Knicks vs Brooklyn Nets Match Player Stats
The knicks vs brooklyn nets match player stats from July 11, 2026, tell the story of a dominant Brooklyn Nets performance against the New York Knicks during the NBA Summer League in Las Vegas. Brooklyn secured an impressive 91-65 victory at the Thomas & Mack Center, using a powerful third-quarter performance to turn a competitive contest into a one-sided game. Egor Demin and Mikel Brown Jr. led the Nets with 20 points each, while Pacome Dadiet delivered an equally impressive scoring performance for New York with 20 points.
Although the Knicks entered halftime within reach of their opponents, their offensive production dropped sharply after the break. Brooklyn scored 30 points in the third quarter while limiting New York to just nine. That 21-point difference became the defining moment of the contest. The Nets also controlled the rebounding battle, shot more accurately from the field, and created additional opportunities through their defensive activity.
This game offered an interesting look at two young rosters developing their skills during the NBA Summer League. Individual performances from Demin, Brown, Dadiet, Chaney Johnson, and Tyler Nickel provided several important talking points. Examining the complete team numbers alongside individual contributions helps explain why Brooklyn earned such a convincing result.
Knicks vs Brooklyn Nets Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Brooklyn Nets and New York Knicks met in an NBA Summer League contest on July 11, 2026. The matchup took place in Las Vegas, where both teams were competing to evaluate young players and build experience ahead of the next stage of their basketball development.
Brooklyn finished the game with a 91-65 victory. The result improved the Nets’ Summer League record to 3-2, while the Knicks moved to 1-4.
Here is a quick overview of the matchup.
| Game Detail | Information |
| Matchup | Brooklyn Nets vs. New York Knicks |
| Competition | NBA Summer League |
| Tournament Location | Las Vegas |
| Date | July 11, 2026 |
| Game Time | 3:00 AM |
| Venue | Thomas & Mack Center |
| City | Las Vegas, Nevada |
| Final Score | Nets 91, Knicks 65 |
| Winning Team | Brooklyn Nets |
| Losing Team | New York Knicks |
| Nets Record | 3-2 |
| Knicks Record | 1-4 |
| Game Status | Final |
| Game ID | 401881830 |
Brooklyn’s victory was built on more than scoring. The Nets produced a stronger shooting percentage, collected 14 more rebounds, and matched New York closely in assists despite taking control of the game through their offensive efficiency.
The Knicks had some positive individual performances, particularly from Pacome Dadiet and Tyler Nickel. However, their overall shooting struggles made it difficult to maintain pressure on Brooklyn.
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Results
The final score does not completely explain how this game developed. New York actually held a one-point advantage after the opening quarter. Brooklyn gradually gained control in the second period before producing a decisive third-quarter run.
The quarter-by-quarter breakdown shows exactly when the contest changed.
| Quarter | Brooklyn Nets | New York Knicks |
| First Quarter | 15 | 16 |
| Second Quarter | 23 | 17 |
| Third Quarter | 30 | 9 |
| Fourth Quarter | 23 | 23 |
| Final Score | 91 | 65 |
First Quarter: Knicks Start Slightly Better
The opening quarter was relatively competitive. New York scored 16 points, one more than Brooklyn’s 15.
Neither team established a major advantage during this period. The Knicks managed to create a small lead, but the difference was not large enough to suggest that they had complete control.
For Brooklyn, the opening period provided an opportunity to settle into the game. The Nets eventually found better offensive rhythm, but their early scoring output showed that they needed to improve their execution.
New York’s one-point advantage also demonstrated that the teams were initially capable of competing at a similar level.
Second Quarter: Brooklyn Takes the Lead
The Nets responded in the second quarter with 23 points. New York managed 17.
Brooklyn’s six-point advantage changed the scoreboard and gave the team a five-point halftime lead.
The improvement was important because the Nets began finding more reliable scoring opportunities. Their ability to produce additional points helped create separation without requiring an extraordinary offensive performance.
The Knicks remained within reach, but their scoring output was not enough to prevent Brooklyn from taking control.
