Bengals vs Denver Broncos Match Player Stats
The bengals vs denver broncos match player stats from September 29, 2025, reveal a dominant performance by the Denver Broncos, who defeated the Cincinnati Bengals 28-3 in an NFL regular-season matchup. Denver controlled the contest through an effective passing attack, a powerful ground game, and an aggressive defensive performance that consistently pressured Cincinnati’s quarterback. Bo Nix delivered 326 passing yards and two touchdowns, while running back J.K. Dobbins added 101 rushing yards. On the other side, Cincinnati struggled to generate offensive momentum, finishing with only 178 total yards of offense and three points.
The final score tells an important part of the story, but the individual statistics explain how Denver established such a significant advantage. The Broncos combined 326 passing yards with 186 rushing yards, producing 512 total offensive yards. Cincinnati managed just 125 passing yards and 53 rushing yards. Denver also recorded three sacks and six quarterback hits, limiting the Bengals’ ability to develop their passing game.
This detailed breakdown examines the final score, quarterback performances, rushing production, receiving statistics, defensive contributions, special teams, and the most important statistical differences between the two teams. It also explains which individual performances had the greatest influence on the outcome.
Bengals vs Denver Broncos Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The September 29, 2025, meeting between Cincinnati and Denver finished with a convincing 28-3 victory for the Broncos.
Denver improved its season record to 2-2, including a 2-0 record at home. Cincinnati also moved to 2-2 overall but remained 1-2 in away games.
The biggest difference was offensive efficiency. Denver consistently moved the football through the air and on the ground, while Cincinnati struggled to maintain possession and create scoring opportunities.
Final Game Information
| Match Detail | Information |
| Matchup | Cincinnati Bengals vs Denver Broncos |
| Sport | National Football League |
| Date | September 29, 2025 |
| Game Status | Final |
| Final Score | Broncos 28, Bengals 3 |
| Winning Team | Denver Broncos |
| Losing Team | Cincinnati Bengals |
| Broncos Record | 2-2 |
| Broncos Home Record | 2-0 |
| Bengals Record | 2-2 |
| Bengals Away Record | 1-2 |
| Broncos Total Points | 28 |
| Bengals Total Points | 3 |
| ESPN Game ID | 401772716 |
Denver’s victory was built on three major advantages:
- Passing production: Bo Nix completed 29 of 42 passes for 326 yards and two touchdowns.
- Rushing production: Denver accumulated 186 rushing yards on 38 attempts.
- Defensive pressure: The Broncos recorded three sacks and six quarterback hits.
Cincinnati had no comparable offensive response. Jake Browning completed 14 of 25 passes for 125 yards without a touchdown. The Bengals also failed to record a sack against Denver’s quarterback.
These numbers demonstrate how Denver controlled both sides of the football.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown
The scoring pattern shows that Denver established control early and maintained its advantage throughout the game.
The Broncos scored seven points in the opening quarter before adding another 14 in the second. Cincinnati managed only a field goal during the first quarter and failed to score again.
Denver added seven points in the fourth quarter to complete its 28-3 victory.
Quarter Scoring Table
| Quarter | Cincinnati Bengals | Denver Broncos |
| First Quarter | 3 | 7 |
| Second Quarter | 0 | 14 |
| Third Quarter | 0 | 0 |
| Fourth Quarter | 0 | 7 |
| Final Score | 3 | 28 |
First Quarter: Denver Establishes an Early Advantage
Denver opened the game with seven points, immediately putting Cincinnati in a position where it needed to respond.
The Bengals managed three points through kicker Evan McPherson, who successfully converted a 26-yard field goal.
Although Cincinnati reached the scoreboard, its offense did not establish the same level of production as Denver.
The Broncos entered the second quarter with a four-point advantage.
Second Quarter: Broncos Create Separation
The second quarter proved especially important.
Denver scored 14 additional points, extending its lead and putting considerable pressure on Cincinnati.
