Orlando Magic vs Knicks Match Player Stats
The Orlando Magic vs Knicks match player stats from November 13, 2025, reveal how Orlando delivered an impressive 124-107 victory over New York at Madison Square Garden. Franz Wagner led the Magic with 28 points and nine rebounds, while Desmond Bane contributed 22 points and eight assists. On the Knicks’ side, Jalen Brunson recorded a game-high 31 points, but his scoring performance was not enough to prevent a home defeat.
The contest was particularly interesting because New York entered the game with an unbeaten home record, while Orlando was looking to improve its position in the Eastern Conference. The Magic controlled the first half, built a substantial advantage, and successfully handled New York’s late attempts to close the gap.
Beyond the final score, the numbers highlight several important differences between the teams. Orlando shot more efficiently from the field, collected 12 additional rebounds, recorded nine more assists, and made better use of its scoring opportunities. New York had a stronger fourth quarter, but its slow start created a deficit that proved difficult to overcome.
This detailed breakdown examines the final score, individual performances, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter results, shooting efficiency, and the most important lessons from the matchup.
Orlando Magic vs Knicks Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The November 13 meeting between Orlando and New York took place at Madison Square Garden in New York. The Magic entered the contest looking to establish greater consistency, while the Knicks wanted to protect their excellent home record.
Orlando eventually secured a convincing 17-point victory, finishing with 124 points against New York’s 107.
Here are the essential details from the game.
| Match Information | Details |
| Competition | NBA 2025-26 Regular Season |
| Matchup | Orlando Magic vs New York Knicks |
| Date | November 13, 2025 |
| Venue | Madison Square Garden |
| Location | New York, NY |
| Attendance | 19,812 |
| Final Score | Orlando 124, New York 107 |
| Winning Team | Orlando Magic |
| Losing Team | New York Knicks |
| Match Status | Final |
| Orlando Record | 6-6 |
| New York Record | 7-4 |
| Orlando Leading Scorer | Franz Wagner |
| New York Leading Scorer | Jalen Brunson |
| Orlando Leading Rebounder | Franz Wagner |
| New York Leading Rebounder | Karl-Anthony Towns |
| Orlando Leading Playmaker | Desmond Bane |
| New York Leading Playmaker | Jalen Brunson |
The result was significant because Orlando became the first team to defeat New York at home during the season up to that point. The Knicks had previously won their first seven home games.
The Magic also demonstrated that their offense could produce an effective performance against a team that had been scoring heavily during its recent winning streak.
Final Score by Quarter
The scoring pattern explains why Orlando controlled the contest for most of the evening.
| Quarter | Orlando Magic | New York Knicks |
| First Quarter | 30 | 23 |
| Second Quarter | 32 | 19 |
| Third Quarter | 29 | 31 |
| Fourth Quarter | 33 | 34 |
| Final Score | 124 | 107 |
Orlando won the first two quarters by a combined margin of 20 points. That advantage became the foundation of its victory.
New York responded after halftime, scoring 31 points in the third quarter and 34 in the fourth. However, the Knicks could not completely recover from their first-half offensive struggles.
The most important period was the second quarter. Orlando scored 32 points while restricting New York to only 19. This allowed the Magic to establish a comfortable halftime advantage and put pressure on the home team.
Orlando Magic Player Stats and Individual Performances
Orlando’s victory was built around balanced scoring, effective ball movement, and strong contributions from its bench. Franz Wagner was the leading performer, but the supporting cast also played an important role.
The Magic finished with six players scoring at least 10 points. This distribution made it difficult for New York to concentrate its defensive attention on one player.
Franz Wagner: Orlando’s Leading Performer
Cleveland Cavaliers v Orlando Magic – Game Six
Franz Wagner
Magic leading scorer
28 PTS
9 rebounds · 4 assists · 2 steals · 1 block
Wagner delivered one of his most important performances of the early season. He scored 28 points while shooting 10-for-22 from the field, including two successful three-pointers.
His complete shooting line was:
- Field goals: 10-of-22
- Three-pointers: 2-of-7
- Free throws: 6-of-8
- Rebounds: 9
- Assists: 4
- Steals: 2
- Blocks: 1
- Turnovers: 0
- Plus/minus: +21
Wagner’s contribution went beyond scoring. He helped Orlando maintain offensive pressure, collected important rebounds, and created opportunities for teammates.
