Washington Wizards vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats

The washington wizards vs dallas mavericks match player stats from January 28, 2025, tell the story of a dominant Dallas performance at American Airlines Center. The Mavericks defeated the Washington Wizards 130-108, using outstanding three-point shooting, efficient ball movement, and strong interior defense to secure a convincing 22-point victory. Klay Thompson led all scorers with 23 points, while Olivier-Maxence Prosper contributed 20 points and P.J. Washington added 19 points and nine rebounds. Daniel Gafford also played a major role with 18 points, eight rebounds, three assists, and five blocks.

Although Washington managed to compete more effectively after halftime, the damage had already been done during a remarkable first quarter in which Dallas scored 42 points. The Wizards struggled to match the Mavericks’ shooting efficiency and offensive rhythm throughout the game. Dallas finished with 53% shooting from the field, 44% from three-point range, and 39 assists. Washington, meanwhile, recorded 42% field-goal shooting and converted only 30% of its three-point attempts.

This breakdown examines the complete player statistics, team performances, quarter-by-quarter scoring, individual contributions, and tactical factors that determined the result. It also explains which players made the biggest impact and what the numbers reveal about the difference between the two teams.

Match Overview: Dallas Mavericks vs Washington Wizards

The January 28 meeting brought together two teams experiencing very different situations during the 2024-25 NBA regular season. Dallas entered the contest with a 25-22 record, while Washington had struggled to find consistency, carrying a 6-39 record.

Playing at home, the Mavericks took advantage of their offensive quality and quickly established control. Their first-quarter performance created a substantial advantage that Washington never managed to eliminate.

Here are the essential details from the contest.

Match Information	Details
Matchup	Dallas Mavericks vs Washington Wizards
Date	January 28, 2025
Competition	NBA Regular Season
Venue	American Airlines Center
Location	Dallas, Texas
Attendance	20,031
Final Score	Mavericks 130-108 Wizards
Winning Team	Dallas Mavericks
Game Status	Final
Game ID	401705223
Mavericks Record	25-22
Wizards Record	6-39
Mavericks Home Record	14-10
Wizards Away Record	1-21
Season Series	Dallas won 2-0

Dallas entered the game with a considerably stronger record and home-court advantage. Washington needed an efficient offensive performance to challenge the Mavericks, but its shooting numbers never reached the level required to keep pace.

The 22-point margin reflected the difference in execution, particularly during the opening period.

Washington Wizards vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats

The individual statistics provide a clearer picture of how the contest developed. Dallas received contributions from several players rather than depending on a single scorer. Its combination of perimeter shooting, interior finishing, and passing made the offense difficult to contain.

Washington also had several players reach double figures, but the team’s overall shooting efficiency remained below Dallas’s level.

Dallas Mavericks Player Statistics

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	Other Contributions
Klay Thompson	23	3	4	8-15	7-12	58% 3PT
Olivier-Maxence Prosper	20	5	1	7-11	2-4	Efficient scoring
P.J. Washington	19	9	3	9-14	1-3	2 STL, 1 BLK
Daniel Gafford	18	8	3	8-13	–	5 BLK
Kyrie Irving	13	5	5	4-9	2-6	Offensive creation
Jaden Hardy	12	1	0	5-8	2-4	Scoring contribution
Quentin Grimes	9	4	6	3-8	3-6	Playmaking
Spencer Dinwiddie	8	3	9	2-3	2-2	2 STL
Kessler Edwards	5	7	2	2-3	1-2	Rebounding
Markieff Morris	2	1	0	1-6	–	–
Kylor Kelley	1	4	0	0-0	–	Rebounding
Brandon Williams	0	1	6	0-2	–	Playmaking

PTS = Points, REB = Rebounds, AST = Assists, STL = Steals, BLK = Blocks. A dash indicates that the supplied box-score data did not list a successful attempt or additional contribution in that category.

Klay Thompson Leads Dallas With 23 Points

Klay Thompson was Dallas’s leading scorer, finishing with 23 points, three rebounds, and four assists. He converted eight of his 15 field-goal attempts and made seven of his 12 three-point attempts.

His three-point percentage was approximately 58.3%, an outstanding return from beyond the arc.

Thompson’s performance was important because his shooting created additional space for the Mavericks’ other offensive players. When a perimeter shooter consistently converts difficult attempts, defenders must pay closer attention to the outside threat. That can create better opportunities for players operating closer to the basket.

