Sacramento kings vs san antonio spurs match player stats

The sacramento kings vs san antonio spurs match player stats provide a detailed look at how San Antonio secured a convincing 126-97 victory over Sacramento on October 17, 2026, at the Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas. The Spurs controlled the game from the opening quarter, producing 42 points in the first 12 minutes and building an advantage that the Kings struggled to overcome. Dylan Harper led San Antonio with 19 points, while Zach LaVine was Sacramento’s leading scorer with 20 points. Victor Wembanyama, De’Aaron Fox, Stephon Castle, and the Spurs’ supporting players also contributed to a balanced team performance.

The 29-point result reflected more than just a difference in shooting. San Antonio dominated the rebounding battle, created additional scoring opportunities, moved the ball effectively, and established defensive pressure throughout the contest. Sacramento showed some improvement after halftime, particularly in the third quarter, but the early deficit proved too large to overcome.

This breakdown examines the complete box score, starting lineups, bench contributions, individual performances, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter scoring, and the most important factors behind San Antonio’s victory. It also explains what the numbers reveal about both teams beyond the final score.

Sacramento Kings vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The October 17 matchup took place during the 2026-27 NBA preseason at the Frost Bank Center. San Antonio entered its home game looking to build better chemistry among its established players and developing talent. Sacramento, meanwhile, had an opportunity to evaluate its lineup combinations and individual performances against a competitive opponent.

The Spurs delivered an impressive offensive performance, finishing with 126 points. Their 45% field-goal shooting, 33% three-point accuracy, and 61 total rebounds helped establish control over the contest.

Sacramento finished with 97 points and struggled to find consistent offensive rhythm. Although the Kings generated 13 steals and received productive scoring contributions from LaVine, Sabonis, and Simmons, their shooting efficiency and rebounding numbers were not enough to match San Antonio.

Match Information

Match Detail	Information
Sport	NBA Basketball
Game	Sacramento Kings vs San Antonio Spurs
Date	October 17, 2026
Match Time	5:00 AM
Season	2026-27 Preseason
Venue	Frost Bank Center
Location	San Antonio, Texas
Attendance	18,354
Final Score	Spurs 126, Kings 97
Winning Team	San Antonio Spurs
Winning Margin	29 Points
Kings Record Listed	0-5
Spurs Record Listed	2-3
Game Officials	J.T. Orr, J.B. DeRosa, Brent Haskill
Broadcast Information	DAZN SAS, Kings+
ESPN Game ID	401898843

The attendance of 18,354 indicates strong interest in the matchup at the Frost Bank Center. Playing in front of a home crowd, San Antonio established its advantage early and maintained control for most of the game.

The most important statistical difference was the rebounding margin. San Antonio collected 61 rebounds compared with Sacramento’s 38. That 23-rebound advantage gave the Spurs additional possessions and reduced Sacramento’s opportunities to build offensive momentum.

Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown

The scoring progression explains why San Antonio won so comfortably. The Spurs produced their biggest offensive performance in the opening quarter, scoring 42 points while limiting Sacramento to just 18.

Sacramento improved after the first quarter, but the early damage had already created a difficult situation.

Quarter	Sacramento Kings	San Antonio Spurs
First Quarter	18	42
Second Quarter	19	29
Third Quarter	35	30
Fourth Quarter	25	25
Final Score	97	126

First Quarter: San Antonio Takes Immediate Control

San Antonio opened the game with an outstanding offensive display, scoring 42 points in the first quarter. Sacramento managed only 18, leaving the Kings with a 24-point deficit after the opening period.

The Spurs’ early success established the direction of the game. Their offense found scoring opportunities through multiple players instead of relying on one individual. The combination of efficient shooting, ball movement, and pressure around the basket made it difficult for Sacramento to establish defensive stability.

The Kings struggled to match the Spurs’ pace. Their limited first-quarter production forced them into an early recovery situation, making every subsequent possession increasingly important.

A 42-18 opening period is significant because it creates both a scoreboard advantage and a tactical advantage. The leading team can maintain its preferred style, while the trailing team may feel pressure to take more difficult shots.

Second Quarter: Spurs Extend Their Advantage

San Antonio continued to control the game in the second quarter, scoring 29 points against Sacramento’s 19.

The Spurs entered halftime with a 71-37 advantage. Their 34-point lead demonstrated how effectively they had managed the first half.

Sacramento needed a major improvement in shooting efficiency and defensive execution. However, San Antonio continued to generate enough offense to prevent the Kings from making meaningful progress.