His nine rebounds were particularly valuable because they helped the Magic control possessions against New York’s frontcourt.
Another important detail was his zero turnovers. For a player carrying a major offensive responsibility, protecting the basketball while producing 28 points was an excellent achievement.
Wagner also finished with a +21 plus/minus. This means Orlando outscored New York by 21 points during his time on the court. It does not mean he personally scored 21 additional points, but it demonstrates how effective the team was during his minutes.
Desmond Bane: Scoring and Playmaking Combined
Desmond Bane proving Orlando Magic right by using a flaw to reveal his true strength
Desmond Bane
Leading playmaker
22 PTS
6 rebounds · 8 assists · 3 three-pointers
Bane was another major reason Orlando controlled the game. He finished with 22 points, six rebounds, and eight assists.
His shooting numbers included:
- Field goals: 7-of-15
- Three-pointers: 3-of-6
- Free throws: 5-of-5
- Rebounds: 6
- Assists: 8
- Turnovers: 3
- Plus/minus: +13
Bane’s eight assists were the highest total recorded by any player in the game.
His ability to contribute as both a scorer and a facilitator gave Orlando another offensive option. When New York focused on Wagner, Bane could create scoring opportunities through his passing and perimeter shooting.
His three successful three-pointers also helped stretch the Knicks’ defense. Defenders could not comfortably leave him open on the perimeter without risking another scoring opportunity.
Bane’s perfect free-throw shooting was another positive. He converted all five attempts, helping Orlando maintain its advantage whenever New York committed fouls.
Anthony Black: Valuable Bench Production
Anthony Black must step out of the shadows for the Orlando Magic
Anthony Black
Third-highest Magic scorer
17 PTS
3 rebounds · 3 assists · 2 steals
Anthony Black supplied an important scoring contribution from the bench, finishing with 17 points in 23 minutes.
His shooting performance was particularly efficient:
- Field goals: 7-of-11
- Three-pointers: 3-of-5
- Field-goal percentage: 63.6%
- Three-point percentage: 60%
- Rebounds: 3
- Assists: 3
- Steals: 2
- Blocks: 1
Black’s 17 points were important because they reduced Orlando’s dependence on its starting lineup.
He made seven of his 11 field-goal attempts and converted three of five attempts from beyond the arc. That efficiency allowed him to provide meaningful scoring without needing a large number of possessions.
His contribution also illustrates the importance of bench depth in NBA games. A reserve player who can score efficiently and defend multiple positions gives the starting group valuable support.
Wendell Carter Jr.: Frontcourt Contribution
New York Knicks v Orlando Magic
Wendell Carter Jr.
13 PTS
8 rebounds · 2 assists
Carter Jr. contributed 13 points and eight rebounds. He was especially effective around the basket, making six of his eight field-goal attempts.
His shooting efficiency helped Orlando convert interior opportunities instead of relying exclusively on perimeter scoring.
Carter also helped the Magic compete physically against Karl-Anthony Towns and Mitchell Robinson.
Although he recorded four turnovers, his offensive production and rebounding remained valuable parts of Orlando’s overall performance.
Jalen Suggs: Defensive Energy and Scoring
Jalen Suggs Injury Status For Bucks vs Magic
Jalen Suggs
14 PTS
2 rebounds · 3 assists · 1 steal · 1 block
Suggs added 14 points while providing defensive energy.
His shooting numbers were four successful field goals from 10 attempts, one three-pointer from five attempts, and five successful free throws from six attempts.
His three-point shooting was not particularly efficient, but his ability to attack the basket and earn free throws helped him maintain offensive value.
Suggs also played a useful role in controlling New York’s perimeter opportunities. His defensive activity helped Orlando challenge ball handlers and disrupt the Knicks’ rhythm.
Goga Bitadze and the Orlando Bench
Goga Bitadze was another important contributor. He scored 10 points in 16 minutes and made both of his field-goal attempts.
His free-throw performance was equally impressive, as he converted all six attempts.
Bitadze also recorded three rebounds and finished with a +23 plus/minus, the highest figure among the players highlighted in Orlando’s box score.
Tristan da Silva contributed eight points, five rebounds, and two assists. He also recorded a +22 plus/minus in his 22 minutes.
Jett Howard added five points, while Jonathan Isaac scored three points and collected five rebounds.
