Memphis Grizzlies vs Lakers Match Player Stats
The memphis grizzlies vs lakers match player stats from the January 2026 matchup reveal how the Los Angeles Lakers turned a competitive contest into a 120-114 victory with a decisive fourth-quarter performance. Luka Doncic led all scorers with 36 points, while LeBron James contributed 26 points and 10 assists. For Memphis, Jaylen Wells scored a team-high 23 points, but the Grizzlies could not maintain their early scoring advantage when the game entered its final period.
The matchup offered a useful look at the difference between scoring production and overall team efficiency. Memphis finished with 47 rebounds and 29 assists, while Los Angeles recorded 30 assists and shot 48% from the field. The Lakers also benefited from a substantial advantage at the free-throw line, making 33 attempts compared with Memphis’s 20 made free throws. Those details help explain how Los Angeles won despite recording fewer total rebounds and making fewer field goals.
This detailed breakdown covers the final score, individual player performances, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter scoring, tactical turning points, and the numbers that mattered most. The analysis uses the ESPN game data supplied for this article, with the date discrepancy in the source clearly identified rather than silently corrected.
Memphis Grizzlies vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Final Score and Game Overview
The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Memphis Grizzlies 120-114 at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, California. The six-point margin reflected a game in which Memphis remained competitive for three quarters before Los Angeles produced its strongest scoring period in the fourth.
Los Angeles Lakers Scores, Stats and Highlights – ESPN
Los Angeles Lakers
120
Winner
FINAL
120-114
6-point margin
FedExForum announces policy changes for guests | Memphis Grizzlies
Memphis Grizzlies
114
Runner-up
Venue
Crypto.com Arena
Location
Los Angeles, California
Attendance
18,997
ESPN Game ID
401810356
Quarter-by-quarter scoring
| Quarter | Memphis Grizzlies | Los Angeles Lakers | Quarter leader |
| First | 34 | 26 | Memphis |
| Second | 31 | 28 | Memphis |
| Third | 22 | 29 | Lakers |
| Fourth | 27 | 37 | Lakers |
| Final | 114 | 120 | Lakers |
Memphis scored 65 points in the first half, building a 65-54 lead at halftime. The Lakers responded with 66 points after the break, compared with Memphis’s 49. That second-half difference was the central reason the home team recovered and secured the win.
The third quarter began the momentum shift. Los Angeles outscored Memphis 29-22, cutting into the deficit and setting up a decisive final period. The Lakers then scored 37 points in the fourth, ten more than Memphis.
The progression matters because the final score alone does not explain the contest. Memphis had enough offensive production to lead for much of the game, but Los Angeles generated a stronger finish when each possession carried greater weight.
Date clarification: The supplied ESPN text labels the box score January 4, 2026, but its game information and season-series section identify January 5, 2026. The listed game time is 7:30 AM on January 5. This article retains the supplied details and acknowledges the discrepancy rather than presenting the date as independently verified.
Complete Player Stats: Memphis Grizzlies vs Los Angeles Lakers
Individual production shaped this game in several different ways. Luka Doncic delivered the highest scoring total, LeBron James combined scoring with playmaking, and Jake LaRavia provided an important third scoring contribution for Los Angeles. Memphis relied on Jaylen Wells for its leading scoring output, while Cedric Coward and Jock Landale supplied efficient offense and rebounding.
Los Angeles Lakers player statistics
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Field Goals | 3-Pointers | Free Throws |
| Luka Doncic | 36 | 9 | 8 | 10/20 | 4/10 | 12/13 |
| LeBron James | 26 | 7 | 10 | 8/14 | 2/7 | 8/10 |
| Jake LaRavia | 26 | 5 | 4 | 9/16 | 4/10 | Not supplied |
| Deandre Ayton | 15 | 8 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied |
| Jarred Vanderbilt | 7 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied |
| Marcus Smart | 6 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied |
| Dalton Knecht | 3 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied |
| Jaxson Hayes | 1 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied |
The supplied player data does not include every statistic for every player. Missing entries are therefore marked as not supplied rather than estimated. The listed scoring totals for the Lakers’ eight players add up to 120 points.
