 more touchdown passes.
However, the statistics should not be interpreted as proof that Alabama will automatically dominate every offensive category. Vanderbilt’s defense could change the matchup through pressure, coverage adjustments, and turnovers.
The more useful conclusion is that Alabama has several established offensive contributors and more passing production to work with entering the game.
Vanderbilt Commodores Offensive Player Statistics
Vanderbilt enters the matchup with a more challenging conference record, but its individual offensive statistics reveal some areas that Alabama cannot afford to overlook.
Jared Curtis, Sedrick Alexander, and Junior Sherrill are the leading offensive contributors identified in the supplied data.
The most interesting feature of Vanderbilt’s offensive profile is the receiving production of Junior Sherrill.
While Alabama holds a significant advantage in quarterback passing production, Vanderbilt’s leading receiver has accumulated 246 more receiving yards than Alabama’s leading receiver.
That difference creates an important individual matchup.
Jared Curtis: Vanderbilt’s Leading Quarterback
Jared Curtis is Vanderbilt’s leading quarterback in the supplied statistical information.
His numbers include:
| Passing Statistic | Total |
| Passing Yards | 1,657 |
| Completions | 145 |
| Attempts | 224 |
| Completion Percentage | 64.73% |
| Passing Touchdowns | 8 |
| Interceptions | 8 |
Curtis has completed approximately 64.7% of his recorded passing attempts.
Although this is lower than Russell’s completion percentage, the difference is approximately 2.6 percentage points.
The more significant statistical gap is in touchdown production and interceptions.
Curtis has recorded eight touchdown passes and eight interceptions. This creates a 1:1 touchdown-to-interception ratio.
Russell, by comparison, has recorded 18 touchdown passes and five interceptions.
This difference is one of the strongest indicators of Alabama’s advantage at quarterback.
However, quarterback statistics require context. Passing production can be affected by offensive protection, receiver availability, play selection, game situations, and the quality of opposing defenses.
Curtis’s performance against Alabama will depend on how effectively Vanderbilt creates passing opportunities while protecting him from defensive pressure.
What Curtis needs to accomplish
Vanderbilt would benefit from a controlled passing approach.
The offense should prioritize:
- Taking available short and intermediate completions.
- Avoiding unnecessary throws into heavily defended areas.
- Maintaining possession through productive drives.
- Using receiver movement to create defensive mismatches.
- Taking calculated opportunities for deeper passes.
Curtis does not necessarily need to match Russell’s passing-yard total for Vanderbilt to compete.
The more important requirement is protecting the football while converting enough possessions into scoring opportunities.
Sedrick Alexander: Vanderbilt’s Leading Rusher
Sedrick Alexander has recorded 333 rushing yards on 85 attempts.
His supplied statistics are:
| Rushing Statistic | Total |
| Rushing Attempts | 85 |
| Rushing Yards | 333 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 6 |
| Average Yards Per Carry | 3.92 |
Alexander averages approximately 3.92 yards per rushing attempt.
Although his average is below Brown’s 4.79 yards per carry, Alexander has recorded one more rushing touchdown.
This creates an interesting comparison.
Brown has accumulated 26 more rushing yards on 10 fewer attempts. Alexander, however, has scored six rushing touchdowns compared with Brown’s five.
The difference suggests that both players have contributed to their respective teams in different ways.
Brown has generated more yardage per attempt, while Alexander has been slightly more productive in terms of rushing touchdowns.
Alexander’s importance against Alabama
Vanderbilt cannot afford to make its offense entirely dependent on Curtis’s passing.
A productive rushing game can help in several ways:
- It reduces the number of obvious passing situations.
- It can slow down an aggressive defensive front.
- It gives the quarterback more manageable down-and-distance situations.
- It can help control the clock.
- It creates opportunities for play-action passing.
Alexander’s six rushing touchdowns make him an important option near the goal line.
If Vanderbilt can establish a dependable running game, Alabama may need to adjust its defensive positioning. That could create additional space for Sherrill and the other receivers.
Junior Sherrill: Vanderbilt’s Leading Receiver
Junior Sherrill is arguably one of the most interesting individual players in this matchup.