The Broncos’ offense benefited from the combination of Bo Nix’s passing production and an effective rushing attack.
Cincinnati could not answer with a touchdown or field goal.
At halftime, Denver had built a 21-3 advantage.
Third Quarter: Defensive Control
Neither team scored in the third quarter.
However, the absence of scoring did not change the overall direction of the contest.
Denver continued to benefit from its earlier advantage, while Cincinnati needed a major offensive improvement to make the game competitive.
The Broncos’ defensive pressure made that difficult.
Fourth Quarter: Denver Completes the Victory
Denver added seven more points in the final quarter.
Cincinnati remained scoreless, finishing the game with only three points.
The Broncos completed a 25-point victory without allowing the Bengals to score an offensive touchdown.
Quarterback Player Stats: Bo Nix vs Jake Browning
Quarterback production was one of the most important differences in this matchup.
Bo Nix delivered a productive passing performance for Denver, while Jake Browning struggled to generate enough offensive production for Cincinnati.
The comparison becomes particularly interesting when examining passing yards, completion percentages, touchdowns, interceptions, and quarterback ratings.
Quarterback Statistics Comparison
| Statistic | Bo Nix | Jake Browning |
| Team | Denver Broncos | Cincinnati Bengals |
| Completions | 29 | 14 |
| Pass Attempts | 42 | 25 |
| Completion Percentage | 69.0% | 56.0% |
| Passing Yards | 326 | 125 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 7.8 | 5.0 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 0 | 3 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 0 | 19 |
| QBR | 74.1 | 28.4 |
| Passer Rating | 97.9 | 69.6 |
Bo Nix: Denver’s Passing Leader
Bo Nix delivered one of the strongest individual performances of the game.
He completed 29 of 42 passing attempts for 326 yards and two touchdowns. His average of 7.8 yards per attempt demonstrated his ability to produce meaningful gains through the passing game.
His 69.0% completion rate also reflected consistent accuracy.
Nix’s performance was particularly valuable because Denver did not have to depend exclusively on its passing attack. The Broncos also established a productive rushing game, allowing their quarterback to operate within a balanced offensive system.
His most important statistical contributions included:
- 326 passing yards.
- 29 completed passes.
- Two passing touchdowns.
- 7.8 yards per attempt.
- 97.9 passer rating.
- 74.1 QBR.
- Zero sacks taken.
Nix also contributed seven rushing yards and one rushing touchdown on six attempts.
That additional rushing production made his performance even more valuable. He was involved in both passing and running situations, giving Cincinnati’s defense another responsibility to manage.
Although Nix threw one interception, his overall production remained substantially better than Browning’s.
Jake Browning: Limited Passing Production for Cincinnati
Jake Browning completed 14 of 25 passes for 125 yards.
His completion percentage was 56.0%, and he averaged five yards per attempt.
The most important issue was Cincinnati’s inability to convert passing opportunities into touchdowns.
Browning did not throw a touchdown pass, and the Bengals finished with only three total points.
His individual numbers included:
- 14 completed passes.
- 25 passing attempts.
- 125 passing yards.
- 5.0 yards per attempt.
- Zero passing touchdowns.
- Zero interceptions.
- Three sacks taken.
- 69.6 passer rating.
- 28.4 QBR.
Browning avoided throwing an interception, which was a positive element of his performance. However, protecting the football was not enough to compensate for the lack of offensive production.
Denver’s defensive pressure also affected his ability to operate comfortably.
The Broncos recorded three sacks for 19 yards lost, while Browning failed to establish a consistent passing rhythm.
Which Quarterback Had the Better Performance?
Bo Nix clearly delivered the stronger performance.
He produced 201 more passing yards than Browning and recorded two passing touchdowns.
His completion percentage was also 13 percentage points higher.
The difference becomes even clearer when considering the quarterbacks’ ratings:
- Bo Nix: 97.9 passer rating.
- Jake Browning: 69.6 passer rating.