His seven successful three-pointers were also the highest individual three-point total recorded in the supplied player statistics.

Thompson did not need an unusually high number of attempts to become the leading scorer. His 15 field-goal attempts produced 23 points, demonstrating how efficient perimeter shooting can influence an entire offensive system.

Olivier-Maxence Prosper Adds 20 Points

Olivier-Maxence Prosper delivered one of the most productive performances of the evening. He recorded 20 points, five rebounds, and one assist while shooting seven of 11 from the field.

He also converted two of his four three-point attempts.

Prosper’s contribution was particularly valuable because it gave Dallas another reliable scoring option. Defenses cannot focus entirely on the primary perimeter threats when multiple players are capable of producing points.

His field-goal percentage was approximately 63.6%, making him one of the most efficient high-volume scorers in the contest.

Prosper’s five rebounds also helped Dallas maintain its advantage on the glass. Although his statistical contribution was not as broad as that of some teammates, his scoring efficiency made him an important part of the victory.

P.J. Washington Delivers an All-Around Performance

P.J. Washington finished with 19 points, nine rebounds, and three assists. He made nine of his 14 field-goal attempts and added one successful three-pointer from three attempts.

His performance demonstrated value on both ends of the floor.

Washington was one rebound away from a double-double. His nine rebounds helped Dallas control possessions and limited Washington’s opportunities to create second-chance scoring situations.

He also recorded two steals and one block, giving him a meaningful defensive contribution.

An important detail in Washington’s performance was his shooting efficiency. Making nine of 14 attempts represents approximately 64.3% shooting from the field.

He did not need to take an excessive number of shots to produce 19 points. That efficiency helped Dallas maintain offensive balance.

Daniel Gafford Controls the Paint

Daniel Gafford contributed 18 points, eight rebounds, three assists, and five blocks.

His five blocks were particularly significant because they represented the strongest individual shot-blocking performance in the supplied statistics.

Gafford converted eight of his 13 field-goal attempts, finishing with approximately 61.5% shooting.

His interior presence gave Dallas an additional defensive advantage. Washington’s players had to consider the possibility of a blocked shot whenever they attacked the basket.

Gafford’s contribution also extended beyond defense. He provided efficient scoring around the rim and helped the Mavericks turn their offensive possessions into points.

The combination of 18 points and five blocks illustrates how a center can influence a game without being the primary ball handler.

Kyrie Irving Provides Scoring and Playmaking

Kyrie Irving recorded 13 points, five rebounds, and five assists.

He shot four of nine from the field and converted two of six attempts from three-point range.

Although his scoring total was lower than Thompson’s, Prosper’s, and Washington’s, Irving helped connect the Mavericks’ offense.

His five assists were important in a game where Dallas finished with 39 team assists. Effective ball movement helped prevent the Wizards from concentrating their defensive attention on one player.

Irving’s contribution was therefore not limited to his personal scoring numbers. His ability to create opportunities for teammates supported the overall offensive structure.

Spencer Dinwiddie Leads Dallas in Assists

Spencer Dinwiddie finished with eight points, three rebounds, and nine assists.

He was the Mavericks’ leading individual playmaker in this contest.

Dinwiddie made two of three field-goal attempts and converted both of his three-point attempts. He also recorded two steals.

His nine assists represented a major contribution to Dallas’s ball movement. They also demonstrated how a player can influence the final score without needing to take many shots.

The Mavericks’ 39 team assists showed that their offensive production was spread across the lineup. Dinwiddie’s passing was one of the strongest examples of that collective approach.

Other Dallas Contributors

Several additional Mavericks made useful contributions.

• Jaden Hardy: Scored 12 points on five-of-eight shooting, including two successful three-pointers.
• Quentin Grimes: Added nine points and six assists, providing another source of ball movement.
• Kessler Edwards: Collected seven rebounds and scored five points.
• Brandon Williams: Recorded six assists despite not scoring.
• Markieff Morris: Added two points.
• Kylor Kelley: Scored one point and collected four rebounds.

These contributions helped Dallas maintain offensive productivity across multiple positions.

The Mavericks did not rely exclusively on their highest-scoring players. Their supporting lineup also contributed to the final result.

Washington Wizards Player Statistics

The Wizards had several players produce respectable individual numbers, but their combined efficiency was not enough to overcome Dallas’s early advantage.

