New England Patriots vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers Match Player Stats
The new england patriots vs tampa bay buccaneers match player stats reveal how New England secured a 28-23 victory over Tampa Bay on November 9, 2025. The Patriots combined an explosive rushing performance from TreVeyon Henderson with important contributions from their receiving corps to finish with 28 points. Although Baker Mayfield threw for 273 yards and three touchdowns, Tampa Bay could not overcome New England’s balanced offensive production. Henderson delivered the standout individual performance with 147 rushing yards and two touchdowns, while Mack Hollins recorded 106 receiving yards. The five-point result reflected a competitive contest in which explosive plays, rushing efficiency, and defensive execution played important roles.
The matchup provided several interesting statistical contrasts. New England scored seven points in every quarter, demonstrating consistent scoring throughout the game. Tampa Bay started with seven points in the opening quarter but managed only three in the second and six in the third before scoring seven in the fourth. Both quarterbacks surpassed 270 passing yards, but their performances differed in efficiency and touchdown production. Mayfield completed more passes and avoided interceptions, while Drake Maye averaged more yards per completion attempt and benefited from a productive running game.
This detailed breakdown examines the individual performances, quarterback statistics, rushing production, receiving numbers, defensive contributions, special teams, and important statistical differences that shaped the final result.
New England Patriots vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The November 9, 2025, meeting between the New England Patriots and Tampa Bay Buccaneers finished with a 28-23 Patriots victory.
New England entered the contest with an 8-2 record and improved its away record to 5-0 following the win. Tampa Bay entered with a 6-3 record but finished the game with a 2-2 home record.
The five-point difference reflected a matchup in which both offenses produced meaningful yardage. Tampa Bay generated 273 passing yards, while New England finished with 270. However, the Patriots established a considerable advantage on the ground, recording 166 rushing yards compared with Tampa Bay’s 113.
TreVeyon Henderson was the most productive offensive player in the matchup. His 147 rushing yards accounted for a significant portion of New England’s ground production. He also scored twice, giving the Patriots an effective scoring option beyond their passing attack.
Baker Mayfield produced three passing touchdowns for Tampa Bay. His connection with Emeka Egbuka and Tez Johnson helped the Buccaneers remain competitive, but their inability to generate a rushing touchdown limited the variety of their scoring production.
Complete Match Information
| Match Detail | Information |
| Game | New England Patriots vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
| Date | November 9, 2025 |
| Competition | National Football League |
| Sport | American Football |
| Final Score | Patriots 28, Buccaneers 23 |
| Winning Team | New England Patriots |
| Losing Team | Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
| Patriots Record | 8-2 |
| Patriots Away Record | 5-0 |
| Buccaneers Record | 6-3 |
| Buccaneers Home Record | 2-2 |
| Match Status | Final |
| ESPN Game ID | 401772772 |
Final Score by Quarter
The scoring progression shows that New England maintained the same scoring output in all four quarters. Tampa Bay experienced more variation, particularly during the middle two periods.
| Quarter | New England Patriots | Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
| First Quarter | 7 | 7 |
| Second Quarter | 7 | 3 |
| Third Quarter | 7 | 6 |
| Fourth Quarter | 7 | 7 |
| Total | 28 | 23 |
New England’s seven-point production in every quarter is one of the most notable features of the final score.
The Patriots did not depend on one unusually productive period to establish their advantage. Instead, they continued adding points throughout the contest.
Tampa Bay matched New England in the opening and final quarters. However, its three-point second quarter and six-point third quarter created a scoring difference that contributed to the final outcome.
This quarter-by-quarter comparison also illustrates why a relatively close final score does not necessarily mean both teams followed the same offensive pattern.
Quarterback Player Stats: Drake Maye vs Baker Mayfield
Quarterback production was one of the most interesting aspects of this matchup.
Drake Maye and Baker Mayfield both finished with more than 270 passing yards. However, their statistical profiles were different.
Mayfield completed more passes and threw three touchdowns without an interception. Maye completed fewer passes but produced a higher yards-per-attempt average and two passing touchdowns.
Drake Maye’s Passing Performance
Drake Maye finished the game with 16 completions on 31 attempts for 270 passing yards.
He averaged 8.7 yards per attempt and threw two touchdown passes. His performance also included one interception and one sack for a loss of one yard.
| Passing Statistic | Drake Maye |
| Completions | 16 |
| Passing Attempts | 31 |
| Completion Percentage | 51.6% |
| Passing Yards | 270 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 8.7 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks Taken | 1 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 1 |
| QBR | 48.5 |
| Passer Rating | 89.4 |
Maye’s 270 passing yards represented productive yardage despite his relatively low completion percentage.