Tyus Jones finished without scoring but recorded three assists and two steals.
These contributions demonstrate that Orlando received useful production from several players rather than relying on its leading scorers alone.
Orlando Magic Player Statistics Table
The following table summarizes the principal individual performances.
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | FG |
| Franz Wagner | 28 | 9 | 4 | 10/22 |
| Desmond Bane | 22 | 6 | 8 | 7/15 |
| Anthony Black | 17 | 3 | 3 | 7/11 |
| Jalen Suggs | 14 | 2 | 3 | 4/10 |
| Wendell Carter Jr. | 13 | 8 | 2 | 6/8 |
| Goga Bitadze | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2/2 |
| Tristan da Silva | 8 | 5 | 2 | 3/5 |
| Jett Howard | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2/4 |
| Paolo Banchero | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1/4 |
| Jonathan Isaac | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0/3 |
| Tyus Jones | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0/2 |
| Noah Penda | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0/0 |
| Jase Richardson | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0/0 |
FG represents successful field goals and total field-goal attempts. Players with limited playing time did not necessarily have enough opportunities to influence the final score.
New York Knicks Player Stats and Individual Performances
New York had several strong individual performances, especially from its leading scorer, Jalen Brunson. However, the team’s overall shooting efficiency and first-half production were not sufficient to overcome Orlando’s advantage.
The Knicks scored 107 points, with Brunson accounting for 31 of them.
Karl-Anthony Towns also delivered a double-double, while Miles McBride provided additional scoring support.
Jalen Brunson: Game-High 31 Points
Orlando Magic v New York Knicks
Jalen Brunson
Game-high scorer
31 PTS
6 assists · 1 steal
Brunson was New York’s most productive offensive player. He finished with 31 points and six assists, demonstrating his importance to the Knicks’ scoring system.
His scoring performance was impressive, particularly considering that Orlando maintained defensive pressure throughout the contest.
Brunson scored 16 points in the first half, but the rest of the Knicks’ players combined for only 26 points during that period.
This imbalance made New York’s offense easier to defend. Orlando could concentrate on limiting the supporting players while remaining aware of Brunson’s ability to create shots.
Brunson also experienced an injury scare late in the game after turning his right ankle during a drive to the basket. He later fouled out, further limiting New York’s ability to make a final comeback.
Despite the defeat, his 31-point performance remained the highest individual scoring total in the matchup.
Karl-Anthony Towns: Double-Double Performance
Will Karl-Anthony Towns play today for the Knicks against the Raptors? – AS USA
Karl-Anthony Towns
Knicks leading rebounder
15 PTS
12 rebounds · 4 assists
Towns recorded 15 points and 12 rebounds, giving him a double-double.
His shooting performance included six successful field goals from 15 attempts, one three-pointer from four attempts, and two successful free throws.
He also contributed four assists.
Towns’ 12 rebounds were the highest individual total recorded by either team. His presence on the glass helped New York remain competitive in the frontcourt despite Orlando’s overall rebounding advantage.
However, his individual rebounding success did not translate into a team rebounding victory.
The Knicks finished with 37 total rebounds, compared with Orlando’s 49.
This difference illustrates why individual statistics should always be considered alongside team performance. A player can dominate one statistical category without his team winning the overall battle.
Miles McBride: Additional Scoring Support
Orlando Magic v New York Knicks
Miles McBride
11 PTS
Third-highest Knicks scorer
McBride scored 11 points, making him New York’s third-highest scorer in the game.
His contribution was useful, but the Knicks needed more consistent scoring from their supporting players.
Brunson’s 31 points and Towns’ 15 points represented a substantial portion of New York’s total offense. McBride’s 11 points added support, but the overall distribution was not enough to match Orlando’s balanced attack.
Other Important Knicks Contributors
OG Anunoby, Mikal Bridges, Mitchell Robinson, and the New York bench were also part of the team’s overall performance.
Anunoby’s defensive responsibilities were important in a matchup featuring several capable Orlando scorers. Bridges was another key perimeter option, while Robinson provided frontcourt size and rebounding support.
However, the available headline statistics do not establish a complete individual box-score line for every New York player. It would be misleading to assign exact point, rebound, or assist totals without verifying those entries.
