Charlotte Hornets vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats

The charlotte hornets vs cleveland cavaliers match player stats from November 10, 2026, highlight an important 124-112 home victory for Charlotte at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina. The Hornets produced an outstanding offensive performance, scoring 40 points in the second quarter and another 38 in the third to establish control of the contest. Cleveland responded with 32 points in the final period, but its late scoring effort was not enough to overcome the deficit.

Charlotte’s biggest statistical advantages came from three-point shooting and rebounding. The Hornets made 23 of 46 attempts from beyond the arc, an impressive 50% conversion rate. They also collected 49 rebounds, compared with Cleveland’s 32. Those differences helped Charlotte compensate for shooting a lower overall field-goal percentage than its opponent.

Grayson Allen led Charlotte with 27 points, while Ryan Kalkbrenner recorded a team-high 15 rebounds and Coby White contributed nine assists. Cleveland’s leading scorer was Meleek Thomas with 18 points, and James Harden led the Cavaliers in assists with five, according to the supplied game data.

The result gave Charlotte a 1-0 lead in the season series. Although Cleveland finished with better overall field-goal accuracy, Charlotte’s perimeter shooting, offensive rebounding, and strong middle quarters proved decisive.

Match Overview: Charlotte Hornets vs Cleveland Cavaliers

The November 10 result was more than a routine regular-season win. Charlotte entered the contest with a 3-7 record at the time of the game, while Cleveland had a 5-5 record before the result. The Hornets needed a positive performance after a difficult run, and their offensive execution helped them secure an important victory.

Game information

Category	Details
Match	Cleveland Cavaliers vs Charlotte Hornets
Date	November 10, 2026
Competition	NBA regular season
Season	2026-27
Final score	Charlotte 124, Cleveland 112
Venue	Spectrum Center
Location	Charlotte, North Carolina
Attendance	17,471
Game ID	401909953
Match status	Final
Season series	Charlotte leads 1-0

The official NBA game summary identifies the contest as November 9 in the United States, while the supplied ESPN schedule information lists November 10. This difference reflects the game’s date presentation across time zones. The result and final score are consistent.

Charlotte’s 12-point victory came from a combination of outside shooting, second-chance opportunities, and strong individual performances. Cleveland actually finished with a higher overall field-goal percentage, but Charlotte attempted more shots and made nine additional three-pointers.

Final Score by Quarter

The quarter-by-quarter scoring shows exactly when Charlotte created its advantage.

Quarter	Cleveland Cavaliers	Charlotte Hornets
First Quarter	28	29
Second Quarter	25	40
Third Quarter	27	38
Fourth Quarter	32	17
Final Score	112	124

Charlotte held a one-point advantage after the opening quarter. The second quarter changed the direction of the game as the Hornets scored 40 points and limited Cleveland to 25.

The third period continued Charlotte’s offensive momentum. Another 38 points gave the home team a substantial advantage heading into the final quarter.

Cleveland won the fourth quarter by 15 points, but the comeback attempt started too late. Charlotte’s earlier scoring advantage proved too large to overcome.

Charlotte Hornets vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats: Complete Box Score

The individual performances provide a clearer picture of how the game developed. Charlotte received scoring contributions from several players, while Cleveland relied on a mixture of its starters and bench players.

The following tables use the supplied ESPN game data and the available detailed box-score figures. They include points, shooting, rebounds, assists, turnovers, defensive contributions, and plus-minus where available.

Cleveland Cavaliers Player Statistics

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST
Jarrett Allen	19	12	5-5	1-1	1-2	7	1
Evan Mobley	24	9	3-5	2-2	1-2	2	3
James Harden	25	11	3-9	2-7	3-3	3	5
Donovan Mitchell	23	11	4-11	1-3	2-2	2	4
Peyton Watson	21	13	5-9	2-4	1-2	2	1
Mario Hezonja	17	10	5-11	0-3	0-0	3	0
Riley Minix	17	2	1-4	0-3	0-0	2	0
Thomas Bryant	15	11	3-5	2-3	3-3	2	0
Norchad Omier	12	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	3	1
Craig Porter Jr.	17	9	4-6	0-1	1-1	2	4
Tyrese Proctor	23	6	2-4	0-1	2-3	1	4
Meleek Thomas	27	18	7-12	4-6	0-0	3	3