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	Other Contributions
Bilal Coulibaly	16	4	5	6-15	2-6	2 STL, 2 BLK
Jordan Poole	15	6	6	6-15	3-9	–
Corey Kispert	15	2	0	4-10	2-4	–
Tristan Vukcevic	10	2	1	4-8	1-4	–
Richaun Holmes	9	5	0	4-5	–	Efficient finishing
Jonas Valanciunas	9	5	2	4-7	–	–
Kyle Kuzma	7	6	1	3-11	0-3	–
Bub Carrington	7	1	1	2-6	1-3	–
Justin Champagnie	6	6	4	3-6	–	1 STL
Alex Sarr	4	2	1	2-6	0-2	–
Kyshawn George	3	2	1	1-6	1-4	–
Patrick Baldwin Jr.	3	2	0	1-3	1-1	–
Anthony Gill	2	0	0	1-1	–	–
Johnny Davis	2	2	1	1-2	–	1 STL

Bilal Coulibaly Leads Washington With 16 Points

Bilal Coulibaly was Washington’s leading scorer, finishing with 16 points, four rebounds, and five assists.

He converted six of his 15 field-goal attempts and made two of six three-point attempts.

His contribution was not limited to scoring. Coulibaly also recorded two steals and two blocks, giving him one of Washington’s most complete individual performances.

The combination of five assists, two steals, and two blocks showed his ability to contribute in several areas.

However, his shooting efficiency was approximately 40% from the field. Against a team shooting above 50%, Washington needed more consistent scoring production from its leading players.

Coulibaly’s defensive activity was encouraging, but the Mavericks had enough offensive options to continue producing points.

Jordan Poole Contributes 15 Points and Six Assists

Jordan Poole finished with 15 points, six rebounds, and six assists.

He shot six of 15 from the field and converted three of nine three-point attempts.

Poole’s six assists made him an important part of Washington’s offensive creation. His ability to distribute the ball gave teammates opportunities to score rather than forcing every possession into an individual shot.

However, his overall field-goal percentage was 40%.

Against a team that made 53% of its shots, Washington needed greater offensive efficiency from its primary scoring options.

Poole’s 15 points provided useful production, but the team needed additional consistency to close the gap.

Corey Kispert Provides Perimeter Scoring

Corey Kispert also recorded 15 points.

He finished with two rebounds and made four of 10 field-goal attempts, including two of four from three-point range.

Kispert’s perimeter shooting gave Washington another offensive option.

He converted 50% of his three-point attempts, which was a positive individual result. However, the Wizards’ overall three-point percentage remained at 30%.

This distinction is important. A player can shoot efficiently from the perimeter while the team still struggles collectively.

Kispert’s performance showed that Washington had opportunities to generate useful outside scoring, but it did not receive enough consistent production across the entire rotation.

Tristan Vukcevic Adds 10 Points

Tristan Vukcevic finished with 10 points, two rebounds, and one assist.

He made four of eight field-goal attempts and converted one of four three-point attempts.

His 50% field-goal percentage made him one of Washington’s more efficient scorers.

Vukcevic’s contribution was useful because the Wizards needed scoring from their bench and supporting players.

Nevertheless, his 10 points could not offset Dallas’s much deeper offensive production.

Richaun Holmes and Jonas Valanciunas

Richaun Holmes recorded nine points and five rebounds while making four of five field-goal attempts.

His 80% shooting percentage was one of the best individual marks among Washington’s players.

Jonas Valanciunas also scored nine points, collecting five rebounds and two assists. He converted four of seven field-goal attempts.

Both players provided interior scoring and rebounding.

Their efficiency demonstrated that Washington could find productive opportunities around the basket. The larger problem was converting those opportunities into a consistent team-wide offensive performance.

Kyle Kuzma’s Statistical Contribution

Kyle Kuzma finished with seven points, six rebounds, and one assist.

He made three of 11 field-goal attempts and missed all three of his three-point attempts.

His shooting percentage was approximately 27.3%.

For a player expected to contribute meaningful scoring, this was a difficult offensive performance.

Kuzma’s six rebounds were still useful, but the Mavericks’ defensive pressure limited his ability to turn possessions into points.

Washington needed a stronger offensive contribution from its established scoring options to challenge Dallas.

Other Washington Contributors

The remaining Wizards also provided different forms of production.