Denver received significantly more production from its quarterback position, and that advantage helped determine the outcome.
Rushing Player Stats: J.K. Dobbins Leads Denver
The rushing statistics provide another explanation for Denver’s victory.
The Broncos finished with 186 rushing yards on 38 attempts, averaging 4.9 yards per carry.
Cincinnati recorded only 53 rushing yards on 15 attempts.
This difference allowed Denver to maintain offensive balance and prevented Cincinnati from focusing entirely on stopping the passing game.
Team Rushing Statistics
| Statistic | Cincinnati Bengals | Denver Broncos |
| Total Rushing Attempts | 15 | 38 |
| Total Rushing Yards | 53 | 186 |
| Yards Per Carry | 3.5 | 4.9 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Leading Rusher | Chase Brown | J.K. Dobbins |
| Leading Rusher’s Yards | 40 | 101 |
Denver produced 133 more rushing yards than Cincinnati.
The Broncos also recorded two rushing touchdowns, while the Bengals failed to score on the ground.
J.K. Dobbins: The Broncos’ Leading Rusher
J.K. Dobbins was Denver’s leading rushing contributor.
He recorded 16 carries for 101 yards, averaging 6.3 yards per attempt.
His longest run covered 16 yards.
Crossing the 100-yard mark was an important achievement because it demonstrated how effectively Denver moved the football without relying entirely on passing plays.
Dobbins’ rushing statistics were:
| Statistic | Performance |
| Rushing Attempts | 16 |
| Rushing Yards | 101 |
| Yards Per Carry | 6.3 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 16 yards |
Dobbins did not score a rushing touchdown, but his contribution was still important.
His ability to gain consistent yardage helped Denver control offensive situations and maintain pressure on Cincinnati’s defense.
He also recorded one reception for four yards.
RJ Harvey Adds Valuable Rushing Production
RJ Harvey provided another important contribution to Denver’s ground game.
He recorded:
- 14 rushing attempts.
- 58 rushing yards.
- Four receptions.
- 40 receiving yards.
- One receiving touchdown.
Harvey averaged approximately 4.1 yards per rushing attempt.
His versatility was particularly valuable.
He contributed as both a runner and receiver, giving Denver another option in different offensive situations.
His receiving touchdown also demonstrated that his contribution extended beyond traditional rushing production.
Marvin Mims Jr. Provides a Big-Play Contribution
Marvin Mims Jr. contributed 16 rushing yards on one attempt.
More importantly, that rushing attempt resulted in a touchdown.
His contribution was significant because it gave Denver another way to attack Cincinnati’s defensive structure.
Mims also caught six passes for 69 yards, making him one of Denver’s most productive receiving options.
Bo Nix Adds a Rushing Touchdown
Bo Nix recorded six rushing attempts for seven yards and one touchdown.
Although his total rushing yardage was limited, the touchdown added another scoring contribution to his overall performance.
It also demonstrated the value of quarterback mobility in short-yardage and scoring situations.
Cincinnati’s Rushing Production
Chase Brown led the Bengals with 40 rushing yards on 10 attempts.
He averaged four yards per carry and recorded a longest run of six yards.
His statistics were:
| Statistic | Chase Brown |
| Rushing Attempts | 10 |
| Rushing Yards | 40 |
| Yards Per Carry | 4.0 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 6 yards |
Other Cincinnati rushing contributions included:
| Player | Attempts | Yards |
| Chase Brown | 10 | 40 |
| Andrei Iosivas | 1 | 5 |
| Samaje Perine | 1 | 4 |
| Jake Browning | 3 | 4 |
| Total | 15 | 53 |
Cincinnati did not have enough rushing production to create a balanced offense.
Chase Brown was the team’s most productive runner, but his 40 yards were not enough to significantly change the offensive situation.
Receiving Player Stats: Courtland Sutton Leads Denver
The receiving statistics reveal another major difference between the two teams.
Denver recorded 326 receiving yards, while Cincinnati finished with 125.