His 8.7 yards per attempt indicated that New England generated substantial yardage from its completed passes. The figure was notably higher than Mayfield’s 6.3 yards per attempt.
This difference suggests that the Patriots generated more passing yardage per attempt, even though Tampa Bay completed a greater number of passes.
Maye’s two touchdown passes also contributed directly to New England’s scoring total.
However, his interception was an important negative statistic. Turnovers can affect field position and scoring opportunities, making ball security an important consideration when evaluating quarterback performances.
His 48.5 QBR and 89.4 passer rating provide additional context beyond passing yards and touchdowns.
Maye also contributed seven rushing attempts for 13 yards. Although his running production was modest compared with Henderson’s performance, his mobility added another option to the Patriots’ offensive attack.
Baker Mayfield’s Passing Performance
Baker Mayfield delivered a productive passing performance for Tampa Bay.
He completed 28 of 43 attempts for 273 yards and three touchdowns. Unlike Maye, he did not throw an interception.
Mayfield recorded a 106.1 passer rating and a 65.5 QBR.
| Passing Statistic | Baker Mayfield |
| Completions | 28 |
| Passing Attempts | 43 |
| Completion Percentage | 65.1% |
| Passing Yards | 273 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 6.3 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 2 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 15 |
| QBR | 65.5 |
| Passer Rating | 106.1 |
Mayfield completed 12 more passes than Maye and attempted 12 additional passes.
His completion percentage of 65.1% demonstrated consistent short and intermediate passing production. He also distributed the ball effectively among several receivers.
Three touchdown passes were particularly important because Tampa Bay did not record a rushing touchdown.
However, Mayfield’s 6.3 yards per attempt was lower than Maye’s 8.7. This indicates that New England produced more passing yardage relative to the number of attempts.
Mayfield also absorbed two sacks for a combined loss of 15 yards.
Although he avoided interceptions, the sacks represented opportunities for the Patriots’ defense to disrupt Tampa Bay’s offensive rhythm.
Drake Maye vs Baker Mayfield: Statistical Comparison
| Category | Drake Maye | Baker Mayfield |
| Completions | 16 | 28 |
| Attempts | 31 | 43 |
| Completion Percentage | 51.6% | 65.1% |
| Passing Yards | 270 | 273 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 8.7 | 6.3 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 1 | 2 |
| QBR | 48.5 | 65.5 |
| Passer Rating | 89.4 | 106.1 |
The comparison demonstrates two different approaches to quarterback production.
Mayfield recorded more completions, more touchdowns, a higher passer rating, and a higher QBR. Maye generated nearly the same passing yardage with considerably fewer attempts.
One particularly interesting detail is the difference between their passing averages.
Maye averaged 8.7 yards per attempt, compared with Mayfield’s 6.3. This difference highlights the Patriots’ ability to generate substantial passing yardage without requiring as many attempts.
Nevertheless, Mayfield’s three touchdowns and zero interceptions made his individual passing performance statistically strong.
The final result cannot be explained through quarterback statistics alone. New England’s rushing advantage and Henderson’s touchdown production were also important parts of the matchup.
Patriots Rushing Stats: TreVeyon Henderson Leads the Ground Game
New England’s rushing performance was one of the biggest statistical differences between the teams.
The Patriots recorded 166 rushing yards on 27 attempts, averaging 6.1 yards per carry. They also scored two rushing touchdowns.
TreVeyon Henderson led the backfield with 147 yards on 14 carries.
His average of 10.5 yards per attempt demonstrated the explosive nature of his performance.
TreVeyon Henderson’s Outstanding Performance
Henderson finished with:
- 14 rushing attempts.
- 147 rushing yards.
- 10.5 yards per carry.
- Two rushing touchdowns.
- Longest run of 69 yards.
His 69-yard longest run was particularly significant.
A running play of that length can immediately change field position and create scoring opportunities. It also forces opposing defenses to account for the possibility of another explosive run.
Henderson’s average of 10.5 yards per carry was substantially higher than the team’s overall average of 6.1.
The difference indicates how much his individual production influenced New England’s rushing statistics.
He was also productive in the passing game, recording one reception for three yards on one target.
Although his receiving contribution was limited, his primary value came from his ability to generate yardage through the ground attack.
Henderson’s two rushing touchdowns made him the leading individual scoring contributor for New England among the listed rushing performers.
Complete Patriots Rushing Statistics
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TDs |
| TreVeyon Henderson | 14 | 147 | 10.5 | 2 |
| Drake Maye | 7 | 13 | 1.9 | 0 |
| Terrell Jennings | 4 | 5 | 1.3 | 0 |
| D’Ernest Johnson | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
| DeMario Douglas | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 27 | 166 | 6.1 | 2 |
Henderson accounted for the majority of New England’s rushing production.
