Toronto Raptors vs New Orleans Pelicans Player Stats
The toronto raptors vs new orleans pelicans match player stats provide a detailed look at how New Orleans secured a 122-111 victory over Toronto on March 12, 2026, at the Smoothie King Center. The Pelicans delivered an efficient offensive performance, shooting 51% from the field and recording 27 assists. Toronto, despite receiving strong scoring contributions from Immanuel Quickley and Brandon Ingram, struggled to match New Orleans’ shooting accuracy throughout the contest.
Trey Murphy III led the Pelicans with 28 points, while Dejounte Murray added 27 points and played an important role in controlling the offense. Zion Williamson contributed another 19 points, giving New Orleans three major scoring options. On Toronto’s side, Quickley finished with 25 points, Ingram scored 22, and RJ Barrett added 16.
The final score tells only part of the story. New Orleans created its advantage through better shooting, stronger ball movement, and more effective defensive rebounding. Toronto actually recorded more steals and offensive rebounds, but those advantages were not enough to overcome the Pelicans’ offensive efficiency.
This breakdown examines the final score, individual player performances, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter results, important matchups, and the major lessons from the game. It also explains which numbers mattered most and why the statistical differences were important to the final result.
Toronto Raptors vs New Orleans Pelicans Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The March 12 meeting between Toronto and New Orleans produced an 11-point victory for the home team. The Pelicans entered the matchup with a difficult season record, but their offensive execution in this particular game made the difference.
Toronto had a stronger overall season record and a respectable away record entering the matchup. However, New Orleans took advantage of its opportunities at the Smoothie King Center and produced one of its more effective offensive performances.
Final Match Information
| Match Detail | Information |
| Match | New Orleans Pelicans vs. Toronto Raptors |
| Sport | NBA Basketball |
| Date | March 12, 2026 |
| Game ID | 401810803 |
| Venue | Smoothie King Center |
| Location | New Orleans, Louisiana |
| Attendance | 16,568 |
| Match Status | Final |
| Final Score | Pelicans 122, Raptors 111 |
| Winning Team | New Orleans Pelicans |
| Losing Team | Toronto Raptors |
| Game Referee 1 | Brent Barnaky |
| Game Referee 2 | Jason Goldenberg |
| Game Referee 3 | Tyler Ricks |
New Orleans finished with 122 points, while Toronto managed 111. The 11-point difference reflected the Pelicans’ advantage in shooting efficiency and their ability to generate more productive offensive possessions.
The attendance of 16,568 also shows that the game was played in front of a substantial home crowd. The Smoothie King Center provided the setting for a performance in which New Orleans maintained its offensive rhythm across the second half.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score
The quarter scores help explain how the Pelicans gradually established control.
| Quarter | Toronto Raptors | New Orleans Pelicans |
| First Quarter | 30 | 29 |
| Second Quarter | 28 | 31 |
| Third Quarter | 25 | 33 |
| Fourth Quarter | 28 | 29 |
| Total | 111 | 122 |
Toronto started slightly better, scoring 30 points in the opening quarter compared with New Orleans’ 29.
The second quarter changed the direction of the game. The Pelicans scored 31 points and took a narrow advantage into halftime.
The most important separation came in the third quarter. New Orleans scored 33 points, while Toronto managed only 25. That eight-point difference created a significant advantage for the home team.
Both teams scored relatively similar totals in the final quarter, but Toronto could not recover the ground it had lost.
Complete Toronto Raptors Player Stats
Toronto received useful offensive contributions from several players, but its shooting percentage remained a major weakness.
The Raptors finished with 39 successful field goals on 94 attempts. Their three-point shooting was also limited, with 14 makes from 44 attempts.
Immanuel Quickley led the team with 25 points. Brandon Ingram followed with 22, while RJ Barrett contributed 16.
Raptors Individual Player Statistics
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Steals | Blocks |
| Immanuel Quickley | 25 | 6 | 3 | 2 | Not provided |
| Brandon Ingram | 22 | 6 | 5 | 4 | Not provided |
| RJ Barrett | 16 | 7 | 1 | 1 | Not provided |
| Scottie Barnes | 9 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Jakob Poeltl | 8 | 5 | 0 | Not provided | 3 |
| Sandro Mamukelashvili | 8 | 5 | 1 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Jamal Shead | 9 | 1 | 3 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Gradey Dick | 7 | 1 | 0 | Not provided | Not provided |
Note: Statistics marked as not provided were not included in the supplied player data. They should not be interpreted as zero.