The second quarter also highlighted the importance of consistent team production. Even after the outstanding opening period, the Spurs did not allow their offensive intensity to disappear.

Third Quarter: Sacramento Shows Its Best Response

The third quarter was Sacramento’s strongest period.

The Kings scored 35 points, their highest quarter total of the game, while holding San Antonio to 30.

This five-point advantage showed that Sacramento could compete more effectively when its offense became productive. The Kings found better scoring opportunities and reduced the difference between the teams.

However, the 34-point halftime deficit meant that a five-point improvement was not enough to change the overall result.

The third quarter remains an important part of the statistical story because it shows that Sacramento did not produce the same offensive performance throughout all four periods. Its strongest response came after halftime.

Fourth Quarter: Both Teams Finish Even

The final quarter ended 25-25.

Neither team created a scoring advantage during the period, and San Antonio comfortably protected its lead.

The Spurs did not need an unusually high-scoring finish. Their work during the first half had already established enough separation to secure the victory.

For Sacramento, the final quarter represented another missed opportunity to reduce the deficit. The Kings scored at a reasonable rate, but they could not produce the sustained run needed to make the game competitive again.

Sacramento Kings Player Stats

Sacramento finished with 97 points, shooting 41% from the field and 24% from three-point range. The team’s leading scorer was Zach LaVine, who recorded 20 points.

Domantas Sabonis contributed a double-digit scoring and rebounding performance, while Ben Simmons provided playmaking and rebounding support.

The Kings also received useful contributions from Precious Achiuwa, Darius Acuff Jr., and other bench players.

Sacramento Kings Starting Lineup Statistics

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	FG
Domantas Sabonis	30	14	10	1	0	0	4-9
Keegan Murray	17	3	1	0	0	0	1-5
Zach LaVine	30	20	3	3	3	0	6-12
Ben Simmons	26	14	8	7	1	0	5-9
Darius Acuff Jr.	19	13	1	2	0	1	5-12

Zach LaVine Leads Sacramento in Scoring

Zach LaVine was the Kings’ leading scorer, finishing with 20 points in 30 minutes.

His shooting numbers included:

• 20 total points
• 6-of-12 field goals
• 1-of-5 three-pointers
• 7-of-7 free throws
• 3 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 3 steals

LaVine’s 50% field-goal accuracy was one of the more encouraging individual statistics for Sacramento. He converted half of his attempts from the field and made every free throw he attempted.

His three-point shooting was less effective. LaVine connected on only one of five attempts from beyond the arc.

Nevertheless, his overall scoring production gave Sacramento an important offensive option. The three steals also showed that he contributed defensively rather than focusing exclusively on scoring.

The main challenge was that Sacramento did not receive enough similarly efficient scoring performances from the rest of its starting lineup.

Domantas Sabonis Provides Interior Production

Domantas Sabonis recorded 14 points and 10 rebounds in 30 minutes.

His complete statistical line included:

• 14 points
• 10 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 4-of-9 field goals
• 5-of-10 free throws
• 5 turnovers

Sabonis reached double figures in both scoring and rebounding. His 10 rebounds made him Sacramento’s leading rebounder.

However, the five turnovers were an important part of his performance. Against a team that was already controlling the game, losing possessions created additional challenges for the Kings.

Sabonis also converted only half of his free throws. Improving that efficiency would have helped Sacramento make better use of its opportunities.

His rebounding contribution was valuable, but San Antonio’s collective size and activity around the basket limited the overall impact of his interior production.

Ben Simmons Contributes as a Playmaker

Ben Simmons finished with 14 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists.

His performance was particularly important because he provided Sacramento with another player capable of creating opportunities for teammates.

His numbers included:

• 14 points
• 8 rebounds
• 7 assists
• 5-of-9 field goals
• 4-of-4 free throws
• 1 steal
• 5 turnovers

Simmons was one of Sacramento’s most productive playmakers. His seven assists led the Kings, demonstrating his ability to distribute the basketball and involve teammates.

He also converted all four of his free throws and shot approximately 56% from the field.

However, his five turnovers were a concern. The combination of seven assists and five turnovers shows that his playmaking created opportunities but also came with possession losses.

A more efficient balance between creating shots and protecting the basketball would have improved Sacramento’s offensive execution.

Darius Acuff Jr. Shows Scoring Potential

Darius Acuff Jr. contributed 13 points in 19 minutes.

His performance included:

• 13 points
• 5-of-12 field goals
• 1-of-2 three-pointers
• 2-of-4 free throws
• 2 assists
• 1 block

Acuff provided another scoring option in the starting lineup. His 13 points demonstrated an ability to contribute even when the team was struggling collectively.

