Jacksonville jaguars vs 49ers match player stats
The jacksonville jaguars vs 49ers match player stats from September 29, 2025, tell the story of a surprising 26-21 victory for the Jacksonville Jaguars. Jacksonville delivered an impressive performance at Levi’s Stadium, combining an effective rushing attack, timely defensive plays, and a spectacular special teams touchdown to overcome the San Francisco 49ers. Although San Francisco produced more passing yards, the Jaguars made better use of their opportunities and capitalized on important mistakes.
Trevor Lawrence completed 21 of 31 passes for 174 yards and one touchdown without throwing an interception. Running back Travis Etienne Jr. was another major contributor, recording 124 rushing yards on 19 carries and scoring one touchdown. On the other side, Brock Purdy threw for 309 yards and two touchdowns, but two interceptions and a lost fumble hurt San Francisco’s chances.
The game featured several individual performances worth examining. Christian McCaffrey collected 141 yards from scrimmage, Devin Lloyd intercepted two passes, and Parker Washington delivered an 87-yard punt return touchdown. These contributions explain why Jacksonville secured the victory despite finishing with fewer passing yards.
This breakdown examines the complete player statistics, team performances, offensive production, defensive contributions, turnovers, and important factors that determined the final result.
Jacksonville Jaguars vs 49ers Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The September 29 meeting between Jacksonville and San Francisco produced a competitive contest with several momentum-changing moments. Jacksonville entered the game looking to establish consistency, while San Francisco wanted to protect its home field.
The Jaguars ultimately won 26-21, improving their record to 3-1. The 49ers also entered the matchup with a 3-1 record but suffered their first defeat in the game.
Here are the essential details.
| Game Information | Details |
| Matchup | Jacksonville Jaguars vs. San Francisco 49ers |
| Date | September 29, 2025 |
| Competition | National Football League |
| Venue | Levi’s Stadium |
| Final Score | Jaguars 26, 49ers 21 |
| Jacksonville Record | 3-1 |
| San Francisco Record | 3-1 |
| Jacksonville Away Record | 1-1 |
| San Francisco Home Record | 1-1 |
| Game Status | Final |
| Winning Team | Jacksonville Jaguars |
Jacksonville’s victory came from a balanced approach. The team did not need Trevor Lawrence to produce an exceptionally high passing total because its running game and special teams created additional scoring opportunities.
San Francisco, meanwhile, generated more offensive yardage through the air. However, its inability to protect the football became a major disadvantage.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score
The scoring distribution highlights Jacksonville’s strong second and third quarters.
| Quarter | Jacksonville Jaguars | San Francisco 49ers |
| First Quarter | 0 | 3 |
| Second Quarter | 17 | 3 |
| Third Quarter | 9 | 8 |
| Fourth Quarter | 0 | 7 |
| Final Score | 26 | 21 |
San Francisco started with a narrow 3-0 advantage after the opening quarter. Jacksonville responded with 17 points in the second quarter, creating a significant lead.
The Jaguars added another nine points in the third quarter. Although San Francisco scored eight points during that period and added seven more in the fourth, the comeback attempt was unsuccessful.
One important detail is that Jacksonville did not score in the final quarter. Its earlier production and defensive execution were enough to preserve the five-point advantage.
Trevor Lawrence Player Stats and Passing Performance
Trevor Lawrence played an important role in Jacksonville’s victory by controlling the offense and avoiding costly passing mistakes.
He completed 21 of 31 attempts for 174 passing yards and one touchdown. More importantly, he finished without an interception or a sack.
His numbers were not as impressive in total yardage as Brock Purdy’s, but his efficiency and ball security helped Jacksonville maintain control.
| Passing Statistic | Trevor Lawrence |
| Completions | 21 |
| Attempts | 31 |
| Completion Percentage | 67.7% |
| Passing Yards | 174 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 5.6 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 0 |
| QBR | 67.2 |
| Passer Rating | 92.7 |
Completion Percentage and Passing Efficiency
Lawrence completed approximately 67.7% of his passes, showing that he consistently connected with his receivers.