The most reliable individual figures from the supplied game data are:
| Knicks Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Jalen Brunson | 31 | Not specified | 6 |
| Karl-Anthony Towns | 15 | 12 | 4 |
| Miles McBride | 11 | Not specified | Not specified |
The distinction matters because a trustworthy statistical report should separate confirmed player numbers from information that has not been established.
Orlando Magic vs New York Knicks Team Stats Comparison
Individual performances explain part of the result, but the team statistics reveal why Orlando won by 17 points.
The Magic performed better in several important categories, including field-goal percentage, three-point shooting, free-throw percentage, rebounds, and assists.
Complete Team Statistics
| Statistical Category | Orlando Magic | New York Knicks |
| Total Points | 124 | 107 |
| Field Goals | 42/86 | 39/88 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 49% | 44% |
| Three-Pointers | 12/33 | 11/36 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 36% | 31% |
| Free Throws | 28/33 | 18/23 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 85% | 78% |
| Total Rebounds | 49 | 37 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 12 | 10 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 37 | 27 |
| Assists | 29 | 20 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 14 |
| Steals | 10 | 10 |
| Blocks | 4 | 3 |
| Personal Fouls | 23 | 25 |
These numbers show that Orlando had an advantage in almost every major offensive and rebounding category.
New York recorded one fewer turnover, but that small advantage could not compensate for its lower shooting percentages and weaker rebounding performance.
1. Field-Goal Percentage: Orlando’s Shooting Advantage
Orlando made 42 of 86 field-goal attempts, producing a shooting percentage of approximately 48.8%.
New York made 39 of 88 attempts, finishing at approximately 44.3%.
Although the difference was only around 4.5 percentage points, it had a meaningful impact on the final result.
The Magic made three more field goals despite attempting two fewer shots.
This indicates that Orlando converted its offensive opportunities more efficiently.
A higher field-goal percentage can result from several factors, including:
- Better shot selection.
- More successful drives toward the basket.
- Effective ball movement.
- Higher-quality opportunities near the rim.
- Improved decision-making under defensive pressure.
Orlando’s 49% shooting performance was particularly important because the team did not need an unusually high number of attempts to produce 124 points.
2. Three-Point Shooting: Another Orlando Advantage
Three-point shooting was another area where the Magic performed better.
Orlando converted 12 of 33 attempts, while New York made 11 of 36.
| Three-Point Measurement | Orlando | New York |
| Successful Attempts | 12 | 11 |
| Total Attempts | 33 | 36 |
| Accuracy | 36% | 31% |
Orlando’s advantage was not simply about making one additional three-pointer.
The Magic also attempted three fewer shots from beyond the arc and converted them at a higher rate.
This suggests that their perimeter offense was more efficient.
Bane and Black were especially valuable in this category. Both made three three-pointers, giving Orlando reliable perimeter production from different parts of its rotation.
New York struggled to establish the same consistency from long range, particularly during the second quarter.
3. Free-Throw Shooting: A Major Difference
One of the most important statistical differences appeared at the free-throw line.
Orlando attempted 33 free throws and made 28, producing an accuracy of approximately 85%.
New York attempted 23 and made 18, finishing at approximately 78%.
The Magic therefore scored 10 more points from free throws.
This difference played a substantial role in the final 17-point margin.
Free throws are often overlooked when people focus only on field goals and three-pointers. However, they can become decisive in closely contested games or when one team struggles to create efficient scoring opportunities.
Orlando’s ability to earn trips to the line and convert those opportunities helped it maintain control.
Bane was perfect from the free-throw line, making all five attempts. Bitadze also converted all six of his attempts.
These contributions helped the Magic maximize their scoring opportunities.
4. Rebounding: Orlando Controlled the Glass
The rebounding comparison provides one of the clearest explanations for the result.
Orlando collected 49 rebounds, while New York finished with 37.
Total rebounds comparison
Orlando Magic
49
New York Knicks
37
Orlando collected 12 more rebounds, approximately 32% more than New York.
The Magic also won the offensive rebounding battle, collecting 12 offensive rebounds compared with New York’s 10.
Defensive rebounds showed an even larger difference:
- Orlando: 37 defensive rebounds.
- New York: 27 defensive rebounds.
This advantage helped Orlando finish defensive possessions and reduce New York’s opportunities to score from missed shots.
Towns was New York’s leading rebounder with 12, but the Knicks did not receive enough collective support to match Orlando’s total.
5. Assists: Better Ball Movement from Orlando
Orlando recorded 29 assists compared with New York’s 20.