The remaining players contributed smaller amounts of yardage, with Maye adding 13 yards on seven attempts.
The Patriots’ ability to generate 166 rushing yards provided balance to their offense.
It also meant that New England did not have to depend exclusively on Maye’s passing production to move the football.
Why New England’s Rushing Production Mattered
There are several reasons why the Patriots’ ground performance deserves attention.
First, rushing efficiency can help an offense maintain manageable down-and-distance situations.
Second, successful runs can force defensive adjustments. When a defense must respect the running game, additional opportunities may become available through play-action passing and other offensive concepts.
Third, explosive rushing plays can produce significant yardage without requiring several consecutive completions.
Henderson’s 69-yard longest run demonstrated this final advantage.
The Patriots finished with 53 more rushing yards than Tampa Bay. That difference helped establish New England’s overall yardage advantage.
Buccaneers Rushing Stats: Sean Tucker Leads Tampa Bay
Tampa Bay finished with 113 rushing yards on 21 attempts.
The Buccaneers averaged 5.4 yards per carry, but they did not record a rushing touchdown.
Sean Tucker was the team’s leading rusher with 53 yards on nine carries.
Rachaad White also contributed 38 rushing yards, while Sterling Shepard and Kameron Johnson each recorded 11 yards on one attempt.
Sean Tucker’s Rushing Numbers
Tucker’s performance included:
- Nine rushing attempts.
- 53 rushing yards.
- 5.9 yards per carry.
- No rushing touchdowns.
His 5.9-yard average was higher than Tampa Bay’s overall rushing average of 5.4.
Tucker provided the most productive individual ground contribution for the Buccaneers.
However, his total of 53 yards was considerably lower than Henderson’s 147-yard performance.
This difference was an important part of the statistical comparison between the two backfields.
Rachaad White’s Contribution
Rachaad White recorded 10 carries for 38 yards.
He averaged 3.8 yards per attempt and did not score a rushing touchdown.
White also contributed in the receiving game with five receptions for 16 yards.
His combined rushing and receiving involvement gave Tampa Bay another option for moving the football, particularly through short passes.
However, his 38 rushing yards did not match Tucker’s production or Henderson’s explosive output.
Complete Buccaneers Rushing Statistics
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TDs |
| Sean Tucker | 9 | 53 | 5.9 | 0 |
| Rachaad White | 10 | 38 | 3.8 | 0 |
| Sterling Shepard | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 |
| Kameron Johnson | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 |
| Team Total | 21 | 113 | 5.4 | 0 |
Tampa Bay’s 113 rushing yards were respectable, particularly considering the team’s average of 5.4 yards per carry.
However, the Buccaneers did not convert their rushing production into touchdowns.
This was a notable contrast with New England, which scored twice through its running game.
Patriots vs Buccaneers Rushing Comparison
| Rushing Category | Patriots | Buccaneers |
| Attempts | 27 | 21 |
| Rushing Yards | 166 | 113 |
| Yards Per Carry | 6.1 | 5.4 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Longest Run | 69 yards | 18 yards |
New England held a 53-yard advantage in total rushing production.
The Patriots also recorded six additional rushing attempts and two touchdowns.
The most striking difference was the longest run. Henderson’s 69-yard effort was considerably longer than Tampa Bay’s 18-yard longest run.
These numbers illustrate how explosive individual plays can influence team rushing totals.
Patriots Receiving Stats: Mack Hollins Leads New England
New England’s receiving group produced 270 yards on 16 receptions.
The team averaged 16.9 yards per reception and recorded two receiving touchdowns.
Mack Hollins led the Patriots with 106 receiving yards.
Kyle Williams and Stefon Diggs also contributed important touchdown receptions.
Mack Hollins’ 106-Yard Performance
Hollins was New England’s leading receiver in total yardage.
His final numbers were:
- Six receptions.
- 106 receiving yards.
- 17.7 yards per reception.
- 10 targets.
- Longest reception of 54 yards.
- Zero receiving touchdowns.
Hollins was an important source of downfield production.
His 106 yards represented a substantial portion of the Patriots’ total passing yardage.
He also recorded the most receptions among New England’s listed receivers.
The combination of six catches and 17.7 yards per reception demonstrates that his contribution extended beyond short, possession-based completions.
His 54-yard longest reception was another significant figure in the receiving breakdown.
Kyle Williams’ Touchdown Reception
Kyle Williams finished with one reception for 72 yards and one touchdown.
His average was 72.0 yards per reception, reflecting the impact of his single recorded catch.