Immanuel Quickley: 25 Points
Immanuel Quickley was Toronto’s leading scorer and one of the most important offensive contributors in the matchup.
He finished with:
- 25 points
- 6 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 2 steals
Quickley’s scoring output gave Toronto a reliable offensive option. His ability to contribute points while also collecting rebounds and creating defensive opportunities made him an important part of the Raptors’ performance.
However, individual scoring success does not always translate into team success. Quickley reached 25 points, but Toronto still struggled to convert enough of its overall shooting opportunities.
The difference between the teams was particularly visible in field-goal percentage. Toronto shot 41%, while New Orleans reached 51%. That gap made it difficult for the Raptors to keep pace, even with Quickley’s strong scoring contribution.
Brandon Ingram: 22 Points
Brandon Ingram delivered another productive performance for Toronto.
His final numbers included:
- 22 points
- 6 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 4 steals
Ingram’s contribution was valuable because he provided more than scoring. His five assists demonstrated his involvement in creating opportunities for teammates, while four steals represented a significant defensive contribution.
His 22 points also made him Toronto’s second-leading scorer.
The four steals stand out because they show how Ingram contributed to defensive activity even when the team was struggling to contain New Orleans’ offense.
For Toronto, the challenge was turning those defensive plays into more efficient scoring possessions. The Raptors recorded 13 steals as a team, but their overall shooting performance prevented them from fully benefiting from those opportunities.
RJ Barrett: 16 Points
RJ Barrett finished with 16 points and seven rebounds.
His recorded statistics were:
- 16 points
- 7 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 1 steal
Barrett provided useful scoring support behind Quickley and Ingram. His seven rebounds were also important because they helped Toronto remain competitive on the glass.
One interesting detail is that Toronto recorded 43 total rebounds, six fewer than New Orleans. Barrett’s seven rebounds helped support the Raptors’ overall rebounding effort, but the team still struggled to secure enough defensive possessions.
His contribution was meaningful, particularly because Toronto needed multiple players to score consistently against a Pelicans team that was converting shots at a much higher rate.
Scottie Barnes: Defensive Contributions
Scottie Barnes finished with nine points, six rebounds, four assists, three steals, and one block.
Although his scoring total was lower than the Raptors’ leading offensive players, his overall statistical contribution showed activity in several areas.
His four assists helped Toronto move the ball, while three steals represented an important defensive contribution.
Barnes also recorded one block, giving him a presence around the basket.
A player does not need to lead the scoring chart to influence a game. Barnes’ performance demonstrated how rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks can provide value beyond points.
However, Toronto needed more collective offensive efficiency to turn those contributions into a winning result.
Jakob Poeltl: Interior Defense
Jakob Poeltl recorded eight points, five rebounds, and three blocks.
His three blocks were particularly notable. They represented an important defensive contribution and helped Toronto challenge New Orleans around the basket.
Poeltl’s performance highlighted one of the areas where the Raptors had some success. Toronto matched New Orleans with five total team blocks, and Poeltl accounted for three of Toronto’s recorded individual blocks.
However, the Pelicans still managed to score 122 points. This suggests that protecting the rim alone was not enough to disrupt their overall offensive rhythm.
Other Toronto Contributions
Toronto also received contributions from its supporting players.
Sandro Mamukelashvili recorded eight points, five rebounds, and one assist. His production provided additional scoring and rebounding support.
Jamal Shead finished with nine points, one rebound, and three assists. His scoring contribution was useful, while his assists helped create additional offensive opportunities.
Gradey Dick added seven points and one rebound.
These performances show that Toronto had several players contributing offensively. The problem was not simply a lack of individual scoring. It was the team’s overall conversion rate.
When a team attempts 94 field goals but makes only 39, it needs exceptional efficiency in other areas to compensate. Toronto did not receive enough of that additional production to overcome New Orleans.
Complete New Orleans Pelicans Player Stats
New Orleans produced a balanced offensive performance with multiple players contributing significant scoring.