The Broncos also produced two receiving touchdowns.
Courtland Sutton led Denver’s receiving group, while Tee Higgins was Cincinnati’s leading receiver by yardage.
Team Receiving Comparison
| Statistic | Bengals | Broncos |
| Receptions | 14 | 29 |
| Receiving Yards | 125 | 326 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Leading Receiver | Tee Higgins | Courtland Sutton |
Denver recorded 15 more receptions and 201 additional receiving yards.
This advantage helped the Broncos maintain offensive momentum throughout the game.
Courtland Sutton: Denver’s Leading Receiver
Courtland Sutton was Denver’s leading receiver.
He recorded five receptions for 81 yards and one touchdown.
His average of 16.2 yards per reception demonstrated his ability to produce meaningful gains.
His statistics included:
| Statistic | Courtland Sutton |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Receiving Yards | 81 |
| Yards Per Reception | 16.2 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 1 |
Sutton’s contribution was important because he provided Denver with a productive downfield receiving option.
His 81 yards represented the highest receiving total among players in this game.
Marvin Mims Jr.: A Versatile Offensive Contributor
Marvin Mims Jr. delivered an impressive all-around performance.
He finished with six receptions for 69 yards.
He also contributed 16 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown.
His receiving statistics were:
- Six receptions.
- 69 receiving yards.
- 11.5 yards per reception.
- Zero receiving touchdowns.
His ability to contribute in multiple offensive roles made him one of Denver’s most useful players.
Mims was particularly important because his rushing and receiving production gave the Broncos additional flexibility.
Troy Franklin Adds Receiving Depth
Troy Franklin recorded four receptions for 55 yards.
He averaged 13.8 yards per reception.
Although he did not score a touchdown, his production helped Denver distribute the football among multiple receiving options.
His contribution also reduced the pressure on Sutton to generate all of the team’s passing production.
RJ Harvey Contributes as a Receiver
RJ Harvey recorded four receptions for 40 yards and one receiving touchdown.
His receiving production complemented his 58 rushing yards.
Harvey finished with 98 combined rushing and receiving yards.
That total highlights his importance to Denver’s offensive balance.
Other Denver Receiving Contributions
Denver received additional production from several players.
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Touchdowns |
| Courtland Sutton | 5 | 81 | 1 |
| Marvin Mims Jr. | 6 | 69 | 0 |
| Troy Franklin | 4 | 55 | 0 |
| RJ Harvey | 4 | 40 | 1 |
| Adam Trautman | 2 | 32 | 0 |
| Evan Engram | 4 | 29 | 0 |
| Tyler Badie | 1 | 11 | 0 |
| Nate Adkins | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| J.K. Dobbins | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Pat Bryant | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This distribution demonstrates that Denver did not depend on one receiver.
Multiple players contributed meaningful yardage, allowing the offense to attack Cincinnati through different options.
Tee Higgins Leads Cincinnati’s Receiving Group
Tee Higgins was Cincinnati’s leading receiver by yardage.
He recorded three receptions for 32 yards, averaging 10.7 yards per reception.
His performance was:
| Statistic | Tee Higgins |
| Receptions | 3 |
| Receiving Yards | 32 |
| Yards Per Reception | 10.7 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 0 |
Although Higgins led the Bengals in receiving yards, his production was limited compared with Denver’s leading receivers.
Ja’Marr Chase’s Receiving Performance
Ja’Marr Chase recorded five receptions for 23 yards.
He averaged just 4.6 yards per reception.
His five catches were the highest reception total among Cincinnati’s listed receivers, but his yardage remained limited.
This distinction is important.
A high reception count does not necessarily indicate a productive receiving performance. The yards gained per catch and the ability to create meaningful offensive progress also matter.
Chase’s statistics demonstrate how difficult it was for Cincinnati to generate explosive passing plays.