Additional Cleveland defensive statistics

Player	TO	STL	BLK	OREB	DREB	+/-
Jarrett Allen	1	0	1	0	7	-9
Evan Mobley	4	2	1	0	2	-24
James Harden	4	1	0	0	3	-22
Donovan Mitchell	0	1	0	0	2	-3
Peyton Watson	2	0	0	0	2	-10
Mario Hezonja	0	0	1	1	2	-16
Riley Minix	0	0	0	0	2	+5
Thomas Bryant	0	1	1	1	1	+18
Norchad Omier	0	0	0	2	1	+15
Craig Porter Jr.	1	1	0	1	1	+7
Tyrese Proctor	1	1	0	0	1	-20
Meleek Thomas	0	2	0	0	3	-1

Meleek Thomas led Cleveland with 18 points. He converted seven of his 12 field-goal attempts and made four three-pointers in six attempts. His shooting gave the Cavaliers an important scoring option, particularly when their offense needed additional production.

Jarrett Allen was another efficient contributor. He made all five of his field-goal attempts and finished with 12 points and seven rebounds. Although his scoring efficiency was excellent, his playing time was limited to 19 minutes in the supplied box score.

James Harden recorded 11 points and five assists. His playmaking helped Cleveland generate scoring opportunities, but his four turnovers and 3-of-9 shooting from the field show that his offensive contribution was not as efficient as the Cavaliers needed.

Donovan Mitchell also finished with 11 points. He made four of 11 field-goal attempts and added four assists. Cleveland needed more consistent scoring from its leading perimeter options to match Charlotte’s production.

Thomas Bryant contributed 11 points in 15 minutes, providing useful scoring from the bench. Craig Porter Jr. added nine points and four assists, while Peyton Watson finished with 13 points.

Charlotte Hornets Player Statistics

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST
Naz Reid	32	25	10-26	4-9	1-2	13	4
Ryan Kalkbrenner	35	8	4-7	0-0	0-0	15	3
Grayson Allen	34	27	8-14	6-12	5-6	4	6
Coby White	20	10	3-12	0-4	4-5	3	8
Sion James	33	11	4-9	3-6	0-0	4	4
Royce O’Neale	23	10	4-8	2-5	0-0	3	1
Tidjane Salaun	18	14	4-6	3-4	3-3	3	0
Hannes Steinbach	13	2	1-3	0-0	0-0	2	1
Christian Anderson	16	9	3-5	3-4	0-0	1	1
Liam McNeeley	16	8	3-3	2-2	0-0	2	1

Additional Charlotte defensive statistics

Player	TO	STL	BLK	OREB	DREB	+/-
Naz Reid	3	1	0	1	12	+16
Ryan Kalkbrenner	2	2	3	10	5	+20
Grayson Allen	3	2	0	1	3	-1
Coby White	3	0	0	1	2	-6
Sion James	0	2	0	0	4	+18
Royce O’Neale	0	1	0	0	3	+12
Tidjane Salaun	0	1	0	0	3	-3
Hannes Steinbach	1	0	0	2	0	-6
Christian Anderson	2	0	0	1	0	+6
Liam McNeeley	0	0	0	1	1	+4

Charlotte’s offensive performance was led by Grayson Allen, who scored 27 points. His six successful three-pointers were particularly important because they helped the Hornets build their advantage during the second and third quarters.

Naz Reid added 25 points and 13 rebounds, providing Charlotte with another major offensive contribution. His ability to score inside and outside made him difficult to defend throughout the contest.

Ryan Kalkbrenner’s 15 rebounds were equally important. He collected 10 offensive rebounds, giving Charlotte additional possessions and creating more opportunities to score after missed shots.

Coby White finished with 10 points and eight assists in the detailed box score. His passing helped organize Charlotte’s offense and distribute scoring opportunities among the other players.

Tidjane Salaun provided 14 points off the bench, while Sion James scored 11. Royce O’Neale added 10 points, and Christian Anderson contributed nine.

These performances demonstrate that Charlotte did not depend on a single scorer. Its starting group and bench both contributed to the winning result.

Top Performers of the Game

Individual statistics are useful for understanding a basketball game, but the most important performances are those that influence the result. Several players stood out because of their scoring, rebounding, shooting efficiency, and ability to create opportunities.

1. Grayson Allen: Charlotte’s Leading Scorer

Game-high 27 points

Grayson Allen delivered Charlotte’s strongest individual scoring performance. He scored 27 points on 8-of-14 shooting from the field and converted six of his 12 three-point attempts.