His receiving production stands out even when compared with Alabama’s leading receiver.
| Receiving Statistic | Total |
| Receptions | 56 |
| Receiving Yards | 747 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 4 |
| Average Yards Per Reception | 13.34 |
Sherrill has recorded 747 receiving yards on 56 receptions.
His average gain is approximately 13.34 yards per catch.
Compared with Rico Scott, Sherrill has:
- 246 more receiving yards.
- 25 more receptions.
- One more receiving touchdown.
This does not necessarily make Sherrill the better overall receiver. The statistics reflect production within different offensive systems and should be considered alongside playing opportunities and defensive matchups.
Nevertheless, his numbers show why Alabama must pay close attention to him.
Why Sherrill could influence the matchup
Vanderbilt’s passing game needs a dependable receiver who can help move the chains.
Sherrill’s 56 receptions demonstrate that he has been a frequently used target.
His 747 receiving yards also show that those opportunities have generated substantial production.
Against Alabama, his responsibilities could include:
- Finding open space against zone coverage.
- Creating separation from defensive backs.
- Providing a reliable target on third downs.
- Converting intermediate passes into additional yardage.
- Giving Curtis an option when the defense applies pressure.
If Alabama limits Sherrill’s involvement, Vanderbilt will need additional receivers to contribute.
If he continues producing at his season-to-date level, Vanderbilt may have a better opportunity to sustain offensive drives.
Vanderbilt’s Offensive Challenges
Vanderbilt’s offensive challenge is primarily about consistency.
The team has produced useful individual numbers, especially through Sherrill, but its 4-5 overall record indicates that the offense has not consistently translated its opportunities into wins.
The quarterback’s eight interceptions are another concern.
Against a ranked opponent, turnovers can become particularly costly because they provide the opposition with additional possessions and may create favorable field position.
Vanderbilt must therefore balance aggression with ball security.
The team needs enough passing production to challenge Alabama’s defense, but it cannot afford repeated mistakes.
Quarterback Comparison: Keelon Russell vs Jared Curtis
The quarterback matchup is one of the most important statistical comparisons ahead of November 14.
Both players have completed a substantial number of passes, but Russell has produced considerably more passing yardage and touchdowns.
| Quarterback Statistic | Keelon Russell | Jared Curtis |
| Passing Yards | 2,263 | 1,657 |
| Completions | 165 | 145 |
| Attempts | 245 | 224 |
| Completion Percentage | 67.35% | 64.73% |
| Touchdowns | 18 | 8 |
| Interceptions | 5 | 8 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 9.24 | 7.40 |
Several differences deserve attention.
Passing Yardage
Russell leads Curtis by 606 passing yards.
This represents a substantial difference in accumulated production.
It also suggests that Alabama has generated more offensive yardage through its leading quarterback.
Completion Percentage
Russell’s completion percentage is approximately 2.6 percentage points higher.
Although the difference may appear modest, consistent completions can help an offense remain on schedule.
Touchdown Production
Russell has thrown 18 touchdown passes, compared with Curtis’s eight.
That is a difference of 10 touchdowns.
This is particularly important because touchdowns directly contribute to scoring rather than simply moving the football downfield.
Turnover Management
Russell has thrown five interceptions, while Curtis has thrown eight.
Russell’s lower interception total is an advantage for Alabama.
However, interceptions are only one part of ball security. Fumbles, sacks, penalties, and poor decisions on critical downs can also influence a game.
Overall Quarterback Assessment
Based on the supplied numbers, Russell enters the matchup with the stronger statistical profile.
He leads in:
- Total passing yards.
- Completion percentage.
- Passing touchdowns.
- Yards per attempt.
- Interception avoidance.
Curtis still has the opportunity to make an impact, particularly if Vanderbilt’s receiving group creates favorable matchups.
The biggest question is whether Vanderbilt can give Curtis enough protection to operate efficiently against Alabama.
