Golden State Warriors vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats

The golden state warriors vs memphis grizzlies match player stats reveal how Memphis Grizzlies secured a hard-fought 111-108 victory over the Golden State Warriors on October 24, 2026, at Chase Center in San Francisco. The three-point difference reflected a competitive game in which both teams produced strong individual performances, but Memphis found more consistent scoring opportunities when they mattered most. Ty Jerome led the Grizzlies with 28 points, while Cameron Boozer delivered an impressive all-around performance with 25 points, 13 rebounds, and 6 assists. For Golden State, Stephen Curry finished with 24 points, but his contribution was not enough to prevent the Warriors from falling to another defeat.

The matchup offered an interesting contrast between shooting efficiency, ball movement, rebounding, and defensive pressure. Golden State converted 90% of its free throws and recorded 12 steals, yet Memphis made 47% of its field-goal attempts compared with the Warriors’ 41%. That difference in overall shooting efficiency played an important role in the final result. Memphis also finished with a 47-41 rebounding advantage and seven blocks, helping the visitors overcome their 25 turnovers.

For basketball fans, this game provides several useful statistical lessons. Individual scoring totals explain who contributed the most points, but shooting percentages, rebounds, assists, turnovers, and defensive plays reveal why one team won. Looking beyond the final score makes it easier to understand how Memphis controlled important stretches and how Golden State came close to changing the outcome.

Match Overview: Memphis Grizzlies vs Golden State Warriors

The October 24 contest brought two competitive NBA teams together at Chase Center. Golden State entered the matchup looking to earn its first victory of the season, while Memphis aimed to continue its positive start.

Memphis eventually won 111-108 after a closely contested four-quarter battle. The Warriors started slightly better, but the Grizzlies responded in the second quarter. Golden State produced a strong third-quarter performance before Memphis regained control in the final period.

Complete Match Information

Match Detail	Information
Match	Memphis Grizzlies vs Golden State Warriors
Date	October 24, 2026
Competition	NBA
Final Score	Memphis 111-108 Golden State
Winning Team	Memphis Grizzlies
Losing Team	Golden State Warriors
Venue	Chase Center
Location	San Francisco, California
Attendance	18,064
Game Status	Final
Game ID	401909850
Memphis Season Record	2-0
Golden State Season Record	0-2
Memphis Season Series Lead	1-0
Next Scheduled Meeting	November 20, 2026
Broadcast Information	NBA League Pass

The attendance of 18,064 reflected a strong crowd for the matchup. Playing at home gave Golden State familiar surroundings and crowd support, but Memphis handled the pressure and secured an important road victory.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score

Quarter	Memphis Grizzlies	Golden State Warriors
First Quarter	33	34
Second Quarter	27	22
Third Quarter	24	34
Fourth Quarter	27	18
Final Score	111	108

The scoring pattern tells an interesting story.

Golden State won the opening quarter by one point. Memphis then outscored the Warriors 27-22 in the second period to establish a four-point halftime advantage.

The third quarter belonged to Golden State. The Warriors scored 34 points while limiting Memphis to 24, changing the momentum and entering the final period with a six-point lead.

However, Memphis produced a stronger fourth-quarter finish. The Grizzlies scored 27 points and held Golden State to just 18. That nine-point advantage erased the Warriors’ lead and secured the three-point victory.

The final quarter was particularly important because it demonstrated Memphis’s ability to respond after losing control during the third period.

Golden State Warriors vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats: Complete Statistical Analysis

The individual performances provide a clearer understanding of how this matchup developed. Ty Jerome was Memphis’s leading scorer, but Cameron Boozer contributed across several statistical categories.

Stephen Curry remained Golden State’s leading offensive player. Yaxel Lendeborg and Brandin Podziemski also supplied important scoring support.

Memphis Grizzlies Player Performance

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Ty Jerome	28	Not specified	5
Cameron Boozer	25	13	6
Jaylen Wells	17	Not specified	Not specified
Zach Edey	Not specified	10	Not specified

Memphis received valuable contributions from its leading players.