Trey Murphy III led the team with 28 points, while Dejounte Murray scored 27. Zion Williamson added 19 points, and Herbert Jones contributed 16.
This distribution gave the Pelicans several reliable scoring options instead of depending on one player.
Pelicans Individual Player Statistics
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Steals | Blocks |
| Trey Murphy III | 28 | 7 | 3 | 3 | Not provided |
| Dejounte Murray | 27 | 5 | 6 | 2 | Not provided |
| Zion Williamson | 19 | 6 | 4 | 1 | Not provided |
| Herbert Jones | 16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Not provided |
| Yves Missi | 6 | 10 | 2 | Not provided | 2 |
| Jordan Hawkins | 7 | 2 | 2 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Karlo Matkovic | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | Not provided |
| DeAndre Jordan | 3 | 4 | 2 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Derik Queen | 3 | 5 | 3 | Not provided | 2 |
Note: Statistics marked as not provided were not included in the supplied player data. They should not be interpreted as zero.
Trey Murphy III: 28 Points
Trey Murphy III was New Orleans’ leading scorer with 28 points.
His recorded performance included:
- 28 points
- 7 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 3 steals
Murphy’s performance was important because he combined scoring with contributions in other areas.
His seven rebounds helped New Orleans control the glass, while three steals demonstrated defensive activity.
The 28-point performance also gave the Pelicans an important offensive advantage. Toronto had to account for Murphy as a major scoring threat, which created opportunities for other players.
His contribution was particularly valuable because New Orleans did not depend exclusively on outside shooting from one player. The team’s overall field-goal percentage reached 51%, suggesting that its offensive production came from effective execution across the lineup.
Dejounte Murray: 27 Points
Dejounte Murray finished just one point behind Murphy with 27 points.
His complete recorded numbers were:
- 27 points
- 5 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 2 steals
Murray’s six assists were particularly important.
They showed his ability to contribute as both a scorer and a facilitator. While his 27 points helped New Orleans maintain its offensive production, his passing helped create opportunities for teammates.
His performance also supported the Pelicans’ team total of 27 assists.
That number was seven higher than Toronto’s 20 assists. The difference suggests that New Orleans was more successful at creating scoring opportunities through passing.
Murray’s contribution was therefore about more than individual scoring. He helped connect the Pelicans’ offense and maintain pressure on Toronto’s defense.
Zion Williamson: 19 Points
Zion Williamson added 19 points, six rebounds, four assists, and one steal.
His contribution gave New Orleans another important offensive option.
Williamson’s scoring helped prevent Toronto from focusing its defensive attention exclusively on Murphy and Murray.
His four assists were also valuable because they supported the Pelicans’ overall ball movement.
A balanced offensive structure is difficult to defend. When three players score 19 or more points, opponents have to manage several threats simultaneously.
That was one of the important advantages New Orleans created during this game.
Herbert Jones: 16 Points
Herbert Jones contributed 16 points, two rebounds, one assist, and one steal.
His scoring gave the Pelicans a fourth player with at least 16 points.
This was significant because it reduced the pressure on the team’s leading scorers.
Jones also contributed defensively through his recorded steal.
His 16-point performance helped New Orleans maintain offensive balance and prevented Toronto from concentrating all its defensive resources on the team’s primary scoring options.
Yves Missi: 10 Rebounds
Yves Missi made an important contribution on the boards.
His recorded numbers included:
- 6 points
- 10 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 2 blocks
Missi did not need a large scoring total to provide value.
His 10 rebounds were particularly important because they helped New Orleans finish with 49 total rebounds.
He also recorded two blocks, giving the Pelicans additional defensive protection around the basket.
The combination of rebounding and shot-blocking made his performance valuable even without a high scoring total.
Other Pelicans Contributions
New Orleans also received useful production from its supporting players.
Jordan Hawkins recorded seven points, two rebounds, and two assists.
Karlo Matkovic finished with four points, three rebounds, and one steal.
DeAndre Jordan contributed three points, four rebounds, and two assists.
Derik Queen recorded three points, five rebounds, three assists, and two blocks.
These contributions helped New Orleans maintain its overall balance. The leading scorers supplied most of the offensive production, while the supporting players added rebounds, assists, and defensive activity.