Memphis Grizzlies player statistics
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Field Goals | 3-Pointers | Free Throws |
| Jaylen Wells | 23 | 1 | 2 | 8/16 | 3/11 | 4/4 |
| Cedric Coward | 16 | 8 | Not supplied | 6/9 | 2/3 | 2/2 |
| Jaren Jackson Jr. | 14 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied |
| Jock Landale | 13 | 10 | 3 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied |
| Santi Aldama | 12 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied |
| GG Jackson | 11 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied |
| Cam Spencer | 5 | Not supplied | 9 | Not supplied | Not supplied | Not supplied |
The six listed Memphis leading scorers other than Cam Spencer contributed the majority of the team’s offense, while Spencer’s nine assists highlight his role in creating opportunities for teammates. The listed scoring figures total 94 points, leaving 20 points to be accounted for by other Memphis players in the supplied game data.
What the player statistics reveal
Three themes stand out from the individual numbers.
- Scoring concentration: Doncic, James, and LaRavia combined for 88 points, accounting for nearly three-quarters of the Lakers’ total. Their scoring gave Los Angeles multiple ways to answer Memphis.
- Playmaking balance: James recorded 10 assists and Doncic added eight. The two primary creators combined for 18 assists, helping explain the Lakers’ 30 team assists.
- Memphis efficiency in selected roles: Coward made six of nine field-goal attempts, while Landale secured 10 rebounds. Their contributions were valuable even though the team did not win.
These numbers should be interpreted together. A player’s point total measures scoring output, but rebounds, assists, shooting efficiency, and defensive activity help explain how that output affected the game.
Luka Doncic’s 36-Point Performance
Luka Doncic was the leading individual performer in the game, finishing with 36 points, nine rebounds, and eight assists. His scoring came from several areas rather than depending on one type of shot.
| Luka Doncic statistic | Result |
| Points | 36 |
| Rebounds | 9 |
| Assists | 8 |
| Field goals | 10/20 |
| Field-goal percentage | 50% |
| Three-pointers | 4/10 |
| Three-point percentage | 40% |
| Free throws | 12/13 |
| Free-throw percentage | 92.3% |
| Steals | 0 |
| Blocks | 1 |
Efficient scoring across three levels
Doncic made half of his 20 field-goal attempts. He also connected on four three-pointers and converted 12 of 13 free throws. This combination gave him scoring options from beyond the arc, inside the arc, and at the line.
His free-throw performance was particularly important. Thirteen attempts gave him a reliable source of points even when Memphis made it difficult to finish possessions with uncontested shots.
A useful way to assess his efficiency is true shooting percentage, which estimates scoring efficiency while accounting for field goals, three-pointers, and free throws.
Using the supplied figures and the standard NBA estimation formula:
\[ TS\%=\frac{PTS}{2(FGA+0.44\times FTA)} \]
\[ TS\%=\frac{36}{2(20+0.44\times13)} \approx 69.4\% \]
Doncic’s estimated true shooting percentage was approximately 69.4%, an efficient result for a 36-point performance. This calculation is derived from the supplied box-score data.
Rebounding and playmaking added value
Doncic’s nine rebounds were one short of a double-double in points and rebounds. His eight assists also show that he contributed beyond finishing possessions himself.
The distinction is important when studying a high-scoring guard. If a player scores heavily but does not create opportunities for teammates, the offense can become predictable. Doncic’s assist total suggests that his scoring threat also helped generate opportunities for other Lakers.
His overall line of 36 points, nine rebounds, and eight assists demonstrates how scoring and creation worked together in this matchup.
LeBron James: Scoring and Playmaking Combined
LeBron James finished with 26 points, seven rebounds, and 10 assists. His double-digit assist total was the highest among the listed players and helped Los Angeles maintain offensive balance.
| LeBron James statistic | Result |
| Points | 26 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Assists | 10 |
| Field goals | 8/14 |
| Field-goal percentage | 57.1% |
| Three-pointers | 2/7 |
| Three-point percentage | 28.6% |
| Free throws | 8/10 |
| Free-throw percentage | 80% |
An efficient field-goal performance
James converted eight of his 14 field-goal attempts, a field-goal percentage of approximately 57.1%. That was a strong result given his 26-point scoring output.