Williams was targeted twice.
Although his reception total was lower than Hollins’ and Diggs’, his 72-yard touchdown provided an important scoring contribution.
His performance demonstrates why reception totals alone do not always describe a receiver’s overall impact.
A single explosive reception can produce more yardage than several shorter catches.
Stefon Diggs Adds Another Touchdown
Stefon Diggs recorded five receptions for 46 yards and one touchdown.
His receiving average was 9.2 yards per catch.
Diggs received eight targets and recorded a longest reception of 19 yards.
His five receptions made him an important part of New England’s passing distribution.
While Hollins generated more total receiving yards, Diggs contributed a touchdown and provided another reliable receiving option.
Complete Patriots Receiving Statistics
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TDs | Targets |
| Mack Hollins | 6 | 106 | 17.7 | 0 | 10 |
| Kyle Williams | 1 | 72 | 72.0 | 1 | 2 |
| Stefon Diggs | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 1 | 8 |
| DeMario Douglas | 2 | 34 | 17.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Hunter Henry | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 4 |
| TreVeyon Henderson | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Austin Hooper | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jack Westover | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Team Total | 16 | 270 | 16.9 | 2 | 29 |
The table highlights the distribution of New England’s passing production.
Hollins led in receiving yards and receptions, Williams delivered the longest reception and a touchdown, and Diggs added five catches and another score.
DeMario Douglas also contributed 34 yards on two receptions.
Hunter Henry recorded one reception for nine yards, while Henderson added three receiving yards.
Austin Hooper and Jack Westover were each targeted once but did not record a reception.
What the Patriots Receiving Numbers Tell Us
New England’s receiving statistics reveal an offense that generated yardage through several different players.
Hollins supplied the largest overall receiving contribution.
Williams provided the biggest individual explosive play in the receiving game.
Diggs added a touchdown while maintaining a consistent reception total.
Douglas contributed another 34 yards, giving Maye several options across the receiving group.
This distribution is important because an offense becomes more difficult to defend when its production is not concentrated in one player.
The Patriots finished with 270 passing yards, matching Maye’s individual passing total.
Buccaneers Receiving Stats: Emeka Egbuka Leads Tampa Bay
Tampa Bay produced 273 receiving yards on 28 receptions.
The Buccaneers averaged 9.8 yards per reception and recorded three receiving touchdowns.
Emeka Egbuka led the team with 115 receiving yards.
Cade Otton also delivered an important performance with nine receptions for 82 yards.
Emeka Egbuka’s 115 Receiving Yards
Egbuka was Tampa Bay’s leading receiver.
His final statistics included:
- Six receptions.
- 115 receiving yards.
- 19.2 yards per reception.
- One touchdown.
- 31-yard longest reception.
- 13 targets.
His 115 receiving yards represented the largest individual receiving total for either team.
Egbuka averaged 19.2 yards per reception, making him one of Tampa Bay’s most productive downfield options.
He also recorded one touchdown, contributing directly to the Buccaneers’ scoring production.
His 13 targets were the highest among Tampa Bay’s listed receivers.
That number demonstrates how frequently the passing offense looked in his direction.
Although he did not record the longest individual reception in the game, his combination of yardage and touchdown production made him a central part of the Buccaneers’ offense.
Cade Otton’s Nine-Reception Performance
Cade Otton finished with nine receptions for 82 yards.
He averaged 9.1 yards per reception and received 12 targets.
His longest reception covered 16 yards.
Otton led Tampa Bay in receptions.
His nine catches provided Mayfield with a consistent short and intermediate passing option.
The difference between Otton’s nine receptions and Egbuka’s six catches illustrates the variety of roles within Tampa Bay’s receiving group.
Egbuka generated more total yardage, while Otton recorded more receptions.
Tez Johnson’s Two Touchdowns
Tez Johnson recorded four receptions for 42 yards and two touchdowns.
He averaged 10.5 yards per reception and received five targets.
His longest reception was 12 yards.
Johnson’s two touchdown receptions were particularly important because they accounted for two of Tampa Bay’s three passing touchdowns.
Although his receiving yardage was lower than Egbuka’s and Otton’s, his scoring contribution was significant.
This is an important distinction when analyzing receiving performances.
Total yardage measures how much ground a player gains through receptions, while touchdowns show how often those contributions directly result in points.
Johnson’s two scores made him Tampa Bay’s leading receiving touchdown contributor.