At halftime, the Nets led 38-33.
Third Quarter: The Decisive Turning Point
The third quarter was the most important part of the entire matchup.
Brooklyn scored 30 points while holding New York to only nine. The Nets won the period by 21 points, transforming a relatively close contest into a comfortable advantage.
This stretch explains much of the final 26-point margin.
Several factors are visible in the overall statistics:
- Brooklyn finished with a 41% field-goal percentage.
- New York managed only 28% shooting from the field.
- The Nets collected 50 total rebounds.
- The Knicks finished with 36 rebounds.
- Brooklyn recorded eight steals and six blocks.
- New York produced only seven steals and three blocks.
These numbers suggest that Brooklyn combined better offensive execution with stronger activity on the defensive end.
The third quarter was not simply about scoring more points. It was about creating a gap that New York could not recover from.
Fourth Quarter: Brooklyn Maintains Control
Both teams scored 23 points in the final quarter.
The Knicks improved their scoring compared with the third period, but the comeback opportunity had already disappeared.
Brooklyn did not need another major scoring run. Its existing advantage allowed the team to manage the remaining minutes and secure the victory.
The equal fourth-quarter score also shows that New York was capable of producing a more competitive offensive performance after its difficult third period.
However, the earlier 30-9 quarter remained too damaging to overcome.
Brooklyn Nets Player Stats and Individual Performances
The Nets received strong contributions from several players. Egor Demin and Mikel Brown Jr. shared the team’s scoring lead with 20 points apiece.
Chaney Johnson also delivered an important all-around performance, contributing points, rebounds, assists, and defensive production.
Brooklyn Nets Player Statistics
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Steals |
| Egor Demin | 20 | 3 | 2 | Not provided |
| Mikel Brown Jr. | 20 | 1 | 3 | Not provided |
| Chaney Johnson | 11 | 9 | 2 | 4 |
| Danny Wolf | 9 | 8 | 3 | Not provided |
| Hunter Sallis | 9 | 5 | Not provided | Not provided |
Only the player statistics supplied in the available game data are included. Missing individual figures have not been estimated.
Egor Demin: Brooklyn’s Leading Scorer
Egor Demin was one of the most important players in Brooklyn’s victory. He finished with 20 points, three rebounds, and two assists.
His scoring contribution helped the Nets establish offensive pressure throughout the game.
A 20-point performance is particularly valuable in a Summer League environment because these contests provide opportunities for young players to demonstrate their scoring ability, decision-making, and offensive versatility.
Demin’s contribution was not limited to scoring. His three rebounds and two assists also showed that he participated in other areas of the game.
What makes his performance notable is that he shared the scoring responsibility with another teammate. Brooklyn did not depend on a single player to produce all of its offense.
Instead, Demin and Brown both reached 20 points, creating a more balanced scoring attack.
Mikel Brown Jr.: Matching the Team’s Scoring Leader
Mikel Brown Jr. also finished with 20 points.
His final line included one rebound and three assists.
Matching Demin’s scoring total gave Brooklyn two players capable of carrying a significant part of the offensive workload.
His three assists were also important because they showed an ability to contribute to team offense beyond individual scoring.
When two players reach 20 points in the same game, it becomes harder for an opposing defense to focus on just one scoring option.
This type of balance helped Brooklyn maintain offensive pressure and avoid depending entirely on one player.
Chaney Johnson: An All-Around Defensive Performance
Chaney Johnson delivered one of the most complete performances of the contest.
His statistics included:
- 11 points
- Nine rebounds
- Two assists
- Four steals
Johnson’s four steals were especially important. He recorded the highest individual steal total listed in the supplied player statistics.
His nine rebounds also placed him at the top of Brooklyn’s rebounding contributions.
A player who can score, rebound, and create defensive opportunities provides significant value to a team. Johnson demonstrated that combination against New York.
His performance also highlights why basketball analysis should extend beyond points.
A player can influence a game by disrupting passing lanes, collecting missed shots, and creating additional possessions. Johnson contributed in each of these areas.