Toronto Raptors vs New Orleans Pelicans Team Statistics Comparison
The team statistics provide the clearest explanation of why New Orleans won.
Toronto had some advantages, particularly in steals and offensive rebounds. However, the Pelicans were more efficient with their shooting and created more assists.
Complete Team Statistics
| Statistical Category | Toronto Raptors | New Orleans Pelicans |
| Final Score | 111 | 122 |
| Field Goals | 39/94 | 45/88 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 41% | 51% |
| Three-Pointers | 14/44 | 14/29 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 32% | 48% |
| Free Throws | 19/25 | 18/24 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 76% | 75% |
| Total Rebounds | 43 | 49 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 14 | 10 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 29 | 39 |
| Assists | 20 | 27 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 15 |
| Steals | 13 | 10 |
| Blocks | 5 | 5 |
| Personal Fouls | 17 | 16 |
Several differences deserve closer attention.
Field-Goal Efficiency: New Orleans’ Biggest Advantage
The Pelicans made 45 of their 88 field-goal attempts, producing a 51% shooting percentage.
Toronto made 39 of 94 attempts, finishing at 41%.
That created a 10-percentage-point difference.
The shooting gap was arguably the most important statistical factor in the result.
Toronto attempted six more field goals but made six fewer shots. More attempts did not translate into more points because the Raptors struggled to convert their opportunities.
New Orleans, meanwhile, generated more successful field goals with fewer attempts.
This is a useful reminder that offensive volume and offensive efficiency are different measurements.
A team can attempt more shots without necessarily producing a better offensive performance.
Three-Point Shooting: Same Makes, Different Efficiency
Both teams made 14 three-pointers.
However, their attempts were very different.
Toronto attempted 44 three-pointers, while New Orleans attempted only 29.
The resulting percentages were:
- Toronto: 14/44, or 32%
- New Orleans: 14/29, or 48%
The Pelicans reached the same number of successful three-point shots while using 15 fewer attempts.
That difference illustrates the value of shot selection and conversion.
Toronto generated more perimeter attempts, but the additional volume did not produce additional made three-pointers.
New Orleans was considerably more efficient from outside.
This does not mean that taking fewer three-pointers automatically produces better results. It shows that the quality and conversion rate of those attempts matter.
Rebounding: Pelicans Controlled the Defensive Glass
New Orleans finished with 49 rebounds compared with Toronto’s 43.
The most noticeable difference came from defensive rebounds.
| Rebounding Category | Raptors | Pelicans |
| Offensive Rebounds | 14 | 10 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 29 | 39 |
| Total Rebounds | 43 | 49 |
Toronto actually recorded four more offensive rebounds.
This was a positive area for the Raptors because offensive rebounds can create additional scoring opportunities after missed shots.
However, New Orleans collected 10 more defensive rebounds.
That advantage helped the Pelicans finish defensive possessions and limit Toronto’s ability to generate second-chance opportunities.
The overall six-rebound difference shows that New Orleans had the stronger performance on the boards.
Assists: Better Ball Movement From New Orleans
The Pelicans recorded 27 assists, compared with Toronto’s 20.
That seven-assist advantage is another important part of the statistical story.
Assists provide an indication of how effectively a team creates scoring opportunities through passing.
New Orleans’ total suggests stronger collective involvement in its offensive possessions.
Dejounte Murray contributed six assists, while Zion Williamson added four and Trey Murphy III recorded three.
Toronto also had several players involved in playmaking. Ingram recorded five assists, Barnes added four, and Quickley contributed three.
However, the team total still favored New Orleans.
The difference between 27 and 20 assists suggests that the Pelicans were more successful at connecting individual scoring efforts with team offense.
Turnovers: Toronto Protected the Ball Better
One area where Toronto performed better was turnovers.
The Raptors committed 11 turnovers, while New Orleans recorded 15.
This means Toronto gave the ball away four fewer times.
Fewer turnovers generally help teams maintain possession and reduce unnecessary scoring opportunities for opponents.
Toronto’s lower turnover total was a positive part of its performance.
However, the advantage was not enough to overcome its shooting problems.
The Pelicans compensated for their higher turnover count by converting a greater percentage of their field-goal attempts.