Complete Buccaneers Receiving Statistics
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TDs | Targets |
| Emeka Egbuka | 6 | 115 | 19.2 | 1 | 13 |
| Cade Otton | 9 | 82 | 9.1 | 0 | 12 |
| Tez Johnson | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 2 | 5 |
| Sterling Shepard | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 0 | 4 |
| Rachaad White | 5 | 16 | 3.2 | 0 | 5 |
| Payne Durham | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kameron Johnson | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sean Tucker | 1 | -2 | -2.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Team Total | 28 | 273 | 9.8 | 3 | 43 |
Tampa Bay’s receiving group recorded more receptions and slightly more total yardage than New England.
The Buccaneers finished with 28 catches compared with the Patriots’ 16.
They also recorded 43 targets, while New England finished with 29.
However, New England averaged more yards per reception.
The Patriots’ 16.9-yard average was considerably higher than Tampa Bay’s 9.8-yard average.
This difference highlights two distinct passing approaches.
Tampa Bay recorded more short and intermediate completions, while New England generated more yardage from each completed reception.
Patriots vs Buccaneers Receiving Comparison
| Receiving Category | Patriots | Buccaneers |
| Receptions | 16 | 28 |
| Receiving Yards | 270 | 273 |
| Yards Per Reception | 16.9 | 9.8 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Targets | 29 | 43 |
| Longest Reception | 72 yards | 31 yards |
Tampa Bay held a three-yard advantage in total receiving yardage.
The Buccaneers also recorded one additional receiving touchdown and 12 more receptions.
However, New England’s 72-yard longest reception was more than twice Tampa Bay’s 31-yard longest reception.
This statistical contrast is important because it demonstrates that total receiving yardage can hide differences in how offenses generate production.
Defensive Player Stats: Tackles, Sacks, and Interceptions
Defensive production was another important part of the matchup.
New England recorded 74 total tackles and 31 solo tackles.
Tampa Bay finished with 53 total tackles and 34 solo tackles.
The Patriots also recorded two sacks, six tackles for loss, five passes defended, and five quarterback hits.
The Buccaneers recorded one sack, three tackles for loss, five passes defended, and six quarterback hits.
Patriots Defensive Statistics
| Defensive Category | Patriots |
| Total Tackles | 74 |
| Solo Tackles | 31 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for Loss | 6 |
| Passes Defended | 5 |
| Quarterback Hits | 5 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
New England’s six tackles for loss demonstrated its ability to disrupt Tampa Bay’s offensive plays behind or near the line of scrimmage.
The Patriots also generated two sacks and five quarterback hits.
These statistics indicate that the defense created pressure on Mayfield, even though he finished with 273 passing yards and three touchdowns.
The absence of a defensive interception meant New England did not record a takeaway through the passing game.
However, its pressure and tackling production remained important components of the defensive performance.
Buccaneers Defensive Statistics
| Defensive Category | Buccaneers |
| Total Tackles | 53 |
| Solo Tackles | 34 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 3 |
| Passes Defended | 5 |
| Quarterback Hits | 6 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
Tampa Bay recorded one sack and six quarterback hits.
Its defense also defended five passes and recorded three tackles for loss.
The most notable defensive statistic was the interception recorded by Tykee Smith.
Tykee Smith’s Interception
Tykee Smith recorded one interception for Tampa Bay.
His interception return covered zero yards, and he did not score a defensive touchdown.
The play represented Tampa Bay’s only recorded interception in the supplied statistics.
It also provided a defensive takeaway against Drake Maye.
Interceptions are important because they end an opponent’s possession and can change field position.
However, a single interception does not automatically determine the outcome of a game.
The Patriots still produced 28 points and maintained their offensive balance through the rushing attack.
Defensive Comparison
| Category | Patriots | Buccaneers |
| Total Tackles | 74 | 53 |
| Solo Tackles | 31 | 34 |
| Sacks | 2 | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 6 | 3 |
| Passes Defended | 5 | 5 |
| QB Hits | 5 | 6 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Defensive TDs | 0 | 0 |
New England recorded more total tackles, sacks, and tackles for loss.
Tampa Bay recorded more solo tackles, one additional quarterback hit, and the game’s interception.
These statistics show that both defenses contributed meaningful plays, although their production differed across individual categories.
Special Teams Player Stats
Special teams also contributed to the statistical picture.
The Patriots used Andy Borregales as their kicker and Bryce Baringer as their punter.
Tampa Bay relied on Chase McLaughlin for field goals and extra points, while Riley Dixon handled punting duties.
Patriots Kicking Statistics
Andy Borregales finished with four successful extra-point attempts.
| Kicking Statistic | Andy Borregales |
| Field Goals Made | 0 |
| Field Goal Attempts | 0 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 0.0% |
| Extra Points Made | 4 |
| Extra Point Attempts | 4 |
| Total Points | 4 |
Borregales did not attempt a field goal according to the supplied statistics.