Danny Wolf: Important Contributions Around the Basket
Danny Wolf recorded nine points, eight rebounds, and three assists.
His eight rebounds were the second-highest individual total among the Brooklyn players listed.
Although his scoring total was lower than those of Demin and Brown, his contribution was valuable because he helped the Nets control the possession battle.
Eight rebounds can make a meaningful difference in a game where one team consistently creates additional opportunities.
Wolf also registered three assists, tying Brown for the highest assist total among the listed Brooklyn players.
His performance reflected a useful combination of rebounding, passing, and scoring.
Hunter Sallis: Supporting the Offensive Effort
Hunter Sallis finished with nine points and five rebounds.
His contribution provided another scoring option for Brooklyn.
Having several players capable of adding points makes an offense more difficult to defend. If opponents focus too heavily on the leading scorers, supporting players can benefit from additional opportunities.
Sallis also added five rebounds, giving the Nets another player who contributed to their advantage on the boards.
New York Knicks Player Stats and Individual Performances
Despite the defeat, New York had several individual performances worth examining.
Pacome Dadiet led the Knicks with 20 points and seven rebounds. Tyler Nickel added 18 points, making him the team’s second-highest scorer among the players included in the supplied statistics.
Dillon Jones also contributed as a playmaker and defender.
New York Knicks Player Statistics
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Steals |
| Pacome Dadiet | 20 | 7 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Tyler Nickel | 18 | 4 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Dillon Jones | 6 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Mohamed Diawara | 7 | 6 | Not provided | Not provided |
The table reflects the available player highlights, not a complete roster box score.
Pacome Dadiet: New York’s Leading Scorer
Pacome Dadiet was the most productive Knicks player in terms of scoring.
He recorded 20 points and seven rebounds, matching Brooklyn’s leading scorers in total points.
His offensive production was one of the few major positives for New York.
Dadiet showed that the Knicks had a player capable of producing points even when the team struggled collectively.
His seven rebounds also demonstrated his contribution beyond the scoring column.
However, an individual 20-point performance was not enough to compensate for the team’s overall shooting problems.
The Knicks finished the game shooting just 28% from the field. That made it difficult for Dadiet’s contribution to translate into a competitive team result.
Tyler Nickel: An Important Scoring Option
Tyler Nickel finished with 18 points and four rebounds.
His scoring output was close to Dadiet’s 20-point total, giving New York two players with significant offensive contributions.
Nickel’s performance was particularly important because the Knicks needed more than one reliable scoring option.
Together, Dadiet and Nickel accounted for 38 points.
That was a substantial share of New York’s 65-point total.
Their production demonstrated that the team had individual scoring ability, but the supporting offense did not provide enough efficiency to challenge Brooklyn consistently.
Dillon Jones: Playmaking and Defensive Activity
Dillon Jones recorded six points, three rebounds, four assists, and three steals.
His four assists led the Knicks among the players highlighted in the available data.
Jones also produced three steals, showing that he contributed defensively.
His statistical line illustrates why assists and steals are important when evaluating a player’s overall impact.
Assists help create scoring opportunities for teammates, while steals can interrupt an opponent’s offensive possession and potentially generate transition opportunities.
Although Jones did not reach double figures in scoring, his contributions in other categories provided value to New York.
Mohamed Diawara: Rebounding Support
Mohamed Diawara recorded seven points and six rebounds.
His six rebounds were a useful contribution, particularly because New York struggled to control the overall rebounding battle.
Diawara’s numbers show that he was involved in the team’s effort to compete physically around the basket.
However, Brooklyn’s collective advantage on the boards made it difficult for New York to gain control of possessions.
His performance was one of the supporting contributions that the Knicks could build on in future Summer League games.
Complete Team Comparison: Nets vs Knicks
The most revealing part of this matchup is the difference between the two teams’ overall statistics.
Brooklyn was more efficient from the field, collected more rebounds, and recorded additional defensive statistics.