Ty Jerome finished with 28 points, making him the highest scorer in the game. Cameron Boozer recorded 25 points, 13 rebounds, and 6 assists, producing one of the most complete performances of the night.

Jaylen Wells added 17 points, providing another important scoring option. Zach Edey collected 10 rebounds, helping Memphis control the boards.

These performances demonstrate that the Grizzlies did not depend on a single player. Their leading scorers and rebounders contributed in different ways, allowing the team to remain competitive throughout the game.

Note: The supplied statistical record does not include complete individual box-score figures for every player. Unavailable figures are therefore not estimated or invented.

Ty Jerome: Memphis’s Leading Scorer

Ty Jerome delivered the highest-scoring individual performance of the matchup with 28 points in 32 minutes.

His shooting numbers were equally important:

Statistical Category	Performance
Minutes	32
Points	28
Field Goals	11/22
Three-Pointers	3/5
Free Throws	3/5
Rebounds	2
Assists	5
Turnovers	4
Steals	1
Blocks	0
Plus/Minus	+10

Jerome converted half of his field-goal attempts and made three of his five three-point attempts. His perimeter accuracy helped Memphis maintain offensive balance.

His five assists also showed that he was not simply looking for his own shot. He helped create opportunities for teammates while remaining the primary scoring threat.

One particularly useful detail is his plus/minus rating of +10. This means Memphis outscored Golden State by 10 points during his time on the court. It does not measure individual performance in isolation, but it supports the positive impact of his minutes.

Cameron Boozer: The Most Complete Performance

Cameron Boozer was arguably Memphis’s most influential all-around player.

He finished with 25 points, 13 rebounds, and six assists. His performance covered three major areas of basketball: scoring, rebounding, and playmaking.

Statistical Category	Performance
Minutes	37
Points	25
Field Goals	6/13
Three-Pointers	4/7
Free Throws	9/9
Rebounds	13
Assists	6
Turnovers	6
Steals	2
Blocks	0
Plus/Minus	+12

His shooting efficiency deserves particular attention.

Boozer made four of seven three-point attempts, giving Memphis another reliable perimeter option. He also converted all nine free throws.

His 13 rebounds led the game, while his six assists tied for the team lead. This combination made him valuable even when he was not directly scoring.

The most important moment came late in the fourth quarter. According to the game recap, Boozer made the go-ahead jumper with 20 seconds remaining. That basket gave Memphis the advantage it needed to complete its comeback.

His six turnovers were a negative part of an otherwise impressive performance. However, his scoring, rebounding, playmaking, and late-game contribution made him central to the result.

Jaylen Wells Provides Important Scoring Support

Jaylen Wells contributed 17 points in 25 minutes.

Statistical Category	Performance
Minutes	25
Points	17
Field Goals	5/9
Three-Pointers	4/7
Free Throws	3/5
Rebounds	4
Assists	3
Turnovers	1
Plus/Minus	+12

Wells was particularly effective from three-point range. He made four of seven attempts, matching Boozer’s three-point production.

His 17 points helped prevent Golden State from concentrating all its defensive attention on Jerome and Boozer.

Wells also finished with only one turnover. That was a useful contribution in a game where Memphis committed 25 turnovers as a team.

Zach Edey Controls the Interior

Zach Edey provided Memphis with a strong presence around the basket.

He recorded eight points and 10 rebounds in 22 minutes. He also contributed three assists, one steal, and two blocks.

Statistical Category	Performance
Minutes	22
Points	8
Field Goals	4/6
Rebounds	10
Assists	3
Steals	1
Blocks	2
Turnovers	0
Plus/Minus	+25

Edey’s 10 rebounds were the second-highest individual total for Memphis.

His most impressive number was his plus/minus of +25. Memphis outscored Golden State by 25 points during his minutes on the floor.

This figure should not be interpreted as proof that one player alone created the victory. However, it highlights how productive the team was during his appearances.

His two blocks also strengthened Memphis’s interior defense.