Other Cincinnati Receiving Contributions
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Yards Per Reception |
| Tee Higgins | 3 | 32 | 10.7 |
| Chase Brown | 3 | 31 | 10.3 |
| Ja’Marr Chase | 5 | 23 | 4.6 |
| Andrei Iosivas | 1 | 22 | 22.0 |
| Mitchell Tinsley | 1 | 9 | 9.0 |
| Mike Gesicki | 1 | 8 | 8.0 |
| Samaje Perine | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Cincinnati had individual contributions from several players, but the offense lacked the overall production required to challenge Denver.
Defensive Player Stats: Denver Controls the Line of Scrimmage
Denver’s defensive performance was one of the biggest reasons Cincinnati finished with only three points.
The Broncos recorded three sacks, six quarterback hits, and two tackles for loss.
Cincinnati failed to record a sack against Bo Nix.
The difference in defensive pressure affected the quarterbacks’ ability to operate effectively.
Team Defensive Statistics
| Defensive Statistic | Bengals | Broncos |
| Total Tackles | 88 | 46 |
| Solo Tackles | 43 | 22 |
| Sacks | 0 | 3 |
| Tackles for Loss | 1 | 2 |
| Passes Defended | 2 | 2 |
| Quarterback Hits | 1 | 6 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
Cincinnati recorded more total tackles, but that figure should not automatically be interpreted as better defensive performance.
A defense can accumulate a high number of tackles because its opponent runs more plays or controls possession.
Denver’s lower tackle total came alongside three sacks and six quarterback hits.
Those pressure statistics provide a clearer picture of how effectively the Broncos disrupted Cincinnati’s offense.
Alex Singleton Leads Denver in Tackles
Alex Singleton led the Broncos with 11 total tackles, including six solo tackles.
His contribution was important in maintaining defensive consistency.
Singleton’s statistics were:
| Statistic | Alex Singleton |
| Total Tackles | 11 |
| Solo Tackles | 6 |
His performance helped Denver limit Cincinnati’s opportunities to establish offensive rhythm.
Nik Bonitto Produces a Strong Pass-Rushing Performance
Nik Bonitto was one of Denver’s most effective defensive players.
He recorded:
- Three total tackles.
- Two solo tackles.
- 1.5 sacks.
- One tackle for loss.
- Two quarterback hits.
His 1.5 sacks represented half of Denver’s three total sacks.
Bonitto’s pressure made it difficult for Browning to remain comfortable in the pocket.
His contribution was especially important because Cincinnati needed more time to develop its passing plays.
John Franklin-Myers Adds Defensive Pressure
John Franklin-Myers also contributed to Denver’s pass rush.
He recorded two tackles, one solo tackle, one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.
His performance helped Denver maintain pressure throughout the game.
Jonathon Cooper Contributes to the Defensive Effort
Jonathon Cooper recorded two tackles, including one solo tackle.
He also contributed half a sack, one pass defended, and two quarterback hits.
His ability to pressure the quarterback added another dimension to Denver’s defensive performance.
Cincinnati’s Leading Tacklers
Demetrius Knight Jr. led Cincinnati with 10 tackles, including six solo tackles.
He also recorded an interception according to the supplied statistical data.
Other leading Cincinnati defensive contributors included:
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles |
| Demetrius Knight Jr. | 10 | 6 |
| Geno Stone | 10 | 4 |
| Dax Hill | 9 | 5 |
| Jordan Battle | 9 | 4 |
These players were involved in several defensive situations.
However, Cincinnati’s defense could not generate enough pressure against Nix.
The Bengals finished without a recorded sack or defensive touchdown.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnovers can dramatically influence NFL games, particularly when one team is already struggling offensively.
The supplied statistics show that Denver recorded one interception thrown by Bo Nix, while Cincinnati recorded no interceptions thrown by Browning.
The defensive interception statistics list one interception for Cincinnati, credited to Demetrius Knight Jr., and none for Denver.
Neither team recorded a fumble.