• Justin Champagnie: Scored six points, collected six rebounds, and recorded four assists.
• Bub Carrington: Added seven points, one rebound, and one assist.
• Alex Sarr: Finished with four points, two rebounds, and one assist.
• Kyshawn George: Recorded three points, two rebounds, and one assist.
• Patrick Baldwin Jr.: Scored three points and converted his only three-point attempt.
• Anthony Gill: Finished with two points on one-of-one shooting.
• Johnny Davis: Added two points, two rebounds, one assist, and one steal.

These performances contributed to Washington’s overall statistics, but Dallas maintained the advantage through its superior shooting and passing.

Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown

The scoring pattern explains why Dallas won comfortably.

The Mavericks established their lead immediately, while Washington improved its offensive output during the remaining three periods.

Quarter	Washington Wizards	Dallas Mavericks	Quarter Winner
First Quarter	16	42	Mavericks
Second Quarter	27	31	Mavericks
Third Quarter	33	28	Wizards
Fourth Quarter	32	29	Wizards
Final Score	108	130	Mavericks

First Quarter: Dallas Takes Complete Control

Dallas scored 42 points in the opening quarter, while Washington managed only 16.

The 26-point difference was the most important development of the entire game.

Dallas established offensive rhythm almost immediately. Its perimeter shooting and ability to create efficient scoring opportunities allowed the team to build a major advantage.

Washington struggled to respond.

Scoring only 16 points in an opening quarter creates significant pressure because the trailing team must spend the rest of the game trying to recover.

The Mavericks entered the second quarter with a 42-16 advantage.

That lead gave Dallas flexibility. It could continue playing aggressively without needing to take unnecessary risks.

Second Quarter: Mavericks Extend Their Lead

Washington improved offensively in the second period, scoring 27 points.

However, Dallas continued to produce at a strong rate with 31 points.

The Mavericks entered halftime leading 73-43.

Washington had scored more than it managed in the first quarter, but the 30-point halftime deficit demonstrated the scale of the challenge.

Dallas had already established control in three important areas:

• Perimeter shooting.
• Offensive efficiency.
• Ball movement.

The Wizards needed a major second-half response to make the game competitive.

Third Quarter: Washington Shows Improvement

The third quarter was Washington’s strongest period.

The Wizards scored 33 points, compared with Dallas’s 28.

This was a five-point advantage for Washington.

The improved scoring showed that the team could generate better offensive possessions after halftime.

However, a strong quarter was not enough to erase the first-half deficit.

Dallas remained ahead 101-76 entering the fourth quarter.

The Mavericks still held a 25-point advantage.

Fourth Quarter: Wizards Win the Period but Lose the Game

Washington scored 32 points in the final quarter, while Dallas recorded 29.

The Wizards therefore won the third and fourth quarters.

Despite this late improvement, Dallas finished with a 130-108 victory.

The result illustrates an important basketball principle: winning individual quarters does not guarantee a victory when an opponent has already created a substantial advantage.

Washington’s late scoring improved the final margin but could not change the outcome.

Team Statistics Comparison

The team numbers reveal the biggest differences between the two sides.

Statistical Category	Washington Wizards	Dallas Mavericks
Total Points	108	130
Field Goals	42-101	49-92
Field-Goal Percentage	42%	53%
Three-Pointers	11-37	20-45
Three-Point Percentage	30%	44%
Free Throws	13-17	12-17
Free-Throw Percentage	76%	71%
Total Rebounds	45	51
Total Assists	23	39
Total Turnovers	11	11
Total Steals	5	5
Total Blocks	3	7

Field-Goal Efficiency Favored Dallas

Dallas made 49 of 92 field-goal attempts, producing a 53% shooting percentage.

Washington converted 42 of 101 attempts, finishing at 42%.

The difference was substantial.

Dallas made seven more field goals despite attempting nine fewer shots.

This is one of the clearest explanations for the final score.

When a team consistently converts a larger share of its attempts, it can generate more points without needing additional possessions.

The Mavericks’ shooting efficiency helped them maintain control throughout the contest.

Three-Point Shooting Created a Major Advantage

The three-point numbers were another major difference.

Dallas made 20 of 45 attempts, while Washington converted 11 of 37.

That gave the Mavericks nine more successful three-point shots.

Since each successful attempt is worth three points, this difference represented 27 additional points in made three-pointers.

Dallas’s 44% accuracy was also significantly higher than Washington’s 30%.

Klay Thompson’s seven successful attempts were a major part of this advantage.