Memphis Bench Contributions

Memphis received additional production from several reserves.

Bench Player	Minutes	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Jerami Grant	26	6	0	3
Kris Murray	13	0	3	1
Isaiah Stewart	16	4	2	0
Quinten Post	20	2	1	1
Scotty Pippen Jr.	17	8	6	3
Cam Spencer	17	11	2	1

Cam Spencer was the most productive Memphis reserve in scoring, contributing 11 points.

Scotty Pippen Jr. added eight points and six rebounds, giving the team another source of energy and activity.

Although the starting lineup provided most of Memphis’s scoring, the bench helped distribute the workload across the game.

Golden State Warriors Player Stats and Individual Performances

Golden State had several strong individual performances, but its overall shooting percentage was lower than Memphis’s.

Stephen Curry led the Warriors with 24 points. Yaxel Lendeborg and Brandin Podziemski each contributed 18 points.

The Warriors also benefited from strong free-throw shooting and defensive activity. However, their inability to maintain offensive production in the fourth quarter proved costly.

Stephen Curry: Warriors’ Leading Scorer

Stephen Curry finished with 24 points and remained Golden State’s primary offensive threat.

Statistical Category	Performance
Minutes	30
Points	24
Field Goals	5/15
Three-Pointers	3/10
Free Throws	11/11
Rebounds	2
Assists	4
Turnovers	0
Steals	0
Blocks	0
Plus/Minus	-4

Curry’s 11 successful free throws were a major part of his scoring total.

He made all his free-throw attempts, showing excellent accuracy at the line. However, he converted only five of 15 field-goal attempts.

His three-point shooting was also below his usual standard, with three successful shots from 10 attempts.

An important positive was his zero-turnover performance. Even while carrying a significant scoring responsibility, Curry avoided giving Memphis extra possessions through personal turnovers.

His four assists also reflected his role as a scorer and playmaker.

Yaxel Lendeborg: An Impressive All-Around Contribution

Yaxel Lendeborg produced one of the most complete performances for Golden State.

He recorded 18 points, 13 rebounds, and six assists. He also led the Warriors in rebounding and tied for the team’s highest assist total.

Statistical Category	Performance
Minutes	37
Points	18
Field Goals	4/11
Three-Pointers	1/3
Free Throws	9/12
Rebounds	13
Assists	6
Turnovers	6
Steals	3
Blocks	0
Plus/Minus	-9

His 13 rebounds matched Boozer’s game-high total.

Lendeborg also collected six assists, demonstrating his ability to contribute beyond scoring. His three steals were tied for the highest individual total on Golden State.

However, six turnovers reduced the value of his offensive contribution. Memphis was able to benefit from several additional possessions as a result of Golden State’s ball-handling mistakes.

Lendeborg’s overall performance showed why points alone do not explain a player’s influence. He contributed in almost every major statistical category, even though his team did not win.

Brandin Podziemski Adds 18 Points

Brandin Podziemski also finished with 18 points.

Statistical Category	Performance
Minutes	33
Points	18
Field Goals	7/17
Three-Pointers	2/8
Free Throws	2/2
Rebounds	2
Assists	3
Turnovers	4
Steals	3
Blocks	1
Plus/Minus	0

Podziemski provided a second major scoring option alongside Curry.

He made seven field goals and converted both free throws. His three steals also demonstrated his defensive activity.

His three-point shooting was less effective, as he converted two of eight attempts.

A notable detail is his zero plus/minus rating. This means Golden State scored exactly as many points as Memphis during his time on the floor.

Although he did not finish with a positive rating, his contribution helped Golden State remain competitive.

Draymond Green’s Playmaking and Defense

Draymond Green contributed five points, five rebounds, and six assists.

Statistical Category	Performance
Minutes	31
Points	5
Field Goals	2/4
Three-Pointers	1/2
Rebounds	5
Assists	6
Turnovers	5
Steals	0
Blocks	1
Plus/Minus	-5

Green’s biggest contribution came through playmaking.