His three-point shooting was less efficient, with two makes from seven attempts. However, the overall field-goal figure indicates that he found scoring opportunities beyond the three-point line as well.
The distinction between overall field-goal percentage and three-point percentage matters because a player can have an average outside shooting night while remaining highly effective through other shot types.
Ten assists helped sustain the offense
James’ 10 assists were especially relevant in a game decided by six points. Passing can force defensive rotations, create open shots, and prevent a defense from focusing exclusively on the leading scorer.
Combined with Doncic’s eight assists, James’ playmaking contributed to a Lakers team total of 30 assists. That was one more than Memphis recorded.
The numbers do not establish that any particular assist directly caused the fourth-quarter turnaround. They do, however, show that the Lakers distributed the ball effectively across the game.
Jake LaRavia’s Important 26 Points
Jake LaRavia matched James with 26 points, making him one of the game’s three leading scorers. His performance gave Los Angeles another productive scoring option alongside its two high-profile creators.
| Jake LaRavia statistic | Result |
| Points | 26 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 4 |
| Field goals | 9/16 |
| Field-goal percentage | 56.3% |
| Three-pointers | 4/10 |
| Three-point percentage | 40% |
LaRavia made nine of 16 field-goal attempts, including four three-pointers. His 56.3% field-goal percentage indicates that he converted opportunities at a strong rate.
His four made three-pointers also provided valuable perimeter scoring. When a defense has to account for Doncic’s creation and James’ ability to drive or pass, productive shooting from another player can make defensive coverage more difficult.
LaRavia’s 26 points should not be treated as a minor contribution behind the headline stars. Together, he, Doncic, and James scored 88 of the Lakers’ 120 points. That concentration shows just how much the team’s offensive result depended on its leading trio.
Memphis Grizzlies: Jaylen Wells Leads the Scoring
Jaylen Wells was Memphis’ top scorer with 23 points. He made eight of 16 field-goal attempts and converted all four free throws.
| Jaylen Wells statistic | Result |
| Points | 23 |
| Rebounds | 1 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Field goals | 8/16 |
| Field-goal percentage | 50% |
| Three-pointers | 3/11 |
| Three-point percentage | 27.3% |
| Free throws | 4/4 |
| Free-throw percentage | 100% |
Strong overall scoring, uneven perimeter results
Wells’ 50% field-goal percentage was solid, but his three-point shooting was less productive. He made three of 11 attempts from beyond the arc, a rate of approximately 27.3%.
That difference is worth noting. Three-point attempts are included in field-goal totals, so a player’s overall field-goal percentage can look respectable even when the outside shot is inconsistent.
Wells still delivered 23 points, making him a major part of Memphis’ offense. His four-for-four free-throw performance also showed that he converted his opportunities at the line.
The rebounding contrast
Wells recorded one rebound, while other Memphis players supplied more of the team’s work on the glass. This does not invalidate his scoring contribution, but it illustrates why individual performance is best assessed through multiple categories.
A scoring guard or wing may have responsibilities that differ from those of a center. Rebounding totals must therefore be understood within a player’s role rather than used as a single measure of overall quality.
Cedric Coward and Jock Landale Provide Support
Two other Memphis players produced noteworthy statistical contributions in different ways.
Cedric Coward’s efficient 16 points
Coward scored 16 points on six-of-nine field-goal shooting. He made two of three three-point attempts and converted both free throws.
His shooting line translates to a field-goal percentage of 66.7% and a three-point percentage of 66.7%. With eight rebounds, Coward supplied both efficient scoring and meaningful work on the glass.
His reported plus/minus was +13. This means Memphis scored 13 more points than Los Angeles during the minutes he was on the court, according to the conventional interpretation of the statistic. It does not mean that Coward personally produced a 13-point advantage, nor does it override the final team result.
Plus/minus is affected by teammates, opponents, substitutions, and the timing of scoring runs. It is most useful when considered alongside other performance indicators and game context.
Jock Landale’s double-digit rebounding
Landale finished with 13 points, 10 rebounds, and three assists. His 10 rebounds gave him a double-double in points and rebounds.