The Mavericks received additional perimeter production from several other players, allowing their offense to remain dangerous even when Thompson was not shooting.

Rebounding Helped Dallas Control Possessions

Dallas finished with 51 rebounds, while Washington recorded 45.

The six-rebound advantage was meaningful because rebounding determines which team gains control after missed shots.

Offensive rebounds can create additional scoring opportunities, while defensive rebounds prevent opponents from extending possessions.

P.J. Washington recorded nine rebounds, and Daniel Gafford added eight.

For the Wizards, Kyle Kuzma, Jordan Poole, and Justin Champagnie each contributed six rebounds.

Although Washington remained competitive in this category, Dallas finished ahead.

Assists Reveal Dallas’s Ball Movement

One of the most important differences was the assist total.

Dallas recorded 39 assists, compared with Washington’s 23.

That was a 16-assist advantage.

The number demonstrates how effectively the Mavericks created scoring opportunities through passing.

Dinwiddie led Dallas with nine assists. Quentin Grimes contributed six, while Kyrie Irving and several other players helped maintain offensive movement.

Washington also had useful playmaking contributions from Jordan Poole and Bilal Coulibaly, who recorded six and five assists respectively.

However, the overall difference suggests that Dallas generated more assisted scoring opportunities.

This is particularly important when analyzing team offense. Scoring totals show what happened, but assists help explain how those points were created.

Turnovers Were Identical

Both teams recorded 11 turnovers.

This means Dallas did not win because Washington made substantially more mistakes with possession.

Instead, the biggest differences came from shooting efficiency, passing, rebounding, and defensive activity.

The identical turnover total makes the comparison more interesting.

It shows that Washington protected the basketball at a similar rate but could not match Dallas’s offensive execution.

Defensive Statistics Favor Dallas

Dallas recorded seven blocks, while Washington finished with three.

Both teams collected five steals.

Daniel Gafford’s five blocks were particularly important.

His rim protection helped discourage Washington’s interior attempts and gave the Mavericks another way to disrupt offensive possessions.

P.J. Washington also contributed two steals and one block.

For Washington, Bilal Coulibaly provided two steals and two blocks, demonstrating strong individual defensive activity.

Nevertheless, Dallas’s seven-block team total reflected its greater impact around the basket.

The Biggest Reasons Dallas Won

The final score was influenced by several connected factors rather than one individual performance.

1. An Exceptional Opening Quarter

The 42-16 first-quarter result gave Dallas a 26-point advantage.

This was the foundation of the victory.

Washington spent the remainder of the game attempting to recover from that early deficit.

Even though the Wizards performed better after halftime, the opening period created too large a gap.

2. Superior Three-Point Accuracy

Dallas made 44% of its three-point attempts.

Washington made only 30%.

The difference in perimeter efficiency helped the Mavericks produce a much higher offensive total.

Thompson’s 7-of-12 performance was especially important.

3. Better Ball Movement

The Mavericks recorded 39 assists.

This indicated that their offensive possessions frequently produced opportunities for teammates.

Dinwiddie’s nine assists were the highest individual total.

Dallas’s passing also made its attack less predictable because several players could receive the ball in useful scoring positions.

4. Multiple Scoring Options

Dallas had four players score at least 18 points:

• Klay Thompson: 23.
• Olivier-Maxence Prosper: 20.
• P.J. Washington: 19.
• Daniel Gafford: 18.

This scoring distribution made it difficult for Washington to concentrate on stopping one player.

The Mavericks also received 13 points from Kyrie Irving and 12 from Jaden Hardy.

That additional production strengthened their offensive depth.

5. Interior Defensive Pressure

Gafford’s five blocks gave Dallas a major presence near the basket.

The Mavericks finished with seven blocks overall.

This helped reduce Washington’s ability to score comfortably in the paint.

6. Efficient Use of Scoring Opportunities

Dallas shot 53% from the field despite attempting fewer shots than Washington.

The Mavericks’ ability to convert their attempts was a defining factor.

Washington attempted 101 field goals but made only 42.

Dallas attempted 92 and made 49.

That difference in conversion efficiency explains much of the scoring gap.

Why Washington Lost Despite a Better Second Half

Washington’s performance after halftime deserves attention.

The Wizards won both the third and fourth quarters.

They scored 33 points in the third and 32 in the fourth.

This was a noticeable improvement compared with their opening-quarter production.

However, several issues prevented a comeback.