His six assists tied Lendeborg for the team lead, while his five rebounds helped Golden State compete physically.

However, five turnovers were costly. His offensive contribution was also limited to five points.

Green’s role illustrates how a player can influence a game without being one of the leading scorers. His passing and defensive responsibilities remained important even when his scoring numbers were modest.

Golden State Bench Contributions

The Warriors also received scoring support from their reserves.

Bench Player	Minutes	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Georges Niang	13	4	3	0
Gui Santos	20	5	4	2
Al Horford	19	3	5	0
Gary Payton II	11	7	2	0
De’Anthony Melton	20	10	1	0
Brandon Williams	9	4	2	1
Will Richard	3	0	0	0

De’Anthony Melton was Golden State’s most productive reserve, scoring 10 points.

Gary Payton II added seven points, while Gui Santos contributed five points and four rebounds.

Melton also played an important part in the late stages of the game. His three-pointer with 3:47 remaining put Golden State ahead 106-94. That looked like a potentially decisive advantage, but Memphis responded with a remarkable scoring run.

The contributions from Golden State’s reserves were useful, but they could not prevent the late collapse.

Complete Player Box Score

The following tables bring together the available individual statistics from both teams. They are useful for readers who want to compare performances without moving between separate sections.

Memphis Grizzlies Full Box Score

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Cameron Boozer	37	25	13	6	2	0	6	+12
GG Jackson	15	2	4	1	0	0	1	+5
Jaylen Wells	25	17	4	3	0	0	1	+12
Zach Edey	22	8	10	3	1	2	0	+25
Ty Jerome	32	28	2	5	1	0	4	+10
Jerami Grant	26	6	0	3	2	1	2	-7
Kris Murray	13	0	3	1	0	1	0	+2
Isaiah Stewart	16	4	2	0	1	0	2	-16
Quinten Post	20	2	1	1	0	2	2	-15
Scotty Pippen Jr.	17	8	6	3	0	1	5	-6
Cam Spencer	17	11	2	1	0	0	2	-7

Golden State Warriors Full Box Score

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Draymond Green	31	5	5	6	0	1	5	-5
Graham Ike	12	10	2	1	1	0	0	-16
Yaxel Lendeborg	37	18	13	6	3	0	6	-9
Stephen Curry	30	24	2	4	0	0	0	-4
Brandin Podziemski	33	18	2	3	3	1	4	0
Georges Niang	13	4	3	0	1	0	1	+5
Gui Santos	20	5	4	2	1	1	0	+14
Al Horford	19	3	5	0	0	2	0	-2
Gary Payton II	11	7	2	0	0	0	1	+6
De’Anthony Melton	20	10	1	0	1	1	0	-17
Brandon Williams	9	4	2	1	1	0	2	+8
Will Richard	3	0	0	0	1	0	0	+5

MIN means minutes played, PTS means points, REB means rebounds, AST means assists, STL means steals, BLK means blocks, TO means turnovers, and +/- represents the team’s point differential while a player was on the court.

Players who did not enter the game are excluded from the statistical tables.

Team Statistical Comparison: Memphis vs Golden State

Individual performances explain who contributed, but team statistics provide a better picture of why Memphis won.

The Grizzlies were more efficient from the field and collected more rebounds. Golden State performed better at the free-throw line and generated more steals, but those advantages were not enough to overcome Memphis’s shooting efficiency.

Complete Team Statistics

Statistical Category	Memphis	Golden State
Total Points	111	108
Field Goals	40/86	34/83
Field-Goal Percentage	47%	41%
Three-Pointers	15/39	14/41
Three-Point Percentage	38%	34%
Free Throws	16/22	26/29
Free-Throw Percentage	73%	90%
Total Rebounds	47	41
Assists	27	23
Turnovers	25	19
Steals	7	12
Blocks	7	6

1. Field-Goal Efficiency Favored Memphis

Memphis converted 40 of 86 field-goal attempts, producing a 47% shooting percentage.

Golden State made 34 of 83 attempts, finishing at 41%.