His contribution was important because Memphis collected 47 total rebounds, compared with 45 for the Lakers. The Grizzlies also secured 16 offensive rebounds, twice the Lakers’ eight.
Offensive rebounds can create second-chance scoring opportunities after an initial shot misses. Memphis’ advantage in this category suggests that it had opportunities to extend possessions. However, additional possessions do not automatically translate into victory if the team cannot convert enough of them into points.
Landale’s line illustrates a different kind of value from Wells’ scoring or Spencer’s playmaking. The Grizzlies received contributions from multiple roles, but the overall result still depended on their combined execution.
Cam Spencer’s Nine Assists and Memphis Playmaking
Cam Spencer scored five points and recorded nine assists in the supplied statistics. Although his scoring total was modest, his passing was one of Memphis’ most important individual contributions.
Assists measure passes that directly lead to made field goals under the official scoring rules. They do not capture every useful pass, screen, or off-ball movement that helps create a shot. Nevertheless, nine assists provide strong evidence of Spencer’s involvement in creating scoring opportunities.
Memphis finished with 29 team assists, just one fewer than Los Angeles. This shows that the Grizzlies were able to generate offense through passing, even though their shooting efficiency and fourth-quarter scoring did not match the Lakers’ overall result.
The key distinction is between creating a scoring opportunity and converting it. A team can move the ball well, collect offensive rebounds, and earn free throws but still lose if it fails to turn enough possessions into points.
Team Statistics Comparison
The team numbers explain several aspects of the 120-114 result that the individual scoring table cannot show on its own.
| Statistical category | Memphis Grizzlies | Los Angeles Lakers |
| Points | 114 | 120 |
| Field goals made | 42 | 38 |
| Field-goal attempts | 100 | 80 |
| Field-goal percentage | 42% | 48% |
| Three-pointers made | 10 | 11 |
| Three-point attempts | 41 | 41 |
| Three-point percentage | 24% | 27% |
| Free throws made | 20 | 33 |
| Free-throw attempts | 22 | 41 |
| Free-throw percentage | 91% | 80% |
| Total rebounds | 47 | 45 |
| Offensive rebounds | 16 | 8 |
| Defensive rebounds | 31 | 37 |
| Assists | 29 | 30 |
| Turnovers | 8 | 10 |
| Steals | 6 | 4 |
| Blocks | 1 | 6 |
| Team fouls | 31 | 18 |
1. The Lakers converted a higher percentage of their shots
Los Angeles made 38 of 80 field-goal attempts, producing a 47.5% shooting percentage, rounded to 48% in the supplied data. Memphis made 42 of 100 attempts, or 42%.
Memphis made four more field goals, but it needed 20 additional attempts to do so. That is an important distinction when comparing offensive efficiency.
A team that takes more shots does not necessarily score more efficiently. Missed shots can create offensive rebound opportunities, but those extra chances must still be converted into points.
The Lakers’ higher field-goal percentage helped them produce more points from a smaller number of attempts.
2. Free throws created a major scoring difference
The Lakers made 33 of 41 free throws, while Memphis made 20 of 22.
| Free-throw measure | Lakers | Grizzlies |
| Attempts | 41 | 22 |
| Makes | 33 | 20 |
| Percentage | 80.5% | 90.9% |
| Points from free throws | 33 | 20 |
Los Angeles scored 13 more points from free throws. Memphis was more accurate at the line, but the Lakers attempted 19 additional free throws.
This is one of the clearest statistical differences in the game. Memphis’ 91% conversion rate was excellent, but accuracy alone could not compensate for the Lakers’ much larger number of successful free throws.
The available figures do not establish why every free throw was awarded. A detailed play-by-play review would be needed to distinguish shooting fouls, bonus situations, technical fouls, and other circumstances.
3. Memphis won the offensive rebounding battle
The Grizzlies collected 16 offensive rebounds, compared with eight for Los Angeles. They also finished with a two-rebound advantage overall.
That difference suggests Memphis created additional chances after missed shots. Offensive rebounds can keep a possession alive, increase pressure on the opposing defense, and lead to putbacks or open perimeter attempts.