His 174 passing yards might appear modest compared with other quarterback performances, but the Jaguars did not depend entirely on their passing attack.
Jacksonville had a productive rushing performance that allowed Lawrence to operate within a more balanced offensive system.
A quarterback does not always need 300 passing yards to deliver an effective performance. In this matchup, avoiding turnovers and converting important opportunities were more valuable than chasing passing statistics.
Touchdown Production
Lawrence threw one touchdown pass during the game. His contribution helped Jacksonville generate points without exposing the offense to unnecessary risks.
His zero-interception performance was especially important because San Francisco’s quarterback struggled with turnovers.
Why Lawrence’s Performance Mattered
Three aspects of Lawrence’s performance deserve attention:
- Ball security: He finished without an interception or a lost fumble.
- Passing accuracy: His completion percentage was above 67%.
- Offensive balance: He allowed Jacksonville to combine passing plays with a productive ground attack.
Lawrence’s performance demonstrated that efficient quarterback play can be more valuable than impressive individual yardage totals.
Brock Purdy Player Stats and San Francisco Passing Analysis
Brock Purdy produced more passing yards than Trevor Lawrence, but his performance included several mistakes that affected San Francisco’s chances.
Purdy completed 22 of 38 passes for 309 yards and two touchdowns. However, he also threw two interceptions and lost one fumble.
His passing production helped San Francisco move the football, but the turnovers reduced the value of that offensive success.
| Passing Statistic | Brock Purdy |
| Completions | 22 |
| Attempts | 38 |
| Completion Percentage | 57.9% |
| Passing Yards | 309 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 8.1 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Sacks Taken | 1 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 3 |
| QBR | 53.7 |
| Passer Rating | 79.8 |
Passing Yardage and Downfield Production
Purdy averaged 8.1 yards per passing attempt, considerably more than Lawrence’s 5.6.
His 309 passing yards demonstrated that San Francisco could generate meaningful offensive production through the air.
Christian McCaffrey, Jake Tonges, and Ricky Pearsall were among the players who helped move the ball downfield.
However, passing yardage does not provide a complete picture of quarterback performance.
Purdy’s two interceptions created additional problems for the 49ers. His lost fumble added another costly mistake.
The Impact of Two Interceptions
Interceptions can change the direction of an NFL game because they remove an offensive possession and give the opposing team an opportunity to take control.
Purdy threw two interceptions, both recorded by Jacksonville linebacker Devin Lloyd.
These plays highlighted Jacksonville’s ability to recognize passing opportunities and capitalize on mistakes.
The interceptions were particularly damaging because San Francisco had generated enough passing production to remain competitive.
Comparing the Two Quarterbacks
| Category | Trevor Lawrence | Brock Purdy |
| Completions | 21 | 22 |
| Attempts | 31 | 38 |
| Completion Percentage | 67.7% | 57.9% |
| Passing Yards | 174 | 309 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 5.6 | 8.1 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 2 |
| Sacks | 0 | 1 |
| QBR | 67.2 | 53.7 |
| Passer Rating | 92.7 | 79.8 |
Purdy won the passing-yardage comparison, but Lawrence finished with the stronger passer rating and QBR.
The difference illustrates an important football principle: quarterback evaluation must consider accuracy, turnovers, touchdowns, and game circumstances rather than passing yards alone.
Statistical note: The supplied ESPN data lists Purdy’s individual passing total as 309 yards, while the team passing summary lists 306 yards. The receiving summary also totals 309 yards. These figures are not fully consistent, so the individual quarterback figure is retained here as displayed in the player statistics.
Jacksonville Jaguars Rushing Stats
Jacksonville’s rushing attack was one of the most important reasons behind its victory.
The Jaguars finished with 151 rushing yards on 32 attempts, averaging 4.7 yards per carry. They also recorded one rushing touchdown.
Travis Etienne Jr. led the ground game with an outstanding performance.