New York finished with more assists by one, but that advantage did not offset its shooting problems.
Full Team Statistics
| Statistical Category | Brooklyn Nets | New York Knicks |
| Points | 91 | 65 |
| Field Goals Made | 30 | 19 |
| Field Goals Attempted | 74 | 67 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 41% | 28% |
| Three-Pointers Made | 12 | 9 |
| Three-Pointers Attempted | 34 | 39 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 35% | 23% |
| Free Throws Made | 11 | 10 |
| Free Throws Attempted | 16 | 14 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 69% | 71% |
| Total Rebounds | 50 | 36 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 16 | 10 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 34 | 26 |
| Assists | 15 | 16 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 13 |
| Steals | 8 | 7 |
| Blocks | 6 | 3 |
| Personal Fouls | 22 | 21 |
Field-Goal Efficiency: Brooklyn Had a Clear Advantage
The biggest difference in shooting efficiency came from field goals.
Brooklyn made 30 of 74 attempts, finishing at 41%.
New York converted 19 of 67 attempts, producing a 28% field-goal percentage.
The 13-percentage-point difference was significant.
Brooklyn made 11 more field goals despite attempting only seven additional shots.
This shows that the Nets were more effective at converting their opportunities.
For New York, the low shooting percentage created a difficult situation. Even when the Knicks managed to create offensive possessions, they struggled to turn those possessions into points.
This was particularly damaging during the third quarter, when the team scored just nine points.
Three-Point Shooting: Nets Were More Accurate
Three-point shooting was another area where Brooklyn performed better.
The Nets converted 12 of 34 attempts, giving them a 35% success rate.
The Knicks attempted more three-pointers, taking 39 shots from beyond the arc, but made only nine.
Their percentage was 23%.
The difference is important because New York attempted five more three-pointers but made three fewer.
This indicates that simply taking more shots from long range did not provide the offensive advantage the Knicks needed.
Brooklyn was more productive with fewer attempts.
Three-point efficiency can change the direction of a basketball game because successful long-range shots provide three points instead of two.
The Nets’ better percentage helped them create a larger scoring advantage.
Free-Throw Shooting: A Small Knicks Advantage
Free-throw shooting was one category in which New York performed slightly better.
The Knicks made 10 of 14 attempts, finishing at 71%.
Brooklyn converted 11 of 16 attempts, producing a 69% percentage.
The difference was small and did not have a major influence on the final result.
Both teams had room to improve at the free-throw line, but New York’s slight advantage was not enough to compensate for its field-goal and three-point struggles.
Rebounding: Brooklyn Controlled the Boards
Rebounding was another major factor.
Brooklyn finished with 50 total rebounds, compared with 36 for New York.
That created a 14-rebound advantage for the Nets.
The breakdown was also revealing:
- Brooklyn offensive rebounds: 16
- New York offensive rebounds: 10
- Brooklyn defensive rebounds: 34
- New York defensive rebounds: 26
The Nets collected six more offensive rebounds and eight more defensive rebounds.
Offensive rebounds are especially valuable because they give a team another opportunity to score after missing a shot.
Brooklyn’s 16 offensive rebounds helped the team maintain pressure and create additional possessions.
Defensive rebounds are equally important because they allow a team to end the opponent’s possession and begin its own offensive attack.
The Nets performed better in both categories.
Assists: Knicks Finished Slightly Ahead
New York recorded 16 assists, while Brooklyn finished with 15.
This was a small statistical advantage for the Knicks.
However, the difference of one assist did not translate into better offensive efficiency.
Assists provide information about how teams create scoring opportunities, but they do not tell the entire story.
A team can generate assisted shots and still struggle if those attempts are not converted.
That appears to be an important distinction in this matchup.
The Knicks finished with more assists but made only 28% of their field-goal attempts.
Turnovers: Brooklyn Protected Possessions Better
The Nets recorded 11 turnovers, compared with 13 for the Knicks.
This gave Brooklyn a two-turnover advantage.
Limiting turnovers helps a team maintain offensive opportunities and avoid giving opponents additional chances to score.