His perimeter shooting was a major factor in the Hornets’ offensive success.

Allen’s performance included:

• 27 total points.
• 8 successful field goals from 14 attempts.
• 6 three-pointers from 12 attempts.
• 5 successful free throws from 6 attempts.
• 4 rebounds.
• 6 assists.
• 2 steals.

His 50% three-point shooting was particularly valuable. Charlotte made 23 three-pointers as a team, and Allen accounted for six of them.

He also contributed as a playmaker, recording six assists. This meant his impact extended beyond scoring.

2. Naz Reid: A Complete Offensive Performance

Naz Reid finished with 25 points and 13 rebounds. His contribution gave Charlotte another reliable scoring option and helped the team control the glass.

He made 10 of 26 field-goal attempts, including four three-pointers.

Reid’s ability to score from different areas of the court gave Charlotte flexibility. He could attack near the basket or create opportunities from the perimeter.

His 13 rebounds also helped the Hornets maintain possession and limit Cleveland’s chances to generate second-chance points.

3. Ryan Kalkbrenner: The Rebounding Leader

Ryan Kalkbrenner recorded 15 rebounds, the highest individual total in the game.

His performance included:

• 8 points.
• 15 total rebounds.
• 10 offensive rebounds.
• 5 defensive rebounds.
• 3 assists.
• 2 steals.
• 3 blocks.

The 10 offensive rebounds are especially significant. Offensive rebounds extend possessions and allow teams to create additional shots without needing to force a turnover or regain possession through defense.

Kalkbrenner’s work on the boards helped Charlotte establish a major advantage in total rebounds.

4. Coby White: Charlotte’s Playmaking Leader

Coby White recorded eight assists in the detailed box score, although the supplied summary lists nine.

He also scored 10 points and collected three rebounds.

His passing helped Charlotte create opportunities for Grayson Allen, Naz Reid, and other offensive contributors.

A point guard or primary ball-handler does not always need to lead the team in scoring to influence the outcome. White’s assist production illustrates how ball movement can support a high-scoring offense.

5. Meleek Thomas: Cleveland’s Leading Scorer

Meleek Thomas led the Cavaliers with 18 points.

He shot 7-of-12 from the field and made four of six three-point attempts. His 58.3% field-goal shooting was an efficient individual performance.

Thomas also recorded three rebounds and three assists.

Although his scoring helped Cleveland remain competitive, the Cavaliers needed more production from their other offensive options to match Charlotte’s combined scoring.

6. James Harden: Cleveland’s Assist Leader

James Harden recorded five assists, the highest total for Cleveland in the supplied detailed box score.

He finished with 11 points, three rebounds, and four turnovers.

Harden’s ability to create opportunities remained important, but Cleveland struggled to turn its offensive possessions into enough points to match the Hornets.

Team Statistics: Hornets vs Cavaliers

The team comparison explains why Charlotte won despite Cleveland finishing with a better overall field-goal percentage.

Statistical Category	Cleveland	Charlotte
Total Points	112	124
Field Goals Made	42	44
Field Goal Attempts	82	93
Field Goal Percentage	51%	47%
Three-Pointers Made	14	23
Three-Point Attempts	35	46
Three-Point Percentage	40%	50%
Free Throws Made	14	13
Free Throw Attempts	18	16
Free Throw Percentage	78%	81%
Total Rebounds	32	49
Offensive Rebounds	4	17
Defensive Rebounds	28	32
Assists	27	29
Turnovers	13	14
Steals	9	9
Blocks	6	3
Personal Fouls	16	16

The detailed box-score team totals are used here. Minor discrepancies in some supplied summary fields should be checked against the official gamebook before republication.

Field-Goal Shooting

Cleveland finished with a 51% field-goal percentage, compared with Charlotte’s 47%.

At first glance, this statistic suggests that Cleveland was the more efficient team when shooting from the field.

However, field-goal percentage does not tell the entire story.

Charlotte attempted 93 shots and made 44, while Cleveland attempted 82 shots and made 42. The Hornets created 11 more attempts and converted two additional field goals.

This difference matters because teams can compensate for lower shooting accuracy by creating more possessions and generating additional shot attempts.

Charlotte’s rebounding advantage was central to that process.

Three-Point Shooting

Three-point shooting was one of the clearest differences between the teams.

Charlotte made 23 of 46 three-point attempts, producing a 50% success rate.