His shooting percentage was not particularly high, but he converted five field goals and added a defensive block.

For a preseason contest, individual production from younger players can be useful when evaluating their offensive decision-making, shot selection, and ability to handle minutes against NBA competition.

Keegan Murray Has a Difficult Shooting Night

Keegan Murray finished with three points in 17 minutes.

His statistical line included:

• 3 points
• 1-of-5 field goals
• 1-of-2 three-pointers
• 1 rebound
• 2 personal fouls

Murray struggled to establish an offensive rhythm. Although he made one three-pointer, his overall field-goal production remained limited.

His performance illustrates one of Sacramento’s major problems in this game: the starting lineup did not receive consistent scoring from every position.

When one of the team’s starting players contributes only three points, the scoring responsibility becomes more concentrated on the other starters and the bench.

Sacramento Kings Bench Player Statistics

Sacramento’s bench produced several useful individual performances, particularly from Precious Achiuwa.

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	FG
De’Andre Hunter	20	2	2	0	1	0	1-5
Precious Achiuwa	22	13	4	2	1	0	6-7
Alex Karaban	5	0	0	0	1	0	0-0
Jonathan Mogbo	12	4	4	0	1	0	2-4
Daeqwon Plowden	12	5	0	0	0	0	1-3
Tristen Newton	5	1	0	1	1	0	0-2
Nique Clifford	18	5	4	1	0	1	2-5
Emanuel Sharp	25	3	1	2	4	0	1-9

Players listed as DNP (Did Not Play) were Leaky Black, Viktor Lakhin, Dylan Cardwell, Maxime Raynaud, Elfrid Payton, Malik Monk, and Adam Flagler.

Precious Achiuwa Delivers Efficient Bench Scoring

Precious Achiuwa produced one of Sacramento’s most efficient offensive performances.

He recorded 13 points in 22 minutes while making six of seven field-goal attempts.

His numbers included:

• 13 points
• 6-of-7 field goals
• 4 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 1 steal

Achiuwa’s field-goal accuracy was approximately 86%, making him one of the most efficient scorers on either team.

His performance was particularly notable because Sacramento struggled to shoot efficiently as a team.

He demonstrated the value of effective interior scoring and converting high-quality opportunities. His contribution also gave the Kings another productive option outside their starting five.

Nique Clifford Makes a Positive Contribution

Nique Clifford recorded five points, four rebounds, one assist, and one block in 18 minutes.

His most encouraging statistical detail was his plus/minus of +6.

Plus/minus measures the point difference while a player is on the court. Clifford was the only Sacramento player with a positive figure in the supplied box score.

Although this statistic does not independently establish an individual’s overall performance, it provides additional context about the team’s scoring during his minutes.

Clifford also connected on two of five field-goal attempts and made his only three-point attempt.

Emanuel Sharp Creates Defensive Opportunities

Emanuel Sharp recorded four steals, the highest individual total for Sacramento.

He finished with three points, one rebound, and two assists in 25 minutes.

His four steals demonstrated his ability to disrupt San Antonio’s offensive possessions.

However, his shooting performance was difficult. Sharp made only one of nine field-goal attempts and missed all five of his three-point attempts.

His defensive activity was useful, but Sacramento needed more offensive production to compete with San Antonio’s scoring efficiency.

San Antonio Spurs Player Stats

San Antonio’s 126-point performance featured contributions from its starters and reserves.

Dylan Harper led the team with 19 points, while De’Aaron Fox added 16. Victor Wembanyama contributed 14 points and eight rebounds, and Stephon Castle finished with 13 points and five assists.

The Spurs also received 15 points from Keldon Johnson and 11 from Ja’Kobi Gillespie.

This balanced scoring distribution made San Antonio difficult to defend.

San Antonio Spurs Starting Lineup Statistics

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	FG
Victor Wembanyama	17	14	8	2	2	2	5-9
De’Aaron Fox	22	16	6	3	0	0	5-9
Devin Vassell	22	12	6	4	1	1	5-10
Stephon Castle	23	13	5	5	2	0	6-9
Dylan Harper	21	19	0	4	1	0	7-12

Dylan Harper Leads the Spurs in Scoring

Dylan Harper delivered the highest scoring total for San Antonio, finishing with 19 points in 21 minutes.

His performance included:

• 19 points
• 7-of-12 field goals
• 3-of-6 three-pointers
• 2-of-4 free throws
• 4 assists
• 1 steal

Harper’s 58% field-goal accuracy demonstrated impressive scoring efficiency.