Running Back Comparison: Traeshawn Brown vs Sedrick Alexander
The rushing matchup is closer than the quarterback comparison.
| Rushing Category | Traeshawn Brown | Sedrick Alexander |
| Attempts | 75 | 85 |
| Rushing Yards | 359 | 333 |
| Touchdowns | 5 | 6 |
| Yards Per Carry | 4.79 | 3.92 |
Brown has accumulated more total rushing yards despite having fewer attempts.
His average of 4.79 yards per carry is approximately 0.87 yards higher than Alexander’s.
Alexander has recorded more rushing touchdowns, which indicates that he has contributed more frequently to Vanderbilt’s ground-game scoring.
Which Running Back Has the Statistical Advantage?
Brown holds the advantage in:
- Total rushing yards.
- Average yards per carry.
- Production despite fewer attempts.
Alexander leads in:
- Rushing attempts.
- Rushing touchdowns.
These differences matter because running backs can influence games in different ways.
A player who consistently generates yardage can help an offense maintain possession. A player who converts short-yardage opportunities can become especially valuable near the goal line.
For Alabama, Brown’s efficiency could help establish offensive balance.
For Vanderbilt, Alexander’s touchdown production offers an important scoring option.
Wide Receiver Comparison: Rico Scott vs Junior Sherrill
The leading receiver comparison is one area where Vanderbilt has a clear statistical advantage.
| Receiving Category | Rico Scott | Junior Sherrill |
| Receptions | 31 | 56 |
| Receiving Yards | 501 | 747 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 4 |
| Yards Per Reception | 16.16 | 13.34 |
Sherrill leads in total receiving yards, receptions, and touchdowns.
Scott, however, has the higher average yards per reception.
This distinction offers a useful way to understand their different statistical contributions.
Sherrill’s production suggests a higher volume of involvement in Vanderbilt’s passing offense.
Scott’s average indicates that his receptions have generated more yardage per catch.
Why This Matchup Matters
The two receivers could influence their teams in different ways.
Sherrill may be particularly important for sustaining Vanderbilt drives through consistent targets.
Scott could help Alabama generate larger gains when the defense allows opportunities downfield.
The key defensive question is whether each team can limit the opposing receiver without sacrificing coverage elsewhere.
Alabama must identify ways to reduce Sherrill’s involvement.
Vanderbilt must prevent Scott from turning individual catches into major offensive gains.
Neither receiver should be judged by total yardage alone. Catch volume, average gain, touchdown production, and the quality of defensive coverage all matter.
Defensive Player Statistics: Alabama vs Vanderbilt
Offensive production receives much of the attention before major college football games, but defensive statistics can explain why one team has a stronger chance of controlling the contest.
Alabama and Vanderbilt both have identifiable defensive contributors.
The supplied statistics highlight Devan Thompkins and Caleb Woodson for Alabama, along with Issa Ouattara and CJ Heard for Vanderbilt.
| Defensive Category | Alabama | Vanderbilt |
| Sack Leader | Devan Thompkins | Issa Ouattara |
| Total Sacks | 5 | 4 |
| Tackles Leader | Caleb Woodson | CJ Heard |
| Total Tackles | 70 | 63 |
Devan Thompkins: Alabama’s Sack Leader
Devan Thompkins has recorded five sacks.
Sacks are important because they stop offensive progress and can push an opponent into difficult passing situations.
A successful pass rush can:
- Reduce the quarterback’s time to make decisions.
- Disrupt passing rhythm.
- Create negative-yardage plays.
- Increase the possibility of forced mistakes.
- Make third-down conversions more difficult.
Against Vanderbilt, Thompkins could be an important contributor to Alabama’s defensive approach.
His ability to pressure Curtis may reduce the time available for Sherrill and the other receivers to create separation.
However, sacks are not the only measure of pass-rushing performance. Quarterback pressures, quarterback hits, and the ability to disrupt plays without recording a sack also matter.
Caleb Woodson: Alabama’s Tackles Leader
Caleb Woodson leads Alabama with 70 tackles.
This is seven more than Vanderbilt’s CJ Heard.
Tackles indicate involvement in defensive stops, but the total does not independently establish a player’s overall defensive quality.