The First-Half Deficit Was Too Large

Dallas entered halftime leading 73-43.

A 30-point deficit is difficult to overcome against any NBA opponent.

Washington needed to produce an exceptional second half while also preventing Dallas from scoring consistently.

Although the Wizards improved, they did not generate enough defensive stops to create a realistic comeback opportunity.

Inconsistent Perimeter Shooting

Washington converted only 11 of 37 three-point attempts.

The 30% shooting percentage limited its ability to close the gap quickly.

Dallas, on the other hand, made 20 three-pointers.

The difference in outside shooting created an important scoring advantage for the home team.

Limited Scoring Efficiency From Key Players

Jordan Poole and Bilal Coulibaly both scored 15 or more points, but each finished at 40% shooting from the field.

Kyle Kuzma struggled further, converting only three of 11 attempts.

Washington needed more efficient production from its leading offensive players.

The individual numbers show that some supporting players were productive, but the team did not receive enough consistent scoring from the entire rotation.

Dallas Maintained Offensive Production

Even when Washington improved, Dallas continued scoring.

The Mavericks recorded 57 points in the second half.

That prevented the Wizards from making the kind of sustained run required to turn the game around.

Head-to-Head Season Series: Dallas Wins 2-0

The January 28 matchup was the second meeting between the teams during the 2024-25 regular season.

Dallas won both games.

Game	Date	Result	Winner
First Meeting	December 6, 2024	Mavericks 137-101 Wizards	Dallas
Second Meeting	January 28, 2025	Mavericks 130-108 Wizards	Dallas

The first contest ended with a 36-point Dallas victory.

The second game produced a 22-point margin.

Across both meetings, Dallas demonstrated a clear advantage in scoring production.

The season series finished 2-0 in favor of the Mavericks.

For Washington, the results highlighted the difficulty of competing with Dallas’s offensive efficiency during those matchups.

For Dallas, the two victories provided evidence of its ability to exploit the Wizards’ defensive weaknesses.

Player Matchups That Defined the Game

Individual matchups help explain how the contest developed beyond the overall statistics.

Klay Thompson vs Washington’s Perimeter Defense

Thompson’s seven three-pointers were among the most important individual contributions.

His ability to convert outside attempts placed pressure on Washington’s perimeter defenders.

The Wizards needed to contest his shooting opportunities while also protecting the paint.

That defensive challenge became more difficult because Dallas had several other scoring threats.

Daniel Gafford vs Washington’s Interior Offense

Gafford’s five blocks made him a major defensive presence.

Washington needed to find ways to finish around the basket without allowing Dallas to control the paint.

His combination of interior scoring and rim protection gave the Mavericks value at both ends.

P.J. Washington vs the Wizards’ Frontcourt

P.J. Washington’s 19 points and nine rebounds demonstrated his offensive and rebounding impact.

His efficient shooting also helped Dallas avoid unnecessary empty possessions.

The performance was especially important because he contributed without dominating the ball.

Jordan Poole vs Dallas’s Defensive Pressure

Poole recorded 15 points and six assists.

His passing helped Washington create opportunities, but the Mavericks’ overall defensive performance limited the Wizards’ scoring efficiency.

Poole needed more consistent support from the rest of the offense to challenge Dallas.

Statistical Leaders From the Game

The following table identifies the leading individual performers in the major statistical categories.

Category	Player	Team	Total
Most Points	Klay Thompson	Mavericks	23
Second-Most Points	Olivier-Maxence Prosper	Mavericks	20
Third-Most Points	P.J. Washington	Mavericks	19
Most Rebounds	P.J. Washington	Mavericks	9
Most Assists	Spencer Dinwiddie	Mavericks	9
Most Blocks	Daniel Gafford	Mavericks	5
Most Steals	Multiple players	Both Teams	2

These leaders demonstrate Dallas’s advantage across several statistical categories.

Thompson led scoring, P.J. Washington led rebounding, Dinwiddie led assists, and Gafford led blocks.

Washington’s strongest individual all-around performance came from Bilal Coulibaly, who recorded 16 points, five assists, two steals, and two blocks.

Understanding Important Basketball Statistics

Box-score numbers become more useful when readers understand what each category represents.

Points

Points measure the total scoring contribution of a player.

A field goal inside the three-point line is worth two points, a successful three-point shot is worth three, and a made free throw is worth one.

Thompson’s 23 points made him the leading scorer in this matchup.