His four successful extra points accounted for four points in New England’s final total.
Buccaneers Kicking Statistics
Chase McLaughlin converted one field goal and two extra points.
| Kicking Statistic | Chase McLaughlin |
| Field Goals Made | 1 |
| Field Goal Attempts | 1 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 100% |
| Longest Field Goal | 36 yards |
| Extra Points Made | 2 |
| Extra Point Attempts | 2 |
| Total Points | 5 |
McLaughlin finished with five total points.
His field goal covered 36 yards, and he successfully converted both extra-point attempts.
Patriots Punting Statistics
Bryce Baringer recorded five punts for 248 yards.
His average was 49.6 yards per punt.
| Punting Category | Patriots |
| Punter | Bryce Baringer |
| Punts | 5 |
| Total Punt Yards | 248 |
| Average | 49.6 |
| Longest Punt | 59 yards |
| Touchbacks | 1 |
| Inside the 20 | 1 |
Baringer’s average of 49.6 yards demonstrated substantial distance on his punts.
His longest punt covered 59 yards.
Buccaneers Punting Statistics
Riley Dixon recorded six punts for 258 total yards.
| Punting Category | Buccaneers |
| Punter | Riley Dixon |
| Punts | 6 |
| Total Punt Yards | 258 |
| Average | 43.0 |
| Longest Punt | 50 yards |
| Touchbacks | 1 |
| Inside the 20 | 2 |
Dixon averaged 43.0 yards per punt.
He recorded two punts inside the 20-yard line, compared with one for Baringer.
Although Baringer had the higher average and longest punt, Dixon placed more punts inside the opponent’s 20-yard line.
Kick and Punt Return Statistics
Return production provided another comparison between the teams.
| Return Category | Patriots | Buccaneers |
| Kick Returner | Efton Chism III | Kameron Johnson |
| Kick Returns | 2 | 2 |
| Kick Return Yards | 45 | 48 |
| Kick Return Average | 22.5 | 24.0 |
| Longest Kick Return | 28 | 26 |
| Punt Returner | Marcus Jones | Kameron Johnson |
| Punt Returns | 3 | 2 |
| Punt Return Yards | 3 | 12 |
| Punt Return Average | 1.0 | 6.0 |
| Longest Punt Return | 2 | 7 |
Kameron Johnson led Tampa Bay’s kick return group with 48 yards on two returns.
Efton Chism III recorded 45 yards on two returns for New England.
The Patriots had the longer individual kick return at 28 yards.
Marcus Jones handled punt returns for New England, recording three returns for three yards.
Kameron Johnson recorded two punt returns for 12 yards for Tampa Bay.
Neither team recorded a return touchdown in the supplied statistics.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnovers are an important part of any NFL statistical breakdown because they can change possession and influence scoring opportunities.
The supplied statistics show that New England recorded one interception thrown by Drake Maye and one fumble that was recovered without being lost.
Tampa Bay did not record a fumble and secured one interception through Tykee Smith.
Patriots Turnover Statistics
| Category | Patriots |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 |
| Fumbles | 1 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 |
| Fumbles Recovered | 1 |
| Fumble Player | Marcus Jones |
Marcus Jones was listed as the Patriots’ player responsible for the recorded fumble.
The important distinction is that New England did not lose possession through that fumble.
Although Maye threw an interception, the fumble was recovered by the Patriots.
Buccaneers Turnover Statistics
| Category | Buccaneers |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 |
| Fumbles | 0 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 |
| Interceptions Recorded | 1 |
| Interception Player | Tykee Smith |
Tampa Bay avoided throwing an interception and did not record a fumble.
Tykee Smith’s interception was the team’s defensive takeaway.
Why Turnover Statistics Matter
The turnover comparison highlights an interesting feature of the game.
Tampa Bay avoided offensive turnovers according to the supplied statistics, while New England had one interception.
However, the Patriots still finished with the higher score.
This demonstrates why turnover numbers should be examined alongside offensive efficiency, explosive plays, and touchdown production.
New England’s two rushing touchdowns and higher rushing yardage were important statistical advantages.
Complete Team Statistical Comparison
The overall team numbers help explain the final 28-23 result.
Both teams produced more than 270 passing yards, but New England generated significantly more rushing yardage.