A defender’s responsibilities, position, playing time, and opportunities all influence tackle totals.
Woodson’s 70 tackles nevertheless make him an important player to watch.
His involvement could become particularly valuable if Vanderbilt attempts to establish its rushing game through Alexander.
Issa Ouattara: Vanderbilt’s Sack Leader
Issa Ouattara has recorded four sacks.
He trails Thompkins by one sack, but his role could be important in Vanderbilt’s attempt to slow Alabama’s passing attack.
Vanderbilt needs defensive pressure to prevent Russell from operating comfortably.
If Ouattara can disrupt the pocket, Alabama may have fewer opportunities to develop longer passing plays.
This is especially important because Russell has accumulated 2,263 passing yards and 18 touchdowns.
Vanderbilt cannot rely only on its secondary to contain that production.
The defensive front must contribute by creating pressure and forcing difficult decisions.
CJ Heard: Vanderbilt’s Tackles Leader
CJ Heard has recorded 63 tackles.
He leads Vanderbilt in this category and is one of the defense’s key statistical contributors.
His involvement may be particularly important against Alabama’s balanced offense.
The Commodores must defend both the run and the pass. If Alabama can gain consistent yardage through Brown, Vanderbilt may be forced to bring additional defenders closer to the line of scrimmage.
That could create more opportunities for Russell to attack the passing game.
Heard’s tackling contribution will therefore be worth monitoring as part of Vanderbilt’s overall defensive performance.
Key Statistical Matchups That Could Decide the Game
Individual player comparisons become more useful when connected to actual game situations.
Several specific matchups could influence how the November 14 contest develops.
1. Alabama’s Passing Attack Against Vanderbilt’s Secondary
Alabama’s 2,263 passing yards and 18 touchdown passes give the team a significant statistical advantage at quarterback.
Vanderbilt needs to prevent Russell from finding open receivers consistently.
The defense should focus on:
- Limiting deep completions.
- Maintaining disciplined coverage.
- Applying pressure without unnecessary penalties.
- Forcing Alabama into third-and-long situations.
- Preventing easy touchdown opportunities.
If Vanderbilt cannot disrupt Alabama’s passing rhythm, the Commodores may struggle to keep pace.
2. Junior Sherrill Against Alabama’s Defensive Coverage
Sherrill’s 747 receiving yards are a meaningful part of Vanderbilt’s offensive production.
He has recorded 246 more receiving yards than Alabama’s leading receiver.
This gives Vanderbilt a legitimate individual offensive strength entering the matchup.
Alabama must prevent Sherrill from becoming a reliable outlet on important downs.
If he receives enough opportunities to move the chains, Vanderbilt could maintain possession for longer periods.
3. Vanderbilt’s Pass Protection Against Alabama’s Rush
Devan Thompkins has five sacks, while Vanderbilt’s quarterback has thrown eight interceptions.
These numbers create an important defensive opportunity for Alabama.
The Crimson Tide will want to pressure Curtis and force him into uncomfortable passing situations.
Vanderbilt must respond with disciplined blocking and sensible offensive decisions.
Repeated pressure could make it difficult for the Commodores to develop longer plays.
4. Rushing Efficiency and Possession
Brown averages 4.79 yards per carry, compared with Alexander’s 3.92.
Alabama therefore has the better average rushing production among the two leading backs.
If Brown can maintain that level of efficiency, Alabama may be able to reduce its dependence on passing plays.
Vanderbilt needs Alexander to provide a productive alternative.
A balanced rushing attack can make an offense less predictable and help control possession.
5. Turnovers and Field Position
Russell has thrown five interceptions, compared with Curtis’s eight.
This is another important difference.
Turnovers can change the direction of a game even when one team has the stronger overall statistical profile.
Vanderbilt needs to protect the football and avoid giving Alabama additional possessions.
Alabama, meanwhile, should look for opportunities to create defensive pressure without sacrificing coverage discipline.
Recent Form: Alabama’s Last Five Games
Recent results provide another way to evaluate the two teams before their meeting.
Alabama has won three of its last five games, while Vanderbilt has won only one during the same period.