Turnover Statistics
| Statistic | Bengals | Broncos |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Defensive Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Fumbles Recorded | 0 | 0 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
The Bengals’ defensive interception provided a positive moment, but it did not translate into enough offensive production to change the result.
Denver’s ability to avoid fumbles also helped the team maintain control.
One important distinction is that an interception thrown and an interception recorded by a defense describe opposite sides of the same event. They should not be added together as separate turnovers.
Special Teams Player Stats
Special teams also contributed to the overall game statistics.
Cincinnati received its only points through Evan McPherson’s field goal.
Denver’s kicker Wil Lutz successfully converted all four extra-point attempts.
The Broncos also benefited from productive kick returns and punt returns.
Kicking Statistics
| Statistic | Evan McPherson | Wil Lutz |
| Team | Bengals | Broncos |
| Field Goals Made | 1 | 0 |
| Field Goals Attempted | 1 | 0 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 100% | N/A |
| Extra Points Made | Not listed | 4 |
| Extra Points Attempted | Not listed | 4 |
| Total Points | 3 | 4 |
| Longest Field Goal | 26 yards | Not applicable |
McPherson converted his only field-goal attempt, giving Cincinnati three points.
Lutz did not attempt a field goal but successfully converted all four extra points.
Kick Return Statistics
| Statistic | Charlie Jones | RJ Harvey |
| Team | Bengals | Broncos |
| Kick Returns | 2 | 2 |
| Return Yards | 48 | 58 |
| Average | 24.0 | 29.0 |
| Longest Return | 30 yards | 29 yards |
RJ Harvey recorded 58 kick-return yards, averaging 29 yards per return.
Charlie Jones recorded 48 yards on two returns.
Both players provided useful field-position contributions.
Punt Return Statistics
| Statistic | Charlie Jones | Marvin Mims Jr. |
| Team | Bengals | Broncos |
| Punt Returns | 1 | 3 |
| Return Yards | 16 | 24 |
| Average | 16.0 | 8.0 |
Charlie Jones averaged 16 yards on his only punt return.
Marvin Mims Jr. returned three punts for 24 total yards.
Although Jones had the better average, Denver benefited from Mims’ additional return opportunities.
Punting Statistics
| Statistic | Ryan Rehkow | Jeremy Crawshaw |
| Team | Bengals | Broncos |
| Total Punts | 8 | 4 |
| Punting Yards | 403 | 199 |
| Average Punt Distance | 50.4 | 49.8 |
| Touchbacks | 1 | 2 |
| Inside the 20 | 3 | 1 |
| Longest Punt | 69 yards | 62 yards |
Ryan Rehkow punted eight times for 403 yards.
His average was 50.4 yards per punt, and his longest punt traveled 69 yards.
Jeremy Crawshaw punted four times for 199 yards, averaging 49.8 yards.
The difference in punt totals is noteworthy.
Cincinnati punted twice as many times as Denver, reflecting the difficulty the Bengals experienced in sustaining offensive drives.
However, punting averages alone do not measure overall special teams effectiveness. Field position, return opportunities, and the location of each punt also matter.
Total Offensive Production: Why Denver Won
The combined offensive statistics provide the clearest explanation of the final result.
Denver accumulated 512 total yards through its passing and rushing production.
Cincinnati finished with 178 total yards.
That created a 334-yard advantage for Denver.
Total Offensive Comparison
| Statistic | Cincinnati Bengals | Denver Broncos |
| Passing Yards | 125 | 326 |
| Rushing Yards | 53 | 186 |
| Total Offensive Yards | 178 | 512 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Total Offensive Touchdowns | 0 | 4 |
| Total Points | 3 | 28 |
Denver produced almost three times as many total offensive yards as Cincinnati.
The Broncos also scored four offensive touchdowns according to the supplied passing and rushing touchdown statistics.
Cincinnati did not record an offensive touchdown.
The Passing Game Created a Major Difference
Denver’s 326 passing yards were 201 more than Cincinnati’s 125.
That difference demonstrates how effectively Nix distributed the football.