He also converted three of his six attempts from three-point range, giving San Antonio another reliable perimeter scoring option.

His four assists showed that he contributed to the team’s ball movement rather than concentrating entirely on individual scoring.

One particularly interesting detail was his plus/minus of +20. San Antonio significantly outscored Sacramento during his time on the floor.

Harper’s performance was an important example of how a young player can influence a game through efficient shooting and productive decision-making.

De’Aaron Fox Controls the Offensive Tempo

De’Aaron Fox finished with 16 points, six rebounds, and three assists in 22 minutes.

His shooting statistics included:

• 16 points
• 5-of-9 field goals
• 2-of-5 three-pointers
• 4-of-4 free throws
• 6 rebounds
• 3 assists
• +33 plus/minus

Fox recorded the highest plus/minus among all players in the supplied box score.

His +33 figure means San Antonio outscored Sacramento by 33 points during his minutes on the court.

This does not mean Fox personally scored 33 points more than his opponent. Instead, it reflects the combined scoring difference while he participated.

His ability to score efficiently, contribute rebounds, and create opportunities helped the Spurs maintain their advantage.

Fox’s performance was particularly impressive because he played only 22 minutes.

Victor Wembanyama Contributes on Both Ends

Victor Wembanyama recorded 14 points, eight rebounds, two assists, two steals, and two blocks in 17 minutes.

His shooting performance included five successful field goals on nine attempts and four made free throws on four attempts.

His statistical contribution was notable in several areas:

• 14 points
• 8 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 2 steals
• 2 blocks
• 5-of-9 field goals
• +32 plus/minus

Wembanyama’s defensive numbers were particularly valuable.

Two steals and two blocks demonstrated his ability to influence possessions in different ways. His size also provides San Antonio with an important defensive presence around the basket.

He did not need extended playing time to produce an effective statistical performance.

The combination of scoring, rebounding, and defensive activity made him one of the Spurs’ most influential players.

Stephon Castle Provides Playmaking and Defense

Stephon Castle finished with 13 points, five rebounds, and five assists.

His performance also included two steals and four turnovers.

Castle converted six of nine field-goal attempts, giving him approximately 67% shooting accuracy.

His ability to create opportunities for teammates was particularly important. Five assists made him San Antonio’s leading assist provider.

He also contributed defensively with two steals.

Castle’s plus/minus of +32 reflected San Antonio’s substantial scoring advantage during his playing time.

Although four turnovers were a negative part of his performance, his overall contribution remained strong.

Devin Vassell Adds Efficient Scoring and Versatility

Devin Vassell recorded 12 points, six rebounds, and four assists in 22 minutes.

His statistics included:

• 12 points
• 5-of-10 field goals
• 2-of-6 three-pointers
• 6 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 1 steal
• 1 block

Vassell contributed in multiple areas rather than focusing only on scoring.

His four assists demonstrated his ability to support the team’s offensive movement, while six rebounds added value on the defensive and offensive glass.

He also connected on two three-point attempts.

His balanced statistical line was another example of San Antonio’s collective approach.

San Antonio Spurs Bench Player Statistics

The Spurs’ reserves provided additional scoring, rebounding, and defensive support.

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	FG
Harrison Barnes	13	3	1	0	0	0	1-3
Keldon Johnson	20	15	5	2	0	0	4-9
Julian Champagnie	17	9	4	2	0	1	3-11
David Jones Garcia	10	2	1	0	1	0	1-4
Carter Bryant	17	5	8	0	0	0	2-7
Maliq Brown	10	4	4	0	0	0	2-4
Luke Kornet	13	1	3	0	0	1	0-2
Tarris Reed Jr.	14	2	8	2	1	0	0-1
Jordan McLaughlin	10	0	2	2	0	0	0-2
Ja’Kobi Gillespie	10	11	0	1	0	1	3-6

Players listed as DNP were Malik Williams, Jon Elmore, RJ Davis, and Taelon Peter.

Keldon Johnson Provides Valuable Bench Scoring

Keldon Johnson was one of San Antonio’s most productive reserves.

He recorded 15 points, five rebounds, and two assists in 20 minutes.

His scoring numbers included four successful field goals on nine attempts and six made free throws on nine attempts.

Johnson also collected four offensive rebounds.

That detail is important because offensive rebounds create additional scoring opportunities. His activity around the basket helped San Antonio maintain pressure on Sacramento’s defense.

His contribution demonstrated that the Spurs could continue generating offense when their starting players were not on the court.