Alabama’s Recent Results
| Date | Opponent | Result | Outcome |
| November 8, 2026 | LSU | 31-13 | Win |
| October 25, 2026 | Texas A&M | 31-20 | Win |
| October 18, 2026 | Tennessee | 10-26 | Loss |
| October 11, 2026 | Georgia | 17-20 | Loss |
| October 3, 2026 | Mississippi State | 56-23 | Win |
Alabama’s latest result was a 31-13 victory over LSU on November 8.
That result is important because the Crimson Tide enter the Vanderbilt matchup following a conference victory.
The team also recorded a 31-20 win over Texas A&M on October 25.
However, the two consecutive losses against Tennessee and Georgia demonstrate that Alabama has experienced periods of inconsistency.
The 56-23 victory over Mississippi State earlier in October also highlights the team’s ability to produce a high-scoring performance.
What Alabama’s recent form tells us
Alabama has demonstrated the ability to recover from difficult results.
Its three victories in the last five games provide a positive foundation entering Week 11.
The main concern is consistency against strong opponents. The losses against Tennessee and Georgia show that Alabama can be challenged when its opponent successfully disrupts its preferred style of play.
Against Vanderbilt, the Crimson Tide will want to maintain the momentum generated by their latest win.
Vanderbilt’s Recent Results
| Date | Opponent | Result | Outcome |
| November 8, 2026 | Mississippi State | 25-23 | Win |
| October 25, 2026 | Kentucky | 17-34 | Loss |
| October 18, 2026 | Arkansas | 21-31 | Loss |
| October 11, 2026 | Ole Miss | 17-52 | Loss |
| October 3, 2026 | Georgia | 14-38 | Loss |
Vanderbilt’s latest result was a narrow 25-23 victory against Mississippi State.
That win is important because it ended a difficult sequence of four consecutive losses.
Before defeating Mississippi State, Vanderbilt had lost to Kentucky, Arkansas, Ole Miss, and Georgia.
The defeat against Ole Miss was particularly challenging, with Vanderbilt allowing 52 points.
The team also struggled defensively against Georgia, allowing 38 points.
These results suggest that Vanderbilt needs to improve its defensive consistency before facing Alabama.
What Vanderbilt’s recent form tells us
Vanderbilt enters the matchup with an opportunity to build confidence after its latest victory.
The Mississippi State result could provide some positive momentum, but the team must address the defensive problems reflected in its previous four games.
Against Alabama, Vanderbilt will need to perform more consistently across all four quarters.
A strong opening period will not be enough if the defense cannot maintain its discipline later in the game.
Recent Form Comparison
| Category | Alabama | Vanderbilt |
| Wins in Last Five | 3 | 1 |
| Losses in Last Five | 2 | 4 |
| Latest Result | Win | Win |
| Latest Opponent | LSU | Mississippi State |
| Latest Score | 31-13 | 25-23 |
| Points Scored in Last Five | 145 | 94 |
| Points Allowed in Last Five | 102 | 178 |
The scoring comparison provides additional context.
Alabama has scored 145 points and allowed 102 across its last five listed games.
Vanderbilt has scored 94 points and allowed 178.
That creates a substantial difference in recent offensive and defensive performance.
Alabama has averaged 29 points scored per game across those five results. Vanderbilt has averaged 18.8.
Defensively, Alabama has allowed an average of 20.4 points, while Vanderbilt has allowed 35.6.
These calculations are based on the five supplied results, not projected figures for the upcoming game.
SEC Standings Before the Matchup
Conference standings provide a broader picture of each team’s position within the Southeastern Conference.
| Standings Category | Alabama | Vanderbilt |
| National Ranking | No. 7 | Unranked |
| Overall Record | 7-2 | 4-5 |
| SEC Record | 5-2 | 1-5 |
| SEC Position | 2nd | 16th |
| Overall Wins | 7 | 4 |
| Overall Losses | 2 | 5 |
Alabama is listed second in the SEC standings with a 5-2 conference record.
Vanderbilt is listed sixteenth with a 1-5 conference record.