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Touchdowns | Longest Run |
| Travis Etienne Jr. | 19 | 124 | 6.5 | 1 | 48 |
| Bhayshul Tuten | 4 | 14 | 3.5 | 0 | 8 |
| Brian Thomas Jr. | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
| Trevor Lawrence | 7 | 7 | 1.0 | 0 | 6 |
| Parker Washington | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | -1 |
| Team Total | 32 | 151 | 4.7 | 1 | 48 |
Travis Etienne Jr. Leads Jacksonville’s Ground Attack
Travis Etienne Jr. was Jacksonville’s most productive offensive player in terms of rushing yardage.
He recorded:
- 19 rushing attempts.
- 124 rushing yards.
- 6.5 yards per carry.
- One rushing touchdown.
- A longest run of 48 yards.
His 124-yard performance gave Jacksonville a reliable offensive foundation.
The 48-yard run was particularly important because explosive rushing plays can quickly change field position and create scoring opportunities.
Etienne also contributed as a receiver, catching one pass for one yard on two targets.
His combined rushing and receiving production totaled 125 yards from scrimmage.
Bhayshul Tuten’s Contribution
Bhayshul Tuten finished with 14 rushing yards on four carries.
His average of 3.5 yards per attempt was lower than Etienne’s production, but his involvement helped Jacksonville distribute some of the workload.
Tuten also caught one pass for eight yards.
His special teams contribution was even more significant. He returned two kickoffs for 78 yards, averaging 39 yards per return.
His longest kickoff return covered 54 yards, providing Jacksonville with valuable field position.
Trevor Lawrence as a Rusher
Lawrence recorded seven rushing attempts for seven yards.
His rushing numbers were not particularly impressive, but quarterback carries can provide additional flexibility when defensive coverage limits passing options.
His contribution was primarily important through his passing efficiency and management of the offense.
Jacksonville’s Overall Rushing Advantage
Jacksonville finished with 151 rushing yards, compared with San Francisco’s 83.
That created a 68-yard advantage on the ground.
The Jaguars also recorded a rushing touchdown, while San Francisco did not score on any rushing attempt.
This difference helped Jacksonville control offensive situations and reduce its dependence on high-volume passing.
San Francisco 49ers Rushing Stats
San Francisco entered the matchup with a talented group of offensive players, including Christian McCaffrey.
However, the 49ers struggled to establish the same level of rushing production as Jacksonville.
They finished with 83 rushing yards on 24 attempts, averaging 3.5 yards per carry.
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Touchdowns | Longest Run |
| Christian McCaffrey | 17 | 49 | 2.9 | 0 | 11 |
| Brian Robinson Jr. | 5 | 21 | 4.2 | 0 | 7 |
| Brock Purdy | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 0 | 11 |
| Team Total | 24 | 83 | 3.5 | 0 | 11 |
Christian McCaffrey’s Rushing Performance
McCaffrey finished with 49 rushing yards on 17 carries.
His average of 2.9 yards per attempt was lower than expected for a player capable of contributing in several offensive situations.
He did not record a rushing touchdown.
However, his contribution as a receiver was much more productive.
McCaffrey caught six passes for 92 yards and one touchdown, making him one of San Francisco’s most important offensive contributors.
His combined production reached 141 yards from scrimmage.
Brian Robinson Jr. Adds Rushing Support
Brian Robinson Jr. recorded five carries for 21 yards.
He averaged 4.2 yards per attempt, giving San Francisco another option in the backfield.
Although he did not record a touchdown, his contribution provided some support behind McCaffrey.
Purdy’s Rushing Contribution
Purdy added 13 rushing yards on two carries.
His 6.5-yard average was the highest among San Francisco’s listed rushing contributors.
However, his rushing production was not enough to compensate for the team’s overall difficulties establishing the ground game.
Jacksonville vs San Francisco Rushing Comparison
| Statistic | Jaguars | 49ers |
| Rushing Attempts | 32 | 24 |
| Rushing Yards | 151 | 83 |
| Yards Per Carry | 4.7 | 3.5 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Longest Run | 48 | 11 |
Jacksonville won this category convincingly.