Cleveland made 14 of 35 attempts, finishing at 40%.

The Hornets therefore made nine more three-pointers.

Because each successful three-pointer is worth three points, that difference represents 27 additional points from made three-point shots before considering the teams’ different two-point and free-throw totals.

Charlotte’s perimeter production gave the team a scoring advantage that Cleveland struggled to match.

Free-Throw Performance

Cleveland converted 14 of 18 free throws, while Charlotte made 13 of 16.

Both teams performed reasonably well at the free-throw line.

Charlotte had a slightly higher conversion rate at 81%, compared with Cleveland’s 78%.

However, the difference in free-throw production was small. It was not the primary reason for the final result.

Rebounding Comparison

Charlotte: 49 rebounds

Charlotte collected 49 rebounds, while Cleveland finished with 32.

That created a 17-rebound advantage for the Hornets.

The biggest difference came from offensive rebounds.

Charlotte recorded 17 offensive rebounds, while Cleveland collected only four.

This gave the Hornets more opportunities to recover their own missed shots and create additional scoring possessions.

Kalkbrenner’s 10 offensive rebounds were especially important.

Assists and Ball Movement

Charlotte recorded 29 assists, while Cleveland finished with 27.

The difference was not particularly large, but it shows that both teams were able to create scoring opportunities for teammates.

Charlotte’s advantage came from combining ball movement with better perimeter conversion.

Coby White’s playmaking and Grayson Allen’s shooting were two important parts of that combination.

Turnovers and Defensive Activity

Cleveland committed 13 turnovers, compared with Charlotte’s 14.

The Cavaliers therefore had a small advantage in protecting possession.

Both teams recorded nine steals.

Cleveland also finished with six blocks, three more than Charlotte.

These defensive statistics show that Cleveland was not completely outmatched defensively. The Cavaliers generated steals and protected the rim, but their advantages in those categories could not offset Charlotte’s shooting and rebounding production.

How Charlotte Won the Game

Charlotte’s 124-112 victory was built around three major advantages: perimeter shooting, offensive rebounding, and a powerful scoring run before halftime.

Cleveland had some statistical advantages, including overall field-goal percentage, blocks, and turnovers. However, the Hornets were more effective at turning their opportunities into points.

1. The Three-Point Advantage Changed the Game

The most noticeable difference was Charlotte’s performance from beyond the arc.

The Hornets converted 23 three-pointers, compared with Cleveland’s 14. That nine-shot difference was a major part of the final scoring gap.

Charlotte’s 50% accuracy from three-point range also meant that its perimeter attempts were highly productive.

Grayson Allen led this effort with six successful three-pointers. Naz Reid added four, while Sion James and Tidjane Salaun each contributed three.

Christian Anderson and Liam McNeeley also provided perimeter scoring from the bench.

This distribution made it difficult for Cleveland to focus its defensive attention on just one shooter.

When several players can consistently make outside shots, defenders must cover more space. That can create opportunities for drives, interior passes, and open looks for other teammates.

2. Offensive Rebounding Created Extra Possessions

Charlotte’s 17 offensive rebounds were another decisive factor.

The Cavaliers collected only four offensive rebounds, meaning the Hornets had a 13-rebound advantage in this category.

This difference helped Charlotte maintain offensive pressure even when its initial shots did not go in.

Ryan Kalkbrenner was particularly effective, collecting 10 offensive rebounds.

Offensive rebounding has an important effect on basketball strategy because it can:

• Create additional field-goal attempts.
• Give teammates more time to get into scoring positions.
• Increase pressure on the opposing defense.
• Reduce the effectiveness of defensive possessions.
• Generate second-chance points without requiring a turnover.

Charlotte’s ability to recover missed shots helped explain why it attempted 11 more field goals than Cleveland.

3. Charlotte’s Second and Third Quarters Created Separation

The Hornets scored 78 combined points during the second and third quarters.

Cleveland managed only 52 points during the same period.

That 26-point difference across two quarters created the foundation for Charlotte’s victory.

The Hornets did not need to dominate every period. Instead, they produced two exceptionally strong quarters that gave them enough breathing room to withstand Cleveland’s late response.

This is an important distinction when evaluating the final score. Charlotte’s win was primarily built before the fourth quarter, not through a dominant finish.

4. Multiple Scoring Options Reduced Cleveland’s Defensive Flexibility

Charlotte had several players capable of contributing meaningful points.