The difference is significant because conference results reflect how teams have performed against opponents within the same competition.
Alabama has won five of its seven SEC games, while Vanderbilt has won only one of its six.
The standings also provide context for the importance of the November 14 meeting.
Alabama is looking to strengthen its position near the top of the conference.
Vanderbilt, meanwhile, has an opportunity to improve its conference record and demonstrate progress against one of the SEC’s ranked programs.
ESPN Matchup Predictor and Pregame Expectations
The supplied ESPN Analytics matchup predictor gives Alabama a 94.8% winning probability and Vanderbilt a 5.2% probability.
| Team | Matchup Predictor |
| Alabama Crimson Tide | 94.8% |
| Vanderbilt Commodores | 5.2% |
Source: ESPN Analytics figures supplied for the scheduled matchup.
These figures indicate that Alabama is a substantial statistical favorite.
However, a matchup predictor is not a final result or a guarantee.
A probability of 94.8% means the model strongly favors Alabama based on its underlying inputs. It does not mean that Vanderbilt has no chance of winning.
Football games can be influenced by factors that are difficult to predict precisely, including:
- Injuries and player availability.
- Turnovers.
- Special-teams performance.
- Offensive penalties.
- Quarterback pressure.
- Red-zone efficiency.
- Weather conditions.
- Coaching decisions.
Vanderbilt’s home-field advantage is another factor worth considering.
Playing at FirstBank Stadium could provide the Commodores with additional support and familiarity with the venue.
Nevertheless, the supplied predictor reflects a major advantage for Alabama.
Why Alabama Is the Favorite
Several statistical factors support Alabama’s position:
- Better overall record: Alabama is 7-2, compared with Vanderbilt’s 4-5.
- Stronger conference performance: Alabama has a 5-2 SEC record, while Vanderbilt has a 1-5 record.
- Quarterback production: Russell leads Curtis in passing yards and touchdowns.
- Recent form: Alabama has won three of its last five games.
- Defensive production: Alabama’s leading tackler and sack leader have slightly higher totals than their Vanderbilt counterparts.
How Vanderbilt Could Make the Game Competitive
Despite the statistical gap, Vanderbilt has some areas that could create opportunities.
Sherrill’s receiving production is one of the clearest examples.
His 747 receiving yards give Vanderbilt a productive target who could challenge Alabama’s secondary.
Alexander’s six rushing touchdowns also provide an alternative scoring option.
The most important factor, however, is turnover management.
If Vanderbilt can protect the football, sustain drives, and prevent Alabama from generating short-field scoring opportunities, the game could become more competitive than the pregame prediction suggests.
Betting Market Information and Its Statistical Meaning
The supplied pregame information includes a point spread, total-points line, and moneyline.
These figures describe market expectations rather than actual player performance.
| Betting Market | Listed Odds |
| Alabama Spread | -17.5 (-110) |
| Vanderbilt Spread | +17.5 (-110) |
| Over 52.5 Points | -105 |
| Under 52.5 Points | -115 |
| Alabama Moneyline | -1050 |
| Vanderbilt Moneyline | +675 |
The spread lists Alabama as a 17.5-point favorite.
In simple terms, the market expects Alabama to win by more than two touchdowns, although the spread is not a prediction of the exact final margin.
The total-points line is 52.5.
This represents the combined scoring threshold used in the listed market.
The moneyline also strongly favors Alabama.
These numbers should be treated as pregame market information, not confirmed outcomes or guaranteed predictions. Odds can change before kickoff, and market prices do not establish the statistical performance of individual players.
How the Betting Figures Relate to Player Statistics
The spread and total become easier to understand when considered alongside the season-to-date numbers.
Alabama’s quarterback has thrown 18 touchdowns, while Vanderbilt’s has thrown eight.
That difference supports the view that Alabama has a more productive passing offense.
However, Vanderbilt’s leading receiver has produced more receiving yards than Alabama’s leading receiver.
This demonstrates why team-level expectations and individual player comparisons are not always identical.
A team can be a strong favorite while an opposing player still leads a particular statistical category.