Steals: Toronto Created More Defensive Pressure
Toronto recorded 13 steals, compared with New Orleans’ 10.
That three-steal advantage shows that the Raptors generated more recorded takeaways.
Brandon Ingram contributed four steals, while Scottie Barnes recorded three and Quickley added two.
New Orleans also had multiple contributors, including Murphy with three steals and Murray with two.
Toronto’s defensive activity was useful, but the Pelicans still scored 122 points.
This demonstrates that defensive events must be evaluated alongside overall scoring efficiency.
A team can record more steals and still lose if the opponent consistently converts its offensive opportunities.
Free Throws and Personal Fouls
Toronto made 19 of 25 free throws, finishing at 76%.
New Orleans converted 18 of 24 attempts, producing a 75% percentage.
The teams were almost identical in this category.
Toronto made one additional free throw, but that small advantage did not significantly change the overall statistical balance.
The Raptors committed 17 personal fouls, while the Pelicans committed 16.
Neither team had a major advantage in this area.
The most important differences remained field-goal efficiency, three-point percentage, assists, and defensive rebounding.
How New Orleans Pelicans Won the Game
The final score of 122-111 was the result of several connected advantages rather than one isolated statistical category.
New Orleans created better scoring opportunities, converted its shots more efficiently, and maintained offensive balance.
1. Superior Shooting Efficiency
The Pelicans’ 51% field-goal percentage was significantly higher than Toronto’s 41%.
This was the most obvious difference in the team statistics.
New Orleans made six more field goals despite attempting six fewer shots.
That efficiency allowed the Pelicans to build their lead without relying on an unusually high number of possessions.
Toronto’s 94 attempts show that the team generated offensive volume, but its 39 successful field goals were not enough.
2. Multiple Scoring Leaders
New Orleans had four players score at least 16 points.
- Trey Murphy III: 28 points
- Dejounte Murray: 27 points
- Zion Williamson: 19 points
- Herbert Jones: 16 points
This distribution made the Pelicans difficult to defend.
Toronto could not focus entirely on one scorer because multiple players were capable of producing points.
The Raptors also had three players reach double figures, but New Orleans received a fourth major scoring contribution from Jones.
3. Stronger Ball Movement
New Orleans recorded 27 assists.
That number was seven higher than Toronto’s total.
The Pelicans’ passing helped create a more connected offense.
Murray’s six assists were particularly important, while Williamson and Murphy also contributed to the team’s playmaking.
This collective involvement helped New Orleans produce a more efficient scoring performance.
4. Third-Quarter Separation
The third quarter was a defining period.
New Orleans outscored Toronto 33-25.
That eight-point advantage gave the Pelicans additional breathing room heading into the final quarter.
Toronto could not completely recover from that stretch.
The Raptors scored 28 points in the fourth quarter, but New Orleans matched them with 29.
As a result, the home team protected its advantage and finished with an 11-point victory.
Why Toronto Raptors Lost Despite Strong Individual Performances
Toronto’s defeat was not caused by one player failing to score.
Quickley reached 25 points, Ingram added 22, and Barrett contributed 16.
The Raptors also had advantages in steals, offensive rebounds, and turnovers.
However, several weaknesses prevented those positives from producing a victory.
Poor Overall Shooting Percentage
Toronto’s 41% field-goal percentage was its biggest statistical problem.
The Raptors attempted 94 shots but made only 39.
The Pelicans, by comparison, made 45 of 88 attempts.
This difference created a significant scoring disadvantage.
Inefficient Three-Point Conversion
Toronto made 14 three-pointers, exactly the same number as New Orleans.
However, the Raptors needed 44 attempts to reach that total.
The Pelicans needed only 29.
This difference suggests that Toronto did not receive enough value from its perimeter shooting volume.
Fewer Assists
Toronto recorded 20 assists.
New Orleans recorded 27.
The seven-assist difference indicates that the Pelicans created more assisted scoring opportunities.
Toronto’s individual offensive contributions were useful, but the overall team passing numbers favored New Orleans.
Defensive Rebounding Problems
Toronto collected 29 defensive rebounds, while New Orleans recorded 39.
This difference allowed the Pelicans to finish more defensive possessions successfully.
Although Toronto collected 14 offensive rebounds, the team did not convert enough of its overall shooting opportunities to overcome the gap.