Ja’Kobi Gillespie Adds Perimeter Scoring

Ja’Kobi Gillespie finished with 11 points in only 10 minutes.

He made three of six field-goal attempts, including three of four from three-point range.

His performance included:

• 11 points
• 3-of-6 field goals
• 3-of-4 three-pointers
• 2-of-2 free throws
• 1 assist
• 1 block

Gillespie’s three successful three-pointers were the highest individual total for San Antonio.

His ability to generate 11 points in limited playing time provided another example of the team’s bench depth.

Carter Bryant and Tarris Reed Jr. Lead Bench Rebounding

Carter Bryant and Tarris Reed Jr. each recorded eight rebounds.

Bryant added five points, while Reed finished with two points.

Both players contributed to San Antonio’s overall rebounding advantage.

Bryant collected three offensive rebounds, while Reed recorded one offensive rebound and seven defensive rebounds.

Their combined eight-rebound performances were especially useful because San Antonio was already controlling the boards through its starting lineup.

The Spurs’ ability to receive rebounding production from multiple positions made it difficult for Sacramento to secure defensive possessions consistently.

Team Statistics: Sacramento Kings vs San Antonio Spurs

The team statistics provide the clearest explanation of the final result.

San Antonio outperformed Sacramento in field-goal percentage, three-point percentage, rebounding, assists, and blocked shots.

The Kings recorded more steals, but that advantage did not compensate for their problems in other areas.

Statistical Category	Sacramento Kings	San Antonio Spurs
Total Points	97	126
Field Goals	34-82	44-98
Field-Goal Percentage	41%	45%
Three-Pointers	6-25	17-51
Three-Point Percentage	24%	33%
Free Throws	23-34	21-28
Free-Throw Percentage	68%	75%
Total Rebounds	38	61
Assists	19	27
Turnovers	20	19
Steals	13	8
Blocks	2	6
Offensive Rebounds	7	19
Defensive Rebounds	31	42
Personal Fouls	25	25

Field-Goal Efficiency

San Antonio finished with 44 successful field goals on 98 attempts, producing a 45% shooting percentage.

Sacramento converted 34 of 82 attempts, finishing at 41%.

Although the Spurs attempted 16 more field goals, they also converted 10 additional shots.

The difference in field-goal percentage was four percentage points.

That gap might appear relatively small, but it becomes more important when combined with the difference in total attempts and offensive rebounds.

San Antonio generated additional possessions and converted them into more points.

Three-Point Shooting Advantage

Three-point shooting was another important difference.

San Antonio made 17 of 51 attempts, while Sacramento connected on only six of 25.

The Spurs finished with 33% accuracy from beyond the arc, compared with 24% for the Kings.

San Antonio made 11 more three-pointers.

Because each successful three-pointer is worth three points, that difference represented a substantial part of the offensive separation.

The Spurs also received perimeter scoring from multiple players, including Dylan Harper, Ja’Kobi Gillespie, Devin Vassell, Stephon Castle, and Julian Champagnie.

Sacramento struggled to generate similar production.

Rebounding: San Antonio’s Biggest Advantage

San Antonio won the rebounding battle 61-38.

The 23-rebound difference was the largest statistical advantage in the game.

The Spurs collected 19 offensive rebounds and 42 defensive rebounds.

Sacramento recorded seven offensive rebounds and 31 defensive rebounds.

This difference matters because rebounds determine which team gains possession after missed shots.

Offensive rebounds provide another opportunity to score, while defensive rebounds prevent the opponent from extending possessions.

San Antonio’s 19 offensive rebounds were particularly important. They gave the Spurs additional chances to attack the basket and maintain offensive pressure.

Sacramento needed better collective positioning and stronger defensive rebounding to limit these opportunities.

Assists and Ball Movement

The Spurs recorded 27 assists compared with Sacramento’s 19.

This eight-assist advantage indicates that San Antonio generated more assisted scoring opportunities.

Stephon Castle led the Spurs with five assists, while Devin Vassell and Dylan Harper each contributed four.

For Sacramento, Ben Simmons led the team with seven assists.

Although Simmons had the highest individual assist total in the game, the Spurs finished with more assists as a team.

This distinction highlights the difference between individual playmaking and overall offensive distribution.

Turnovers and Possession Management

Sacramento recorded 20 turnovers, while San Antonio finished with 19.

The one-turnover difference was relatively small.

However, both teams had opportunities to improve their possession management.

Sabonis and Simmons each recorded five turnovers, while Castle registered four.