The difference was not enormous, but it contributed to Brooklyn’s overall control.
New York needed better shooting efficiency and stronger possession management to remain competitive.
Defensive Statistics: Nets Produced More Stops
Brooklyn recorded eight steals and six blocks.
New York finished with seven steals and three blocks.
The Nets therefore had one additional steal and three more blocks.
These figures suggest that Brooklyn was more active in several defensive categories.
Blocks can discourage opponents from attacking the basket, while steals can create immediate scoring opportunities.
Although the difference in steals was small, the advantage in blocks was more noticeable.
Combined with the rebounding numbers, Brooklyn’s defensive production helped explain its strong second-half performance.
Why Did the Brooklyn Nets Beat the New York Knicks?
A 26-point victory usually results from several factors working together.
In this game, Brooklyn had advantages in shooting efficiency, rebounding, turnovers, and defensive production.
The third-quarter scoring difference was the biggest immediate reason for the final margin, but the wider statistics explain how that advantage developed.
1. Better Overall Shooting
Brooklyn shot 41% from the field, while New York finished at 28%.
This was one of the most important differences.
The Nets converted more of their attempts and produced a stronger offensive performance.
The Knicks struggled to find consistent shooting success, which limited their ability to keep pace.
2. Stronger Three-Point Production
Brooklyn made 12 three-pointers, while New York converted nine.
The Nets also had a much better three-point percentage.
This difference helped Brooklyn generate points without needing as many total attempts.
3. A Major Rebounding Advantage
The Nets collected 50 rebounds compared with 36 for the Knicks.
Their 16 offensive rebounds were especially useful.
More rebounds can lead to more possessions, and additional possessions create more opportunities to score.
Brooklyn’s advantage on the boards helped maintain its offensive pressure.
4. More Effective Defensive Activity
Brooklyn finished with six blocks and eight steals.
The Knicks recorded three blocks and seven steals.
These defensive contributions helped the Nets create a stronger overall performance.
5. The Third-Quarter Explosion
The 30-9 third quarter was the decisive moment.
Brooklyn created a 21-point advantage during that period alone.
New York was unable to produce enough offense to respond.
Even though the Knicks scored 23 points in the fourth quarter, the damage had already been done.
The Importance of Egor Demin and Mikel Brown Jr.’s Combined Scoring
One of the strongest features of Brooklyn’s performance was the shared scoring responsibility between Egor Demin and Mikel Brown Jr.
Both players finished with 20 points.
Their combined 40 points represented a major portion of the Nets’ 91-point total.
This type of offensive balance is important for a developing team.
When an offense relies on just one scorer, opponents can concentrate their defensive attention on that player.
However, when two players can produce 20 points each, the defense must account for multiple threats.
Demin contributed three rebounds and two assists, while Brown added one rebound and three assists.
Both players therefore provided some additional value beyond scoring.
Their performances were central to Brooklyn’s offensive success.
Pacome Dadiet and Tyler Nickel Provided New York’s Main Scoring Threat
The Knicks also received an important scoring contribution from two players.
Dadiet finished with 20 points, while Nickel added 18.
Their combined 38 points represented a large share of New York’s total offense.
However, the difference between individual scoring and team efficiency is important.
Two players can perform well without the entire team producing an effective offensive game.
New York’s 28% field-goal percentage indicates that the overall scoring effort was inefficient.
The Knicks needed more consistent production from the rest of the lineup.
They also needed to convert a greater percentage of their three-point opportunities.
Dadiet and Nickel provided useful offensive contributions, but their individual performances could not overcome Brooklyn’s collective advantages.
How the Rebounding Battle Influenced the Result
Rebounding is sometimes overlooked when readers focus mainly on points and assists.
However, this matchup demonstrated how important controlling the boards can be.
Brooklyn collected 50 rebounds, while New York recorded 36.
The difference of 14 rebounds was significant.
The Nets also collected 16 offensive rebounds.
That gave Brooklyn additional opportunities after missed shots.