The 68-yard difference in rushing production gave the Jaguars an important advantage and helped balance their offense.
Jacksonville Jaguars Receiving Stats
Jacksonville recorded 21 receptions for 174 receiving yards and one touchdown.
Brian Thomas Jr. led the team in receiving yardage, while Brenton Strange led the Jaguars in receptions.
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Average | Touchdowns | Targets |
| Brian Thomas Jr. | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 0 | 7 |
| Brenton Strange | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 0 | 7 |
| Travis Hunter | 3 | 42 | 14.0 | 0 | 5 |
| Hunter Long | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 1 | 3 |
| Bhayshul Tuten | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 1 |
| LeQuint Allen Jr. | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Travis Etienne Jr. | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Johnny Mundt | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Parker Washington | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tim Patrick | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Team Total | 21 | 174 | 8.3 | 1 | 30 |
Brian Thomas Jr. Leads in Receiving Yardage
The Brian Thomas Jr. recorded five receptions for 49 yards.
He averaged 9.8 yards per reception and received seven targets.
Although he did not score a touchdown, his ability to provide a consistent receiving option helped Jacksonville move the ball.
Brenton Strange Leads in Receptions
Strange finished with six receptions for 45 yards.
His six catches were the most among Jacksonville’s receivers.
He averaged 7.5 yards per reception and provided Lawrence with a dependable short and intermediate passing option.
Travis Hunter’s Receiving Contribution
Travis Hunter recorded three receptions for 42 yards.
His average of 14 yards per catch was one of the better figures among Jacksonville’s receiving contributors.
His longest reception covered 28 yards, demonstrating his ability to create meaningful gains.
Hunter’s overall involvement was not limited to receiving, as he also appeared in the fumble statistics.
Hunter Long Scores a Receiving Touchdown
Hunter Long recorded three receptions for 23 yards and one touchdown.
He received three targets and converted his opportunities into a scoring contribution.
His touchdown was particularly valuable because Jacksonville’s offense needed to capitalize on its scoring opportunities.
Jacksonville’s Receiving Balance
One interesting aspect of the receiving statistics is that Jacksonville did not depend on a single player.
Thomas, Strange, Hunter, and Long all contributed meaningful production.
This distribution made the offense less predictable and gave Lawrence several options in the passing game.
San Francisco 49ers Receiving Stats
San Francisco produced more receiving yards than Jacksonville.
The 49ers recorded 22 receptions for 309 yards and two touchdowns according to the supplied receiving statistics.
Christian McCaffrey led the team in receiving yardage, while Jake Tonges also delivered an important performance.
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Average | Touchdowns | Targets |
| Christian McCaffrey | 6 | 92 | 15.3 | 1 | 11 |
| Jake Tonges | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 1 | 5 |
| Ricky Pearsall | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 0 | 5 |
| Kyle Juszczyk | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 0 | 3 |
| Jauan Jennings | 2 | 24 | 12.0 | 0 | 4 |
| Demarcus Robinson | 1 | 20 | 20.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Luke Farrell | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 1 | 17 | 17.0 | 0 | 4 |
| Skyy Moore | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Team Total | 22 | 309 | 14.0 | 2 | 37 |
Christian McCaffrey Dominates Receiving Production
McCaffrey was San Francisco’s leading receiver.
He caught six passes for 92 yards and one touchdown.
His 15.3-yard average demonstrated that he was effective when the 49ers used him as a passing option.
His receiving touchdown also provided an important scoring contribution.
Combining his 49 rushing yards with 92 receiving yards gives him 141 total yards from scrimmage.
That made him one of the most productive players in the entire matchup.
Jake Tonges Provides an Important Target
Jake Tonges recorded three receptions for 58 yards and one touchdown.
He averaged 19.3 yards per reception, the highest average among San Francisco’s players with multiple catches.
His longest reception covered 23 yards.
Tonges demonstrated that San Francisco had multiple receiving options capable of generating significant yardage.