Grayson Allen scored 27, Naz Reid added 25, and Tidjane Salaun contributed 14.

Sion James, Coby White, and Royce O’Neale also reached double figures.

This balance helped prevent Cleveland from concentrating all its defensive attention on one player.

The Hornets also received useful contributions from Christian Anderson and Liam McNeeley.

Their scoring helped maintain offensive production beyond the starting group.

Cleveland also had multiple double-digit scorers, but its overall three-point production was lower.

Quarter-by-Quarter Match Analysis

Looking at each period separately provides a better understanding of the game’s momentum and how the final result developed.

First Quarter: Cleveland Kept the Game Close

Charlotte 29-28 Cleveland

The opening quarter was competitive, with Charlotte holding a narrow one-point advantage.

Cleveland scored 28 points, demonstrating that its offense could generate scoring opportunities against Charlotte’s defense.

The Hornets finished the period with 29 points.

At this stage, neither team had established a significant advantage. The close score suggested that the contest could develop into a tight game.

Charlotte’s ability to create a small lead was useful, but the decisive part of the contest was still ahead.

Second Quarter: Charlotte Took Control

Charlotte 40-25 Cleveland

The second quarter was arguably the most important period of the game.

Charlotte scored 40 points, its highest quarter total, while Cleveland managed just 25.

The 15-point difference transformed a close contest into a more difficult challenge for the Cavaliers.

Charlotte’s outside shooting and ability to generate additional possessions were important factors in this scoring run.

The Hornets entered halftime with a 69-53 advantage.

That meant Cleveland needed a substantial second-half response to get back into the contest.

Third Quarter: The Hornets Extended Their Lead

Charlotte 38-27 Cleveland

Charlotte continued its strong offensive performance after halftime.

The Hornets scored another 38 points, while Cleveland managed 27.

This gave Charlotte a 27-point advantage entering the final quarter.

The third period demonstrated that the Cavaliers had not found an effective way to slow down Charlotte’s offense.

Although Cleveland continued to score, the Hornets consistently answered with their own offensive production.

The 107-80 score entering the fourth quarter gave Charlotte a comfortable advantage.

Fourth Quarter: Cleveland Produced a Late Response

Cleveland 32-17 Charlotte

Cleveland won the final quarter by 15 points.

The Cavaliers scored 32 points and limited Charlotte to 17.

This was Cleveland’s strongest period in terms of scoring, and it reduced the final margin to 12 points.

However, the comeback opportunity was limited by the size of Charlotte’s third-quarter advantage.

The Hornets did not need to win the final period. They only needed to protect their lead.

The final score of 124-112 confirmed Charlotte’s victory.

Individual Matchups That Influenced the Result

Basketball games are often shaped by several individual battles rather than one isolated performance. This matchup featured important differences in scoring, rebounding, and playmaking.

Grayson Allen vs Cleveland’s Perimeter Defense

Grayson Allen’s 27 points made him the game’s leading scorer.

His six successful three-pointers created a significant challenge for Cleveland’s defensive players.

The Cavaliers needed to limit his opportunities from outside, but Allen converted half of his three-point attempts.

His scoring also helped create opportunities for other Charlotte players. Defenders who focused on stopping his outside shooting had to remain aware of the Hornets’ other offensive options.

Naz Reid vs Cleveland’s Interior Defense

Naz Reid scored 25 points and collected 13 rebounds.

His contribution was important because Charlotte needed scoring from both inside and outside.

Reid’s 10 successful field goals provided a reliable source of offense. His rebounding also helped Charlotte control possession.

Cleveland needed to find a more consistent defensive response to his scoring and activity around the basket.

Ryan Kalkbrenner vs Cleveland’s Rebounding Unit

Kalkbrenner’s 15 rebounds were a major individual advantage.

His 10 offensive rebounds were particularly valuable because they gave Charlotte additional scoring opportunities.

Cleveland’s entire team recorded just four offensive rebounds.

This matchup demonstrates how one player’s work on the glass can influence the wider team statistics.

James Harden vs Charlotte’s Ball Pressure

James Harden recorded five assists and 11 points.

His ability to create opportunities for teammates helped Cleveland maintain offensive production.

However, Charlotte’s overall defensive performance and rebounding advantage made it difficult for Cleveland to convert enough possessions into points.

Harden also recorded four turnovers, which limited the effectiveness of some of his offensive possessions.