Yet Memphis lost despite this advantage. The lesson is not that rebounding was unimportant. Rather, the Grizzlies’ success on the glass was offset by other statistical differences, including lower overall shooting accuracy and fewer free-throw points.
4. The Lakers protected the rim more effectively
Los Angeles recorded six blocks, while Memphis recorded one.
Blocks do not measure all defensive contributions, and a blocked shot can sometimes return possession to the offense. Even so, the five-block difference points to a clear advantage for Los Angeles in recorded shot blocking.
Deandre Ayton contributed three blocks, accounting for half of the Lakers’ total. His defensive production complemented his 15 points and eight rebounds.
Memphis still scored 114 points, so the block total should not be interpreted as proof that the Lakers controlled every defensive possession. It is one part of a broader comparison.
5. Turnovers did not decide the game on their own
Memphis committed eight turnovers, while Los Angeles committed 10. The Grizzlies therefore had two fewer turnovers.
That advantage helped Memphis limit wasted possessions, but it was not enough to overcome the Lakers’ shooting and free-throw advantages.
Turnovers should be assessed in relation to pace, possession count, shot quality, and the points generated by each team. A team can take better care of the ball and still lose if its opponents score more efficiently.
Why the Lakers Won: Four Decisive Factors
The final score was close enough that no single statistic should be treated as the complete explanation. Four factors provide the clearest overall picture.
The fourth-quarter scoring surge
The most direct explanation is the Lakers’ 37-27 advantage in the fourth quarter. They scored 10 more points than Memphis in the final period and turned a competitive contest into a six-point win.
Los Angeles had already reduced the halftime deficit by outscoring Memphis 29-22 in the third quarter. The fourth-quarter performance then completed the comeback.
The sequence matters. The Lakers did not rely on one late scoring burst after three uncompetitive quarters. They improved their scoring output across the second half and finished with their best quarter of the game.
More efficient field-goal shooting
The Lakers’ 48% field-goal percentage compared with Memphis’ 42% gave Los Angeles a substantial efficiency advantage.
Although Memphis made more field goals, the Lakers scored 120 points on 80 attempts. Memphis scored 114 on 100 attempts.
These figures do not account for every possession detail, but they show why raw field-goal totals can be misleading. The number of makes matters, yet the number of attempts required to produce them matters too.
More points from the free-throw line
Los Angeles’ 33 successful free throws created a 13-point advantage in free-throw scoring. That was larger than the final six-point margin.
This does not mean free throws alone explain the win, because the teams also differed in field goals, three-pointers, rebounds, and defensive plays. It does show how a team can compensate for taking fewer field-goal attempts by scoring more often from the line.
Balanced creation from the leading players
Doncic’s 36 points, James’ 26 points and 10 assists, and LaRavia’s 26 points gave the Lakers three high-volume contributors.
Together, those players scored 88 points. Their combined production reduced the burden on any one player to generate the entire offense.
Memphis also received contributions from multiple scorers, led by Wells with 23 points. However, the Lakers’ leading trio combined high scoring with significant playmaking, especially through James and Doncic.
What Memphis Did Well Despite the Loss
A useful game analysis should identify the losing team’s strengths rather than treating the final score as a verdict on every aspect of its performance.
Memphis generated extra possessions
The Grizzlies collected 16 offensive rebounds and 47 total rebounds. Those figures show that they competed effectively on the glass and created additional opportunities after missed shots.
This was not a game in which Memphis simply failed to rebound. Its rebounding advantage is one of the reasons the contest remained competitive.
The team shared the ball
Memphis recorded 29 assists, close to the Lakers’ 30. Spencer’s nine assists were especially notable.
The team total suggests Memphis was not entirely dependent on individual isolation scoring. Passing and possession creation were part of its offense, although assists alone cannot tell us whether the resulting shots were consistently good ones.
Free-throw accuracy remained high
Memphis converted 20 of 22 free throws, approximately 90.9%. That is an excellent conversion rate.
The problem was volume rather than accuracy. The Lakers made 13 more free throws, so Memphis’ efficiency at the line could not erase the difference in attempts.
Multiple players contributed points
Wells scored 23, Coward added 16, Jackson recorded 14, and Landale scored 13. Aldama and GG Jackson also reached double figures.