The Patriots also averaged more yards per reception and recorded a longer individual reception.
| Team Statistic | Patriots | Buccaneers |
| Final Score | 28 | 23 |
| Passing Yards | 270 | 273 |
| Rushing Yards | 166 | 113 |
| Total Offensive Yards | 436 | 386 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Total Touchdowns | 4 | 3 |
| Passing Completions | 16 | 28 |
| Passing Attempts | 31 | 43 |
| Rushing Attempts | 27 | 21 |
| Receptions | 16 | 28 |
| Receiving Yards | 270 | 273 |
| Yards Per Reception | 16.9 | 9.8 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions Recorded | 0 | 1 |
| Fumbles | 1 | 0 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 0 |
| Sacks Recorded | 2 | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 6 | 3 |
| Longest Reception | 72 yards | 31 yards |
| Longest Rush | 69 yards | 18 yards |
New England finished with 436 combined passing and rushing yards.
Tampa Bay recorded 386.
That created a 50-yard advantage for the Patriots.
Interestingly, Tampa Bay actually finished with three more passing yards than New England.
The difference came from the rushing game, where the Patriots produced 53 additional yards.
The Patriots also recorded four total touchdowns compared with Tampa Bay’s three.
Their scoring distribution included two passing touchdowns and two rushing touchdowns.
Tampa Bay’s three touchdowns all came through the passing game.
This difference provides one of the clearest explanations for the final result.
Five Important Statistical Takeaways From the Game
The matchup produced several notable individual and team performances. Looking beyond the final score reveals five particularly important statistical observations.
1. TreVeyon Henderson Delivered the Most Productive Rushing Performance
Henderson’s 147 rushing yards were the highest individual rushing total in the game.
His 10.5 yards per carry and two touchdowns made him New England’s leading ground contributor.
The 69-yard longest run was another major statistical highlight.
His performance was especially important because Tampa Bay’s leading rusher, Sean Tucker, finished with 53 yards.
The 94-yard difference between the two leading rushers demonstrates the gap in individual rushing production.
2. Baker Mayfield Produced Three Passing Touchdowns
Mayfield threw for 273 yards and three touchdowns.
He completed 28 of 43 attempts without an interception.
His 106.1 passer rating was higher than Maye’s 89.4.
Although Tampa Bay lost, Mayfield’s individual passing statistics were productive.
His connection with Egbuka, Otton, and Johnson gave the Buccaneers multiple receiving options.
3. Mack Hollins Led the Patriots in Receiving Yards
Hollins recorded 106 yards on six receptions.
His 17.7-yard average and 54-yard longest reception made him New England’s leading receiver by total yardage.
He was also one of the most important contributors to the Patriots’ 270 passing yards.
4. New England Had a Clear Advantage in Rushing Yards
The Patriots recorded 166 rushing yards, while Tampa Bay finished with 113.
That 53-yard difference was one of the most significant statistical gaps.
New England also recorded two rushing touchdowns.
Tampa Bay did not score through the running game.
5. Both Teams Had Different Offensive Strengths
Tampa Bay recorded more passing completions, more receptions, and three passing touchdowns.
New England generated more rushing yards, more yards per reception, and more combined offensive yardage.
These contrasting strengths show why comparing only passing yards or completion totals would provide an incomplete understanding of the matchup.
How the Patriots Built Their Statistical Advantage
New England’s victory was supported by a combination of passing production, rushing efficiency, and defensive activity.
The Patriots finished with 436 total offensive yards.
Their passing attack produced 270 yards, while the ground game added 166.
The two touchdown runs were especially important because they gave the offense another scoring method beyond passing.
Henderson’s explosive rushing performance also helped New England create substantial yardage without depending on a high volume of completed passes.
Maye completed 16 passes for 270 yards.
This combination produced a relatively high passing average of 8.7 yards per attempt.
The Patriots also distributed receiving production across Hollins, Williams, Diggs, and Douglas.
On defense, New England recorded two sacks and six tackles for loss.
These numbers show that the Patriots generated pressure and disrupted several offensive plays.
The team also recorded 74 total tackles.
Although Tampa Bay had more passing touchdowns and avoided offensive interceptions, New England’s combined offensive production helped establish the difference in the final score.
Why Tampa Bay’s Offensive Production Was Not Enough
Tampa Bay produced 273 passing yards and three touchdowns.
Its passing game was productive, particularly through Egbuka and Otton.
Egbuka finished with 115 yards, while Otton recorded nine receptions for 82 yards.
Tez Johnson added two touchdown receptions.
Despite these contributions, the Buccaneers recorded only 113 rushing yards and no rushing touchdowns.
This made their offense more dependent on passing production.
Mayfield also faced two sacks and five tackles for loss were recorded by New England’s defense.
The Patriots finished with a 50-yard advantage in total offensive yardage.
Another important difference was the longest reception.
New England recorded a 72-yard reception from Kyle Williams, while Tampa Bay’s longest reception was 31 yards.
These numbers highlight the Patriots’ ability to generate a particularly explosive receiving play.