The Knicks, by comparison, finished with 10 offensive rebounds.
This difference meant Brooklyn was more successful at creating second-chance opportunities.
The defensive rebounding advantage was also important.
Brooklyn recorded 34 defensive rebounds, while New York collected 26.
Strong defensive rebounding helps prevent opponents from extending possessions.
When combined with offensive rebounds, Brooklyn’s overall advantage on the boards became a major part of the game’s statistical story.
What the Shooting Numbers Reveal About New York’s Performance
The Knicks’ shooting statistics provide a clear explanation for why the team scored only 65 points.
New York made 19 field goals from 67 attempts.
That resulted in a 28% field-goal percentage.
Its three-point shooting was also below Brooklyn’s level.
The Knicks made nine of 39 attempts from long range.
That 23% percentage suggests that the team had difficulty converting perimeter opportunities.
The number of attempts is also worth examining.
New York attempted 39 three-pointers, five more than Brooklyn.
However, the Nets made 12, while the Knicks made only nine.
The problem was therefore not simply a lack of three-point attempts.
Conversion efficiency was the bigger concern.
For a team trying to improve its offensive performance, the most useful lesson is that shot selection and shot conversion must work together.
Taking more shots does not automatically create a better offense.
The Knicks needed more consistent execution to turn their opportunities into points.
NBA Summer League Context: Why This Matchup Matters
NBA Summer League games serve a different purpose from regular-season contests.
They give young players opportunities to compete, develop confidence, and demonstrate their abilities in an organized professional environment.
Coaches and team personnel can evaluate several areas, including:
- Offensive decision-making
- Shooting consistency
- Defensive positioning
- Rebounding effort
- Passing and playmaking
- Communication
- Performance under pressure
- Ability to adjust during a game
This is why individual performances deserve attention even when the final result is one-sided.
For Brooklyn, the game provided positive evidence of offensive balance.
Demin and Brown demonstrated scoring ability, while Johnson contributed across several statistical categories.
Danny Wolf also provided useful rebounding and playmaking production.
For New York, Dadiet and Nickel showed that they could contribute significant scoring.
Jones provided additional value through assists and steals.
However, the game also highlighted areas where the Knicks needed improvement, especially shooting efficiency and team rebounding.
It is important not to treat a Summer League result as a complete prediction of future NBA performance.
These games are useful evaluation opportunities, but they do not establish how every player will perform during a regular-season schedule.
Team Records After the Game
The July 11 result affected the Summer League records of both teams.
Brooklyn improved to 3-2, while New York moved to 1-4.
| Team | Wins | Losses | Winning Percentage |
| Brooklyn Nets | 3 | 2 | .600 |
| New York Knicks | 1 | 4 | .200 |
The Nets’ .600 winning percentage reflected their three victories in five games.
The Knicks’ .200 percentage showed that they had won one of their five games.
Although records are useful for understanding tournament progress, Summer League standings should be considered alongside individual player development.
A team’s main objective is not always the same as winning every game.
Evaluating young players, testing lineups, and improving execution are also important parts of the competition.
Where to Watch Brooklyn Nets vs New York Knicks Summer League Games
The supplied broadcast information for this matchup listed Prime Video and the Gotham Sports App as viewing options.
Availability can vary depending on the game, region, and broadcast arrangements.
For official game information, the ESPN box score provides the recorded statistics and final result.
Readers can also review the ESPN game box score for the July 11, 2026 contest.
Important Game Details and Officials
The matchup took place at the Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The three officials listed for the game were:
| Official | Name |
| Referee 1 | Matthew Myers |
| Referee 2 | Gerda Gatling |
| Referee 3 | Daron Harris |
The game was recorded under ESPN Game ID 401881830.
The final result was Brooklyn Nets 91, New York Knicks 65.
These details help distinguish this Summer League meeting from other matchups between the two New York-area teams.
Understanding Plus-Minus and Other Basketball Statistics
A box score includes more than points, rebounds, and assists.
One additional statistic often used in basketball analysis is plus-minus.