For Sacramento, reducing these mistakes would have helped preserve offensive possessions.

Turnovers become particularly damaging when the opposing team is already scoring efficiently.

Defensive Production

Sacramento recorded 13 steals, five more than San Antonio’s eight.

Emanuel Sharp led the Kings with four steals, while Zach LaVine added three.

The Spurs recorded six blocks compared with Sacramento’s two.

Wembanyama led San Antonio with two blocks.

These numbers show that the teams created different types of defensive pressure.

Sacramento was more active in stealing the basketball, while San Antonio provided stronger rim protection and blocked more shots.

The Spurs’ defensive rebounding also helped them finish possessions more consistently.

Five Major Reasons San Antonio Won

The final score was the result of several connected statistical advantages.

1. Outstanding First-Quarter Performance

San Antonio scored 42 points in the opening quarter.

Sacramento managed only 18.

The 24-point difference established a difficult situation for the Kings before the game reached halftime.

The Spurs used their early advantage to control the pace and maintain offensive confidence.

2. Superior Rebounding

San Antonio collected 23 more rebounds than Sacramento.

This advantage created additional scoring opportunities and helped the Spurs limit second-chance possessions for the Kings.

The offensive rebounding difference was especially important.

The Spurs collected 19 offensive boards compared with Sacramento’s seven.

3. Better Three-Point Accuracy

San Antonio made 17 three-pointers at 33% accuracy.

Sacramento made only six at 24%.

The Spurs’ ability to score from beyond the arc increased their offensive flexibility and forced Sacramento to defend a larger area of the court.

4. Balanced Scoring Contributions

San Antonio had several players capable of producing points.

Dylan Harper led with 19, followed by De’Aaron Fox with 16 and Keldon Johnson with 15.

Wembanyama and Castle each added 14 and 13 points respectively.

This distribution reduced the pressure on any single player to carry the offense.

5. More Effective Overall Team Offense

San Antonio recorded 27 assists and shot 45% from the field.

Sacramento finished with 19 assists and 41% shooting.

The Spurs’ offensive production was supported by better ball movement, rebounding, and perimeter shooting.

Together, these advantages created a performance that Sacramento could not match.

Key Player Comparisons

Individual comparisons help explain how the most important players influenced the result.

Zach LaVine vs Dylan Harper

LaVine scored 20 points, making him the game’s leading scorer.

Harper finished with 19 points, one fewer than LaVine.

Category	Zach LaVine	Dylan Harper
Points	20	19
Rebounds	3	0
Assists	3	4
Steals	3	1
Field Goals	6-12	7-12
Three-Pointers	1-5	3-6
Minutes	30	21

LaVine produced more total points, but Harper reached almost the same scoring figure in nine fewer minutes.

Harper also had better three-point accuracy and contributed one additional assist.

Both players delivered useful individual performances, although Harper’s team secured the victory.

Domantas Sabonis vs Victor Wembanyama

The matchup between Sabonis and Wembanyama offered an interesting comparison of interior production.

Category	Domantas Sabonis	Victor Wembanyama
Points	14	14
Rebounds	10	8
Assists	1	2
Steals	0	2
Blocks	0	2
Field Goals	4-9	5-9
Minutes	30	17
Turnovers	5	0

Sabonis collected two more rebounds and played considerably longer.

Wembanyama, however, contributed more defensively and committed no turnovers.

Both players scored 14 points, but their statistical contributions came in different ways.

Sabonis focused more heavily on rebounding and interior production, while Wembanyama contributed across scoring, defense, and possession protection.

Ben Simmons vs Stephon Castle

Both players contributed to their teams through playmaking.

Category	Ben Simmons	Stephon Castle
Points	14	13
Rebounds	8	5
Assists	7	5
Steals	1	2
Turnovers	5	4
Field Goals	5-9	6-9
Minutes	26	23

Simmons recorded the higher assist total and collected more rebounds.

Castle was more efficient from the field and added another steal.

Their performances demonstrate the importance of guards and versatile playmakers who can contribute beyond scoring.

What the Plus/Minus Numbers Reveal

Plus/minus is a useful statistic for understanding how a team’s overall score changes while an individual player is on the court.

It should not be interpreted as an independent measurement of personal quality because teammates, opponents, rotations, and game situations all influence the result.

Still, the numbers from this matchup offer useful context.