Coby White vs Cleveland’s Playmaking Defense

Coby White contributed eight assists according to the detailed player box score.

His passing helped Charlotte distribute the ball and create opportunities for its shooters.

Although White scored 10 points, his most important contribution was helping teammates become involved in the offense.

The Hornets’ 29 team assists reflect the value of their collective ball movement.

Starting Lineups and Bench Contributions

Starting lineups are important because they establish the initial matchup and influence how teams approach the opening minutes.

However, bench production can be equally important, especially when a game requires consistent scoring across four quarters.

Cleveland Cavaliers Starting Group

The supplied lineup information identifies the following Cleveland starters:

• Jarrett Allen
• Evan Mobley
• James Harden
• Donovan Mitchell
• Peyton Watson

These players provided a combination of interior defense, perimeter scoring, and playmaking.

Allen contributed 12 points and seven rebounds. Mobley added nine points, while Harden recorded 11 points and five assists.

Mitchell also finished with 11 points, and Watson scored 13.

Cleveland received production from its starting group, but the team needed a more effective scoring performance to match Charlotte.

Charlotte Hornets Starting Group

The supplied starting lineup lists:

• Naz Reid
• Ryan Kalkbrenner
• Grayson Allen
• Coby White
• Sion James

These players provided a balanced offensive structure.

Allen led the team in scoring, Reid added 25 points and 13 rebounds, and Kalkbrenner dominated the boards.

White contributed playmaking, while James scored 11 points and made three three-pointers.

The starting group established a foundation that allowed Charlotte to build its advantage.

Cleveland’s Bench Performance

Cleveland received contributions from several reserve players.

Bench Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Mario Hezonja	10	3	0
Riley Minix	2	2	0
Thomas Bryant	11	2	0
Norchad Omier	0	3	1
Craig Porter Jr.	9	2	4
Tyrese Proctor	6	1	4
Meleek Thomas	18	3	3

Meleek Thomas led Cleveland’s bench scoring with 18 points.

Thomas Bryant added 11 points, while Mario Hezonja contributed 10.

Craig Porter Jr. and Tyrese Proctor helped with ball movement, recording four assists each.

The Cavaliers therefore received useful scoring from their reserves. Their problem was not a complete lack of bench production. Instead, they struggled to match Charlotte’s overall shooting and rebounding advantages.

Charlotte’s Bench Performance

Charlotte’s reserves also made important contributions.

Bench Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Royce O’Neale	10	3	1
Tidjane Salaun	14	3	0
Hannes Steinbach	2	2	1
Christian Anderson	9	1	1
Liam McNeeley	8	2	1

Tidjane Salaun was Charlotte’s leading bench scorer with 14 points.

His shooting was particularly efficient. He made four of six field-goal attempts and three of four attempts from three-point range.

Royce O’Neale contributed 10 points, while Christian Anderson scored nine.

Liam McNeeley added eight points and made all three of his field-goal attempts, including both three-point attempts.

These contributions helped Charlotte maintain offensive production throughout the game.

What the Plus-Minus Statistics Reveal

Plus-minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a particular player is on the court.

For example, a player with a plus-20 finished his playing time with his team scoring 20 more points than its opponents during those minutes.

It is useful for evaluating a player’s impact within the game, but it should not be treated as a complete measure of individual ability.

Charlotte’s Strongest Plus-Minus Performances

Player	Plus-Minus
Ryan Kalkbrenner	+20
Sion James	+18
Naz Reid	+16
Royce O’Neale	+12
Christian Anderson	+6

Kalkbrenner recorded Charlotte’s best plus-minus at +20.

His strong rebounding performance contributed to Charlotte’s ability to control possessions.

Sion James also recorded an impressive +18, while Naz Reid finished at +16.

These numbers indicate that Charlotte generally performed well during their minutes on the court.

Cleveland’s Plus-Minus Results

Player	Plus-Minus
Thomas Bryant	+18
Norchad Omier	+15
Craig Porter Jr.	+7
Riley Minix	+5
Meleek Thomas	-1
Donovan Mitchell	-3
Jarrett Allen	-9
Peyton Watson	-10
Mario Hezonja	-16
Tyrese Proctor	-20
James Harden	-22
Evan Mobley	-24

Thomas Bryant and Norchad Omier recorded positive plus-minus figures despite Cleveland losing.