The Importance of the Third Quarter
The third quarter deserves separate attention because it was the largest difference between the teams in any individual period.
Toronto entered halftime after scoring 58 first-half points.
New Orleans had scored 60.
The Pelicans therefore held a narrow two-point advantage.
After halftime, New Orleans scored 33 points and Toronto managed only 25.
The difference increased from two points to 10 points.
That shift changed the competitive situation.
Toronto needed a strong fourth-quarter response, but the Raptors could not produce a large enough scoring advantage.
Both teams scored at least 28 points in the final period, meaning the Pelicans successfully maintained their lead.
This part of the game demonstrates why quarter-by-quarter analysis is valuable.
A final score provides the outcome, but individual periods help identify when a team gained control and where the opponent struggled to respond.
Season Records and Home-Away Context
The supplied matchup information listed Toronto with a 36-29 season record and a 19-13 away record.
New Orleans entered the matchup with a 22-45 overall record and a 13-21 home record.
| Team | Season Record | Home/Away Record |
| Toronto Raptors | 36-29 | 19-13 Away |
| New Orleans Pelicans | 22-45 | 13-21 Home |
On paper, Toronto had the stronger season record.
The Raptors also had a winning away record according to the supplied figures.
New Orleans, meanwhile, had experienced a more difficult season.
However, individual game results do not always follow season-record expectations.
The Pelicans demonstrated that their offensive capabilities could produce a strong result against a team with a better overall record.
The game also illustrates why matchup analysis should consider the actual performances on the court rather than relying exclusively on standings.
Toronto’s season record suggested a stronger overall campaign, but New Orleans executed more effectively on March 12.
Key Statistical Takeaways From the Match
The most important numbers can be summarized through a few direct comparisons.
| Key Performance Area | Advantage | Statistical Difference |
| Final Score | Pelicans | 122-111 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | Pelicans | 51% vs. 41% |
| Three-Point Percentage | Pelicans | 48% vs. 32% |
| Total Rebounds | Pelicans | 49 vs. 43 |
| Defensive Rebounds | Pelicans | 39 vs. 29 |
| Assists | Pelicans | 27 vs. 20 |
| Turnovers | Raptors | 11 vs. 15 |
| Steals | Raptors | 13 vs. 10 |
| Offensive Rebounds | Raptors | 14 vs. 10 |
| Blocks | Tie | 5 each |
| Free-Throw Percentage | Raptors | 76% vs. 75% |
The comparison shows that New Orleans controlled several of the most important offensive and rebounding categories.
Toronto performed better in turnovers, steals, and offensive rebounds.
However, the Pelicans’ shooting efficiency gave them a more substantial advantage.
The difference between 51% and 41% shooting was particularly important because it affected the value of almost every offensive possession.
What This Game Reveals About Both Teams
The matchup offers useful information about the strengths and weaknesses visible in the supplied statistics.
It is important to distinguish between what the numbers directly establish and what they suggest.
One game cannot define an entire season, but it can reveal how particular performance areas influence a result.
What New Orleans Did Well
New Orleans demonstrated several positive characteristics.
First, the Pelicans converted their field-goal opportunities at a high rate.
Second, their leading scorers produced balanced contributions. Murphy, Murray, Williamson, and Jones all reached at least 16 points.
Third, the team recorded 27 assists, suggesting effective offensive coordination.
Finally, New Orleans collected 39 defensive rebounds, helping it finish possessions and limit Toronto’s second-chance opportunities.
These factors worked together to create a successful offensive performance.
What Toronto Can Learn
Toronto’s statistics also identify areas that could be improved.
The Raptors created 94 field-goal attempts and 44 three-point attempts, but their conversion rates were relatively low.
Improving shot quality and perimeter efficiency would help make those possessions more productive.
The team could also benefit from stronger defensive rebounding.
Toronto’s 29 defensive rebounds were 10 fewer than New Orleans’ total.
The Raptors did several things well, including limiting turnovers and generating steals. Building on those strengths while improving shooting efficiency would provide a more balanced statistical profile.
Why Team Efficiency Matters More Than One Scoring Leader
The performances of Quickley, Ingram, Murphy, and Murray show why individual statistics are important.