Rebounds

Rebounds measure how many times a player secures the basketball after a missed shot.

They are divided into offensive and defensive rebounds.

A strong rebounding performance can create extra possessions or prevent an opponent from gaining second-chance opportunities.

P.J. Washington led the game with nine rebounds.

Assists

An assist is credited when a pass directly leads to a made field goal under NBA statistical rules.

Assists are useful for evaluating ball movement and playmaking.

Dinwiddie’s nine assists showed his importance to Dallas’s offensive organization.

Field-Goal Percentage

Field-goal percentage measures the proportion of successful field-goal attempts.

The formula is:

Field-Goal Percentage = (Made Field Goals ÷ Attempted Field Goals) × 100

Dallas converted 49 of 92 attempts, while Washington made 42 of 101.

This was one of the clearest statistical differences in the contest.

Three-Point Percentage

Three-point percentage measures successful shots from beyond the three-point line.

Dallas finished at 44%, compared with Washington’s 30%.

The difference was a major factor in the final score.

Blocks and Steals

Blocks measure defensive plays in which a player legally deflects an opponent’s shot.

Steals are recorded when a defensive player gains possession through a legal takeaway.

Gafford’s five blocks were particularly important because they helped Dallas defend the basket.

Plus/Minus

Plus/minus measures the difference between a team’s points scored and points allowed while a specific player is on the court.

For example, a player with a plus-10 rating was on the floor during a period when their team outscored its opponent by 10 points.

However, individual plus/minus values were not included in the supplied statistics for this game. They should not be estimated or presented as verified figures.

Where to Find the Official Box Score

Readers who want to examine the complete record can consult the ESPN NBA box score for Dallas Mavericks vs Washington Wizards.

The game record includes the final result and individual statistical information.

When reviewing a historical basketball matchup, it is useful to check:

1. Final team scores.
2. Individual points, rebounds, and assists.
3. Field-goal and three-point shooting.
4. Turnovers and defensive statistics.
5. Quarter-by-quarter scoring.
6. Team records at the time of the game.

Checking these categories provides a more complete understanding than looking at the final score alone.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Washington Wizards vs Dallas Mavericks game on January 28, 2025?

The Dallas Mavericks defeated the Washington Wizards 130-108 on January 28, 2025, at American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas. Dallas secured a 22-point victory after scoring 42 points in the first quarter.

2. Who was the highest scorer in the game?

Klay Thompson was the highest scorer with 23 points for Dallas. He made eight of 15 field-goal attempts and seven of 12 three-point attempts.

3. How many points did Jordan Poole score against Dallas?

Jordan Poole scored 15 points for Washington. He also collected six rebounds and recorded six assists while shooting six of 15 from the field.

4. How many assists did Spencer Dinwiddie record?

Spencer Dinwiddie recorded nine assists, the highest individual assist total in the game. He also scored eight points, collected three rebounds, and recorded two steals.

5. Which Mavericks player recorded the most blocks?

Daniel Gafford led Dallas with five blocks. He also scored 18 points, collected eight rebounds, and recorded three assists.

6. What was the three-point shooting difference between the teams?

Dallas made 20 of 45 three-point attempts, finishing at approximately 44%. Washington converted 11 of 37 attempts, producing approximately 30%. Dallas therefore made nine more three-pointers.

Conclusion

The January 28, 2025, matchup between Dallas and Washington demonstrated the importance of shooting efficiency, offensive balance, and defensive presence. The Mavericks secured a 130-108 victory after producing an exceptional 42-point opening quarter.

Klay Thompson led all players with 23 points, supported by Olivier-Maxence Prosper’s 20 points, P.J. Washington’s 19 points, and Daniel Gafford’s 18 points. Gafford also recorded five blocks, while Spencer Dinwiddie led the game with nine assists.

For Washington, Bilal Coulibaly led the scoring with 16 points, while Jordan Poole and Corey Kispert each contributed 15. The Wizards improved considerably after halftime and won both the third and fourth quarters, but their early deficit proved too difficult to overcome.

The team statistics explain the result clearly. Dallas shot 53% from the field and 44% from three-point range, compared with Washington’s 42% and 30%, respectively. The Mavericks also recorded 39 assists and 51 rebounds.

Ultimately, the washington wizards vs dallas mavericks match player stats show that Dallas won through collective offensive execution rather than relying on one outstanding individual performance. Its superior shooting, effective passing, and interior defense created the difference that decided the game.