Best Plus/Minus Performances

Team	Player	Plus/Minus
Spurs	De’Aaron Fox	+33
Spurs	Victor Wembanyama	+32
Spurs	Stephon Castle	+32
Spurs	Devin Vassell	+26
Spurs	Dylan Harper	+20
Kings	Nique Clifford	+6
Kings	Jonathan Mogbo	0
Kings	Tristen Newton	0
Kings	Daeqwon Plowden	-3
Kings	Precious Achiuwa	-4

Fox recorded the highest plus/minus in the game.

Wembanyama and Castle were close behind, each finishing at +32.

These figures demonstrate how effectively San Antonio controlled the scoreboard during its starters’ minutes.

Nique Clifford was the only Sacramento player with a positive plus/minus.

However, the statistic should always be considered alongside minutes played and the overall game situation.

Sacramento Kings’ Main Areas for Improvement

Although this was a preseason game, the statistical differences identify several areas Sacramento could evaluate.

Improve Three-Point Shooting

Sacramento made only six three-pointers.

A 24% success rate made it difficult to maintain offensive pressure against a team that converted 17 shots from beyond the arc.

The Kings would benefit from more consistent perimeter shooting and better selection of three-point attempts.

Protect the Basketball

The Kings committed 20 turnovers.

Sabonis and Simmons accounted for 10 of them combined.

Improving ball security would help Sacramento create more scoring opportunities and reduce unnecessary possessions for opponents.

Strengthen Defensive Rebounding

Sacramento allowed 19 offensive rebounds.

That number represents a major concern because every offensive rebound provides the opposing team with another chance to score.

Better positioning, communication, and collective rebounding effort could help reduce these opportunities.

Improve Starting-Lineup Consistency

LaVine, Sabonis, and Simmons each scored 14 or more points.

However, Keegan Murray recorded only three points.

A more balanced contribution from the starting lineup would make Sacramento less dependent on a small number of scorers.

Maintain Defensive Intensity

The Kings recorded 13 steals, which was a positive statistic.

However, they allowed San Antonio to score 126 points.

Creating steals is valuable, but it must be combined with defensive rebounding, transition defense, and effective protection around the basket.

What San Antonio Can Take From This Performance

The Spurs also had useful lessons from the game.

Their victory showed the benefits of balanced scoring, strong rebounding, and efficient offensive execution.

Continue Developing Young Players

Dylan Harper scored 19 points, Stephon Castle added 13, and Ja’Kobi Gillespie contributed 11.

These performances provided encouraging evidence of scoring potential among San Antonio’s younger players.

Preseason games offer opportunities to evaluate how developing players respond to different defensive approaches and playing situations.

Maintain Rebounding Strength

The Spurs’ 61 rebounds were a major advantage.

Carter Bryant and Tarris Reed Jr. each recorded eight rebounds, while Wembanyama collected eight and Fox added six.

Receiving this level of production from several positions makes the team more difficult to control around the basket.

Preserve Offensive Balance

San Antonio had five players score at least 12 points.

That balance helped prevent Sacramento from focusing its defensive attention on one primary scorer.

The Spurs should continue emphasizing ball movement and efficient shot selection.

Use Defensive Versatility

Wembanyama’s two blocks, Castle’s two steals, and the team’s six total blocks showed that San Antonio could disrupt Sacramento in different ways.

Maintaining defensive activity without giving away unnecessary fouls is an important part of building consistent team performance.

Season Series and Additional Matchup Context

The supplied matchup information also includes additional games between Sacramento and San Antonio during the 2026-27 season.

According to those records, San Antonio held a 2-0 season-series advantage.

Matchup	Result	Venue	Date
Game 1	Spurs 130-103 Kings	San Antonio	October 28
Game 2	Spurs 124-109 Kings	Sacramento	November 7
Game 3	Scheduled	Sacramento	November 24
Game 4	Scheduled	San Antonio	April 7

The supplied information also lists the following conference and division positions:

Category	Sacramento Kings	San Antonio Spurs
Western Conference Record	1-9	8-2
Division	Pacific	Southwest
Division Standing	5th	1st

These details require an important distinction.

The October 17 game is labeled as a 2026-27 preseason contest in the supplied game header. The additional season-series results, standings, and future fixtures appear to describe regular-season information.

Therefore, these records should not automatically be treated as the standings or season-series context for the October 17 preseason game. They are presented separately to preserve the information supplied without mixing different game contexts.

Where to Find the Official Box Score

Readers who want to examine the original player statistics can consult the ESPN game record.

The box score provides the recorded scoring, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, turnovers, minutes, and other individual statistics.

The official game record is available through the ESPN Sacramento Kings vs San Antonio Spurs box score.

Checking the original box score is particularly useful when comparing individual performances or reviewing statistical details that may not appear in a short match summary.