This is an important reminder that plus-minus reflects what happened during a player’s minutes, not necessarily the final quality of his individual performance.

Evan Mobley recorded the lowest figure at -24, while Harden finished at -22.

Those numbers suggest that Cleveland experienced significant difficulties during their time on the floor.

What This Result Means for Both Teams

A single NBA game does not determine an entire season, but its statistical results can provide useful information about a team’s current strengths and weaknesses.

The Hornets’ victory improved their confidence and gave them an important result against a team with a better record entering the contest.

Charlotte Hornets: A Positive Offensive Result

Charlotte entered the matchup with a 3-7 record before winning 124-112.

The victory improved its record to 4-7 and its home record to 3-4.

The most encouraging aspects of the performance included:

• Making 23 three-pointers.
• Recording 49 total rebounds.
• Collecting 17 offensive rebounds.
• Getting 25 or more points from two players.
• Receiving 14 points from Tidjane Salaun off the bench.
• Recording 29 team assists.

Charlotte demonstrated that its offense could produce points through several different players.

The biggest positive was the combination of perimeter shooting and rebounding. These two strengths helped the team create enough scoring opportunities to overcome Cleveland’s better overall field-goal percentage.

However, the Hornets also allowed Cleveland to score 32 points in the fourth quarter.

Although the lead was large enough to protect the win, maintaining defensive concentration for all four quarters remains an important area of improvement.

Cleveland Cavaliers: Offensive Opportunities but Insufficient Production

Cleveland entered the game with a 5-5 record and moved to 5-6 following the loss.

Its away record became 1-4.

The Cavaliers showed some positive signs:

• They shot 51% from the field.
• They made 14 three-pointers.
• They recorded 27 assists.
• They collected nine steals.
• They blocked six shots.
• They scored 32 points in the final quarter.

However, their four offensive rebounds were a major weakness.

Cleveland also struggled to match Charlotte’s outside shooting volume.

The Cavaliers made 14 three-pointers, while Charlotte made 23. That difference placed considerable pressure on Cleveland’s offense.

The fourth-quarter response showed that the team could score effectively, but it needed to produce that level of offense earlier in the contest.

Statistical Lessons From the Matchup

There are several useful basketball lessons within this result.

Higher Field-Goal Percentage Does Not Always Mean Victory

Cleveland finished with a 51% field-goal percentage, five percentage points higher than Charlotte’s 47%.

Yet the Cavaliers lost by 12 points.

This demonstrates why shooting accuracy must be considered alongside shot volume, three-point production, and rebounding.

A team can shoot more accurately overall but still lose if its opponent creates more attempts and converts significantly more three-pointers.

Offensive Rebounds Can Change a Game

Charlotte’s 17 offensive rebounds created additional scoring opportunities.

This statistic was one of the clearest explanations for the Hornets’ 11-attempt advantage in total field goals.

Teams that consistently recover missed shots can increase their offensive output without necessarily improving their initial shooting percentage.

Bench Scoring Provides Offensive Stability

Both teams received useful contributions from their reserves.

However, Charlotte’s bench included several efficient perimeter shooters.

Salaun, Anderson, O’Neale, and McNeeley all contributed to the Hornets’ outside shooting performance.

This gave Charlotte more ways to maintain its offensive production.

Big Scoring Runs Can Decide Close Games

The first quarter ended with Charlotte ahead by only one point.

The second and third quarters completely changed the situation.

Charlotte’s 40-point second quarter and 38-point third quarter created a 27-point lead.

That advantage proved decisive even after Cleveland won the fourth period.

Previous Form and Season Series Context

The game was an important early-season meeting between two Eastern Conference teams with different records.

Cleveland entered the contest with five wins and five losses, while Charlotte had three wins and seven losses.

The Cavaliers had a better record before tip-off, but the Hornets took advantage of home court and delivered a strong offensive performance.

According to the supplied matchup information, Charlotte took a 1-0 lead in the 2026-27 season series.

The next scheduled matchup is listed as January 2, when the Cavaliers and Hornets are expected to meet again.

That future meeting will provide another opportunity to compare the teams’ adjustments.

Cleveland will have reasons to focus on defensive rebounding and limiting Charlotte’s perimeter shooting.

Charlotte, meanwhile, will want to repeat its offensive execution while improving its fourth-quarter defense.

For readers who want to check the official result and game details, the NBA’s official game summary provides the league’s match information.