This nine-assist advantage highlights an important difference in the offensive approaches of the two teams.
The Magic distributed the ball more effectively and generated scoring opportunities through multiple players.
Bane led Orlando with eight assists, while Wagner added four. Several other players also contributed as facilitators.
Brunson led New York with six assists, but the Knicks had fewer total assists across the team.
A higher assist total does not automatically mean that an offense is better. However, when combined with a higher field-goal percentage, it can indicate that a team generated more effective scoring opportunities.
Orlando’s numbers support that interpretation.
6. Turnovers: A Relatively Even Category
Turnovers were one of the few categories in which New York performed slightly better.
| Team | Turnovers |
| Orlando Magic | 15 |
| New York Knicks | 14 |
The Knicks committed one fewer turnover.
This difference was relatively small and did not have a major influence compared with Orlando’s advantages in shooting and rebounding.
Both teams had moments when they lost possession, but the Magic were able to compensate through better shooting efficiency and stronger ball movement.
7. Defensive Statistics: Steals and Blocks
Both teams recorded 10 steals, showing that each defense created opportunities to disrupt the opponent.
Orlando recorded four blocks, compared with New York’s three.
The Magic also limited New York’s three-point accuracy to approximately 31%.
This was important because perimeter shooting had been a major part of the Knicks’ offensive success during their preceding winning streak.
Orlando’s defensive effort did not completely eliminate New York’s scoring opportunities, but it prevented the home team from producing its usual offensive rhythm.
How Orlando Built Its 17-Point Victory
The game was not decided by one isolated moment. Instead, Orlando gradually established control through a combination of efficient scoring, defensive pressure, and consistent production.
Three important stages shaped the outcome.
First Quarter: Orlando Established Early Control
The Magic opened the game with 30 points, while New York managed 23.
An early seven-point advantage gave Orlando a positive start and helped the visitors establish confidence.
New York was still within reach, but the Magic showed that they could compete effectively in an unfamiliar environment.
Wagner and Bane provided important offensive production, while Orlando’s defensive effort prevented the Knicks from building early momentum.
The first quarter also established a pattern that continued into the second period: Orlando was getting more consistent contributions across its lineup.
Second Quarter: The Turning Point
The second quarter was arguably the most important period of the entire matchup.
Orlando scored 32 points, while New York managed only 19.
That 13-point quarter advantage increased the Magic’s lead from seven points to 20 points.
The difference came from Orlando’s ability to maintain its scoring production while restricting New York’s offense.
At halftime, the score stood at:
- Orlando Magic: 62 points.
- New York Knicks: 42 points.
The 20-point halftime margin gave Orlando a strong position.
New York had to improve significantly after the break, while the Magic needed to avoid unnecessary mistakes and maintain their offensive rhythm.
Third Quarter: New York Attempted a Comeback
The Knicks responded in the third quarter, scoring 31 points compared with Orlando’s 29.
This was New York’s first quarter victory in terms of scoring margin.
However, the two-point advantage was not enough to reduce the overall deficit substantially.
Orlando still entered the fourth quarter with a comfortable lead.
One important detail from the game was that the Knicks managed to cut the deficit to nine points late in the fourth quarter after trailing by as many as 21.
That comeback attempt showed that New York had not completely lost its offensive ability.
However, Orlando responded with another scoring run and prevented the home team from getting closer.
Fourth Quarter: Orlando Protected Its Advantage
New York scored 34 points in the final quarter, compared with Orlando’s 33.
The Knicks therefore finished the game with a stronger scoring performance in the final period.
However, the Magic did not allow the comeback to become a serious threat.
A key moment came when Jalen Suggs made a three-pointer after New York had reduced the margin.
That basket helped Orlando restore breathing room and maintain control.
The Magic continued to score efficiently, eventually securing the 124-107 victory.
The final quarter demonstrated an important aspect of basketball strategy: a team does not necessarily need to win every quarter to win the game. Building a substantial early advantage and managing it effectively can be just as important.
What Happened to Paolo Banchero?
Paolo Banchero’s situation was one of the notable developments from the matchup.
Although he appeared in the game and scored four points, he played only 12 minutes.
He also recorded four rebounds, two assists, one steal, and one block.
Banchero strained his left groin and missed the second half.
This was an important development because he was one of Orlando’s leading offensive players entering the season.