Ricky Pearsall’s Contribution
Pearsall finished with four receptions for 46 yards.
He averaged 11.5 yards per catch and received five targets.
His performance helped San Francisco maintain offensive movement, particularly when the passing game needed additional support.
Other Receiving Contributors
Kyle Juszczyk recorded three catches for 32 yards, while Jauan Jennings added two receptions for 24 yards.
Demarcus Robinson contributed 20 yards on one reception.
Luke Farrell also recorded 20 receiving yards on two catches, while Kendrick Bourne finished with 17 yards on one reception.
The receiving numbers demonstrate that San Francisco had several players involved in its passing attack.
Receiving Comparison
| Statistic | Jacksonville | San Francisco |
| Receptions | 21 | 22 |
| Receiving Yards | 174 | 309 |
| Yards Per Reception | 8.3 | 14.0 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Targets | 30 | 37 |
| Longest Reception | 28 | 31 |
San Francisco clearly won the receiving-yardage comparison.
However, its superior receiving production did not translate into a victory.
Jacksonville’s rushing advantage and ability to create turnovers made the difference.
Defensive Player Stats: Jaguars vs 49ers
Defense played a major role in determining the outcome.
Jacksonville recorded two interceptions and one sack, while San Francisco failed to intercept a pass or record a sack.
Both teams finished with 66 total tackles, but the Jaguars created more important turnovers.
Jacksonville Jaguars Defensive Statistics
| Defensive Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles | Additional Contribution |
| Tyson Campbell | 9 | 4 | Defensive leader |
| Devin Lloyd | 8 | 6 | 1 TFL, 2 passes defended, 2 INT |
| Foyesade Oluokun | 7 | 2 | Fumble recovery |
| Andrew Wingard | 5 | 3 | 1 pass defended, fumble recovery |
| Antonio Johnson | 5 | 2 | Defensive support |
| DaVon Hamilton | 4 | Not specified | Defensive support |
| Arik Armstead | 2 | 2 | 1 sack, 1 TFL |
| Josh Hines-Allen | 2 | 2 | 1 QB hit |
Jacksonville’s defense recorded:
- 66 total tackles.
- 34 solo tackles.
- One sack.
- Three tackles for loss.
- Four passes defended.
- Three quarterback hits.
- Two interceptions.
- Eight interception return yards.
Devin Lloyd’s Outstanding Defensive Performance
Devin Lloyd was arguably Jacksonville’s most influential defensive player.
He recorded eight total tackles, including six solo tackles.
More importantly, he intercepted Brock Purdy twice.
Those interceptions were among the most important defensive contributions of the game.
Lloyd also recorded one tackle for loss and two passes defended.
His performance demonstrated how a linebacker can influence a game through both tackling and pass coverage.
Tyson Campbell Leads in Tackles
Tyson Campbell finished with nine total tackles, the highest number among Jacksonville’s listed defensive leaders.
He recorded four solo tackles.
His contribution helped Jacksonville limit San Francisco’s offensive opportunities and maintain defensive pressure.
Arik Armstead Adds a Sack
Armstead recorded two total tackles, both solo, along with one sack and one tackle for loss.
His pressure helped Jacksonville disrupt the passing game.
Josh Hines-Allen also contributed a quarterback hit.
San Francisco 49ers Defensive Statistics
| Defensive Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles | Additional Contribution |
| Dee Winters | 10 | 9 | 1 TFL, 1 pass defended |
| Marques Sigle | 8 | 6 | 1 pass defended |
| Fred Warner | 8 | 5 | Defensive support |
| Deommodore Lenoir | 6 | 5 | 1 TFL |
San Francisco’s team defensive numbers included:
- 66 total tackles.
- 40 solo tackles.
- Zero sacks.
- Six tackles for loss.
- Two passes defended.
- Zero quarterback hits.
- Zero interceptions.
Dee Winters Leads the 49ers in Tackles
Dee Winters recorded 10 total tackles and nine solo tackles.