This spread of scoring indicates that Memphis had several contributors. The challenge was sustaining the team’s offensive effectiveness through the final quarter, when Los Angeles outscored it by 10.
Starting Lineups and Bench Contributions
The supplied starting lineups provide useful context for understanding how the teams approached the matchup.
Memphis Grizzlies starters
- Jaren Jackson Jr. (#8)
- Cedric Coward (#23)
- Jaylen Wells (#0)
- Jock Landale (#31)
- Cam Spencer (#24)
Los Angeles Lakers starters
- LeBron James (#23)
- Jake LaRavia (#12)
- Deandre Ayton (#5)
- Marcus Smart (#36)
- Luka Doncic (#77)
The Lakers’ listed starting group included their two leading creators, Doncic and James, along with LaRavia, Ayton, and Smart. Memphis started Wells, Coward, Jackson, Landale, and Spencer.
The supplied data also identifies several bench players for both sides. For Los Angeles, Jarred Vanderbilt scored seven points, Marcus Smart scored six, Dalton Knecht scored three, and Jaxson Hayes scored one. The listed Lakers bench group also included Nick Smith Jr., Maxi Kleber, Gabe Vincent, and Bronny James.
Memphis’ listed bench group included Santi Aldama, GG Jackson, Christian Koloko, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, Javon Small, John Konchar, and Vince Williams Jr. Aldama scored 12 points, while GG Jackson scored 11.
The supplied scoring data does not provide a complete minutes breakdown, so it would be inaccurate to attribute the fourth-quarter scoring surge to a particular substitution or bench unit without further evidence.
Inactive players and availability
The supplied ESPN text lists John Konchar as unavailable for Memphis because of left thumb surgery and Vince Williams Jr. because of left knee tendinitis. For the Lakers, Maxi Kleber and Bronny James were listed as DNP by coach’s decision, while Gabe Vincent was listed with a strained back.
DNP means “did not play.” The designation alone does not establish how much a player’s absence affected the result. Evaluating that impact would require additional information about expected roles, rotation patterns, and available replacements.
Season-Series Context and Team Records
The supplied data lists Memphis at 15-20 overall and 8-11 away, while Los Angeles was listed at 22-11 overall and 10-6 at home.
Those records provide context for the matchup, but they should be treated as the records displayed in the supplied source rather than independently verified current standings.
The season-series section also lists the following results:
| Listed matchup | Result |
| November 1 | Memphis 112, Lakers 117 |
| January 3 | Lakers 121, Memphis 128 |
| January 5 | Memphis 114, Lakers 120 |
The accompanying source text states that the Lakers led the season series 3-0. However, the three listed scores do not support that statement: the listed January 3 result is a Memphis victory, while the other two are Lakers victories.
There is also a date discrepancy between January 4 and January 5 for the featured game. These inconsistencies mean the supplied information cannot establish the season-series record with confidence.
For that reason, the safest conclusion is to focus on the featured game’s verified internal score data as supplied: Los Angeles won 120-114. The broader season-series claim should be checked against the original game records before publication as a definitive statistic.
How to Read Basketball Player Statistics Correctly
The memphis grizzlies vs lakers match player stats are most useful when the numbers are interpreted as a connected set rather than isolated achievements.
Points and field-goal percentage
Points show how much scoring a player contributed. Field-goal percentage shows the proportion of field-goal attempts that went in.
A player with 20 points on 8-of-12 shooting has a different efficiency profile from a player with 20 points on 8-of-22 shooting. The point totals match, but the number of attempts required does not.
Free throws and three-pointers also affect scoring totals, so field-goal percentage should not be treated as a complete efficiency measure.
Rebounds and possession value
Total rebounds include both offensive and defensive rebounds. Offensive rebounds extend possessions after missed shots, while defensive rebounds typically help end an opponent’s possession.
Memphis’ 16 offensive rebounds were an advantage in this game. Yet the Lakers’ ability to score efficiently and get to the free-throw line helped offset that difference.
Assists and offensive responsibility
Assists help measure a player’s direct contribution to made baskets by teammates. They can reveal how a team distributes offensive responsibility.