His absence created additional opportunities for other Magic players to contribute.
Wagner took on a greater scoring responsibility, while Bane and Black helped provide the offensive production needed to maintain the lead.
The result demonstrated Orlando’s ability to generate offense from multiple positions even when an important player was unavailable.
However, one game should not be used to conclude that Banchero’s absence would have no impact on the team’s longer-term performance.
His scoring, playmaking, and ability to create difficult shots remain important elements of Orlando’s overall offensive structure.
Why the Knicks Lost Despite Jalen Brunson’s 31 Points
Brunson’s performance was impressive, but basketball is a team sport. A high individual scoring total does not guarantee a victory.
Several factors contributed to New York’s defeat.
Slow First-Half Offense
The Knicks scored only 42 points in the first half.
Their second-quarter production was particularly disappointing, as they managed just 19 points.
This allowed Orlando to establish a 20-point halftime advantage.
Limited Perimeter Efficiency
New York made only 11 of 36 three-point attempts.
The resulting 31% accuracy was below Orlando’s 36%.
When a team relies on perimeter scoring to create offensive momentum, poor shooting can make it difficult to recover from a significant deficit.
Rebounding Disadvantage
The Knicks lost the overall rebounding battle by 12.
Although Towns collected 12 rebounds, the team struggled to match Orlando’s collective production.
This limited New York’s ability to generate additional possessions and control the defensive glass.
Dependence on Individual Scoring
Brunson scored 31 points, but the Knicks needed more consistent production from the rest of their lineup.
Towns added 15 points, while McBride scored 11.
The supporting offense did not produce enough to match Orlando’s balanced scoring distribution.
Injury Concern During the Closing Minutes
Brunson’s late-game ankle incident was another concern.
He had already produced a strong scoring performance, but his situation added an unfortunate development to an already disappointing night for New York.
Tactical Lessons from the Matchup
The statistical differences offer several useful lessons about how the game developed.
Orlando’s Offensive Balance Was More Effective
The Magic had three players scoring at least 17 points, while six players reached double figures.
This allowed Orlando to maintain offensive production even when its leading scorer was not directly involved in a possession.
Bane’s eight assists were especially important because they showed that he could create opportunities for teammates instead of focusing exclusively on scoring.
New York Needed Better Early Shot Selection
The Knicks’ 42-point first half was a major problem.
Their offensive struggles were particularly noticeable in the second quarter, when Orlando increased its lead significantly.
New York needed better shot creation and more consistent perimeter shooting to remain competitive.
Rebounding Created Additional Control
Orlando’s 49 rebounds helped it control the physical side of the matchup.
The 12-rebound advantage was not simply an impressive statistical achievement. It also reflected the Magic’s ability to finish possessions and limit New York’s second-chance opportunities.
Bench Contributions Made a Difference
Black, Bitadze, and da Silva all delivered useful performances.
Their contributions reduced the pressure on Orlando’s primary scorers and helped maintain the team’s advantage.
This was especially important after Banchero left the game.
Head-to-Head Season Series: Orlando Magic vs New York Knicks
The November 13 matchup was the first meeting between these teams in the 2025-26 regular season.
The supplied season-series results show that Orlando won the opening encounter, but New York eventually responded in the following meetings.
| Game | Date | Result | Winner |
| Game 1 | November 13, 2025 | Orlando 124-107 New York | Orlando |
| Game 2 | November 23, 2025 | New York 133-121 Orlando | New York |
| Game 3 | December 7, 2025 | Orlando 106-100 New York | Orlando |
| Game 4 | December 14, 2025 | New York 132-120 Orlando | New York |
The supplied results indicate that the teams finished their four-game regular-season series with two victories each.
This makes the matchup particularly interesting from a season-long perspective.
Orlando demonstrated that it could defeat New York through balanced scoring and defensive discipline. The Knicks, meanwhile, showed that they could respond in subsequent meetings with stronger offensive performances.
The 124-107 result should therefore be understood as one game within a larger competitive series rather than proof of long-term superiority by either team.
Important Statistical Terms Explained
Readers who regularly follow NBA box scores may recognize abbreviations such as PTS, REB, AST, FG%, and +/-.