Challenges Identified in the Game

Although Charlotte secured the victory, both teams had areas that deserve further attention.

Charlotte’s Defensive Consistency

Charlotte allowed Cleveland to score 32 points in the fourth quarter.

The Hornets had built a comfortable advantage, but allowing such a strong final-period performance could become a concern in closer games.

The team needs to maintain defensive intensity even when leading by a substantial margin.

Cleveland’s Defensive Rebounding

Cleveland’s four offensive rebounds compared with Charlotte’s 17 were a major statistical disadvantage.

The Cavaliers need to improve their ability to finish defensive possessions by securing missed shots.

Without consistent defensive rebounding, even good defensive stops can become additional scoring opportunities for opponents.

Cleveland’s Perimeter Defense

Charlotte’s 23 successful three-pointers demonstrated the difficulty Cleveland had in controlling the perimeter.

The Cavaliers need to improve their defensive rotations, closeouts, and communication when facing teams with several reliable outside shooters.

Charlotte’s Late-Game Execution

The Hornets scored just 17 points in the fourth quarter.

Their earlier advantage protected the win, but their offensive production declined significantly.

Maintaining better ball movement and shot selection during the final period would help Charlotte manage leads more effectively.

Important Data Accuracy Notes

For anyone preparing this match report for publication, a few statistical details deserve attention.

1. Game date: The NBA’s official game summary displays November 9, 2026, in Charlotte’s local game reporting, while the supplied ESPN information identifies November 10. The difference comes from date presentation across time zones.
2. Coby White’s assists: The detailed player box score records eight assists, while the supplied summary lists nine. The detailed box-score figure has been used in the player table.
3. Team turnovers: The supplied summary lists Charlotte with 14 turnovers and Cleveland with 13. Some secondary matchup displays show different figures. The detailed box score is used here.
4. Player assignments: The supplied roster contains unusual team and lineup combinations. Player names and team assignments should be checked against the official NBA gamebook before being treated as independently verified roster information.
5. Game result: The final score of Charlotte 124, Cleveland 112 is consistent with the official NBA game summary.

These distinctions matter because an accurate statistical article should separate verified game results from information that may need additional confirmation.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Charlotte Hornets vs Cleveland Cavaliers game on November 10, 2026?

The Charlotte Hornets defeated the Cleveland Cavaliers 124-112 at Spectrum Center. Charlotte secured the victory after scoring 40 points in the second quarter and 38 in the third.

2. Who was the highest scorer in the game?

Grayson Allen was the leading scorer with 27 points for Charlotte. He made eight field goals, including six three-pointers, and converted five free throws.

3. How many points did the Cavaliers score?

The Cleveland Cavaliers scored 112 points. Meleek Thomas led Cleveland with 18 points, followed by Peyton Watson with 13 points.

4. Who recorded the most rebounds in the match?

Ryan Kalkbrenner led all players with 15 rebounds for Charlotte. He also collected 10 offensive rebounds, making his performance particularly important.

5. How many three-pointers did Charlotte make?

Charlotte made 23 three-pointers from 46 attempts, finishing with a 50% three-point shooting percentage. Cleveland made 14 three-pointers from 35 attempts.

6. What was the biggest difference between the two teams?

The biggest statistical difference was rebounding and three-point shooting. Charlotte collected 49 rebounds compared with Cleveland’s 32 and made nine more three-pointers.

Conclusion

The Charlotte Hornets defeated the Cleveland Cavaliers 124-112 in an impressive offensive performance on November 10, 2026. Charlotte established control through outstanding second- and third-quarter scoring, making 78 combined points across those periods.

The charlotte hornets vs cleveland cavaliers match player stats highlight Grayson Allen’s game-high 27 points, Naz Reid’s 25 points and 13 rebounds, and Ryan Kalkbrenner’s game-leading 15 rebounds. Coby White also contributed important playmaking, while Tidjane Salaun provided valuable scoring from the bench.

For Cleveland, Meleek Thomas led the team with 18 points, and James Harden recorded five assists. The Cavaliers shot a better overall field-goal percentage but could not overcome Charlotte’s advantage in three-point shooting and offensive rebounds.

Ultimately, Charlotte’s 23 three-pointers, 49 total rebounds, and strong middle quarters were the defining statistical factors behind the 12-point victory. The result gave the Hornets a 1-0 lead in the season series and highlighted the importance of efficient perimeter shooting and second-chance opportunities in NBA basketball.