However, the final result was determined by the combined output of the entire team.
Quickley scored 25 points, but Toronto still lost by 11.
Murphy scored 28 and Murray added 27, but New Orleans also received 19 points from Williamson and 16 from Jones.
The Pelicans’ broader scoring distribution made their offense more difficult to contain.
This is why a complete statistical breakdown should include shooting percentages, rebounds, assists, turnovers, and defensive contributions rather than focusing exclusively on the highest scorer.
Matchup History and Season-Series Information
The supplied matchup data includes two results:
- First listed result: New Orleans Pelicans 122, Toronto Raptors 111.
- Second listed result: Toronto Raptors 119, New Orleans Pelicans 106.
It also identifies New Orleans as the season-series leader with a 1-0 advantage.
There is an inconsistency in these entries because the listed second result indicates a Toronto victory, while the season-series summary still shows New Orleans leading 1-0.
Therefore, the season-series position should not be treated as independently confirmed from the supplied information.
The March 12, 2026 result is clear: New Orleans defeated Toronto 122-111 at the Smoothie King Center.
For readers researching the complete matchup history, it is important to distinguish this confirmed game result from the conflicting season-series summary.
Official Match Information and Box Score Reference
The game was identified by ESPN Game ID 401810803.
The available game information includes the box score, game recap, play-by-play details, and team comparison statistics.
For readers who want to examine the original player and team figures, the ESPN box score provides the relevant game reference.
The supplied broadcast information lists GCSEN, Pelicans.com, and Sportsnet as viewing-related sources.
Availability and broadcast coverage can vary by location and distribution rights.
The three listed game officials were Brent Barnaky, Jason Goldenberg, and Tyler Ricks.
These details help identify the specific contest and distinguish it from other Toronto-New Orleans meetings.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Toronto Raptors vs New Orleans Pelicans game on March 12, 2026?
The New Orleans Pelicans defeated the Toronto Raptors 122-111 on March 12, 2026, at the Smoothie King Center in New Orleans, Louisiana.
2. Who was the leading scorer for the New Orleans Pelicans?
Trey Murphy III was New Orleans’ leading scorer with 28 points. Dejounte Murray followed closely with 27 points, while Zion Williamson contributed 19.
3. How many points did Immanuel Quickley score against the Pelicans?
Immanuel Quickley scored 25 points for Toronto. He also recorded six rebounds, three assists, and two steals.
4. What were Brandon Ingram’s statistics in the game?
Brandon Ingram finished with 22 points, six rebounds, five assists, and four steals. He was Toronto’s second-leading scorer.
5. Why did the Pelicans defeat the Raptors?
New Orleans won primarily because of its superior shooting efficiency. The Pelicans shot 51% from the field and 48% from three-point range, compared with Toronto’s 41% and 32%, respectively. New Orleans also recorded more rebounds and assists.
6. How many rebounds and assists did each team record?
The Pelicans recorded 49 rebounds and 27 assists. Toronto finished with 43 rebounds and 20 assists. New Orleans therefore held a six-rebound and seven-assist advantage.
Conclusion
The March 12, 2026 matchup between Toronto and New Orleans demonstrated how shooting efficiency and balanced team production can determine an NBA result.
The Pelicans secured a 122-111 victory through a strong offensive performance. Trey Murphy III led all New Orleans scorers with 28 points, while Dejounte Murray added 27 and Zion Williamson contributed 19. Herbert Jones also made an important contribution with 16 points.
Toronto received productive performances from Immanuel Quickley, who scored 25 points, and Brandon Ingram, who added 22. RJ Barrett contributed another 16 points. The Raptors also recorded more steals and offensive rebounds while committing fewer turnovers.
However, New Orleans held the more important advantages. Its 51% field-goal percentage was considerably higher than Toronto’s 41%. The Pelicans also shot 48% from three-point range, collected 49 rebounds, and recorded 27 assists.
The third quarter was another defining factor. New Orleans outscored Toronto 33-25 during that period and established an advantage that the Raptors could not overcome.
Ultimately, the game showed that individual scoring performances must be supported by efficient shooting, effective ball movement, and strong defensive rebounding. The complete statistical picture explains why New Orleans earned the victory despite Toronto entering the contest with the stronger season record.