The six-percentage-point difference is significant in a game decided by three points.

Memphis made six more field goals despite attempting only three additional shots. This suggests that the Grizzlies were more effective at converting their offensive opportunities.

Golden State had several players capable of creating shots, but its overall conversion rate was lower.

Curry’s 5-for-15 shooting performance was one factor in that difference. Podziemski also made only seven of his 17 attempts.

Memphis, meanwhile, received efficient contributions from Jerome, Wells, and Edey.

2. Three-Point Shooting Gave Memphis Another Advantage

Three-point shooting was another important area.

Memphis made 15 of 39 attempts, while Golden State converted 14 of 41.

Three-Point Detail	Memphis	Golden State
Successful Attempts	15	14
Total Attempts	39	41
Percentage	38%	34%
Three-Point Points	45	42

The difference was relatively small, but Memphis made more shots from beyond the arc while attempting fewer.

Boozer and Wells were particularly effective, each making four three-pointers.

Jerome contributed another three successful attempts.

For Golden State, Curry made three three-pointers, while Podziemski added two. Lendeborg and several supporting players also contributed from the perimeter.

The difference was not large enough to explain the entire result, but Memphis gained a useful advantage.

3. Golden State Dominated Free-Throw Accuracy

The Warriors had their clearest statistical advantage at the free-throw line.

Golden State converted 26 of 29 attempts, finishing at 90%.

Memphis made 16 of 22 attempts, recording 73%.

This gave the Warriors a 10-point advantage in free-throw scoring.

Curry was perfect from the line, making all 11 attempts. Lendeborg also contributed nine successful free throws.

Boozer was equally accurate for Memphis, converting all nine of his attempts.

Despite Golden State’s advantage, its lower field-goal efficiency prevented the team from turning that success into a victory.

This is an important reminder that free-throw percentage should not be evaluated separately from field-goal production. A team can shoot exceptionally well from the line and still lose when it struggles to convert shots during normal possessions.

4. Rebounding Helped Memphis Control Possessions

Memphis collected 47 total rebounds compared with Golden State’s 41.

Rebounding Category	Memphis	Golden State
Total Rebounds	47	41
Offensive Rebounds	18	18
Defensive Rebounds	29	23

Both teams recorded 18 offensive rebounds, but Memphis collected six more defensive rebounds.

That difference helped the Grizzlies finish more defensive possessions and limit Golden State’s opportunities to extend attacks through second-chance rebounds.

Boozer and Lendeborg each recorded 13 rebounds, while Edey added 10 for Memphis.

The presence of multiple strong rebounders was important because it prevented either team from relying on a single player to control the glass.

5. Ball Movement Favored Memphis

Memphis recorded 27 assists, four more than Golden State’s 23.

This statistic reflects how frequently the Grizzlies created scoring opportunities through passes leading directly to baskets.

Boozer and Jerome combined for 11 assists. Wells and Edey added another six.

Golden State also had useful playmaking contributions from Green and Lendeborg, who each recorded six assists.

The difference was not enormous, but Memphis’s greater assist total reflected a slightly stronger overall passing contribution.

6. Turnovers Were a Major Problem for Both Teams

Memphis committed 25 turnovers, while Golden State committed 19.

This was one area where the Warriors performed better.

Six fewer turnovers gave Golden State an opportunity to create additional possessions and generate transition opportunities.

However, Memphis managed to overcome its mistakes through better shooting and rebounding.

The Grizzlies’ turnover total is worth highlighting because it represents a potential weakness despite the victory. A team that commits 25 turnovers cannot always expect its shooting efficiency to compensate.

For Golden State, the challenge was different. The Warriors protected the ball better but failed to convert enough of their shooting opportunities.

7. Golden State Created More Defensive Pressure

Golden State finished with 12 steals, five more than Memphis.

Podziemski and Lendeborg recorded three steals each, while the Warriors received additional contributions from their supporting players.

Memphis recorded seven steals and seven blocks.