Tampa Bay’s 28 receptions and three passing touchdowns demonstrated a productive passing attack, but the team did not match New England’s overall combination of rushing and passing production.
What the Match Player Stats Reveal About Offensive Efficiency
Offensive efficiency is more complicated than simply counting passing yards or receptions.
A team can complete more passes without generating the same amount of yardage per completion.
That distinction was visible in this matchup.
Tampa Bay recorded 28 receptions for 273 yards.
New England recorded only 16 receptions for 270 yards.
The Patriots averaged 16.9 yards per reception, while the Buccaneers averaged 9.8.
This difference indicates that New England generated considerably more yardage on each completed reception.
The rushing comparison provides another example.
Tampa Bay averaged 5.4 yards per carry, which was a productive figure.
However, New England averaged 6.1 yards per carry and recorded more rushing attempts.
The Patriots also had Henderson, who averaged 10.5 yards per attempt.
These numbers demonstrate why team averages and individual performances should both be considered when analyzing offensive production.
A team average explains overall efficiency, while individual statistics identify the players responsible for the largest contributions.
Official Match Statistics and Data Accuracy
For readers checking individual performances, the most useful approach is to separate team totals from player-level statistics.
For example, New England’s 270 passing yards are also the combined receiving yards recorded by its players.
Similarly, Tampa Bay’s 273 passing yards match its total receiving yardage.
The rushing figures are separate from passing production and should be added to passing yards when calculating the combined offensive yardage presented in this article.
The final score and individual statistics are based on the supplied ESPN game data for November 9, 2025.
For direct verification of the box score, consult the official ESPN game statistics.
When reviewing a box score, it is also important to distinguish between:
- Passing attempts and completions.
- Receiving targets and completed receptions.
- Rushing attempts and total rushing yards.
- Sacks taken by a quarterback and sacks recorded by a defense.
- Interceptions thrown and interceptions recorded.
- Fumbles and fumbles lost.
These distinctions prevent common statistical misunderstandings.
For instance, a quarterback can throw an interception without his team necessarily losing a separate fumble. Similarly, a receiver can receive multiple targets without recording a catch on every attempt.
Understanding these categories makes the statistical breakdown more useful for readers, analysts, and NFL fans.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Who won the New England Patriots vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers game on November 9, 2025?
The New England Patriots defeated the Tampa Bay Buccaneers 28-23 on November 9, 2025. New England scored seven points in each quarter to secure the five-point victory.
2. How many rushing yards did TreVeyon Henderson record against the Buccaneers?
TreVeyon Henderson recorded 147 rushing yards on 14 carries. He averaged 10.5 yards per carry, scored two touchdowns, and recorded a longest run of 69 yards.
3. How many passing yards did Drake Maye and Baker Mayfield record?
Drake Maye finished with 270 passing yards, two touchdowns, and one interception. Baker Mayfield recorded 273 passing yards, three touchdowns, and zero interceptions.
4. Who was the leading receiver for the Patriots?
Mack Hollins led New England with six receptions for 106 yards. He averaged 17.7 yards per reception and recorded a longest catch of 54 yards.
5. Who led the Buccaneers in receiving yards?
Emeka Egbuka led Tampa Bay with 115 receiving yards on six receptions. He averaged 19.2 yards per catch and scored one receiving touchdown.
6. How many total offensive yards did each team record?
The New England Patriots recorded 436 combined passing and rushing yards. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers finished with 386 total offensive yards, giving New England a 50-yard advantage.
Conclusion
The November 9, 2025, matchup between the New England Patriots and Tampa Bay Buccaneers produced a 28-23 victory for New England. Both teams demonstrated productive passing attacks, but their offensive approaches were different.
Baker Mayfield finished with 273 passing yards and three touchdowns, while Drake Maye recorded 270 passing yards and two touchdowns. Mayfield completed more passes and avoided interceptions, but Maye generated more passing yards per attempt.
The most significant individual performance came from TreVeyon Henderson, who recorded 147 rushing yards, averaged 10.5 yards per carry, and scored twice. His performance helped New England finish with 166 rushing yards, compared with Tampa Bay’s 113.
Mack Hollins led the Patriots in receiving with 106 yards, while Emeka Egbuka led the Buccaneers with 115 yards. Tez Johnson also contributed two receiving touchdowns for Tampa Bay, and Tykee Smith recorded the game’s interception for the Buccaneers.
The team statistics reveal the central difference between the two offenses. Tampa Bay produced slightly more passing yardage and significantly more receptions, but New England generated more rushing yards, more total offensive yardage, and one additional touchdown.
Ultimately, the Patriots’ balanced offensive production and Henderson’s explosive rushing performance were defining statistical features of the game.