Denver also averaged 7.8 yards per passing attempt compared with Cincinnati’s five yards.
This meant the Broncos generated more yardage with each passing opportunity.
The Rushing Game Added Another Advantage
Denver’s 186 rushing yards were 133 more than Cincinnati’s 53.
Dobbins led the way with 101 yards, while Harvey contributed another 58.
The Broncos also used rushing touchdowns to finish offensive possessions.
Cincinnati could not produce a similar ground-game response.
Denver Converted Offensive Opportunities Into Points
The Broncos’ ability to combine passing and rushing production was particularly important.
Their offense did not depend on one player or one method.
Instead, several contributors helped create scoring opportunities.
This balance made Denver difficult to defend and prevented Cincinnati from concentrating its defensive resources on a single offensive threat.
Five Biggest Takeaways From the Game
The individual numbers reveal several important lessons about the September 29 matchup.
1. Bo Nix Was the Most Productive Quarterback
Nix completed 29 passes for 326 yards and two touchdowns.
His performance gave Denver a major advantage through the air.
Although he threw one interception, his overall production was significantly stronger than Browning’s.
2. J.K. Dobbins Delivered a 100-Yard Rushing Performance
Dobbins recorded 101 rushing yards on 16 attempts.
His average of 6.3 yards per carry helped Denver maintain offensive balance.
His contribution was one of the main reasons the Broncos finished with 186 rushing yards.
3. Courtland Sutton Led All Receivers in Receiving Yards
Sutton recorded 81 yards and one touchdown on five receptions.
His ability to generate significant yardage helped Denver stretch Cincinnati’s defense.
4. Denver’s Defense Applied Consistent Pressure
The Broncos recorded three sacks and six quarterback hits.
Nik Bonitto, John Franklin-Myers, and Jonathon Cooper all contributed to the pass rush.
Cincinnati did not record a sack against Nix.
5. Cincinnati Could Not Produce an Offensive Touchdown
The Bengals finished with only three points.
They recorded 125 passing yards and 53 rushing yards.
Their inability to generate consistent offensive production prevented them from challenging Denver’s lead.
What the Statistics Reveal About Both Teams
Beyond the final score, the game provides useful information about the strengths and weaknesses of both offenses.
Denver Broncos: Offensive Balance and Defensive Pressure
Denver’s biggest strength was its ability to produce through multiple offensive methods.
The Broncos finished with:
- 326 passing yards.
- 186 rushing yards.
- 29 completed passes.
- 38 rushing attempts.
- Four offensive touchdowns.
- Three defensive sacks.
This combination created a difficult situation for Cincinnati.
If the Bengals concentrated on stopping the passing game, Denver could use Dobbins and Harvey on the ground.
If Cincinnati committed additional defensive resources to the rushing attack, Nix had opportunities to distribute the ball to Sutton, Mims, Franklin, and other receivers.
Denver’s defensive performance made the advantage even greater.
The Broncos generated pressure without needing an interception or defensive touchdown to determine the outcome.
Cincinnati Bengals: Offensive Production Was the Main Problem
Cincinnati’s biggest challenge was its inability to create enough offensive yardage.
The Bengals finished with:
- 125 passing yards.
- 53 rushing yards.
- 14 receptions.
- Zero passing touchdowns.
- Zero rushing touchdowns.
- Three total points.
Browning did not throw an interception, but Cincinnati still struggled to move the football.
The rushing game also failed to generate enough production to take pressure off the passing attack.
Chase Brown was the team’s leading runner, but his 40 yards were not enough to establish consistent offensive balance.
The defensive unit also struggled to pressure Nix.
These combined problems explain why Cincinnati could not keep pace with Denver.
Statistical Context: How to Evaluate NFL Player Performances
When examining a football box score, it is important to understand what individual statistics actually measure.
A player with the highest number in one category is not necessarily the most valuable contributor.
Different statistics provide different information about performance.