Statistical Interpretation: What the Numbers Really Mean

A final score provides the result, but a complete statistical breakdown explains how the result happened.

This matchup offers several useful examples of why individual and team statistics should be considered together.

Scoring Does Not Tell the Entire Story

LaVine was the leading scorer with 20 points, but his team lost by 29.

That does not make his individual performance unsuccessful. He shot 50% from the field and made all seven free throws.

However, basketball is a team sport, and one player’s scoring cannot compensate for every weakness in shooting, rebounding, defense, and possession management.

Rebounds Can Change the Number of Scoring Opportunities

San Antonio’s 61 rebounds compared with Sacramento’s 38 show why rebounding is more than a secondary statistic.

The Spurs gained additional possessions through offensive rebounds and limited Sacramento’s opportunities to recover missed shots.

Even when two teams have similar shooting percentages, a significant rebounding advantage can create a major difference in total scoring opportunities.

Assists Reveal Offensive Cooperation

San Antonio’s 27 assists indicate that its scoring was supported by effective passing and team movement.

Sacramento’s 19 assists show that it generated fewer assisted baskets.

Although individual playmaking matters, successful offenses generally require contributions from multiple players.

Shooting Percentages Need Context

San Antonio attempted 51 three-pointers and made 17.

Sacramento attempted 25 and made six.

The difference in both volume and accuracy influenced the outcome.

However, shooting percentage should not be evaluated without considering shot attempts, possession totals, offensive rebounds, and game circumstances.

A team can shoot a respectable percentage and still lose because it generates fewer possessions.

Preseason Results Require Careful Interpretation

Preseason games are different from regular-season contests.

Coaches may use different rotations, evaluate developing players, experiment with combinations, and distribute minutes across the roster.

For that reason, one preseason result should not be treated as definitive evidence of how a team will perform throughout the regular season.

The October 17 result is valuable as a record of what happened in this particular matchup. It also provides useful information about individual shooting, rebounding, and lineup production.

However, broader conclusions about long-term team performance require additional games and consistent statistical evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Sacramento Kings vs San Antonio Spurs game on October 17, 2026?

The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Sacramento Kings 126-97 on October 17, 2026, at the Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas. San Antonio secured a 29-point victory after scoring 42 points in the opening quarter.

2. Who was the highest scorer in the game?

Zach LaVine was the highest scorer overall with 20 points for Sacramento. Dylan Harper led San Antonio with 19 points in 21 minutes.

3. How many points did Victor Wembanyama score?

Victor Wembanyama scored 14 points in 17 minutes. He also recorded eight rebounds, two assists, two steals, and two blocks.

4. How many rebounds did the Spurs and Kings record?

San Antonio recorded 61 total rebounds, while Sacramento collected 38. The Spurs finished with a 23-rebound advantage, including 19 offensive rebounds.

5. Which player recorded the most assists?

Ben Simmons recorded the most assists in the game with seven for Sacramento. Stephon Castle led San Antonio with five assists.

6. What was the biggest difference between the two teams?

Rebounding was the biggest statistical difference. San Antonio collected 61 rebounds compared with Sacramento’s 38. The Spurs also made 17 three-pointers, while the Kings made only six.

Conclusion

The October 17, 2026, matchup between Sacramento and San Antonio demonstrated how balanced team production can determine the outcome of an NBA game. The Spurs defeated the Kings 126-97 after establishing a significant advantage in the first quarter and maintaining their offensive effectiveness throughout the contest.

Dylan Harper led San Antonio with 19 points, while De’Aaron Fox contributed 16 and Victor Wembanyama added 14 points with eight rebounds. Stephon Castle and Keldon Johnson also delivered important performances.

For Sacramento, Zach LaVine led all players with 20 points. Domantas Sabonis recorded 14 points and 10 rebounds, while Ben Simmons added 14 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists. Precious Achiuwa also produced an efficient 13-point performance from the bench.

The most important differences appeared in rebounding and perimeter shooting. San Antonio collected 23 more rebounds and made 11 more three-pointers than Sacramento. The Spurs also recorded more assists and blocks, helping them control the game on both ends of the court.

Although Sacramento improved in the third quarter, its early deficit proved too difficult to overcome. The result highlighted San Antonio’s collective offensive production and the importance of controlling rebounds, protecting possessions, and maintaining consistent defensive pressure.

Overall, the sacramento kings vs san antonio spurs match player stats provide a detailed record of an impressive Spurs victory and offer useful insight into the individual contributions and team-level factors that shaped the final result.