For readers primarily interested in player performance, passing yards, receptions, rushing efficiency, touchdowns, tackles, and sacks provide more direct information than betting lines.
FirstBank Stadium: Home-Field Context
FirstBank Stadium in Nashville, Tennessee, will host the November 14 contest.
Playing at home gives Vanderbilt an opportunity to compete in a familiar environment.
Home-field advantage can influence college football through crowd support, communication, player comfort, and familiarity with the stadium.
However, it should not be treated as an automatic competitive advantage large enough to overcome every statistical difference.
Alabama’s experience against SEC opponents and its stronger conference record make it a difficult opponent regardless of the venue.
Why the Venue Matters
Several aspects of the stadium environment could affect the contest:
- Crowd atmosphere: Home supporters can create an energetic environment for Vanderbilt.
- Communication: Crowd noise can affect offensive communication, especially during visiting-team possessions.
- Player familiarity: Vanderbilt players are accustomed to their home surroundings.
- Travel: Alabama must travel to Nashville rather than play at its own stadium.
- Weather: The supplied forecast information lists 47°F, although actual game-day conditions may differ.
Cooler temperatures do not automatically favor either team.
Both offenses will need to execute their normal responsibilities while adjusting to the conditions on the field.
For Vanderbilt, the most important objective is to use its home environment to start confidently and maintain competitive energy throughout the game.
Three Statistical Areas to Monitor During the Game
Because the matchup is still scheduled, the final individual performances are not available. However, there are three particularly useful statistical areas to monitor when the game begins.
1. Quarterback Efficiency
Passing yards alone do not tell the complete story.
Readers should monitor:
- Completion percentage.
- Passing touchdowns.
- Interceptions.
- Yards per attempt.
- Third-down passing efficiency.
Russell’s season-to-date numbers give Alabama an advantage entering the game.
Curtis’s performance will be especially important in determining whether Vanderbilt can sustain drives.
2. Rushing Production
The rushing comparison provides a useful indicator of offensive balance.
Brown averages 4.79 yards per carry, while Alexander averages 3.92.
During the game, readers should consider whether those averages translate into effective rushing production against the opposing defensive front.
A running back who consistently gains positive yardage can make the offense more difficult to defend.
3. Defensive Pressure and Tackling
Sacks and tackles provide an initial picture of defensive involvement.
However, the game-day statistics should also include pressures, tackles for loss, quarterback hits, and defensive turnovers where available.
Thompkins and Ouattara will be particularly interesting players to monitor because both lead their teams in sacks.
Woodson and Heard are also important contributors because they lead their respective teams in tackles.
How to Read the Official Player Box Score After Kickoff
Readers searching for player statistics often want more than a list of passing yards or touchdowns.
A complete college football box score should be interpreted by separating the major statistical categories.
Passing Statistics
Look for:
- Completions and attempts.
- Passing yards.
- Passing touchdowns.
- Interceptions.
- Longest completion.
- Quarterback rating, if provided.
These numbers show how effectively each quarterback operated.
Rushing Statistics
Look for:
- Total attempts.
- Rushing yards.
- Average yards per carry.
- Rushing touchdowns.
- Longest run.
These figures help explain which team controlled the ground game.
Receiving Statistics
Look for:
- Receptions.
- Receiving yards.
- Average yards per reception.
- Receiving touchdowns.
- Longest reception.
These numbers help identify which receivers had the greatest offensive impact.
Defensive Statistics
Look for:
- Total tackles.
- Solo tackles.
- Assisted tackles.
- Sacks.
- Tackles for loss.
- Interceptions.
- Forced fumbles.
- Fumble recoveries.
These statistics help explain how each defense disrupted the opposing offense.
Team Statistics
Individual numbers should also be considered alongside team-level information.
Important categories include:
- Total offensive yards.
- Time of possession.
- Third-down conversion rate.
- Fourth-down conversion rate.
- Turnovers.
- Penalties.
- Red-zone efficiency.
- Total first downs.
For example, a quarterback could finish with impressive passing yards while his team loses because of turnovers and poor red-zone execution.