Passing Yards and Completion Percentage
Passing yards measure the total distance gained through completed forward passes.
Completion percentage measures how frequently a quarterback completes his passing attempts.
Both numbers are useful, but they should be considered together.
Nix’s 326 passing yards and 69.0% completion rate demonstrate stronger overall passing production than Browning’s 125 yards and 56.0% completion rate.
Yards Per Attempt
Yards per attempt help evaluate passing efficiency.
This statistic is calculated by dividing passing yards by pass attempts.
Denver’s 7.8 yards per attempt compared with Cincinnati’s five yards shows that the Broncos gained more yardage from their passing opportunities.
Rushing Average
Rushing average measures how many yards a player gains per rushing attempt.
Dobbins averaged 6.3 yards per carry.
Brown averaged four yards per carry.
That difference illustrates Denver’s greater effectiveness in the ground game.
Receiving Yards Per Reception
Receiving yards per reception measure average yardage gained on each catch.
Sutton averaged 16.2 yards per reception, while Ja’Marr Chase averaged 4.6.
This helps explain the difference between their receiving contributions.
Defensive Sacks and Quarterback Hits
Sacks measure plays where a defensive player tackles the quarterback behind the line of scrimmage during a passing situation.
Quarterback hits measure additional pressure delivered to the quarterback.
Denver’s three sacks and six quarterback hits demonstrate a more disruptive defensive performance than Cincinnati’s zero sacks and one quarterback hit.
These statistics are particularly useful when evaluating defensive-line effectiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the Bengals vs Denver Broncos game on September 29, 2025?
The Denver Broncos defeated the Cincinnati Bengals 28-3. Denver scored 28 points, while Cincinnati managed only one field goal.
2. How many passing yards did Bo Nix record against the Bengals?
Bo Nix completed 29 of 42 passes for 326 yards and two passing touchdowns. He also recorded one interception and finished with a 97.9 passer rating.
3. How many rushing yards did J.K. Dobbins have against Cincinnati?
J.K. Dobbins recorded 101 rushing yards on 16 attempts. He averaged 6.3 yards per carry, and his longest run covered 16 yards.
4. Who was Denver’s leading receiver against the Bengals?
Courtland Sutton led Denver with five receptions for 81 yards and one touchdown. He averaged 16.2 yards per reception.
5. How many points did the Cincinnati Bengals score?
Cincinnati scored three points. Evan McPherson converted a 26-yard field goal, while the Bengals failed to record a touchdown.
6. How many sacks did the Denver Broncos record?
Denver recorded three sacks against Cincinnati. Nik Bonitto contributed 1.5 sacks, John Franklin-Myers recorded one sack, and Jonathon Cooper added half a sack.
Conclusion
The September 29, 2025, matchup between the Cincinnati Bengals and Denver Broncos demonstrated the importance of balanced offensive production and effective defensive pressure.
Denver secured a convincing 28-3 victory by outperforming Cincinnati in nearly every major offensive category. Bo Nix completed 29 of 42 passes for 326 yards and two touchdowns, while J.K. Dobbins added 101 rushing yards. Courtland Sutton led the receiving group with 81 yards and a touchdown, and RJ Harvey contributed through both rushing and receiving.
Defensively, Denver recorded three sacks and six quarterback hits, making it difficult for Jake Browning to establish a consistent passing rhythm.
Cincinnati’s offensive struggles were reflected in its 178 total yards and three-point finish. Although individual players such as Chase Brown, Tee Higgins, and Demetrius Knight Jr. contributed, the team could not generate enough production to challenge Denver.
Ultimately, the bengals vs denver broncos match player stats show why Denver controlled this contest. The Broncos combined effective quarterback play, productive rushing, reliable receiving options, and aggressive defense to deliver a dominant performance.
For readers evaluating this matchup, the most important figures are Denver’s 512 total offensive yards, Cincinnati’s 178 yards, and the 25-point difference on the scoreboard. Together, these numbers explain the outcome more clearly than the final score alone.