Golden State’s defensive activity helped disrupt Memphis’s offensive rhythm. However, creating turnovers did not automatically lead to enough efficient scoring at the other end.

The Warriors also finished with six blocks, just one fewer than Memphis.

Both teams showed defensive activity, but Memphis’s greater field-goal efficiency ultimately proved more important.

Why Did Memphis Grizzlies Beat Golden State Warriors?

The final score was close, but the game contained several important turning points.

Memphis did not dominate every quarter. In fact, Golden State won two of the four periods and entered the final quarter with a six-point advantage.

The difference came from Memphis’s ability to recover after falling behind.

The First Quarter: Golden State Starts Strong

Golden State opened the game with 34 points, narrowly outperforming Memphis’s 33.

The Warriors used their offensive options to establish an early advantage. Curry helped organize the attack, while Podziemski and Lendeborg supplied additional scoring.

Memphis remained close through contributions from Jerome, Boozer, and Wells.

Neither side established meaningful control during the opening period.

The Second Quarter: Memphis Takes Control

Memphis outscored Golden State 27-22 in the second quarter.

The five-point advantage allowed the Grizzlies to reverse the first-quarter deficit.

The team’s scoring balance was important. Jerome continued to provide offensive production, while Boozer and Wells helped maintain pressure on Golden State’s defense.

By halftime, Memphis had established a four-point advantage.

The Third Quarter: Golden State Changes the Momentum

Golden State produced its strongest period in the third quarter.

The Warriors scored 34 points and limited Memphis to 24.

This 10-point difference turned a four-point halftime deficit into a six-point Golden State lead.

The Warriors appeared to have regained control through improved offensive production.

However, a strong third quarter does not guarantee victory. Teams must maintain their execution throughout the final period, particularly when opponents have the ability to create scoring runs.

The Fourth Quarter: Memphis Completes the Comeback

The final quarter decided the game.

Memphis scored 27 points, while Golden State managed only 18.

The most dramatic sequence occurred during the final 3:47.

According to the official game recap, De’Anthony Melton made a three-pointer to put Golden State ahead 106-94.

At that point, the Warriors appeared to be in a strong position.

However, Golden State subsequently missed nine shots and failed to make another field goal during the remainder of the game.

Memphis capitalized with a 17-0 scoring run.

Boozer made the go-ahead jumper with 20 seconds remaining, giving Memphis the lead. His late basket completed a remarkable comeback and helped secure the 111-108 result.

NBA.com+1

This sequence explains why the final result was so surprising.

Golden State had a 12-point advantage with less than four minutes remaining, but its offense stopped producing successful field goals. Memphis responded with aggressive scoring and better execution during the closing possessions.

The comeback was not simply about one player making a difficult shot. It involved defensive stops, missed Golden State attempts, and the Grizzlies converting opportunities when the pressure was highest.

The Biggest Statistical Reasons Behind the Result

Several numbers deserve special attention when evaluating the outcome.

Key Factor	Advantage	Why It Mattered
Field-Goal Percentage	Memphis	Better overall shot conversion
Three-Point Percentage	Memphis	More accurate perimeter shooting
Total Rebounds	Memphis	Greater control of the boards
Assists	Memphis	More direct passing contributions
Free-Throw Percentage	Golden State	Better accuracy at the line
Steals	Golden State	More defensive takeaways
Turnovers	Golden State	Fewer lost possessions
Fourth-Quarter Scoring	Memphis	Completed the comeback

Three factors stand out above the others.

First, Memphis converted more field-goal attempts. The Grizzlies finished at 47%, compared with Golden State’s 41%.

Second, Memphis controlled more rebounds. Its six-rebound advantage helped the team compete for possession throughout the game.

Third, the fourth-quarter performance was decisive. Memphis outscored Golden State by nine points in the final period and produced a 17-0 run during the closing stages.

These factors explain how Memphis overcame its turnover disadvantage and won a game that appeared to be slipping away.

What the Plus/Minus Statistics Reveal

Plus/minus is one of the most useful statistics for examining how a team performs while a particular player is on the court.