Likewise, a running back could record relatively few yards but score an important touchdown that changes the game’s outcome.
This is why a complete box score provides more meaningful information than a single player’s statistical line.
Where to Find the Official Vanderbilt vs Alabama Game Statistics
For the most accurate postgame information, readers should distinguish between pregame season statistics and the official game box score.
The supplied ESPN listing identifies the game as scheduled for November 14, 2026.
The official ESPN game preview and matchup information can be used to follow the listed contest and check for updated information.
Once the game has been completed, the final box score should be used to establish:
- Which quarterback recorded the most passing yards.
- Which running back led in rushing production.
- Which receiver recorded the most receptions.
- Which player scored the most touchdowns.
- Which defender recorded the most tackles.
- Which defense recorded the most sacks.
- Which team won the turnover battle.
Until the final box score becomes available, it would be inaccurate to describe the season-to-date figures in this article as statistics recorded during the Alabama-Vanderbilt game itself.
This distinction is particularly important for sports statistics searches because pregame player profiles and completed game reports serve different purposes.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. When will Alabama play Vanderbilt in 2026?
Alabama is scheduled to face Vanderbilt on November 14, 2026, at FirstBank Stadium in Nashville, Tennessee. The matchup is listed as a Week 11 SEC contest.
2. Who is Alabama’s leading quarterback against Vanderbilt?
Keelon Russell is Alabama’s leading quarterback in the supplied season-to-date statistics. He has recorded 2,263 passing yards, 18 touchdown passes, and five interceptions on 165 completions from 245 attempts.
3. Who is Vanderbilt’s leading receiver in 2026?
Junior Sherrill leads Vanderbilt’s supplied receiving statistics with 747 receiving yards, 56 receptions, and four receiving touchdowns.
4. Which team is favored to win Alabama vs Vanderbilt?
Alabama is the strong favorite according to the supplied ESPN Analytics matchup predictor. Alabama has a 94.8% winning probability, while Vanderbilt has a 5.2% probability.
5. Who leads the rushing statistics for Alabama and Vanderbilt?
Traeshawn Brown leads Alabama with 359 rushing yards and five touchdowns. Sedrick Alexander leads Vanderbilt with 333 rushing yards and six touchdowns.
6. Has the Alabama vs Vanderbilt football game already been played?
No. According to the supplied November 9, 2026 information, the game is scheduled for November 14, 2026. Final game-specific player statistics are therefore not available yet. The figures discussed in this article represent season-to-date performances.
Conclusion
The upcoming Alabama vs Vanderbilt matchup presents a significant SEC challenge for the Commodores. Alabama enters the November 14 contest with a 7-2 overall record, a 5-2 conference record, and a No. 7 national ranking. Vanderbilt has a 4-5 overall record and a 1-5 SEC record.
The individual player numbers explain much of the difference between the programs.
Keelon Russell has established a strong statistical advantage at quarterback with 2,263 passing yards and 18 touchdowns. Traeshawn Brown has contributed 359 rushing yards, while Rico Scott has recorded 501 receiving yards.
Vanderbilt also has several productive players. Jared Curtis has accumulated 1,657 passing yards, Sedrick Alexander has scored six rushing touchdowns, and Junior Sherrill has produced an impressive 747 receiving yards.
On defense, Caleb Woodson leads Alabama with 70 tackles, while CJ Heard has recorded 63 for Vanderbilt. Devan Thompkins and Issa Ouattara lead their respective teams in sacks with five and four.
Recent form also favors Alabama. The Crimson Tide have won three of their last five games, compared with Vanderbilt’s single victory during the same period. ESPN Analytics’ supplied matchup predictor further reflects the difference, giving Alabama a 94.8% winning probability.
However, Vanderbilt’s home-field advantage and Sherrill’s receiving production provide interesting factors to monitor.
Ultimately, the most important statistical areas will be quarterback efficiency, rushing production, receiving contributions, defensive pressure, and turnover management. These categories will help explain how the contest develops once the teams take the field.
The final player statistics should only be established after the November 14 game has been completed and an official box score becomes available.