He also contributed one tackle for loss and one pass defended.
His 10 tackles made him San Francisco’s leading defensive contributor in this category.
Fred Warner’s Defensive Contribution
Fred Warner finished with eight total tackles, including five solo tackles.
His involvement helped San Francisco remain competitive defensively, particularly against Jacksonville’s rushing attack.
However, the 49ers could not consistently stop Etienne and the Jaguars’ ground game.
Defensive Comparison
| Statistic | Jaguars | 49ers |
| Total Tackles | 66 | 66 |
| Solo Tackles | 34 | 40 |
| Sacks | 1 | 0 |
| Tackles for Loss | 3 | 6 |
| Passes Defended | 4 | 2 |
| Quarterback Hits | 3 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 0 |
San Francisco recorded more tackles for loss and solo tackles.
However, Jacksonville created the more valuable defensive plays.
The two interceptions were particularly important because they directly interrupted San Francisco’s offensive progress.
Turnovers and Fumble Statistics
Turnovers were one of the biggest differences between the two teams.
Jacksonville protected the football more effectively, while San Francisco lost possession through interceptions and fumbles.
| Turnover Category | Jaguars | 49ers |
| Total Fumbles | 1 | 3 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 2 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 2 |
| Interceptions Recorded | 2 | 0 |
Jacksonville recorded one fumble but did not lose possession.
San Francisco recorded three fumbles and lost two.
The 49ers also threw two interceptions.
Jacksonville’s Ball Security
Jacksonville avoided losing a fumble and did not throw an interception.
LeQuint Allen Jr., Foyesade Oluokun, and Andrew Wingard were credited with fumble recoveries in the supplied defensive statistics.
The team did a better job protecting possession during important moments.
San Francisco’s Costly Mistakes
San Francisco recorded three fumbles.
Luke Farrell lost one fumble, while Brock Purdy also lost one.
Christian McCaffrey recorded one fumble but recovered it.
The two lost fumbles combined with Purdy’s two interceptions created four lost possessions through turnovers.
That is a significant disadvantage in a game decided by only five points.
Why Turnovers Changed the Result
Turnovers are particularly damaging because they affect both sides of the game.
An offense loses an opportunity to score, while the opposing team receives an opportunity to gain possession.
Jacksonville’s ability to create interceptions and recover fumbles helped it compensate for San Francisco’s passing-yardage advantage.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams played an especially important role in Jacksonville’s victory.
Parker Washington delivered the most explosive special teams performance of the matchup with an 87-yard punt return touchdown.
Bhayshul Tuten also provided valuable field position through kickoff returns.
Jacksonville Jaguars Return Statistics
| Player | Return Type | Returns | Total Yards | Average | Longest | Touchdowns |
| Parker Washington | Punt | 1 | 87 | 87.0 | 87 | 1 |
| Bhayshul Tuten | Kickoff | 2 | 78 | 39.0 | 54 | 0 |
| LeQuint Allen Jr. | Kickoff | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 25 | 0 |
Jacksonville recorded 103 kickoff return yards and 87 punt return yards.
Washington’s return touchdown was particularly important because it gave Jacksonville six points without requiring the offense to move the ball downfield.
Parker Washington’s 87-Yard Touchdown
Parker Washington recorded one punt return for 87 yards and a touchdown.
His return was one of the most significant individual plays of the game.
Special teams touchdowns are valuable because they can change the scoreboard immediately.
Washington’s contribution helped Jacksonville establish its advantage and increased pressure on San Francisco.
San Francisco Return Statistics
| Player | Return Type | Returns | Total Yards | Average | Longest | Touchdowns |
| Skyy Moore | Kickoff | 3 | 80 | 26.7 | 29 | 0 |
| Skyy Moore | Punt | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 16 | 0 |
Skyy Moore handled San Francisco’s listed returns.
He recorded 80 kickoff return yards and 16 punt return yards.
Although his return numbers were respectable, he did not produce a touchdown.