It measures the difference between the points scored by a player’s team and the points scored by its opponent during that player’s minutes.

For example, a player with a +10 rating was on the court during a period when his team outscored the opponent by 10 points.

Highest Plus/Minus Ratings

Player	Team	Plus/Minus
Zach Edey	Memphis	+25
Cameron Boozer	Memphis	+12
Jaylen Wells	Memphis	+12
Ty Jerome	Memphis	+10
Gui Santos	Golden State	+14
Brandon Williams	Golden State	+8
Gary Payton II	Golden State	+6

Zach Edey’s +25 was the highest rating in the game.

Boozer and Wells also finished with strong positive numbers, suggesting that Memphis performed well during their minutes.

For Golden State, Gui Santos recorded +14 despite the team’s defeat. This illustrates why plus/minus must be interpreted carefully.

A positive rating does not mean a player individually outperformed everyone on the opposing team. It reflects the team’s scoring margin during that player’s time on the court, which is influenced by teammates, opponents, lineups, and game situations.

Similarly, a negative rating does not automatically mean that a player performed poorly.

Curry’s -4 rating, for example, should be considered alongside his 24 points, four assists, and zero turnovers.

The statistic becomes more useful when combined with scoring efficiency, defensive contributions, and the player’s role.

What Golden State Could Have Done Differently

The Warriors had several opportunities to secure the victory.

Their performance was not without positive elements. They made 90% of their free throws, recorded 12 steals, and committed fewer turnovers than Memphis.

However, three areas deserve attention.

Improve Fourth-Quarter Shot Selection

Golden State’s biggest problem was its offensive collapse in the final minutes.

After leading 106-94, the Warriors missed nine shots and failed to make another field goal.

A team protecting a late lead needs to create reliable offensive possessions. That can involve attacking favorable matchups, using controlled pick-and-roll actions, and avoiding rushed attempts.

The final stretch demonstrated how quickly a comfortable lead can disappear when a team cannot produce a successful basket.

Find More Efficient Perimeter Opportunities

The Warriors attempted 41 three-pointers but converted only 14.

Their 34% shooting percentage was below Memphis’s 38%.

Curry and Podziemski combined for 20 three-point attempts, making five.

Golden State needs more balanced perimeter production when opponents concentrate defensive attention on its leading shooters.

Lendeborg’s ability to contribute from multiple positions could also help create different offensive options.

Reduce Costly Ball-Handling Mistakes

Golden State actually committed fewer turnovers than Memphis, but 19 was still a substantial number.

Green and Lendeborg each recorded six turnovers? No. Green had five and Lendeborg had six, while Podziemski added four.

Those three players combined for 15 turnovers.

Reducing unnecessary mistakes would help Golden State generate more controlled possessions, especially when protecting a lead.

What Memphis Can Learn From the Victory

Winning a close road game is valuable, but Memphis also has areas that require attention.

Maintain Offensive Efficiency

Memphis shot 47% from the field and 38% from three-point range.

Those numbers helped the team overcome its turnover problems.

Maintaining this level of shot conversion will be important in future matchups.

Improve Ball Security

The Grizzlies committed 25 turnovers.

Although they won, giving away that many possessions is a serious concern.

Boozer recorded six turnovers, Jerome had four, and Pippen Jr. added five.

Memphis will need more careful passing and possession management against teams capable of converting turnovers into quick points.

Continue Using Multiple Scoring Options

One of Memphis’s biggest strengths was its balanced scoring.

Jerome scored 28 points, Boozer added 25, and Wells contributed 17.

Spencer also scored 11 points from the bench.

This distribution made it harder for Golden State to focus entirely on one offensive player.

The Grizzlies should continue using their different scoring options rather than relying exclusively on one high-volume scorer.

Historical Context and Season Implications

The October 24 result was important for both teams because it affected their early-season records.

Memphis improved to 2-0 overall and 1-0 on the road.

Golden State dropped to 0-2 overall and 0-1 at home.