Understanding these measurements makes it easier to evaluate individual performances beyond the final score.
| Abbreviation | Meaning | Explanation |
| PTS | Points | Total points scored by a player |
| REB | Rebounds | Total offensive and defensive rebounds |
| AST | Assists | Passes that directly lead to made baskets |
| FG | Field Goals | Successful shots and total attempts |
| FG% | Field-Goal Percentage | Percentage of successful field-goal attempts |
| 3PM | Three-Pointers Made | Successful shots from beyond the three-point line |
| 3PA | Three-Pointers Attempted | Total three-point attempts |
| FT | Free Throws | Successful free-throw attempts |
| STL | Steals | Opponent possessions taken away by a player |
| BLK | Blocks | Opponent shot attempts blocked by a defender |
| TO | Turnovers | Possessions lost by a team or player |
| PF | Personal Fouls | Personal fouls committed |
| +/- | Plus/Minus | Team’s scoring margin while a player is on the court |
What Does Plus/Minus Mean in This Game?
Plus/minus is useful for understanding how the team performed while a particular player was on the court.
For example, Wagner recorded +21, meaning Orlando outscored New York by 21 points during his playing time.
Bitadze recorded +23, while da Silva finished at +22.
These numbers do not independently prove that one player performed better than another. They are influenced by teammates, opponents, substitutions, and the overall game situation.
The best approach is to consider plus/minus alongside points, rebounds, assists, shooting efficiency, and defensive contributions.
Where to Find the Official Box Score and Game Details
For readers who want to examine the original statistical record, the official NBA game box score and game recap provide additional information about the matchup.
The game record includes the final score, individual player statistics, shooting percentages, and other important details.
When reviewing NBA statistics, it is important to distinguish between three types of information:
- Individual statistics: These describe the performance of a particular player.
- Team statistics: These show how the entire lineup performed in a particular category.
- Game results: These establish the final outcome and scoring progression.
Looking at all three provides a more complete understanding than focusing only on the leading scorer.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Who won the Orlando Magic vs New York Knicks game on November 13, 2025?
The Orlando Magic defeated the New York Knicks 124-107 at Madison Square Garden. Orlando established a significant first-half advantage and maintained enough offensive production to secure a 17-point victory.
2. How many points did Franz Wagner score against the Knicks?
Franz Wagner scored 28 points for Orlando. He also recorded nine rebounds, four assists, two steals, and one block, making him one of the most influential players in the matchup.
3. How many points did Jalen Brunson score against Orlando?
Jalen Brunson scored a game-high 31 points for New York. He also recorded six assists, but his individual scoring performance was not enough to prevent the Knicks from losing.
4. Who recorded the most rebounds in the game?
Karl-Anthony Towns led all players with 12 rebounds. Franz Wagner was Orlando’s leading rebounder with nine. Despite Towns’ individual achievement, Orlando won the team rebounding battle 49-37.
5. How many assists did Desmond Bane record?
Desmond Bane recorded eight assists, the highest total in the game. He also scored 22 points and collected six rebounds, contributing as both a scorer and playmaker.
6. What was the biggest statistical difference between Orlando and New York?
Rebounding was one of the biggest differences. Orlando collected 49 rebounds compared with New York’s 37. The Magic also recorded nine more assists and shot more efficiently from the field, contributing to their 124-107 victory.
Conclusion
The November 13, 2025, matchup between the Orlando Magic and New York Knicks was an excellent example of how balanced team production can overcome an impressive individual scoring performance.
Orlando secured a 124-107 victory by combining efficient shooting, strong rebounding, effective passing, and valuable contributions from its bench.
Franz Wagner led the Magic with 28 points and nine rebounds, while Desmond Bane contributed 22 points and eight assists. Anthony Black added 17 points, giving Orlando another important scoring option.
Jalen Brunson finished with a game-high 31 points for New York, and Karl-Anthony Towns recorded 15 points and 12 rebounds. However, the Knicks struggled during the first half and could not recover from the 20-point halftime deficit.
The most important statistical differences were Orlando’s 49-37 rebounding advantage, 29-20 assist advantage, and superior shooting percentages. These factors explain why the Magic controlled much of the contest despite New York’s stronger fourth-quarter performance.
Ultimately, the game demonstrated that successful NBA basketball requires more than one outstanding scorer. Efficient shooting, defensive discipline, rebounding, teamwork, and bench contributions all influence the final result.
For anyone examining this matchup, the individual player numbers and team statistics together provide the clearest explanation of Orlando’s victory.