Plus-minus measures the team’s scoring difference while a particular player is on the court.
For example, if a team scores 15 more points than its opponent during a player’s time on the court, that player’s plus-minus is +15.
If the opponent outscores the team by 10 points during that player’s minutes, the figure is -10.
This statistic can provide useful context, but it should not be used alone to evaluate a player’s performance.
A player’s plus-minus can be influenced by teammates, opponents, lineup combinations, and game situations.
It is most useful when considered alongside individual production and team performance.
For this matchup, individual plus-minus figures were not included in the supplied data. Therefore, no player-specific values should be assumed.
Key Takeaways From the Nets vs Knicks Matchup
Several important lessons emerge from this Summer League contest.
Brooklyn Demonstrated Better Offensive Efficiency
The Nets finished with a 41% field-goal percentage compared with New York’s 28%.
They also converted 35% of their three-point attempts, while the Knicks made 23%.
This efficiency advantage helped Brooklyn build its lead.
Rebounding Was a Major Difference
Brooklyn collected 50 rebounds, 14 more than New York.
Its advantage in offensive and defensive rebounds helped the team control possessions.
Both Teams Had Strong Individual Scorers
Demin and Brown led Brooklyn with 20 points each.
Dadiet scored 20 points for New York, while Nickel contributed 18.
These performances demonstrated the scoring potential present on both rosters.
The Third Quarter Decided the Game
Brooklyn’s 30-9 third-quarter advantage created a gap that New York could not overcome.
The period was the defining moment of the matchup.
New York Needed Better Shooting Consistency
The Knicks recorded 67 field-goal attempts but made only 19.
Their 28% shooting percentage was a major obstacle.
Improving shot conversion would have given them a better opportunity to remain competitive.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the Knicks vs Brooklyn Nets game on July 11, 2026?
The Brooklyn Nets defeated the New York Knicks 91-65 in an NBA Summer League game on July 11, 2026, at the Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas.
2. Who was the highest scorer in the Nets vs Knicks game?
Egor Demin and Mikel Brown Jr. were Brooklyn’s leading scorers with 20 points each. Pacome Dadiet also scored 20 points for the New York Knicks.
3. How many points did Pacome Dadiet score against Brooklyn?
Pacome Dadiet scored 20 points and collected seven rebounds for the New York Knicks. He was New York’s leading scorer in the matchup.
4. How many points did Egor Demin score against the Knicks?
Egor Demin recorded 20 points, three rebounds, and two assists for the Brooklyn Nets.
5. Which team had more rebounds in the game?
Brooklyn had more rebounds, collecting 50 compared with New York’s 36. The Nets also led in offensive rebounds, 16-10.
6. What was the biggest turning point in the Nets vs Knicks game?
The third quarter was the biggest turning point. Brooklyn scored 30 points and limited New York to nine, creating a 21-point advantage in that period.
Conclusion
The July 11, 2026, meeting between Brooklyn and New York was a convincing Summer League victory for the Nets. Brooklyn finished with a 91-65 win after delivering a dominant third quarter and maintaining its advantage throughout the final period.
The individual numbers highlighted several impressive performances. Egor Demin and Mikel Brown Jr. each scored 20 points, while Chaney Johnson contributed 11 points, nine rebounds, two assists, and four steals. Danny Wolf also helped Brooklyn control the boards with eight rebounds.
For New York, Pacome Dadiet recorded 20 points and seven rebounds, while Tyler Nickel added 18 points and four rebounds. Dillon Jones contributed four assists and three steals.
The team statistics explain the difference in the final result. Brooklyn shot 41% from the field and 35% from three-point range. New York managed 28% and 23%, respectively. The Nets also controlled the rebounding battle by a margin of 50-36.
Ultimately, the third-quarter score of 30-9 defined the matchup. Brooklyn’s better shooting, rebounding, and defensive activity allowed the team to secure a comfortable victory and improve its Summer League record to 3-2. New York finished at 1-4, with individual scoring performances providing some positive signs despite the disappointing team result.