The victory also gave Memphis a 1-0 advantage in the season series.

For the Grizzlies, winning away from home after trailing by 12 points late in the game provided an encouraging early-season result.

For the Warriors, the defeat highlighted the importance of finishing games. Their third-quarter performance demonstrated that they could build an advantage, but the final period exposed problems with late-game execution.

The teams were scheduled to meet again on November 20, 2026, in Memphis, according to the supplied schedule.

That rematch provides an opportunity to examine whether Golden State can improve its fourth-quarter execution and whether Memphis can maintain its shooting efficiency while reducing turnovers.

The next matchup will also provide another opportunity to compare the performances of Curry, Jerome, Boozer, Lendeborg, and the supporting players.

For readers following the teams throughout the season, the most useful comparison will not simply be the final score. Shooting efficiency, turnover management, defensive rebounds, and fourth-quarter scoring should all be examined together.

Where to Find the Official Match Results and Box Score

Readers who want to verify individual performances should consult the official game record rather than relying exclusively on summaries or social media posts.

The official NBA game summary provides the game information, final score, and quarter-by-quarter results.

The ESPN box score associated with game ID 401909850 is another reference for player-level statistics, including points, rebounds, assists, shooting percentages, steals, blocks, and plus/minus.

When comparing statistics across websites, it is important to check that the game date, teams, and game ID match. This prevents confusion between different meetings in the same season.

The match record lists October 24, 2026, as the game date at Chase Center. Some game listings display October 23 because of their date and time-zone presentation. The official NBA game information identifies the local game date as October 24.

NBA.com+1

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who won the Golden State Warriors vs Memphis Grizzlies match on October 24, 2026?

The Memphis Grizzlies won 111-108 against the Golden State Warriors at Chase Center in San Francisco. Memphis completed a late comeback after trailing by 12 points with 3:47 remaining.

2. Who was the highest scorer in the game?

Ty Jerome was the highest scorer, recording 28 points for Memphis. He made 11 of 22 field-goal attempts and added five assists.

3. How many points did Stephen Curry score?

Stephen Curry scored 24 points for Golden State. He also recorded four assists, two rebounds, and converted all 11 of his free-throw attempts.

4. Which player recorded the most rebounds?

Cameron Boozer of Memphis and Yaxel Lendeborg of Golden State shared the highest individual rebounding total, with 13 rebounds each.

5. Which team had better shooting statistics?

Memphis had better overall shooting efficiency. The Grizzlies made 47% of their field-goal attempts and 38% of their three-pointers. Golden State finished at 41% from the field and 34% from three-point range.

6. When will the Grizzlies and Warriors play again?

According to the supplied schedule, their next meeting is November 20, 2026, in Memphis. The scheduled tip-off time is 6:00 AM.

Conclusion

The October 24, 2026, matchup between Memphis and Golden State was an excellent example of how basketball games can change dramatically during their final minutes. Memphis secured a 111-108 victory at Chase Center despite trailing by 12 points with less than four minutes remaining.

The golden state warriors vs memphis grizzlies match player stats highlight several outstanding individual performances. Ty Jerome led all scorers with 28 points, while Cameron Boozer recorded 25 points, 13 rebounds, and six assists. Jaylen Wells added 17 points, and Zach Edey contributed 10 rebounds.

For Golden State, Stephen Curry finished with 24 points, while Yaxel Lendeborg and Brandin Podziemski scored 18 points each. Lendeborg also collected 13 rebounds and six assists, making him one of the Warriors’ most productive players.

The team comparison reveals why Memphis emerged victorious. The Grizzlies shot 47% from the field, collected 47 rebounds, and recorded 27 assists. Golden State performed better at the free-throw line and generated more steals, but its 41% field-goal percentage and fourth-quarter offensive struggles proved costly.

Ultimately, the 17-0 Memphis scoring run transformed a seemingly comfortable Golden State lead into a memorable Grizzlies victory. The individual box scores, team statistics, and late-game developments together provide a complete picture of this closely contested NBA matchup.