Kicking Statistics
| Kicker | Field Goals | FG Percentage | Longest FG | Extra Points | Total Points |
| Cam Little | 2/3 | 66.7% | 44 yards | 2/2 | 8 |
| Eddy Pineiro | 2/2 | 100% | 26 yards | 1/1 | 7 |
Cam Little converted two of three field-goal attempts and both extra-point attempts.
He finished with eight points.
Eddy Pineiro converted both field-goal attempts and his only extra-point attempt, recording seven points.
Although Pineiro had a perfect field-goal percentage, Jacksonville’s overall special teams production was more impactful because of Washington’s return touchdown.
Punting Statistics
| Punter | Punts | Total Yards | Average | Touchbacks | Inside 20 | Longest |
| Logan Cooke | 5 | 237 | 47.4 | 2 | 1 | 58 |
| Thomas Morstead | 2 | 91 | 45.5 | 0 | 0 | 51 |
Logan Cooke recorded five punts for 237 yards, averaging 47.4 yards per attempt.
Thomas Morstead recorded two punts for 91 yards, averaging 45.5 yards.
Cooke’s larger workload reflected the Jaguars’ different possession and field-position situations throughout the game.
Team Statistics Comparison
Looking at the overall team numbers helps explain why Jacksonville won despite San Francisco’s superior passing production.
| Team Statistic | Jacksonville Jaguars | San Francisco 49ers |
| Final Score | 26 | 21 |
| Passing Yards | 174 | 309* |
| Rushing Yards | 151 | 83 |
| Receptions | 21 | 22 |
| Receiving Yards | 174 | 309 |
| Rushing Attempts | 32 | 24 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 thrown | 2 thrown |
| Interceptions Recorded | 2 | 0 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 2 |
| Sacks Recorded | 1 | 0 |
*The supplied ESPN data contains a discrepancy between Purdy’s individual passing total of 309 yards and the team passing total of 306 yards.
The comparison reveals several important differences.
San Francisco generated significantly more passing yards and receiving production.
Jacksonville, however, produced more rushing yards, protected possession more effectively, and created more turnovers.
The Jaguars also received an important scoring contribution from special teams.
These factors helped Jacksonville win despite having less passing production.
Three Major Factors Behind Jacksonville’s Victory
The final result was not determined by one player or one statistical category.
Several factors combined to give Jacksonville the advantage.
1. Jacksonville Controlled the Ground Game
The Jaguars finished with 151 rushing yards compared with San Francisco’s 83.
Etienne’s 124-yard performance was particularly important.
His 48-yard run demonstrated Jacksonville’s ability to generate explosive offensive plays.
The difference in rushing production helped Jacksonville maintain offensive balance and reduced the pressure on Lawrence to produce a large passing total.
2. Devin Lloyd Created Game-Changing Turnovers
Lloyd’s two interceptions were among the most important defensive plays.
Purdy had a productive passing performance, but his mistakes created additional opportunities for Jacksonville.
The Jaguars also avoided throwing an interception themselves.
This difference in ball security helped Jacksonville control the game’s most important possessions.
3. Parker Washington Changed the Game on Special Teams
Washington’s 87-yard punt return touchdown was a major scoring contribution.
A special teams touchdown can completely change the direction of a contest because it creates points without requiring an extended offensive drive.
Jacksonville also received useful kickoff return production from Tuten.
These contributions gave the Jaguars another way to generate scoring opportunities.
Why San Francisco Lost Despite More Passing Yards
San Francisco’s passing statistics were impressive in several areas.
Purdy finished with 309 individual passing yards and two touchdowns.
The 49ers also had more receiving yards and more receptions than Jacksonville.
However, their offensive production was not supported by effective ball security.
There were four lost possessions recorded through two interceptions and two lost fumbles.
The rushing attack also struggled to create consistent production.
McCaffrey finished with 49 rushing yards on 17 attempts, while the entire team managed only 83 yards on the ground.
This created an imbalance.
San Francisco could move the ball through the air, but it struggled to maintain possession and establish a dependable rushing attack.