James’ 10 assists and Doncic’s eight show that the Lakers’ two leading stars were involved in both scoring and creation. Spencer’s nine assists provide similar evidence of his role for Memphis.
Assists do not capture every aspect of playmaking, however. A pass that leads to a missed shot does not count as an assist, even if it creates a good opportunity.
Plus/minus and context
Plus/minus measures the team’s point differential while a particular player is on the court. Coward’s reported +13 indicates that Memphis outscored Los Angeles during his playing time.
It is not an individual scoring statistic. Teammate performance, opposing lineups, and the timing of substitutions all influence the number.
Shooting percentages and rounding
The supplied team percentages are rounded. For example, 38 made field goals on 80 attempts equals 47.5%, which appears as 48% in the provided table. Likewise, 42 makes on 100 attempts equals exactly 42%.
When calculating advanced metrics, using the underlying makes and attempts is generally more precise than using rounded percentages.
Source and Statistical Limitations
This article uses the ESPN webpage text and statistics supplied with the request. The source is identified as the box score for Lakers 120-114 Grizzlies, with game ID 401810356.
The primary record can be consulted through the ESPN NBA box score.
Several limitations deserve attention:
- The source uses both January 4 and January 5, 2026, for the featured game.
- The season-series statement conflicts with one of the listed results.
- Some individual statistics, including minutes played and complete shooting splits for every player, were not supplied.
- The supplied team foul totals are 31 for Memphis and 18 for Los Angeles. These figures are reproduced as provided, but the available text does not explain the full foul breakdown.
- The scoring analysis identifies statistical relationships. It does not claim that a single number proves the exact cause of every scoring run.
These distinctions matter for accuracy. A useful statistical article should separate directly supplied numbers from calculated percentages and from interpretations of what those numbers may indicate.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who was the top scorer in the Memphis Grizzlies vs Lakers game?
Luka Doncic was the leading scorer with 36 points for the Los Angeles Lakers. He also recorded nine rebounds and eight assists, helping Los Angeles secure a 120-114 victory.
2. What was the final score between the Memphis Grizzlies and Los Angeles Lakers?
The Lakers defeated the Grizzlies 120-114. Memphis led 65-54 at halftime, but Los Angeles outscored the Grizzlies 66-49 in the second half.
3. How many points did LeBron James score against Memphis?
LeBron James scored 26 points, collected seven rebounds, and recorded 10 assists. He made eight of 14 field-goal attempts and eight of 10 free throws.
4. Who led the Memphis Grizzlies in scoring?
Jaylen Wells led Memphis with 23 points. He shot 8-of-16 from the field, made three three-pointers, and converted all four free throws.
5. Which team had better shooting statistics?
The Lakers shot 48% from the field, compared with 42% for Memphis. Los Angeles also made 33 free throws, while Memphis made 20. Memphis, however, recorded more rebounds and committed fewer turnovers.
6. When was the Memphis Grizzlies vs Lakers game played?
The supplied ESPN data contains conflicting dates. The box-score title identifies January 4, 2026, while the game information and season-series section identify January 5, 2026. The discrepancy should be checked against the original game record before using a single date as definitive.
Conclusion
The Memphis Grizzlies vs Lakers match player stats show how Los Angeles secured a 120-114 win through efficient shooting, strong free-throw production, and a decisive second-half response. Luka Doncic led all scorers with 36 points, while LeBron James delivered 26 points and 10 assists. Jake LaRavia added another 26 points, giving the Lakers three major scoring contributors.
Memphis had several strengths of its own. Jaylen Wells led the team with 23 points, Cedric Coward scored efficiently, and Jock Landale collected 10 rebounds. The Grizzlies also won the rebounding battle, collected more offensive rebounds, and committed fewer turnovers.
The difference emerged in how the teams converted their opportunities. Los Angeles shot a higher percentage from the field and made 13 more free throws. After trailing by 11 points at halftime, the Lakers outscored Memphis in both the third and fourth quarters, including a 37-27 advantage in the final period.
Taken together, the statistics reveal a competitive game decided by the Lakers’ stronger finish and greater scoring efficiency. Memphis created extra possessions and distributed the ball effectively, but Los Angeles made better use of its shooting opportunities when the result was on the line.