The Jaguars took advantage of those weaknesses.
Another important factor was the absence of a defensive sack or quarterback hit from San Francisco’s team statistics.
The 49ers recorded six tackles for loss, but they did not consistently disrupt Lawrence through traditional quarterback pressure.
Jacksonville’s quarterback was able to finish without taking a sack or throwing an interception.
Ultimately, San Francisco’s greater passing production could not overcome Jacksonville’s stronger overall performance in rushing, turnovers, and special teams.
Important Statistical Takeaways From the Matchup
Several numbers deserve special attention when evaluating this game.
Travis Etienne Jr.’s 124 rushing yards: His performance provided Jacksonville with its most productive offensive rushing contribution.
Brock Purdy’s 309 passing yards: Despite the defeat, Purdy generated substantial passing production.
Devin Lloyd’s two interceptions: His defensive performance created major problems for San Francisco.
Christian McCaffrey’s 141 yards from scrimmage: His combined rushing and receiving production made him San Francisco’s most productive offensive player by this measure.
Parker Washington’s 87-yard punt return: His touchdown provided Jacksonville with a major special teams contribution.
Jacksonville’s 151 rushing yards: The Jaguars outgained San Francisco by 68 yards on the ground.
San Francisco’s four lost possessions through turnovers: Two interceptions and two lost fumbles significantly affected the 49ers’ chances.
These figures demonstrate that the outcome was influenced by several different areas of football rather than simply quarterback passing production.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What was the final score of the Jaguars vs 49ers game on September 29, 2025?
The Jacksonville Jaguars defeated the San Francisco 49ers 26-21 on September 29, 2025. Jacksonville improved to 3-1, while San Francisco also moved to 3-1 after suffering the defeat.
2. How many passing yards did Trevor Lawrence record against the 49ers?
Trevor Lawrence completed 21 of 31 passes for 174 yards and one touchdown. He finished with zero interceptions, a 92.7 passer rating, and a 67.2 QBR.
3. How many passing yards did Brock Purdy record against Jacksonville?
Brock Purdy recorded 309 passing yards, two touchdown passes, and two interceptions. He completed 22 of 38 attempts and finished with a 79.8 passer rating.
4. Who was the leading rusher in the Jaguars vs 49ers game?
Travis Etienne Jr. was the leading rusher with 124 yards on 19 carries. He averaged 6.5 yards per carry and recorded one rushing touchdown.
5. Who recorded the most receiving yards for the 49ers?
Christian McCaffrey led San Francisco with 92 receiving yards on six receptions. He also recorded one receiving touchdown and added 49 rushing yards.
6. How many interceptions did Devin Lloyd record?
Devin Lloyd recorded two interceptions against Brock Purdy. He also finished with eight total tackles, six solo tackles, one tackle for loss, and two passes defended.
Conclusion
The Jacksonville Jaguars defeated the San Francisco 49ers 26-21 on September 29, 2025, through a combination of effective rushing, defensive takeaways, and special teams production.
Trevor Lawrence delivered an efficient performance with 174 passing yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. Travis Etienne Jr. led the rushing attack with 124 yards and one touchdown, while Parker Washington provided an important 87-yard punt return touchdown.
San Francisco had its own impressive individual performances. Brock Purdy threw for 309 yards and two touchdowns, while Christian McCaffrey produced 141 yards from scrimmage. Jake Tonges also contributed 58 receiving yards and a touchdown.
However, the 49ers struggled with turnovers. Purdy threw two interceptions and lost a fumble, while Luke Farrell also lost a fumble. Devin Lloyd’s two interceptions helped Jacksonville take advantage of those mistakes.
The most important statistical difference was Jacksonville’s ability to combine 151 rushing yards with better ball security and impactful special teams plays. San Francisco generated more passing yards, but Jacksonville made better use of its opportunities.
Overall, this matchup demonstrated why total yardage alone cannot determine the winner of an NFL game. Turnover management, rushing efficiency, defensive execution, and special teams contributions can be equally important when evaluating team performance.
